>liberal policies don't wor-
HMMM SWEETIE, EXPLAIN THIS THEN
>liberal policies don't wor-
HMMM SWEETIE, EXPLAIN THIS THEN
Will bump it for you, seems like an interesting topic to discuss.
>100-odd shitty nigger-countries with nothing in them
>Slav-land
>A fucking leaf
>Australia and nothern africa/the middle east, Both of which are mostly uninhabitable to all but camels and terrorists
>A bunch of countries smaller than california but not nigger-countries
California is still part of america, last i checked Federal policy>state policy so they can't go full Communist
spotted the slide thread
sage
who /highergdpthancalifornia/ here
Imagine how efficient the state would be if they kicked out all the parasites and cut 99% of the programs. California is one of the richest places in the world. It literally has it all. Yet the democrats have been mismanaging the state for years.
And now that i think about it, why wouldn't they have a high GDP with all those Illegal Immigrants acting as practical slave labour for the farms?
Is the conclusion that Poland is such a shithole it's not worth attacking? Because that's the answer. Can't alienate local muslims and get more recruits by attacking drunk idiots in an underdeveloped shanty town...
california hass less people than france and more money tho
You're a fucking faggot and hmm you should kill yourself you fuckinf homo
>when Californians are communist liberals but brag about all the rich people and corporations stationed there
WTF I'M A REPUBLICAN NOW
More of a shekel gap and poverty group as well.
Is that ppp?
That would lower GDP
that pic is you, hope you have cancer
They don't brag about rich people there, idiot.
>write my argument for me
This is spam regardless of ideology.
Right. And France is far more liberal than California. You've just BTFO yourself, OP.
>nigger with twice the population of California and more or less the same GDP is talking shit about other countries
Commiefornians / liberals in general 1000% have a bourgeois superiority complex about the high-value industries they flock to
what country is this
Japan
rwanda
i mean that makes sense, wasnt the genocide there and the russians let it happen?
GDP is a yardstick for idiots. It only shows outputs. If it cost you 1 billion to make a widget, and you sell it for 1 billion + 2 dollars, you still get a high GDP, but 2 dollars of profit.
That's California.
Look up how in debt they are. 6billion dollars, last I looked. They add a billion dollars in debt every year.
Waste of time discussing it here. Most people here can't balance their own bank accounts.
>(((GDP)))
One of the least useful measures.
>HMMM SWEETIE, EXPLAIN THIS THEN
You've provided a graph demonstrating the GDP of a state in the most powerful nation in the world GDP-wise.
>Where's the correlation?
>Where are the statistics that this is caused directly or in relation to liberal policies?
>Ask yourself, are you basing this opinion directly off the observation of one simple graph? How to substantiate the correlation between the GDP and liberal policies?
You're given me a spoon and asking my to prove it's not a fork based on a graph that shows how many spoons were sold last year.
Rightful Japanese clay.
>You've given me*
No. California is home to more industries with money. It's the third highest state in welfare. People who work in Silicon Valley are living in their cars because they can't afford rent.
You are speaking about things you know zero about.
>DUDE WE'RE SO WEALTHY RURAL AND SUBURBAN FLYOVERS BTFO
They do it unknowingly because they are low self-awareness dumbfuck spics.
Enjoy those Liberal policies like massive income disparity and free market paying somebody a hundred million dollars for acting that supplies all your faggot socialism bullshit you liberal tard.
California has a population of 40 million. Only 34 countries in the world have a higher population than California and most of those countries are third-world so that's not much of an accomplishment
GDP per capita is what matters
>MUH GDP
Wow Jews moving money around
It is far from a marker of economic success. A few thousand Jews and Asians earning millions from Silicon Valley and Hollywood and a torrent of undocumented beaners doing every other job for $4/hour driving down the wages of your average American and destroying their bargaining power. What about GDP per capita, or even better, the median or mean wages of California? What about if you compare these metrics to the purchasing power and cost of living.
>Uk higher than Cali
Feelsgoodman...?
>GDP per capita is what matters
This. Fucking Wyoming has a higher GDP per capita than California.
Isn't that just because of Silicon Valley?
Water
Oh please, it's the fucking tech industry you kike. It has nothing to do with ideology. Keep in mind though that if Cali keeps taxing the hell out of those corporations, to pay for those liberal policies, they will lose them and with those tech companies goes their GDP
The map is BS
> The combined debt of California’s state and local governments is at least $848 billion and could escalate past $1.1 trillion, according to a new report.
(From Sacramento CBS 13)
Their claims of being a $0.79 donor state are spurious as well. They're $0.94 at best, probably more.
Play Naval Ops: Warship Gunner 2 and find out.
No. Military bases, manufacturing, the largest port in the US, Hollywood, legalized marijuana, investing firms.
It's why OP is an idiot. We're discussing the $ that flows through California, more than anything.
Hollywood makes a movie that grosses 11 million, well that is added to California GDP. It might have been filmed in New Zeland. The lead actor might be British and paid 4 million, it could of COST 50 million to produce.
It's why this whole thread is shit. It's the blind leading the blind through a sewer, it's just shitty.
They give $.03 more than they get back, in federal tax. This doesn't account for every year when earthquakes, fires, floods, etc. and they beg for federal aid.
Thanks for recent figures, though. Last time I read about it, I read a research paper about California and it's unsustainable economy. The author wrote that Puerto Rico had a more sustainable economy. It's why I think this whole thread is dumb. None of my posts bump this shit show.