Woah, denying man-made climate change is like believing the earth is flat

Woah, denying man-made climate change is like believing the earth is flat.

>Sup Forums denies it
>appeals to science to "prove" blacks and other races are inferior
Sad

Other urls found in this thread:

plantsneedco2.org/default.aspx?menuitemid=368
youtube.com/watch?v=ztninkgZ0ws
youtube.com/watch?v=-VUmtCLePL8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>97 out of 100 climate exports are funded by the government.

back that picture up with statistical data that can accuratley reflect the views of billions of people
oh wait
you can't

Experts* damn auto.

The origin of this 97 % myth stat is the best

> send out a survey to thousands
> ask pointed question
> get "hundreds" of responses
> only 78 are from people who claim to be climate scientists
> 75/78 say yes to your pointed question about climate change

DRUMPF BTFO

>changing global temperature
weasel question
the obvious answer is yes, the question that matters is how much [and the answer is negligibly]

Guess how many get government funding?

Only rural and suburban retards, those that vote for Trump, would deny climate change.

City people are intelligent and acknowledge it. They tend to vote for Hillary Clinton.

It doesn't matter.

No one will do anything.

Planes flying (liberals all travel), ships shipping (liberals all buy shit), and Africa burning so much coal, are the 3 main causes.

But it's the city retards that are causing most of the global warming, as are Africans.

City retards aren't going to do shit other than meaningless gestures.

nigger what

in 1910 eugenics was "settled science"

...

Don't care about your pseudoscience. Come back when you can make actual predictions based on your theory and have it match observation from PAST to FUTURE.

So was scientific racism or homosexuality being a mental illness. Only there is definitive evidence man is behind climate change.

Thx user, i've been looking for that one

Wether or not climate change is man made or not isn't the issue. That's leftists strawmanning. The question is "is it a world ending apocalypse tier problem and can we do something about it" the answer to both of those, according to evidence, is no. If you're in favour of science as you say, then you agree.

>"pseudoscience"
i.e. inconvenient truth. Sorry, the scientific community is behind me. You children are /x/-tier feelsfags.

>according to evidence
Let's see it.

>Sup Forums
>one person

3 of them prove the 97 others wrong, keep shilling

>It's not science if it has no predictive power
>Majority of scientists also thought the world is flat.
HAHAHA. Climatechange is correlation between feelings and temperature. Try again I win.

You're the one claiming it's a catastrophe, the onus is on you not me. If you can show that it is an actual problem, I'll take the effort to provide the evidence for my counter-claim.

Not even.
This report was literally an Aussie shitpost.

97% of the papers (not scientists) they chose to review postulated that human influence might be an element of climate change, whether that be global warming, cooling or just local smog.

consensus is not tantamount to fact

LAWL

We can do something about that after all the politicians and celebrities crying about that have stopped using planes and non-electric cars.

the truth aint a democracy. just because many people think something doesn't mean its true, but it could be.

The problem is government think tanks hear might, and run with it all the way to the paycheck funding.

we probably are to some extent, but it has been changing anyway

people who still reply to this pasta deserve to be baited for the rest of their life

wasn't it like 0.3% of all experts who said climate change was real?

all the nazis in berlin thought invading the ussr was a good idea too. Whats your point? Is a mob of scientists going to make me do all this stupid socialist garbage-cleaning? no? guess their opinions dont amtter then, huh.

Also this figure has been debunked anyway. First of all science isn't about consensus, it's about pursuit of truth. Second, the people who made that survey had a bunch of questions at the start that if you responded to "incorrectly", you were left out of the survey. It's bullshit propaganda. You'd think if these people cared about the earth, they actually pursue the facts.

the man who discovered germs was called crazy and no one actually believed him to the point he went to a psychiatric ward for years

so... there you go.

If you come here trying to have some sort of reasonable conversation, you are wasting your time OP.

97 out of 100 climate scientists are jew hacks.

No-one cares about climate change anymore. Talk to any normie. It just doesn't register anymore.

I guess that's what happens when we're told the ice caps will be gone by 2008 and they're still there in 2017.

Only globalists and the fringe left still talk about it.

>experts THINK humans are changing global temperature
>science is now a democracy
why

climate change is real
unsurprisingly less scientist than 97out of 100 believe that climate change has the worldending
power the jew shills try to convey

>Hurp dee durp...
If'n you say soooo
Mus be orl true
Siense
What's next eh, Talking dogs?

>experts think
>think
so no proof?

^ this
The incessant meme pushed that "all hurricanes are now caused by global w... I mean ""climate change"" and also all forest fires and all droughts" is slowly desensitising the normies.
They're no more ready to sign up to a giant global tax on economic activity than they are to cut off their own toes.

climate change models are not up to the scientifical standard, and never will be due to the difficulty of making perfectly accurate temperature average on a chosen area. Climate is prob changing due to human action, but to what extant ... "Scientist" who makes statement on this matter without doubting are being scientifically dishonnest, but i guess it's for the public good

okay first that was for hand washing, not germs.
Second, what's your point? Sometimes society refuses to believe scientists?

Fake meme.
Do you realize that this fake consensus argument has been debunked for many years. Did you know that the compilers of this fake statistic only looked at the title of the article, without reading it and then arbitrarily decided if it was pro or anti anthropogenic global warming, even though they didn't have the credentials to peer review the articles themselves and cherry picked which ones to keep and which to throw out based on a subjective judgement that only "climate scientists" should have a say, not chemists, physicists
or other sciences using a false "appeal to authority argument", rather than sound logic?

Nice copout, /x/-tard.

I think we're changing global tempeatures. I don't think there's any realistic option to stop this happening.

196,935,000 sq miles = 5.49 X 10^15 sq ft Surface Area of Earth

36,070 Marinas Trench
+ 29,029 Mt. Everest
65,099 ft Avg Surface Roughness
Avg Surface Roughness(ft) / Surface Area(sq ft) = Flatness

65,099 ft/5.49 X 10^15 sq ft= 1.85 X 10^-11ft/sq ft =
.00000000000185 ft/sq ft
Flat as Fuck

Dragons and Elves exisist
I've proven it with a computer program.

(((experts)))

>Implying think tanks might be biased and full of shit in order to secure an easy pay check
No shit.

>97 out of 100 ghostbusters believe ghosts are real

>So was scientific racism or homosexuality being a mental illness. Only there is definitive evidence man is behind climate change.
You have it the wrong way around.

Even if we are causing global warming I've yet to see one solution suggested that isn't retarded or obviously a scam.

>only globalists and fringe left
69% of Americans are in favor of remaining in the Paris climate agreement

>facts aren't a majority decision
get fucked

>numbers from the kike new network
show me pictures as proof you faggot

That's not flatness, that's smoothness.

What is the fucking difference on the surface of a sphere?

you type like redditer im dead fuckin serious and you knew my point by goin at me like that and btw nice way to twist the words there cunt
>Sometimes society refuses to believe scientists?

like ''climate change'' i see what ye did (begins to fling shit at wall) and what my actual point was is if someone is wrong then 1 person should be enough why a million! theres 1.5 billion Indians who agree with dating cousins and marrying dogs, doesn't make it right fucker

plantsneedco2.org/default.aspx?menuitemid=368

the ball on my precision mouse is smooth, cut in in half, then you have flatness on the cut side.
being this retarded

Scientists were always the worst People, largely the most stupid and bad people who walk the Earth. They may have one narrow way in which they are not stupid, one purpose for which they are some use but as a generality they are utterly of the scale 'worst idiots ever'.
Communism is the scientific system, has been their mantra since Solly zuckerman and the Tots and Quots dining club. The utter shit they believe is terrible. Science to many scientists justs means whatever huff they wish it to mean, whatever suits them.
The noble cause of real science is what they vocally appeal too, but that's simply a flag of convienience for nerds to be be huffy arseholes and they piss on their own flag fir ego and shekels constantly.

You want to destroy my race, I want to destroy your planet. :)

When you see statistical trickery like this ask yourself a couple of questions first
>who funds these people?
'Whose bread I eat his word I preach'
>to what degree do they say it is caused by humans?
There's a huge spread between 'humans cause all of it' and 'it's natural but humans speed it up by 0.1%'. Both technically say humans are changing global temperature.
>how many of them believe we can 'fix' it to a meaningful extend?
Do they say we should pump trillions into renewables and limit emissions or do they recognize that is not viable? How many say we should invest in ways to 'deal with it' instead?

I sincerely hope for you this is a bait thread. Unironically believing there exist a lack off dissent to this degree in any scientific field kind of makes you look like a retard.

Obviously, you know nothing of analytic geometry, sorry that you are retarded and can only relate to your mouse. Also you weren't even smart enough to call me out on the earth not being a sphere, but a spheroid.

wow, i don't care.

Those 97 climate experts get paid some good research money as long and they say "Muh global warming"

Do a study on the dishonesty of human beings.
Apply it to the climate cult.
That's science, that is.
(((OP you bait monkey)))

Then why reply faggot?

man, just skimming the news feed makes me rage, seeing all these climate bullshit articles.

even had a heated argument with peeps on kikebook.

people are so fucking gullible, it aint funny.

no, man made climate change isnt a thing.
same with global warming
same with overpopulation

the entire world outside Polish borders is pissing me off with their delusional bullshit.

Why not scientists, why "climate experts"

What the hell is a climate expert anyway.

As good as this video below is, even they couldn't help themselves towards the end to throw in man made.

youtube.com/watch?v=ztninkgZ0ws

Best jobs in the world
Paid to play, like we used to at them to go to uni.
They get the dream lifestyles, and all they have to do is support political correctness.
All 'climate science' is is political correctness.
Political correctness amoungst students who've left uni.

Garbled shite
>like we used to pay them to go to uni

No body is an "expert" on climate. The subject is far too diverse, involving meteorology, chemistry, physics, solar systems study, oceanography, computer modeling, and a host of other science and data collection and analysis. Nobody is an "expert" at all of these things with the exception of Al Gore, but only because he is a complete narcissist.

I wonder?

They are two different terms...

Even in analytic geometry. Stop being a faggot and just admit the typo.

theres that being outnumbered meaning im right carry on again

because theres more of us than you and that means we are always in the right..

.. till ya die from stupidity because your a collective amount of fuckin morons like communism.


btw your leftism is shown, you might want to tuck that in.

You'll quibble about sphere/spheroid but neglect distinction between smoothness and flatness. Interesting. By the way, this is an 18+ board.

I firmly belong to the conservative, right-wing camp, but here is where I draw the line: with science.

If you think your retard ass is smart enough to argue against the best people in science (about evolution, climate change, etc.) then you're' a moron.

What is claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Just like priests, judges, doctors...
scientists also wear the robes.
You would buy any shit they say.

>same with overpopulation
Earth can hold a lot more people, sure, the problem is of a social matter, have you seen China? They don't give a shit if some person is laying dead on the street, as long as it isn't them. Surely this isn't a racial trait, but rather a social.

If you don't see a difference between empirical science, peer-reviewed articles, conclusions arrived with meticulous observation, experimentation, falsification etc and... religion... then I don't know what to tell you.

youtube.com/watch?v=-VUmtCLePL8

They alone are capable of divining their knowledge from sources out of your reach. They access the answers which you are told are beyond your comprehension. They are your priests and you listen intently.

this can't be real?

that the magical 97% ??

seriously ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME


YOIMES IVE HEARD THE 97% NUMBER ????? HOLY FUCKING SHITT

ITT: Ant-science retards no better than flat earthers and young earth creationists