Should provocative pictures of women be banned from this board? Technically they are off topic and Sup Forums-tier...

Should provocative pictures of women be banned from this board? Technically they are off topic and Sup Forums-tier, and they ruin discussions.

faggot

Israeli's used to flood 9/11 and Sandy Hook threads with bm/wf porn until deletion. It was such an obvious outside invasion that Moot had to step in and ban porn on the board. Porn is against the rules here to this day. It's just the moderation is not great because the board has gotten too big

In my fourth reich, footfags are the first to be gassed

any famous historical figures with confirmed foot fetish?

they're jerk traps, but there are plenty of qts that are Sup Forums staples, I'd hate to see them go
kys leaf

shut the fuck up, faggot.

i block ALL threads if there is a photo showing skin, regardless of content.

just ignore them by blocking them..

That's a trap you fucking degenerate, post the whole set nao.

Please provide more of her and her legs.

only grandmas from now on

Well yes, nudity is banned on Sup Forums, but i still see tons of threads that start off with a picture meant to arouse men, but still doesn't have nudity per say. It distracts from real discussion, as you said.

If its not porn dumps I don't see a problem with it.

I love feets

But they both have the same effect, only difference is once u showed actual nudity its a rule violation.

Based rick

no

I would say things liek that are okay, it won't derail anything, but if it shows too much, it should be against the rules, after all, Sup Forums is a christian board.

>Technically they are Sup Forums-tier
So raising the level of discourse on Sup Forums?

Yes they should

This is a place for serious political discussion

If I want porn I will go and get porn

No faggot, if you can't have a serious political discussion without seeing some fucking tits then you're a fucking degenerate

Just wanna cuddle her desu

usually it's shills who post this, so it's a good way to filter out shill threads

is mummy provocative?

too roung nipon san

No because she's ugly

Stfu pleb, she is the most beautiful anime character to ever be reincarnated into human form.

this you said it for me, She is the paragon of white Christian values and purity, she is mummy

yes... it's lame
btw stop fapping

SO MUCH THIS

...

Seriously I think there is no woman I ever trade for her, she is what everyone here should strive to acquire she is the future of our people, hard working, focused, beautiful, based and not to be fucked with

should shitposting be banned, even when it's ironic?

>using sex to distract from subject
yes of course. But the kikes and shills who run this board insist on having them. One of the key uses of this board is to defile \ undermine free debate amongst goyim. We just have to put up with them, grow stronger. Helps if u jerk off b4 browsing Sup Forums

Yes ban any nude photos
That means no women showing anything below the knees, elbows and collar

#Smash the penisarchy

Check your privilege, penis creatures.

This is a feminist board.

this

Does 2channel have a politics board?

I-is there a set of this?

Provocative is not a problem. It's the nudity that's a problem. Back in primary and election time, we were bombarded by "White Man Can't Compete" threads. I bought a second computer just to handle the filter.

Funniest post reply from last year about "white man can't COMPETE" was some user's response that "Black man can't COMPLETE" with a picture of a single biracial mother or a black fatherless child. Funny fucking shit.

hahaha I never get that distracted easily to begin with but good advice. I can see attractive women without going full retard, but I realize .... ummm the majority of types who visit this board and not very good with women or socially so it may distract them but they are not the ones important to what the rest of us are doing and just have to be tolerated as you say

I would prefer that provocative pictures of cartoon ponies be used on this board.