Australia

>104 consecutive quarters of growth without recession
>28% of population born overseas
What does this mean Sup Forums?

but that also includes old British, SAfrican, and NZ people who move there, right?

Indeed it does, and lets not forget those rhodesians.

It means that our economy is driven purely by exponential house price growth caused by Chinese investment.

They're not sand-niggers or just plain 'ol niggers
They're fucking Asians

It means Chinese bubble money will prevent you from ever owning a house.

Most of the largest waves from commonwealth countries are in their second generation now. A significant portion of immigration is still commonwealth but its mainly East and SE Asia

they are trying to give the impression that 1/3 of australians are non european

but these stats fail to acknowledge all the italians, greeks, central europeans, eastern europeans, british, french, canadians, americans's and kiwis that moved her over since 1950. most of the overseas population born in australia are parents. or over 35.

>most oversea's born residents under 35 are either students or on work visa's.

>majority of non citizens in australia are non european.
>majority of citizens in australia are european.

You're getting colonized a second time, this time by godless insectoid chinks.

But to be honest there's still a lot of european immigrants left over. Australia is still over 85% white and so are the children. My Grandfather and Aunt were both born in America and moved there with my australian grandma a while back, there's a lot of english, irish, and scottish immigrants still in Australia. You fags need to reinstate white australia policies though.

Australia is a mining country. Chinee go where the money is

>104 governments in three years
What did Australia mean by this?

you would think we are, but its far from the truth.

most chinks are citizens, most only live in their communities, most ones under 30 are students or on work visa's.

for example, sydney cbd and western sydney is majority foreign born

but south sydney, inner west, north and east are majority australians.

the same thing goes for melbourne, the immigrants don't venture far from the nest. very centered populations based on race here.

>Education
>Commodities

Land tax and repeal of negative gearing when

correction

most chinks are not citizens* !!

>28% of population born overseas

Wait so... Australia is like 65% white, taking into account the abos? Holy shit

Do visa holders take the census?

Prepbull recently announced he is giving 2000 work visas to Pacific Islanders each year for them to work in rural areas. We either get diversity forced on us for either profits or enrichment.

No because 95% of those born overseas are of Scottish/Irish/British heritage.

Australia was still 90% white last nation wide poll. Waiting on latest one, the majority of Chinese in Australia aren't citizens but just work and student visas.

there has a been a huge sway in attitude towards multicultural of late,

people are starting to recognise and realise the implications of it.

some suburbs people grew up in just 15-20 years ago are now majority asians or indian or muslim.

they are seeing the anti australian, race based communities popping up, they can clearly see the blatant anti white propaganda from the media and the labour party.

turnbull on thursday called shorten the most leftwing leader in australia's history. and they are damn right.

australians are seeing the labour party and the greens for what they are. communist-lite

hell of a lot of push back happening at the moment to all this propaganda. the left is too stupid to leave their agenda out in the open.

No. Only citizens.

we are not far behind favourite ally

how does 28% automatically mean non white to you?

majority of immigration to australia for the last 5 decades has been european and from other anglo countries.

Means you're trying too hard.
You can rip the panties off and two pump chump or you can peel away the clothes slowly from head to toe and enjoy kissing and sucking on tits before you stick it in.

yes they do.

but what im saying is that majority of non white people in australia are not citizens.

they are not australian.

this is the biggest lie to expose about this whole multicultural australia thing.

non citizens is what the media and government are trying to push as representing multiculturalism.

>cost of living absolutely through the fucking roof

It means "growth" for the (((economy))) doesn't translate into prosperity for the average individual.

>turnbull on thursday called shorten the most leftwing leader in australia's history. and they are damn right.
lmao what, a good chunk of ALP MP's and leaders 1950's were hard socialists. Like literally nationalise the banks to redistribute wealth socialist.

>australians are seeing the labour party and the greens for what they are. communist-lite
Yeah nothing says communism like removing and lowering barriers for foreign labour in Australian labour markets

It means 72% white Wang

It means that streak won't be lasting much longer.

yea sorry, after i wrote that i realised it was the 1950's

Australia has second HDI and third IHDI

Even in that case I'd still call Whitlam and Gillard (only ALP PM from labor-left faction I believe) further left than Shorten

Oh well I guess that means I can just go out and buy a house then?

The fact that thats the biggest issue facing Australians right now should tell you something

If we didn't have that 28% of our population and didn't have billions being dropped by Asian investors and students then we'd almost certainly have seen a recession by now

It tells me that an endless growth economy, propped up by mass immigration, may be good for the big corporations but it isn't good for shazza and bazza.

from those stats you can see how much aussie love to fuck japs pussy

How could Shazza and Bazza's living standards rise or even stay level without increased capital through both investment and immigration?

Massive fuckery

Improved technology, farming techniques, building techniques etc - that's the sustainable way of improving living standards.

As it is we are seeing a reduction in living standards, young people aren't even trying to buy houses anymore.

>Improved technology, farming techniques, building techniques etc
All of those would boost growth.

The development of technology is driven in part by immigration and foreign investment. Without immigration you have to train your own experts in said technologies often overseas and without foreign investment both the government and private companies have less time and resources to undertake research.

We could do it on our own it would just take way longer and we'd fall behind countries that do capitalise on foreign resources.

>As it is we are seeing a reduction in living standards, young people aren't even trying to buy houses anymore.
I mean if living standards is completely dependent on owning a house then sure. Fact is all necessities of life are readily available and inexpensive in Australia as is reflected by our HDI. Speaking to Australian youth living conditions in particular you can't ignore the fact they have access to incredibly cheap tertiary education which is largely due to the huge amount of foreign students paying thrice an Australians tuition subsidising Australian education.

We could do it on our own and it may take longer but at least it would be sustainable and we'd maintain standard of living. There's no such thing as a free lunch, the benefits you get from immigration come at a huge cost.

>I mean if living standards is completely dependent on owning a house then sure.
A home is probably the most important part of most peoples lives yes.