How can you claim to support the free market if you don't support free migration?

How can you claim to support the free market if you don't support free migration?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/1375325642130.jpg/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Get off my property.

Notional free market is not the same as global free market.

Who's on your property?

I don't support the free market in all things, for instance shills should be strung up by there toes.

Free migration implies that nobody owns any land, which means there are no property rights and no free market

A true free market would enable Texans to protect their border against Californians

>"I support free markets only within this one square mile area!"

>i think free market is the same as free immigration

oh no its retarded

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/1375325642130.jpg/
Without a doubt the most autistic poster on this website

You don't have a free labor market if you don't have free movement of labor.

Free migration means people are permitted to cross political borders, not individual property borders. Quit being retarded.

>Private property can be enforced but when the government tries to defend its holdings it's mean wahhh
>implying the government can own land in a free market in any case

whats so difficult about that?

immigrants. I thought kikes were supposed to be smart.

If immigrants are trespassing on your property, you call the cops and have them pulled out. Problem solved.

...

Native-born Americans aren't accustomed to a free society, considering Americans are the ones voting for continuous war, ever-growing government and the incarceration of an increasing proportion of the total American population.

Jesus Christ

What's your area code my dude I'll fight you right now

You cant have a welfare state and open borders. People will just migrate to get gibs.

Just being around white people is welfare enough to a nigger
You can't have an open border as long as niggers exist

Eliminate the welfare state. Problem solved.

who said i do support the free market? tariffs placed on foreign goods help to balance out the domestic market and allow domestic goods a chance to be sold. also the tax money helps to keep the government from falling apart...

assuming they ever make a fucking budget that gets passed because just raising the debt ceiling is bullshit nigger behavior. every one in the government needs to be replaced by new white nationalist candidates

>Tfw you're a filthy mercantilist and don't have to worry about an inconsistent ideology

Although if I was someone in favour of the free-market, I would argue that with the welfare-state in place, that my country wasn't really a free-market anyway. So, all in all, I wasn't really changing anything, but rather merely changing my non-free market society into its most perfect form.

It's like wanting to play fairly in principle, but cheating if the opponent clearly cheats as well. Kind of.

...

*changing anything fundamental to the kind of economy, but rather

You can do business with people without moving in with them you autist

...

Great, come back and talk to us when you've done that. I mean, if you give a shit about the free market, I'm sure you were planning to do that already.

I don't need to let the entire planet into my house to buy tomatoes from Pierre.

Who's saying that you should let the entire planet into your house?

>Americans are voting for wars
>Its not like jews are vastly over represented in government and are driving every decision an policy in this direction
>what is ZOG

Really nigger?

Your nation is the same as your house. This is why the world is going to shit nowadays: people used to think about their country as a true community worth defending and protexting, now it's just a big market full of shitskins and niggers competing for lower prices.
Kys

You are free to migrate, you fag, just make sure to do it properly and follow the laws of your host country. Why is that so hard to understand? Shilling for open borders? Pathetic. We don't have a free market. When the welfare queens quit stealing 25% of my fucking paych3ck for their bullshit then we can fantasize about free markets and open borders and singing kumbaia by the fire.

FPBP

Because I'm K selected enough to realize that a open border Libertarian society is only going to be libertarian for a time, but a "not really Libertarian" ethno state that's pretty much purely Libertarian, accept for its immigration policies could stay that way indefinitely .

The problem isn't immigration itself. The problem is people showing up uninvited, making asses out of themselves, and outbreeding the natives. Saudi Arabia can be a shithole if it wants but there is literally no reason for the rest of us to be one too.

Don't forget this one. Kikebertarians get the bullet, too.

We don't support free profit, now pay your taxes crony.

Democracy and free market capitalism were mistakes. That's common knowledge

>free market capitalism was a mistake
>t. country which got rich thanks to free market capitalism and turned to shit once it got crony lobbyist corporatism
Really got my ol' thinking box rumbling.

>implying free flow of goods means free flow of people
Immigrants don't ask for permission to enter unlike an import that only enter the country if you purchase it.
as such Immigration is a crime akin to trespassing on private property and is therefore a violation of the NAP that should be met with force

what if
hear me out
ok what if
i know this might sound crazy
but what if
ok listen up
what if we put a requirement to be a citizen to get welfare?

How can u say the slavery is abolished when you sell slaves?

Sure - I guess that means "Free-Market" in Toxic Waste, Child-Trafficking, Slavery, Prostitution, Drugs, Pedophilia, etc...

How about not subsidizing inproductiveness and lazyness at all? Sounds like something that could weed out degenerate filth, don't you think?

more like people will starve on the streets and you become africa tier

"Free Market" - ?

For Plantation Owners to traffic in slave labor.

Then dumping the used trash off onto Taxpayer Funded Public Services?

Typical Jew-Business-Model?

>"boohoo, lazy bums that don't want to work need your money to feed them and their six gorillion children they have, because they are too dumb for protection"
I'd make a side earing by offering a corpse removal service.

Free market with corpses. We can trade corpses and funeral services.

Might as well buy a German Oven while I'm at it.

>immigration
>economics
Its almost as if the two are almost mutually exclusive things.

Please, explain the retard logic you are using to come to the conclusion that those two things cannot be exclusive from each other.

Your property ends with your house. The rest of the country is not your property so Ahmed and Rasheed have all the right to be there.

>in a new government
Not new.
>unfamiliar to the rest of the world
Familiar.
>resting on the sentiments of the people themselves
Most people would vote for accepting immigrants now.
>government of a free society
Hahaha.

Your country is you house user.

only in socialism

Because I'm philosophically consistent.

>you can only have closed borders with socialism

in socialism the country is your property

now only your house is your property so you have no right to tell others which people to bring in their property

Because non-white immigrants vote to take the free market away.

Socialism is the step before communism, which tries to abolish property. They advocate against any property rights, hence against borders. The country being owned as property would be something else entirely, namely monarchism. A monarch would own a country instead of merely ruling over its populace like a chairman would. Thus, he'd have a personal interest in protecting the country instead of only caring for the country insofar he can exploit it for his own benefit. This system wouldn't be in the way of a free market, communism and socialism would, based on their inherent denial of property rights. But I'm not implying anything here.

Democracy is in no way compatible with a libertarian society.

If you want to move to another country it is because you think it will benefit you somehow.

Consequently it seems reasonable that there is a "price" associated with your immigration so that it also benefits the receiving country.

- Free of disease
- Good character
- Acceptable level of education / training / language
- Acceptable finanicial resources

Some countries are more desirable than others. Funnily enough this correlates with, amoung other things, how free market they are. The idea we should give away citizenship for free when it is undoubtedly valuable is hardly capitalist.

>support the free market
>surround yourself with people who do not support the free market

How can you claim to support the free market but not be virulently anti-corporation? Corporations are state-sanctioned artificial reductions in liability and liability is an essential healthy market force.

Until you dismantle corporations, opening up free migration couldn't possibly lead to a free market, rather it just would be global corporatism.