At which side of the broken bridge are you standing?

At which side of the broken bridge are you standing?

Other urls found in this thread:

ecowatch.com/an-island-divided-what-we-must-learn-from-the-tragedy-of-hispaniola-1881891391.html
archive.is/LeYbl
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Neither, I'm on the other edge of the cliff pushing the last communist off.

Boomers are faggots but so are communists. What do?

Im on the side with the trees. Who wants to be on the other side lol

>We dindu nuffin, evil capitalists stole all our trees.

the logical fallacies are strong.

the kid can just get the half finished bridge by pulling up the ropes. its more or less the same work as chopping down the trees.

you made this fucking thread last week and it sucked.

Im thinking Commies are butthurt that capitalists are doing exactly what commies want to do so they argue that communism is better because "equal" distribution

When you are at the bottom of the heirarcy you cry about equal right to wealth and shit but as soon as you end up on top there is no more talk to equality

On the treeless side, impregnating his wife in front of him so her and I can take half of everything he owns.

Build a new one with one of these

This is a terrible analogy.

If the guy on the right was a capitalist, he would have kept the bridge, charging people to use it, saving the hopeless retard on the left the effort of chopping down trees and building a bridge, considering he seemingly cannot do it.

Looks like the bridge is more or less intact, he would just have to work at pulling the bridge up and lasso the rope to the other side.

In fact, it should be easier than building the bridge from scratch as all the parts are there. Some assembly is required.

>Capitalism at its finest
Nah. That would be the gleaming prosperous cities of magnificent engineering feats and world-leading quality of life that it builds.

Dude basically has free lumber and rope which he can sell on the free market and buy a plane ticket, this is dumb as shit

>with what?
who said it had to be a wooden bridge?.
Typical loser that will never accomplish anything. If you are not flexible, you will get crushed as a capitalist.
>Capitalism at its finest
if the broken bridge represents barriers to a market, and you can't afford to build said bridge without the use of wood, then you create another market on your own. Capitalism at it's finest? more like failed capitalist at it's finest.

He forgot that the infrastructure of the bridge, while damaged due to poor maintenance, is still salvageable so that most of the job is already done.
>empireofdust.jpg

This

>in case you missed the point there is 2 redundant dialogue bubbles AND a sign post
maybe this has something to do with the problem?

>i wonder who's behind this faggotry

Most of the bridge is clearly hanging from the tard side so all he has to do is reuse the material.

This meme is retarded. There should be a hefty fine imposed or deposit seized to ensure the materials are returned, or maybe the fucking bridge is never demolished.

Fuck the left is retarded.

so exploitable

>Dude basically has free lumber and rope which he can sell on the free market and buy a plane ticket, this is dumb as shit

LOL

what the fuck does that have to do with capitalism?

>posting pictures of rain shadows
i don't get it.

I AM THE BRIDGE

This, so much so.

What rain shadow? its a 600 ft mountain, it was logged to death by the nogs.

Obviously, based on my viewpoint, I’m on the higher ground looking down at these two idiots that don’t know how to make a bridge. I choose...death for both!

Edgy
Maybe emus
Shadows...?
You're probably the type of person that says ad hominem in an argument and thinks he won.
>Missing the point
Getting dicked by emus also sick
Correct.
I don't know why you're insecure considering you'll never get a girl anyways.
Was that a failed weapon in the emu war?
Get dicked by emus
Correct.
Retard.
Fuck immigrants.

True. They used ALL of their trees as fuel and now have nothing to stop the rains forming mudslides. The DR has offered to help plant trees but Haiti continues to fuck itself. They need to be removed as soon as possible and the land taken back by whites who will be much better caretakers.

man is a bridge. between man and uberman.

kek

I LOVE THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW HOW TO LIVE

Why doenst he clean up the rest of the trees and builds a vacation resort? Then the guy on the other side will build a bridge with his trees to get there.

...

>innovation is a limited resource

>return saw and rope when done

really? didn't think people would understand the dumb point without that sign?

>When you just got your offical Cucknadian Force card

>capitalist
>not selling him the wood, saw and rope in the first place

wew

>an entire bridge half is on your end of cliff
>you have tree stumps that can be used to create rope, in addition to your clothes
>literally everything you need is there
I get that you need someone to blame all your problems on, but maybe it isn't the porky meme you're blaming.

Aren't our poor oppressed black people within the top 15% most prosperous group in the world?

>literally enough wood and rope hanging from HIS side to make another bridge.
>prefers to just stand there and complain instead.
Millenials.

>True. They used ALL of their trees as fuel and now have nothing to stop the rains forming mudslides. The DR has offered to help plant trees but Haiti continues to fuck itself. They need to be removed as soon as possible and the land taken back by whites who will be much better caretakers.
Haiti just proves you can give these people a modern nation, and they will still regress back to savagery every time.

wow... this is deep... I'm a failure because of other people... I feel better now...

>Working for a high paying position = Building a long lasting piece of infrastructure that anyone else can also use to easily get to the same exact position you are in

This comic is retarded

Hey why didn't the man in a business suit take the bucket as well?!

I like how they included the sign for people too retarded to comprehend what's going on

I told some poor commies that I would give them a lift to the other side - with my helicopter.

>At which side of the broken bridge are you standing?

10 steps ahead of you. I built my own bidge 2 km from yours. Stupid leftist.

I'am standing on the left side, using the leftover wood and the bridge hanging down to build a new bridge, so that i can get to the right side. Oh, and just as the gentleman in the suit, i will cut down the bridge afterwards, so that useless, leeching commies that can keep shifting their responsibilities onto other people can stay on the left side together.

OY VEY!
Give all the power to (((socialists))) and we will make everyone equal!

Fuck off.
They miss the part where for years the guy with the saw raised the kid and gave him everything he wanted.
And now enough is enough, and the kid starts wining.

>I'am standing on the left side, using the leftover wood and the bridge hanging down to build a new bridge, so that i can get to the right side. Oh, and just as the gentleman in the suit, i will cut down the bridge afterwards, so that useless, leeching commies that can keep shifting their responsibilities onto other people can stay on the left side together.
This, why allow more leeches to spread

Why do I want to cross the gap?

The saw and rope used by suit man is the big government that the cuck on the left unironically voted into power. Need no more proof that commies suck at everything including political cartoons.

The sign of a skeptic fag (both right and left wing types) is how he likes to debate a million people simultaneously, and usually in reddit fashion.

Bottom of the chasm. Jerking off in the abyss. It's nice.

Also, wouldnt that cartoon be better applied to how western nations are trying to push climate policies on developing nations?

hahah what a fag

let's play a game.
it's called spot the border

To be fair, you might have chosen a better picture. That one gives the impression of a border chosen because of a clear division in the landscape, and my first (okay, dumb) guess was a river.

But then I bothered to look it up.

ecowatch.com/an-island-divided-what-we-must-learn-from-the-tragedy-of-hispaniola-1881891391.html
archive.is/LeYbl

/thread

I thought the same thing, only they were blowing their asses out via mexican food

Super fag much? Nazi > Commies

stop crying about life not being fair and deal with it like a man, you pathetick fuck.

>The saw and rope used by suit man is the big government that the cuck on the left unironically voted into power.

>take out a loan or raise funds to buy wood, saw and rope from capitalist
>build bridge
>get to the other side
>chop down some trees to pay back the loan
>profit

Communism/Socialism: Government is the rich guys; I starve.

Capitalism: Rich guys own the government, I have enough.

Humm....

This is all the fault of those greedy French people making Haiti pay for their revolution.
If that hadn't happened then the natives wouldn't have needed to turn their trees into charcoal.

Is op retarded? Even in the picture all the logs are tied to the young kids side. He doesn't even have to chop down the logs himself. He just needs to make his own rope and pully to bring the logs up as they are all tied together.

Pls ban mass replies thx mods

Seem like there are people with strong opinions in this thread, so:

Sup Forumsacks recommend me a political philosophy/ideology to read up on based on these statements:

I don't believe in equality of outcome, and I think competition is vital to driving progress and giving meaning to humans.

I think capitalism is flawed because it eventually leads to the existence of a subset capitalists that extract rents rather than produce value.

I think owning land that you do not use productively is wrong.

I believe in the primacy of the individual while recognizing that man is a social animal and tribe matters a lot.

I do not put much value in the nation-state. I think national identity matters, but in a way that is inversely proportional to the size of the nation itself. I think a large state is inherently bad.

I've looked into municipalism, federalism, that sort of thing. Not sure that's what I need.

No need for a bridge when the ravine is filled to the top with dead communist swines.

6 million hours in paint

at the side of all right wingers and populists, in our way are the commies and anarchists who protect the establishment of politicians and bankers who hold the means of production. Commies are traitors to the working class.

>ask the old man if you can render services in return for help across the bridge
>leave and find a different forest to build the bridge from
>plant trees like the now-old man did

God forbid if it took any work

Amazing how communists always seem to imply that technical skills are a matter of course. It's just those darn means of production that they're missing.

This.
Millennials are amazingly helpless on even the basics. It's a good job most of them don't own homes because all the little skills you have to learn to keep costs down would end them.

"Wow what am I supposed to do?! I'm helpless I can't get ahead!"

Another kid, desperate to get to the other side, pulls up the dangling rope bridge, removes the logs, and uses a log on the end to hook on to the post on the other side. He climbs up the rope, and celebrates with the other businessman.

"Wow, those corporate assholes, theres no way I can get over!"

Where precisely in the entire world have all the resources to build civilization been sucked up.in a manner that would prevent someone else from building fresh?
I can think of exactly 2 places and both did it to themselves

you can also do it between insrael and west bank

>they turned the jewel of the Caribbean to a fucking desert in less than 200 hundred years
>whitey pls help

They all want to get to the top and fucking nigg out

How is this even capitalism?
They just make a stupid comic and stamp "capitalism" on it & call it aday

your diligence is appreciated krautanon

The seeds to grow your own damn trees literally fall from the sky; the birds shit the damn things. You don't need a saw or rope, just a sharp stone on a branch to fell one tall tree with. If you don't have stones you can dig out the roots of the tree to topple it. Use that single tree to bridge the gap. Hell of a lot harder to split a log than to cut a rope too.

Liberals can't survive without the latest bells and whistles being handed to them on a silver platter. Only benefit of that is that as soon as the system that provides them goes, they go with it.

>The answer is simple: trees bring life.
From Wikipedia:
>Most Dominicans fall within three major ethno-racial groups. The last census conducted in the country estimated the population as 73% mixed race (mainly of European and African descent), 16% White European (mainly of Spanish and French descent), and 11% Black African.
> 95% of Haitians are of predominantly African descent.[1] The remaining 5% of the population is primarily mulattoes, Europeans, Asians and Arabs.

A more likely explanation why Haiti sucks and Dominican Republic not so much. Is that one is populated primarily by black people, while the other is populated by Hispanic people..

This picture shows the outdated expectations of millennials being able to go down the same path as the boomer. We must relearn how to move upwards in a job environment where these old cunts hold on to lower level positions for years after they should have retired due to their mistakes and prevent new blood from coming in.

None because im not a character in shitty strawman cartoon.

numbnuts on the left doesnt even need to build a whole bridge, just make half a bridge with the parts of the old one and jump over

Pull rope up, cut it. Make grappling hook, sling it over opposing log and pull self up.

>I think owning land that you do not use productively is wrong.
What would count as using land productively? Would building a giant statue on your land count as being "productive" and what do you think should be done about people not using their land "productively"?
>I think capitalism is flawed because it eventually leads to the existence of a subset capitalists that extract rents rather than produce value.
But the land it self has value since some people chose to pay for it which means they create value by renting it to people.
>I do not put much value in the nation-state. I think national identity matters, but in a way that is inversely proportional to the size of the nation itself. I think a large state is inherently bad.
So national identity is good but only in small countries? How so?

always the leaf.

>So national identity is good but only in small countries? How so?

No, not trying to make a value statement there. Just saying that a group is more cohesive and likely to share meaningful identity at a smaller level.

My family before my neighborhood before my town before etc.

>What would count as using land productively? Would building a giant statue on your land count as being "productive" and what do you think should be done about people not using their land "productively"?

Good question. I think occupying the land, providing a service on the land, or creating something on the land is productive.

I think sitting on property, whether as your summer home or speculative bet or otherwise, is inefficient and probably wrong.

>But the land it self has value since some people chose to pay for it which means they create value by renting it to people.

If I pay rent, that means is I value having a place to live. The state backs your claim to land you do not occupy, therefore I pay you to "use" the land.

You could say one labored to make the money to make the exchange that allowed them to buy the land. But if you follow that value chain back, the land was always there, and its existence as a good is artificial.

Whereas if you're a merchant selling me an orange you didn't produce but did purchase first, and I follow that value chain, at some point somebody produced or gathered the orange.

I see your point: I voluntarily paid for my right to occupy the land. But I do not believe land should be treated like a normal good for the reasons stated.

I value the land itself, but you have added no value to the land and you did nothing to bring about the land.

Land you do not use or occupy only has value because the state is willing to back your claim.

The argument gets better and hairier when you talk about landlords who actually maintain the property, do work for tenants, etc. as that becomes a service. I believe you can call that something of a standard good.

looks like its time to innovate, maybe a rope bridge across isnt actually the best answer

Also, that Rothbard quote.

>...must be able to own the ground and the resources on which he stands and which he must use.

I am obviously projecting here, but those words are the case I am trying (poorly) to make:

>on which he stands
Occupancy.
>which he must use
Utility.
>must
Necessity. I don't know if I want to make that point or agree with pushing that point, as that could take us to socialism town. And it's one more language game to navigate that we probably do not need.

Now, if I own a property and do not occupy it merely in the hope that it appreciates in value, is it the ground on which I stand? Is it something that I "use"?

It will likely come down to our definition of "use," but I am taking the position that this is not a legitimate form of ownership.

I am also taking from this that I need to read Rothbard to understand better, so thank you user.

of course its a canadian

>Not salvaging the bridge, AKA putting time and effort into something, in order to reach the other side.
Communism at its finest.
0.5 shekels have been deposited to your FUCKING LEAF card.