Do Libertarians actually think a society run completely by corporations is the best option?

Do Libertarians actually think a society run completely by corporations is the best option?

How can people be so deluded? I feel like "real" Libertarian ideals are as stupid and far-fetched as Communism.

A society almost completely run by corporations is what will happen whether you like it or not, it just won't happen in the fantasy manner that ancaps and retarded libertarians believe. Both communists and libertarians are just being used as mere tools for the globalists end game, and it will be already too late when they realize that.

Mega corporations only exist because of the government.

Libertarians are tax cheats trying to push "voluntary" segregation still.

You can form your own community-run corporations, people are just too dumb for that yet. You can form large economic organizations that will advance your interests based on identity, race, religion etc. Just imagine that.

That's why we need the government to regulate entities like Amazon, Facebook and Google.

the act of incorporating is government interference with private business, so corporations would not exist in a libertarian society.

But who would bail out too big to fail corps without guv

>if only people didn't act like people then my ideology would work!

kys.

The problem is that most governments and their population already turned into slaves of these companies and many others. The state won't regulate mega corporations like that because it's already working in favor of them.

The only hope against their advance is to restore the sense of nationalism on the hearts of people, and that really can't be done by the government, it has to be done by the people.

Everyone one of those except maybe Nike and McDonald's was helped put into their position by the goverment.

Like if it's easier to make any institutional, government-level entity follow your agenda than to actually create your own one

Corporations are entities provided with comfy tax breaks, less regulation, basically some kind of advantage, from the state. If there were no state interference in the market, it would be a level playing field and mega corporations like jewgle wouldn't exist.

Corporations are made powerful by the people who buy from them. They are the power chosen and there the most democratic by virtue of existing. There is literally nothing more Libertarian.

...

The concentration of wealth that exists in modern society was facilitated by the state so if the state stopped existing the wealth would stop being concentrated. Also they wouldn't finance their own private armies and basically act as states in all but name even though some of the larger consumer-facing information ones already do online because profit-seeking Jews care about the NAP.

Or, something.

Don't try to pretend you're like you follow a better alternative route.

I always assume Templar flags are NRxfags. Which is even less likely than ancapistan but also somewhat less terrible.

replace those logos with:
>google
>youtube
>islam (do they have a logo?)
>antifa logo
>democrat donkey logo
>twitch logo
>twitter logo
and then you've got something accurate.

Bump. Nobody has a better Idea. We know where the power is concentrated and hoe they maintain power and syphon wealth. There is no debate here. Just people looking for that next red pill.

Farmers..........

>Do Libertarians actually think a society run completely by corporations is the best option?
Yes
>How can people be so deluded? I feel like "real" Libertarian ideals are as stupid and far-fetched as Communism.
What? Libertarian ideas are more extreme republican ideas.

...

corporations, unlike goverments, have to accomplish the demands of the people to succeed

>I feel like "real" Libertarian ideals are as stupid and far-fetched as Communism
No. Statism is communism

how can you be so dumb, OP?

>implying the government didn't circumvent the constitution by whorishly merging with big corporations

This was the plan all along.

>>corporations, unlike goverments, have to accomplish the demands of the people to succeed
Imagine saying this without irony.

>GOBERNMENT