Happy Birthday, Kapital

How did you celebrate the 150th anniversary of the greatest analysis of Capitalism ever produced?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QyIMwzHuiCU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

own a copy, guess I'll try reading it

By burning it.

I do not doubt it.

...

>150 year analysis
A little out of date much?

Groundbreaking work. I recommend you guys read Thomas Picketty's Capital in the 21st Century.

Workers of the world, Unite!

that's like calling newtonian mechanics out of date

kind of not really

by staying capitalist

Not really.

They are actually, Eisenstein was able to explain things Newton could not and expand on things Newton put fourth.

yes exactly however that doesn't mean you should just disregard Newtonian mechanics

Although little of Marx' predictions have come to life, although I disagree with practically every conclusion he draws and although arguing for absolutist materialism is a performative contradiction, I have come to appreciate Marx' analysis.
After I started reading Marx I realized that every "communist" society has been nothing like Marx envisioned. The USSR, and all other dictatorial regimes has been a disgrace to his philosophy, and the societies did not even enter its socialist phase. Maybe because of faulty theory, but still, to talk about him as if you understood his work, while still flying a USSR flag makes you retarded.

Pic related is the greatest analysis of Capitalism ever produced.

You only take in what is useful and what has not yet been displaced by a new better theory. Marx made no analysis of events like the Great depression, classical economic theory being replaced with Keynesian theory, removing the gold standard, stagflation, debt financing, changes in business models, outsourcing, stock ownership, contracting, and so on.

fuck off jewnigger.
ur (((SHEKELS))) cannot buy you a thing in AFTERLIFE greedy bastard

i don't think most/any of those events contradict the core of his work which was more fundamental

Marx can't explain how a person can be both a worker at a factory and a landlord at the same time. Marx can't explain consumer demand being a driver for economic growth. Marx never knew what market saturation was because it wasn't a concept in his time.

> you celebrate the 150th anniversary

can we meme Das Kapital that hitler wrote it?

Modern science has made it obsolete. We now know that the only truly valuable capital is genetic capital. Those with the genes for high-IQ will always dominate society, and those genes are not easy to redistribute.

>people with a lower IQ tend to do easier jobs therefore your analysis is wrong
what

kys

this tends to be the most common argument on this website

really makes me think

INDEED.
welcome in (((brother)))

The means of production cannot be redistributed because the limiting factor in production is a high-IQ brain. Redistributing a complex supply chain into the hands of the low-IQ underclass will only result in entropy and failure. Since IQ is determined almost entirely genetics, the only way to truly redistribute the means of production and create a viable socialist state, is to carefully ensure that all of the high-IQ literate classes are forced to interbreed only with the low IQ underclass. This will prevent the accumulation of genetic capital in endogamous elite social classes.

Achieving true communism will be impossible because the revolutionary vanguard will never agree to redistribute their genetic capital to the lower classes. Most communist revolutionaries are unprincipled status seekers who have failed to advance themselves into elite status through conventional means, such as business or academia, and now wish to dispossess the existing elite through the ideological manipulation of the underclass and establish themselves as the new hereditary elite.

pic related.
its ur daugher.

I can't even imagine what it's like being as retarded as OP.
Does it hurt?

/thread

thats a nice theory do you have anything to back it up with other than an image that shows people with a low iq tend to do easier jobs?

The Capital in a quote:

Suddenly million of people who didn't read it are dying because the few who did could not get the joke.

whats the joke?

your life is still not finished.
get it kike?

You should read up on the hereditary nature of intelligence and social status. The economist Gregory Clark has some good books on the topic.

>how did you celebrate the 150th anniversary of the most boring and unreadable analysis of capitalism ever produced by a German neet who free shit
FTFY

i will do that when you read marx i.e. never

your parents must have been janitors mate

By posting commie memes.

No, my mother worked in a furniture factory and cleaned old peoples homes. I am a real proletariat.

SHITTED

...

If I become a communist do I get a free 8 year old maid girl?

You are right. I will never read Marx. The idea that social inequality can be resolved through the redistribution of tools is laughably obsolete.

At least listen to a presentation by Gregory Clark: youtube.com/watch?v=QyIMwzHuiCU

...

>anyone who believes in indefinite growth on an definite planet is either an economist or mad
well the intro is pretty based so ok

Didn't this faggot have to postpone this trash multiple times because of the marginal revolution?

I've read Marx, and not those other two books, and I still know your ideology is shit.
How would I know that?
IT DOESN'T WORK
Keep dreaming that your utopia will come, it never will. You'll be on your death bead wishing you had invested your time in something that would have actually made a difference.
You're a traitor to humanity, and you deserve worse. You won't get it, because communism will never happen, and you wont have to watch your family and friends disappear. You won't have to watch the rest of them starve to death.

>own a copy
>own

You have some learning to do, comrade.

which of marx's works have you read?

Kapital.
I read it as part of a contemporary philosophy class, with several other books about 10 years.
I was a minarchist then, though definitely more progressive in some aspects. And I still didn't fall for that shit.

*10 years ago.

what were your specific criticisms?

But farmers own their land and capital too. See this is what I mean by communism is an outdated belief system. You don't realize people can occupy multiple positions at the same time.

It's a utopian ideal.
It relies on nobody taking advantage of the system, and that there is no other outside system to attack it.
Oh, and the fact that the Jews created it, and use it to make them selves look better to push their own agendas.

What are your arguments against it? Surely if you know so much about the subject, you should know it's weak points. If you don't and you can't admit it's flaws, you're not ready to accept it as a good ideology.

that's what marx called petit bourgeois and is a class not represented in that particular image

Its is logically flawed and created by a burgeois piece of shit who never owned a business had a job and only couch surfed off his rich fried friedrich engels rufute pic related

Good luck.
2nd hardest read after- fittingly- Hegel. Made Kierkegaard look like Stephen King.

How many pages?

>It's a utopian ideal
no it literally isn't. marx is by far the most prominent anti-capitalist philiosopher because he wasn't an idealist like the socialists before him.

>It relies on nobody taking advantage of the system, and that there is no other outside system to attack it.
you are aware that das kapital is a critique of capitalism and not marx vision for a communist utopia yes? how can you apply this criticism to the LTV for example?

>Oh, and the fact that the Jews created it, and use it to make them selves look better to push their own agendas.
dude jews lmao

>What are your arguments against it? Surely if you know so much about the subject, you should know it's weak points. If you don't and you can't admit it's flaws, you're not ready to accept it as a good ideology.
so far the only convincing argument i have heard is that it does not account for imperialism, but that doesn't mean its

and no i do not claim to know lots about it i consider myself to be learning about it. i am waiting for someone here to quote specific parts of Marx's work and then explain how it's "wrong" but so far all i ever get is some vague general criticisms of socialism as you have made or get told to kill myself. oh and da joos of course

What? You know Monsanto and ConAgra contract farmers out to grow their seeds who in turn sell their product to distribution centers who sell to retailers who in turn sell to household consumers. Its called a supply chain (which Marx never knew about), everybody in the chain makes profit off of the last person. Everybody involved is bourgeois even the farm hands who sell their labor to the farmer.

Lmao

>no it literally isn't.
Didn't even bother reading the rest.
You're so full of your own shit, fuck off.

i would bet my life you haven't read a page of das kapital

>Dude makes Marxshit thread
>All the "ANTI-SOCIALIST OY VEY" crowd ignore thread
Huh
It's almost like all the dudes with ancap/lolbertarian flags are /leftypol/ dudes...

why would you think a guy that dedicated years of his life to reading economists and wrote thousands of pages on the subjects wouldn't be able to comprehend a supply chain? what is your point?

it'll probably just end up hurting your teeny tiny peanut cuckney trumplet brain

The libshits today are all idealists, dialectical materialism is dead. The "ultimate idea" you useful idiots produced was globalist materialism. Communism was nothing but a non sequiter to get you retards to go along with it.

>I don't think
Everyone knows that, you're proudly flying the (((USSR))) flag, and not even ironically at that. Begone from this board Shekelstein!

BUT IN THE END, IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER

Because Marx would be confused as to why people would willingly sell their means of production so willingly. Marx would not be able to understand why the farmer would just call an end to their labor once they sold off the product of their labor to a truck driver who in turn would do the same and sell off their production (or labor) to a retail chain and not want to go further. Marx would not understand why the market would be so small.

And? How about you show a map of communism in Europe before and after the collapse of the USSR

You are right it doesn't matter.

Not to mention if the Amerifags, Britbongs, and Nazifags would've just allied together to rid the world of the true filth, communists, you wouldn't have to worry about why communism hasn't worked from the very beginning of it's (((implementation)))

>marx wouldn't be able to understand supply chains
I still don't understand why you think this and would like to see some quotations/the reasoning behind why you think this.

>Marx would not be able to understand why the farmer would just call an end to their labor once they sold off the product of their labor to a truck driver who in turn would do the same and sell off their production (or labor) to a retail chain and not want to go further
To me it seems pretty obvious that farmers don't do this because they they spend their time farming and it is more efficient for them not to do 3 different things, the same for the truck driver and the retailer?

Communism is dying everywhere at record speeds

Fascism is more powerful than it's been since the end of WW2

It's over.

>if history had happened differently, things would be different
woah

how are your glorious fascist countries doing?

>listening to Jews
Have you not learned from the past?

Look bud, to be honest communism looks great on paper. It's utopian. Of course many people see an actual instance of when it could work, and of course it could. However, the reason it won't, is because people are selfish. No one wants (((equality))), everyone wants to be better than everyone else. That's why Stalin muscled his way in, and even Lenin was afraid of what Stalin would do when he would be the defacto leader of communism.

Marx was a yid. And a very drunken and lazy one at that.

you can be better than everyone else in ways other than making more money than them by virtue of exploiting them through an exploitative system

>Autistic sarcasm
You're the one that brought up an irrelevant map of the height of German expansion in 1941 to 1942 as a way to prove your point for communism kek I was just giving my idea on a utopian view. Unlike the utopian view of communism though, irradiation of communism would actually work

And I agree. But pretending communism does that is ridiculous

Do you actually want to discuss dialectics or are you just another brainlet?

i was replying to a shitpost with a shitpost

in a similar vain to yours: if communist revolutions had succeeded in western europe you wouldn't be arguing for your retarded system with me right now

how profound

pretending that communism does what?

i am responding to posts

Actually it wasn't a shit post. If communism some how beat out the Western world and everyone lives long enough to remember not starving to death then it's obviously not communism lol

Get a job your dirty hippie.

>Does what
Allow a basic functioning society. Which it does not

Your response to my post was to post a fucking map. Have a redpill I guess

>genes are not easy to redistribute

Really jerked by jerky...

>Actually it wasn't a shit post
>starving to death

>If communism some how beat out the Western world and everyone lives long enough to remember not starving to death then it's obviously not communism lol
shitpost

>Allow a basic functioning society. Which it does not
shitpost

...

>what is the Holodomor?
>Thinks I'm shitposting

kek

>Marx hates the idea of the economy but writes on it because capitalism is a big Mastodon
>doesn't understand the economy at all
>doesn't understand the value of currency

Press S to shit on his grave

...

>unironically regurgitating nazi propaganda
>not shitposting

Marx/gommunism in a fucking nutshell.

Because not real communism :DD

>Counters Nazi propaganda with communist propaganda
Lol thats probably why Venezuela is starving too. Both capitalism and communism when left unchecked produce shit societies. Can you meet me half way with that comrade?

>Venezuela is socialist
You're brainlet.