Trump's tax plan

It's shit. Why would you retards vote for 40 years of failed economics started under Ronald Reagan?

You are retarded if you think an extra $2500 per year wont help someone in the middle tax braked or $5000 per year wont help someone in the 4th. You have have to be a literally slide shill to think that isnt major. Fuck off.

WTF I LOVE PAYING TOLLS FOR HIGHWAYS

WTF I LOVE POLICE GIVING ME FINES EVERY MINTUES

WTF I LOVE MY CITY CUTTING SOCIAL SERVICES

> every circle almost doubled in size
>Greedy faggot socialist focuses only on 1%
Kill yourself and save me the trouble

SeeMY SPECIFIC BRAND OF TAX CUTS HAVE NEVER BEEN TRIED

>toll highways
>implying you wouldn't want a highway that's optional and pays for itself
>police fines
I agree with this one very few things should be illegal desu
>city cutting social services
Good, now I don't have to pay for niggers like you

LOl another one of those "im a libcuck in disguse and am going to try my hardest not to sound like a shill while i ree at my keyboard " threads XDDDDD FUCK OFF

>federal spending on roads being more then a drop in the bucket
>federal spending on local law enforcement
>social services are good
Retard.

Remember when you fucking faggots said how great Bannon's 44% plan to tax the rich was?

>social services are good

Well I guess you want 1917 tier revolt in US.

You know the welfare state was created by conservative Bismark to stop socialism right?

>Responding to a troll thread

Where are we going to get money to pay for this shit?

I will put them down myself if need be.

The federal government collects over 3 trillion per year

Tax plan helps poor people. Mnuchin has said they will keep some "loopholes" and deductions for the middle class(which is massive for them, since they are too poor for rich and too rich to recieve poor benefits).

The "rich" receive a lower tax rate, but their effective tax rate will be closer to the real tax rate.

You think the middle class should pay 15-25% the EFFECTIVE tax rate while people like Romney pay 12%?

Fuck off. Everyone pay their fair share, this shit is fucking up the middle class, where they can't afford it anymore.

Don't even get me started on capital gaind tax, where the rich(or mega rich) are actually taxed. Now that is a crooked system!

>The federal government collects over 3 trillion per year

Yeah and we spend like half of that on military (including black listed secret ops projects and nukes) alone.

>Tax plan helps poor people

Yes it's been working real well since the 1980s.

Cutting taxes can increase government revenue. While people may be paying less individually the total revenue will increase due to increased economic activity. This is well understood.

Reminder: The government does not earn money, they take it by force. So the more people are earning, on average, the more they can take. So, if your goal is to increase revenue you should focus on creating more high earners not punishing them with higher taxes.

No, we spend around 15% on defense. The overwhelming majority of federal spending is gibs me dat

>Cutting taxes can increase government revenue.

?????????????

You shrink government revenue by doing that. Do you think the rich honestly invest their money at all if you don't force government to collect their money?

>No, we spend around 15% on defense

You aren't taking into account the black listed protects and nukes.

>tax cuts cause wage stagnation
No, that would be unbridled immigration, promoted mostly by leftists

>You think the middle class should pay 15-25% the EFFECTIVE tax rate while people like Romney pay 12%?

Romney should be paying 90% like in 1944.

>No, that would be unbridled immigration, promoted mostly by leftists

Yeah expect net immigration has declined to zero since the rescission.

The split happens in the 1970 or so with Nixon abolishing the gold standard. Meanwhile Trump is cordial to ideas like introducing gold backed currency for international trade(which is a great way to sneak in gold standard under the nose of central banks).

Seems we got another generation of retards pushing for more anti-union anti-worker anti-labor tax cuts for the rich. Let me remind you why Reagan and Bush Jr. sucked ass.

who has 100k laying around to give someone an excellent job? not many people. Definitely not poor people.

>The split happens in the 1970 or so with Nixon abolishing the gold standard

You mean the last 1970s when Carter started the deregulation you fucking retard.

That's still part of the defence budget you retard, it's just not listed as what it actually is as a line item.

>showing the savings in total dollars
>not showing them in percentages

Reagan's economics worked. It's why every president has followed his model.

It's called the Laffer curve. Look it up. It's not hard to understand why cutting taxes can increase revenue. Though it may be counter intuitive it's completely true.

Only affects whites as nigs dont pay taxes and are a net expense NOT a source of revenue

you might want to look up what happened in the 60's when JFK got whacked

why are you blaming reagan and bush jr for nixon shipping industry to china?

The US has a net migration rate of 3.9/100k.

>Reagan is responsible for NIxon's fuck ups
idiot

No

>doesn't understand what the laffer curve is
Your economic illiteracy is showing Paco.

The decoupling of productivity from labor was caused by exporting jobs (mostly conservatives), importing shitskins (mostly liberals), and the advents of automation and the internet

your gov steals from your people and you call reversing part of the theft stealing?

But the data shows that tax breaks for the wealthy doesn't increase revenue or jobs. A theoretical model that is not need in reality is garbage. Corporations and the ultra rich don't pay taxes (if at all) at a comparable rate to the working class yet benefit the most from social engineering i.e. infrastructure and tax breaks for their historically profitable businesses all on the backs of the most productive people the world has ever seen.

What I find most absurd is how globalization is removed from the equation that says cut taxes for the exceedingly wealthy who use subsidies to ship jobs and manufacturing over seas to sell those products free of tariff and tax at home. It's completely idiotic and an absolute denial of reality.

>Pol is a single person.

Did (they) end up compounding the Harvey relief with raising the debt ceiling into a single vote? What happened with that?

>Some social services are good, therefore all social services are good.

This is the sort of logic you are using and you are sounding like a retard.

>the data
>doesn't show off data
Get rid of that meme flag.

Economics is not empirical and government is 0% of economics anyway. Kys

Why would the guy who invented trickle down economics come out and say it doesn't work if it doesn't work. I'm not going to spend my time finding links for you when a. we both know I'm right, and b. a quick search on your part will bring that data directly to your face.

I share your concern when it comes to multinational corps. but the laffer curve is well established empirically and makes complete sense. Keep in mind we're talking about individual incomes here though, not corporate taxation. I think the root of the problem lays in collusion between governments and corporations, as you mentioned. It creates a system of private profits and public loses. It distorts markets. Combine that with rampant debt fueled inflation that causes people to flee forward into investing in stocks to protect their wealth and you've got the current system of crapitalism.

>Laffer curve.

You mean that thing that the guy who created it said was bullshit?

The term was invented as an insult, you fucking moron. Of course he would say it doesn't work, he never thought otherwise

Remember how you fags said Trump wasn't a "typical Republican?"

Invented the model, (insert ad hominems). It doesn't work, taxing people who make more and more money by sitting on a board of directors at even lower rates than what is an already historically low rate while they pay accountants to hide their earnings to successfully pay even less taxes than the people who actually produce the wealth of those businesses is a fundamentally flawed argument when trying to raise revenue. The workers need the tax breaks and will use the money to stimulate the economy much more because there are simply millions more of them out there who are willing to spend on the things they need (housing, medicine and food for their children).

1. provide source
2. the model stands on it's own regardless of what it's creator says
In other words that is not an argument..