Hillary thinks the lesson of Orwell's 1984 is that you should trust experts, leaders and the press

Hillary thinks the lesson of Orwell's 1984 is that you should trust experts, leaders and the press

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qwsLK3HdZKk
docdro.id/KhyYHDp
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

i can't believe i share the same over-soul with this beast, absolutely devoid of love, truth and joy

She's a total moron.

...

Americans are stupid as fuck, that includes Hillary.

She really does think we're all that stupid. Shockingly out of touch.

This is incredible. She literally refers to brainwashing and misrepresentation, then two lines later attempts it.

Except lots of fiction is worth referencing, Dostoevsky and Orwell is not the same as fucking Harry Potter.

>She literally refers to brainwashing and misrepresentation, then two lines later attempts it.

You'd think attempting to define what's real would include labeling inconvenient news as "fake."

When Big Brother tells you he's against Big Brother.

>entire book is a list of reasons why it's everyone else's fault she wasn't crowned queen of the USA
>claims that reality-bending is the hallmark of authoritarianism
>completely ignores the fact that she was the most unelectable career politician it was possible for the Dems to run
lol

>is that you should trust experts

I trust Barron Trump, you don't?

At this point Orwell (or at least 1984) may as well be Harry Potter.

Only if you interpret it on a surface level in the same respect that people reference HP and SW.

Look at political trends. The amount of times a single party has been elected for 16 straight years can be counted on one hand.

No one believed Hillary could win, least of all the Democrats. She isn't liked even among her own crowd. They gave her "her turn" so she would lose to literally anyone the Republicans put up and never have to worry about her bitching and moaning ever again. The fact that Trump nearly LOST to this stupid fucking bitch is sad in itself, but not quite as sad as Hillary being an arrogant flaccid obnoxious seeping axe wound on the Democratic party.

With her army of staffers and advisors you would think somebody would tell her this book was a bad idea

I wish that it wasn't so well known

That hasn't stopped her before.

>attempting to define reality is a core feature of authoritarianism
>writes a whole book attempting to define reality
the projection is strong with this one

nah, people actually read harry potter

That's frightening.

And to think, this evil cunt could have been President.

HAHAHAHAHAHA no fucking way, this has to be an edit.

Did she seriously unironically write this? How much lack of self-awareness do you have to have to write this? God i hope this was ghostwritten.

Is she clinically incapable of introspection?

youtube.com/watch?v=qwsLK3HdZKk

It's called Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Does she think animal farm is about animal rights too?

Why the fuck do people who have never read that book always use it to refer to Trump? His party and ideology are almost the exact opposite of IngSoc. It's authoritarian socialism being compared to free market capitalism/conservatism.

Holy fuck, I thank God every single day that this thing wasn't elected.

Remember people said Trump was a Democrat plant to destroy the GOP? With all the blaming and BS Hillary is spouting lately, it is more likely she is a GOP plant. She is certainly doing no favors to Democrats, especially at a time when they should be focused on unity.

Either that, or she's just an (extremely out of touch) idiot. Whatever makes people feel better, I guess.

Hillary is controlled opposition who just got her contract extended and is playing the role marvelously.

What are you talking about? Don't you know that she is a wife and grandma?! She even braved a bout of pneumonia just to hug a little girl last year you monster!

People before the internet were that stupid
People buying and reading this book in support of her are that stupid

You guys misunderstand
She knows what she is doing

Even though the book has a Party official explicitly distinguish IngSoc from both Nazism and Communism, there will always be plenty of people who will claim IngSoc is just a thinly-veiled allegory for whichever one of those they don't like.
Political analysis beyond "thing is bad" is too complex for most people to try to understand, even just a straightforward blanket criticism of authoritarianism. "The object of power is power" is just about the simplest way you could say "beware of those who seek power of you, no matter what motive they claim."

Of course the schools can be blamed for most of this, I'm sure the only reason it's required reading in many high schools is to indoctrinate these shallow misinterpretations as educated opinion.

And you think it's about posting "red pills" on Sup Forums, because you don't understand that Orwell was a socialist.

I know who's the bigger retard. I also know you won't respond to this post because you have no response and got btfo.

Jesus Christ, Orwell's grave could be tapped for unlimited energy at this point.

It's just the Algorithm speaking.

This is what we need in leader someone who refuses to take responsibility for their own actions. I hope her book sells as well as the last one.

it's not just Hillary that's out of touch, it's the whole damn party, down to the base. the delusion runs deep

100% right. Democrats want to imagine that Republicans are decent human beings. They're not. Top to bottom they're lying scum. White Protestant Mafia. Break all the laws and blame everyone else of doing it. Kek

It's not delusion. They simply revealed their gameplan too early. In another 10 years, there will be enough minority and niave college voters for their message to be bulletproof. They've simply pulled the trigger too soon. Next election, they'll be able to win without the support of white male voters. In a few more elections after that, they'll start to abandon white women as well.

He said nothing of the kind. Surely you see the absurdity of Hillary's belief that 1984 taught us we should put more blind trust in the inner party elite?

No one said that. And if you think "experts" are equivalent to party elite, then you're a liar or a retard. Experts are the people who test and define facts--you know, the people Sup Forums hates because they'd rather believe outright lies and delusions.

Yes, the experts who rely on government grants to fund their research. Which is why we get absurd ideas pushed like the notion that race is just a social construct with no genetic components. Scientists have to play ball just like everyone else.

>our leaders
>the press
>experts

She's blatantly stating that the plebs and goyim should mentally submit to their betters and never, ever question their anointed leaders (like herself), the Objective and Honest Press/Media, and political (((experts))) who truly have our best interests, not theirs, in mind.

Bertrand Russell agreed in the "Scientific Outlook" in which he advocates for a technocracy of "learned experts" in which no one would have the ability to keep up with vast amounts of knowledge so we will rely solely on "learned experts". Hillary is a true believer folks and thats the horror show you would have been treated to had she won.

>Experts are the people who test and define facts
>define facts
You said it yourself

How can you be so wrong?

Here is the rest of that page.

Heck, here is the rest of the fucking book:
docdro.id/KhyYHDp

Can't be defined unless they're tested. I know you're all Christcucks here, but scientists are the only ones to trust. Sup Forums rejects them except for the 1-3% that confirm they're outdated and incorrect opinions.

>Only I know the truth. Those scientists and researchers are the ones who are wrong!!!!
Kek. Great LARPing. Half of Sup Forums actually believes that shit.

So how do you know the truth if you don't trust anything but what you read on Sup Forums? Because you sure as shit don't have a research lab or go visit the events you complain about daily.

own'd. U guise are pathetic. Used to be decent at trolling. Now you're just stormtards who aren't used to speaking in public.

She sounds like my high school English teacher, who assigned us 1984.

>alright class we'll be reading a new book today, it's about authoritarianism
>in case you didn't know, big brother is an allegory for hitler and how he wanted to suppress individual liberties
>did you know the two minutes hate was inspired by the nazi propaganda films they showed nazi soldiers before they killed jews???
>no coincidence the enemy they always hate on is (((Emmanuel Goldstein))), it's an homage to (((Emma Goldman))) who was one of the bravest most intellectual writers of the 20th century and who the nazis absolutely HATED
>the ministry of truth is kinda like fox news amirite xD
>2+2=5 is a good example of how right wing governments can always change facts and statistics to represent their views, kind of like george bush does (bush was the proto-trump in those days)

I never read it, just bullshitted my way through it until the end of high school, where I always assumed it was about nazis.

...

One of the most prolific fiction writers of our time.

Those types of people read 1984 and pretend to understand it, while standing for all the things Orwell warned against. If enough people tell them a piece of shit is a candy bar, they'll eat it and love it. Calling them sheep is an insult to sheep.

>Wouldn't compete to stoke people's rage and resentment.
Nigga that's all she fucking did

>Can't be defined unless they're tested
A fact that can be "tested" is not defined, it is discovered. It exists independently of our knowledge of it.

>I know you're all Christcucks here, but scientists are the only ones to trust
Treating science like a religion is the greatest ignorance. Especially when your church is headed by Bill Nye.

Nobody is saying that you can't believe anything an "expert" says, but you should use your own critical thinking in alot of thee cases. Alot of time what will be accepted as "fact" is just the de jur opinion the media is pushing.

There is a serious problem with independence in academia. Researchers often self-censor their conclusions or design their experiments with a socially acceptable result in mind. Those who don't self-censor end up like Charles Murray.

> sneakily using "define" instead of "change" despite it being the wrong word in order to make people pushing scientific fact and statistics appear evil

she doesnt have a soul. she's a demon. not human

She's a woman, that's already enough to not be a human.

I can barely believe that this person exists and she almost became our President.

That book is a manual for those who want to join the Clinton cult. It's incoherent and it's not menat to be read by the general public.

>The fact that Trump nearly LOST
he won by a landslide

She is so palpably full of shit, it's astounding. Surely people even blue-dogs read that page and cringe?

its clearly ghost written in another attempt to make her the cute pop culture aware grandma figure that she cant even pretend to be irl

>docdro.id/KhyYHDp
HAHAHA this book is insane. "If the russians could hack my subconscious, they'd find a long list".

This cunt is delusional.

The person who wrote this book for her is conspiring against her. There's no other possible explanation for the OP.

There's no way anyone could be that oblivious.

Not gonna lie, former Hillary supporter here. This is just pathetic.

The best part about 1984 is that it didn't "predict" anything but technology. Everything in the book was copy-pasted from the Stalin-era USSR.

Whenever kids read the book they go "woah sounds like our government lol" totally ignorant of the fact that their democratic government is now repeating what the Soviet fucking Union did. We can't let them change the meaning and context of 1984.

But muh six million popular vote margin

Did Varg shave his head and get a tan?

Looks like it's just psychopathy to me, she can justify anything to herself, the problem is she can convince hordes of idiots of whatever she wants to.

there is no way thats real. why does it make perfect sense that its real

why

Hillary is so smart, to smart too be our President.

Who else could understand 1984's message as "you should trust the government and the media"?

Hmmmm....

Thank you for amalgamating those posts. They really made me think.

BUT SANDERS IS NOT A DEMOCRAT!!!!1

The reptilian brain is strong with this one.

...

>With her army of staffers and advisors you would think somebody would tell her this book was a bad idea
This is the caliber of subterranean mole people that work for her. They are an even more blatant rouge of stiletto heel-licking sycophants and empty suits than the Mooch or Corey Lewandowski