Are age of consent laws constitutional?

Are age of consent laws constitutional?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/primary-sources/24
web.archive.org/web/20050325114700/http://logicalreality.com/openbb/read.php?TID=424&page=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Easily. Considering how we already have laws on being a certain age to vote, run for president, military enlistment as well as buying tabacco or alcohol. This is already a thing.

No. They more local. Never been codified by the Federal government.

This. They are a state matter. You've probably heard someone say something like "sixteen's legal in Kentucky", etc.

The problem is that a 17 year old can go to jail for having sex with a 16 year old in many cases.

They're stupid as shit but there's nothing in the constitution against them.

If the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia also would be. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness. Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today. For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone.

Are age of consent laws constitutional?

Yes

End of thread

Getting a blowjob from a 9 year old girl sounds good about now.

Not where you come from, muhammad

>many cases.
In your imagination

Go away, pedo scum

Are fags and pedos basically the same shit?

a child is anyone under 18 you sick pedo fuck, its literally impossible for a child to consent to sex with an adult which is why its rape.

Yes

Such is life in Vietnam, eh? Really though we should've nuked the place

kys, pedo faggot.

No, and they're unjust besides.
A girl belongs to her father, not the State. Its up to him to decide when and to whom she is to be married. And if he wants to do her before then that's his right. All other sex is rape, under a proper definition of rape which is "sex with a cunt somebody else owns".

there is normally a clause where the charge doesn't apply if the guy and girl are within 1-2 years of each other

...

No, don't try to compare us to fags. The fuck is wrong with you people, always trying to make this horrid comparison? We're nothing like fags.

Age of consent should be at whatever age someone hits puberty.

Yes.

Lots of cute little white girls are sucking big adult cocks in America as we speak.

Yes, but relenting on this issue terminates in a slippery slope of neolibs normalizing having sex with children.
We should leave age of consent laws exactly as they are.

Nah, we naturally have the urge to mate with biologically ready females. We did so without issue for 99% of human history until ugly old cunts approaching menopause lobbied for age of consent laws because nobody wanted to marry aging crabby bitches when there were bright-eyed, nubile, horny teen girls ready to devirginize. Taking teenagers off the market gave men less options and increased the dwinding sexual value of hasbeen shrews who didn't want to die with nothing but cats. That's really the only reason AoC laws exist.

You can't own a kid, fucking retard kek.

So true.

It is widely known though, that there is an absolutely huge cult of youth and "twinks" in a fag community. Both a common fag and a pedo all want one thing: a person without mature, pronounced and developed sexual qualities.

The comparison is very much legitimate. The only difference would be is that a fag doesn't want any problems with law and society (and perhaps even not to ruin an innocent person), while a pedo wants something very vulnerable and easy to manipulate, trick and coerce.

Who owns kids if not their parents?

You're retarded. The feminists/socialists are the ones who have been pushing the AoC up, you retard. And now you're doing their work for them by accepting their new normal.
Sex with children is normal, its very recent that girls being married young became the worst thing ever. Incorrect, females are property.

Untrue. There are court cases where teenage boys have been forced into paying child support to their adult female rapists. In all these cases the boys said they knew they were having sex and consented to it, and each time the courts ruled that by consenting to the sexual act, the male victim could be held liable for supporting the child of their rape. It's a horrible fucking double standard because that shit would never happen to a female rape victim, but the point is, courts sometimes do rule that children can consent to sex, even if the rationale is completely stupid and it throws minor consent theory out the window by simultaneously implying that someone who is too young to consent to sex can indeed consent to sex if they give consent to have sex.

>Incorrect, females are property.
That was never the case, bar literal slavery, you retarded lolbertarian pedo fuck.

WRONG!

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
>The court also ruled that a mother's potential culpability under criminal statutes was of no relevance in determining the father's child support liability in a civil action
Isn't court fun?

this.
fags are messed up, while pedos (not actual pedos but people who are called pedos) just want a non-roastie.

where in the constitution does it say that?

wrong, what is all of society that considered women to be animals that give into their desires?

this!
we men gave women the vote, and they sent us off to war.
then they used the political clout of being safe at home while men were fighting for their life in the trenches, and used to pass laws CONTROLLING men, to make roasties lives even easier.
letting women vote and have a political voice also led to the rise of mobs, gun control, more violence, the great depresion, and so many other ills.

Since most women cant even raise good children on their own, why should they be allowed to control society?

No. The majority of the people that lived on Earth before this century would have been considered pedos by today's feminist laws.

Raping children directly in violation of God.
You will not go to heaven if you take any part in this.

30+ year old Joseph married 13-14 year old Mary.

Are age of constit laws consensual?

Sex between a man and his wife can not be rape.
Could a man a steal his own car? Then how could he rape his own wife?

I dont consent to your age of consent laws

>what is all of society that considered women to be animals that give into their desires
What sort of society would that be? In a traditional society, women had quite a lot of religious, filial and administrative authority, and they usually held the reigns of the clan or the noble family periodically like that: from a man, to his wife, to her eldest son. And, of course, the husband had quite a lot of obligations to his wife that he had to deliver.

Today's laws regarding maturity aren't actually feminist, but Victorian. That said, pedo is someone who is attracted to an underage specifically, not someone who has relations with a minor.

Every time this thread is up I begin composing a thoughtful response only to find the thread removed.

Meanwhile, pizzagate threads are given full license.

Post opinion please.

During Victorian era there were either no AoC laws or it was much lower.

chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/primary-sources/24

>pedo is someone who is attracted to an underage specifically, not someone who has relations with a minor.
That's not how people use it though. Technically pedo is someone who's attracted to prepubescent children specifically. And puberty have been starting earlier and earlier while AoC only rises on the contrary.

Well, last time I started writing about how throughout most of the world father/child relationships are typically ones of violence and intimidation. I then went on to write about how actual pedophilic relationships involving pedagogy represent a truly advanced culture as it involves the highest intergenerational investment yet demonstrated. Few races would see such value in children.

/thread

Fathers deserve to cum inside their daughters cunnies until they are married, and even after that if the daughter is a good girl. Daddy loves his little girl and needs to show it by squirting his milk inside her every day.

no, children should be fucked regardless of the age.

is killing pedophiles with sharp dirty sticks stabbed into their eye sockets repeatedly until their faces drip eye pasts constitutional

i think so

LGBT flag.. .... nice way to promote that LBGT aren't all child mollestostors

...

fuck off ahmed. we have those laws to protect minors so they dont have to testify in court or even participate in a trial against their rapist

its a clean cut is there proof of sex or not in the event it was a minor

...

who was in the right?

Iran

>In Iran, sex outside marriage, regardless of age, is illegal.[36][37] The minimum age of marriage in Iran is 18 for men and 15 for women.[38][39] Ways around these regulations include temporary marriages (Nikah mut‘ah).[40] With the permission of a court girls may marry at a younger age; during 2010 as many as 42,000 children aged between 10 and 14 were married,[41] and 716 girls younger than 10 had wed.[42]

Iraq

>The age of consent in Iraq is 18. "Any person who sexually assaults a boy or girl under the age of 18 without the use of force, menaces or deception is punishable by detention..."

Tell me which country is Z O G' E D?

Surely you mean liberated and democratized goyim.

>Europe having lower aoc than north africa

to be honest, it could be lowered a little.

16 is about right

Who is this boner donor

Muhammad pls

>Lots of cute little white girls are sucking big adult cocks in America as we speak.
That may be, comrade, but here in the U.S. (steeped as we are in what God teaches us) we generally recognize those animals as sick fucks that need to be put down like the rabid dogs that they are.
>Pro tip: we don't eat dogs here; we employ sound stewardship to keep them as the helpful creatures that they are

>Iran
>Iraq
Using two inbred cultures as highlights of anything

those are for children though
a grown man can't fuck a underage girl almost anywhere in europe
but a 16 year old can fuck a 17 or 18 year old
don't remember the specifics though

AoC is 15 years here. For everyone. It's imilar in other european states

At least Iranian men are saved from this one humiliation.

there is nothing wrong with teens having sex with adults.

yeah but the czech republic is degeneracy incarnate
here i'm pretty sure it's a lot older

>czech republic is degeneracy incarnate
lol maybe for V4 standard, but not much different, or even less for rest of Europe. But you can see aoc 14 -16 years all around Europe, without age difference limit

prague is probably worse than most western cities m8
that city needs to be set on fire

youll have to open wider in prison for jamal

>fag flag
>is a pedo

Mmmmmh...

Hell, I like you. You can come over to my house and fuck my sister!

Hahahahahhaha dude shoot yourself

ugly kids

I like your comma ;)

14 is the sweet spot.

Iran is actually perfect, just make the age for girls 18.

im gonna say yea based on that question

I lost my virginity when I was 14 and I enjoyed it very much. She was 1 year older tho.
Back then half of the girls of my class already fucked some older guy too.

Age of consent was 13 here when I was a teen and it wasnt a big deal, nobody cared about it.
Now you are a monster if you are 18 and you have sex with a 16yo girl in some countries. Really makes you think

the founding fathers would have literally tarred and feathered you. it's an agonizing way to die, nevermind the humiliation.

Franco would have had you shot

t. zogomite

web.archive.org/web/20050325114700/http://logicalreality.com/openbb/read.php?TID=424&page=1

...

touch my fucking daughters and i'll kill you

Hello FBI, please hire me unironically

During Franco times you could marry 15/16yo girls what do you mean?

>implying (((they))) would hire outside America

>tarred and feathered you
>die
wat

What the fuck is wrong with you? Why weren't you aborted?

m8, if you don't want to kiss that girl, you might be a bum chum. I don't have a problem with that; I just want you to stop telling heterosexuals how to experience life.

Faggotry is a mental disorder. So is pedophilia. It's time for both of you to take the noose.

>kids going around fucking each other
That's what I mean. Fucking degenerate

What if your daughters touch someone?