What do Democrats mean when they say Russians "hacked the election"?
As far as I know, what happened is that Wikileaks released internal correspondence from the Democratic party. They're just accusing Russia of retrieving that info and delivering it to Wikileaks.
Even if that were true, I'm pretty sure the main reason why Hillary lost is that she was an unlikable cunt representing the interests of parasitic kleptocrats.
only rural and suburban retards didn't vote for Hillary
The point of not explaining what they mean is so idiots assume somehow Russia affected the outcome of the election. If they explained that maybe possibly they released emails or spent money on internet trolls anyone with half a brain would realize that shit doesn't matter
a fucking leaf
What are you doing here, shill? You dropped a shekel.
Hillary's corruption, pedophiliac connections, and schemes were exposed. Hacking apparently includes social engineering when it comes to the dems crying. Russia knows we're the last two bastions of white civilization left. They saved us.
Now that Hillary lost the election, the dems are trying to fuck up trump's first year with MUH RUSSIA because they're sore losers.
Basic google search probably could've answered it. Responded and saged.
...
>retrieving that info and delivering it to wikileaks
Shill thread. CFR on Sup Forums.
...
>Shill thread. CFR on Sup Forums
This is what we mean. Read this and you will be red-pilled.
washingtonpost.com
>What do Democrats mean when they say Russians "hacked the election"?
They just need someone to blame. They also want to ill legitimize the Trump presidency.
Just look at Hillary's new LOL BOOK.
She blames everyone but herself. She blames Bernie, she blames Obama, she blames the DNC, the media, the bogey man, literally everyone but herself.
The DNC needs to wake the fuck up and realize that Hillary was always the problem. They were doomed from the start. The longer Clinton remains in the spot light the more damage she will do to the future of the DNC.
If a foreign government spreads factual true information about politicians in your country, then you undermine the entire democratic process...
because democrats are hypocrites
they accused trump of promoting conspiracy theories yet this whole russian hacking thing could be in a james bond film
>unblock your ads goy
no thanks lmao
...
BINGO!
They never have and never will say exactly what the hacking even consisted of cause they know it is bs.
You mean real Americans and not some kike retards?
i fucking hate leafs now
>unlikable cunt representing the interests of parasitic kleptocrats.
I can't tell who's jewing who anymore. Don't get me wrong, your analysis is not incorrect. It's just that Trump and the RNC are a bunch of kleptocrats too. It's almost as if the 2016 election really didn't matter or really change the course of discourse in any real way. All the sturm und drang is for nought. Nobody exists on purpose and everyone is going to die.
there was 0% chance she could have won legitamately anyway, i dont get why the dnc rigged their own election for her when Bernie sold out so easily anyway??
>pedophile connections
i.e. trump who literally watched underage girls in dressing rooms at beauty pageants.
okay reddit & morty
if you use ublock origin you can set it the settings to block "unblock" messages so you never have to
Macedonia content farmers ruined the election
I believe that Russians used misinformation on social media to discredit clinton.
Should we be concerned? Probably
Can we prove it was the Kremlin? Hardly
It mattered less than liberals would have you think. Most people who voted for Trump did so because of what they saw in him, not because of some fake news of facebook.
They are intentionally vague about it because they know that to the average normie"hacking" is like some stuff on TV.
What's so offensive about the naked unadulterated truth swimming free in a sea of its own rickness?
>misinformation
If anything, they emphasized facts.
Nihilism is a sea of anti-truth and purposelessness. You will live an empty life if you embrace that as your personal ethos.
When they say "russians" they really mean Sup Forums
they are angry at all the memes and trolling, but to be fair the democrats were giving the internet really good material for jokes and memes.
Checked
And I am now fully redpilled.
Last sentences of the article
"But for those who want something more, do be aware that circumstantial evidence of Russian collusion with his campaign is already available. And direct evidence is getting very, very close."
Nihilism is only the beginning of seeing the world for the fucked up kronenberger messautopia that it is. Moving forward from that with a positive ethical schema is known as positive nihilism, or existentialism in a very nietszchean fashion. It's up to you to decide what you're going to do with your crap shoot ride through this human shit pile. You can swallow the effluence or get a shovel and try to make things better.
Nietzsche was trying to put a bullet in Nihilism, I hope you understand that.
I also just noticed that the author of your article is Anne Applebaum, a famous female jew. She has a very puchable face.
Figuratively speaking, Nietzsche wanted to put a bullet into almost everything that sits upon some philosophical pedestal. What is left ad reductum?
That's a misreading of Nietzsche; he didn't endorse nihilism or think it should be tolerated.
The concepts in his writings don't condone the worship or the broken or slave morality seen in modern liberal and Marxist doctrines, they have more compatibility with far-right modernist idea systems like Fascism and Neoreaction.
>Wikileaks
It's a subsidiary of the Kremlin now.
>That's a misreading of Nietzsche; he didn't endorse nihilism or think it should be tolerated
I didn't say any of that or that he did.
>The concepts in his writings don't condone the worship or the broken or slave morality seen in modern liberal and Marxist doctrines, they have more compatibility with far-right modernist idea systems like Fascism and Neoreaction.
That may be your interpretation, but please leave the nazi reading of Nietzsche at the feet of his sister. If we've gotten this far on the subject then you know how his sister purposefully contorted the meaning of his writing to support the political aims of her husband and thus such readings of Nietzsche that justify fascism must be seen as intellectual perversions of a philosophical imperative to tear the idols down. Any kind of bandwagonry would obviously be viewed as some form of Jewish resentement.
Quick rule of thumb: If an elitist politician accuses you of something, they've already done it and are getting ready to get busted for it. Not that breaking the law of the land matters for them, mind you, because some little piggies are more equal than others.
russians supposedly said dont vote for hillary and people didnt and therefore russians are bad dudes
thanks russia
No lmao you can literally read Nietzsche for yourself and come to that conclusion pretty easily.
It's only "guided" readings of Nietzsche that make him out to be some kind of Stirnerite character
>reads Nietzsche
>doesn't read twilight of the idols, genealogy of morals or ecce homo
Come on, get off your high horse, you don't actually know what you're talking about. You can't be seriously be arguing Nietzsche would support fascism as a staunch individual identitarian, skeptical of any kind of group think, therefore you must be shit posting. Will to power is not a political ethos but an ethical imperative. Don't conflate the two.
Yes absolutely I could; someone grasping the reigns of power and trying to implement an eugenic imperial state would be right up his alley.
bingo
It is projective identification for the Clinton's criminal uranium deal with the Russians.
You're what? Claiming a very bad argument that is antithetical to the body of Nietzsche's philosophical work in favor of a skewed interpretation refuted by historical fact or just shit posting leaf?
lmao what do you think the will to power is retard?
Lol you are all morons. It's already been proved that the email payload was full large to be downloaded in the time it was. The wikileaks emails were that, a LEAK. Inside job
youtube.com
There's no voice over telling you what to think, so im not sure trumptards can handle it.
I already stated but to clarify succinctly: an individual self actualization and life affirming ethical imperative resulting in an existential worldview in a post nihilistic world.
It is explicitly not a framework for governance. If you truly believe so you are either a. ignorant, b. indoctrinated, or c. a shill. I'm being persuaded by your lack of substantive arguments that you are a healthy emulcification of all three because you are trying to get me to prove (((your))) negative thesis.
No, it's not. What's apparent in every discussion I have with left-wing Nietzscheans is that you have to be the target audience in order to actually understand his philosophy. None of them ever get it and try to relate it to post-modern concepts or as justifications/rationalizations for indulging in nothingness.
The true meaning is the pursuit of glory through Aryanism (Not Hitler's Aryanism, real Aryanism).
Ethical egoism is not a political philosophy.
Nietzsche wasn't a Stirnerite with morals, he gave moral justification to people pursuing glory (Old Aryan term for glory is "Fame which does not decay").
That used to be passed on by tradition in the ruling classes of Europe but decayed with the influence of Christianity and the increasing bourgeois control of political power.
Nietzsche re-discovered a part of that old Aryan political philosophy by ripping down the false idols we're presented in modern times.
>"Distrust those in whom the impulse to punish is powerful"
>“The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.”
>“We obtain the concept, as we do the form, by overlooking what is individual and actual; whereas nature is acquainted with no forms and no concepts, and likewise with no species, but only with an X which remains inaccessible and undefinable for us.”
>“Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.”
>“One is finally tempted to divide mankind into a minority (minimality) of those people who know how to make much out of little and a majority of those who know how to make a little out of much; indeed, one meets those perverse wizards who, instead of creating the world out of nothing, create nothing out of the world.”
>“It is not the struggle of opinions that has made history so violent, but rather the struggle of belief in opinions, that is, the struggle of convictions.”
>“Possessions are generally diminished by possession.”
>“Become who you are.’
>“Thoughts are the shadows of our feelings — always darker, emptier, simpler.”
Also, it's either from the Antichrist or GM, I can't remember and am not bothering the ten feet to my bookshelf but there's a quote that goes something like, "beware of those who seek power over others..." yeah, Nietzsche was was probably a fascist, I can't exactly put together how but he wrote a lot about Jews as a slave people.... please, you entered an argument of facts with ideology about a guy whose core philosophy was to destroy ideology.
Are you under the impression that plebs are the intended audience for his works?
It's not a universalist philosophy.
Actually only poor people voted for Killary. Go suck a dick like Truehoe.
By hacking they mean people that hated Hillary (most people do) memed the truth on Fakebook and Twatter.
I'm pretty sure I stated earlier that it's a philosophy for individuals. Be that as it may, fascism is a universality policy. Your post highlights my point, it's a terrible misreading to take existential ethical egoism to fascism. Tragic as it is, that interpretation can be found ostensibly historical propaganda first put forth by Nietzsche's sister to bolster her husband's (a national socialist who founded a Nazi colony in
Paraguay) political career.
Did Hitler govern on consensus or his own whims?
Poor people are dumb, that's why they're poor
Did Elizabeth Forster edit Nietzsche's unpublished works for according to her whims or with a consensus?