Should all keynesians be killed?

Should all keynesians be killed?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloque_Walter_Lippmann
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

yes

t. Thatcher.

t. corporate cuckold who likes being poor

yes

yes

why

All neoliberals should
>"In order to stimulate the economy, we should make it easier for the productor to produce so the offer will rise and with it the employment rate etc"
>" Why would the offer rise if the demand stay the same?"
>"uhhhhh......"

>All neoliberals should
neoliberal is a useless leftist buzzword that doesn't make sense

anyone who uses it should be gassed

fuck central banks and fuck leftists

How would you call them then?

call who?

Neoliberals

government parasites that hate the free market and love government monopolized banking

die classicalnorm

Doesn't have quite the same ring to it does it?

god shut the fuck up

you have no argument

go back

go baack to leftypol

die Sup Forumsnorm

die economic slave

why do you love being poor

gas yourself you degenerate fuck

just die you fucking waste

It refers to reagan cock sucking trickle down cucks like you.

die fascismnorm

>dude I rely on leftist media pushing reagan and trickle down memes to brainwash me to make me a slave

you are so pathetic, its so fucking hilarious lmao

im a moderate libertarian
nice try

bootlicker

die fencesitter

...

>using a brainwashed term like trickle down

you are just proving you are a corporate slave
kill yourself leftist

>Why would the offer rise if the demand stay the same?

Better quality and lower prices of products and services, it's obvious

Wow, /leftypol/ should work on their bait game, it's really obvious and only a complete retard would fall for it.

If you have issues with language that usually means you are a special snowflake

...

>issues with language

this translates to "I can't understand your argument so I have given up"

all leftists need to get suffocated
kill them all

you initiated an argument by dismissing it based on the use of one word
S
N
O
W
F
L
A
K
E

You couldn't refute what I said.
lmao

What is it that you want me to refute?
>you are just proving you are a corporate slave kill yourself leftist
this is an insult
>this translates to "I can't understand your argument so I have given up"
This would be applicable if an argument had been made instead of solely an insult
>all leftists need to get suffocated kill them all
once again another insult

You got fucking owned
your replies were less than 5 minutes apart and now more than twice that time has elapsed and still no reply

fucking moron or bot, not sure which

Fuck a Keynesian hating thread and it started without me?
Short answer: it wouldn't hurt but there are worse people I think we'll all agree.

yes

State directed investment in the economy is a smart move. Look at America's development of infrastructure and its funding of high tech industries, as well as East Asia's rapid expansion and state owned enterprises.

I sure love well thought out Sup Forums threads that are not hyperbolic at all.

Maybe it will help.

Pretty much this.

You've got to spend money to make money.

Does digging up a hole and then burrying it creates two productive jobs?

>All modern economies work on Keynesian economics

>"Keynesian economics doesn't work!!!!"

I can't speak for the rest of the world, but here in Latin America, "Keynesians" never read Keynes at all, they are just people who believe that government spending is the solution to everything and that inflation is actually neoliberal propaganda that doesn't exists.

Im gonna be generous and say that it's socialism that doesn't work. Keynesian third way is just mediocre and since it involves significant control of the economy by the politicians of course they love it. They really limit themselves even if they have the chance. There's a reason modern US presidency is called "imperial".

>Most of Europe socialist
>America half socialist
>Canada, Australia socialist

>but socialism doesn't work

What kind of socialist? There are some social democratic ideas that will not go away (though it was Bismarck who introduced pensions). Those countries can afford it now at least for some time because they got rich in the past. Also Australia is very economically liberal to this day.

u wot.

>socialist=socdem

t. American education

>neoliberal is a useless leftist buzzword that doesn't make sense

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloque_Walter_Lippmann

A lot of people get Keynes wrong. It's not an economic system, but a set of theories on how to handle recessions; in fact Keyenes theories were pretty much forgotten for decades because there were no severe recessions that monetary policy couldn't handle.

They don't work, the government spends money less efficiently than private enterprise, so if it took money out and spent it during a recession it would be worse for the economy than leaving the recession be

>tfw you finally realize economics is bs

The chief problem is that spending during recessions and saving during booms is impossible because states never save. A democratically elected leader will always spend to give his voters more things in order to secure votes. Since you'll never save, spending just creates huge, permanent debt. This is why Obama's Neo-Keynesian ideas have doubled the debt to 20 trillion.

Also spending during recessions fucks with the incentive structures for economic actors. Keynes only works if you assume bankers and the like don't plan for the state to bail them out from the beginning.

He served his purpose, the idea of government going into huge debt in order to revive the economy was a necessary evil because of the Great Depression (which could have been avoided). Continuing to have that mentality of run-on debt going into the trillions is purely ridiculous. No one with any common sense would think a policy like that could be sustained forever.

Anytime someone brings up Keynes remind them that they are taking the word of a gay pedophile.

>Also spending during recessions fucks with the incentive structures for economic actors. Keynes only works if you assume bankers and the like don't plan for the state to bail them out from the beginning.
Which they do plan for, since if government intervened once, it'll surely do it again, and again, and again...