Just got my form in the mail

WTF do I do

>Yes for more chaos as prescribed by Kek

>No for no chaos not prescribed by Kek

Just got mine too.

What am i voting /pol?

YES

No, hold out Aussies, don't go down the slippery slope as us burgers have

... today if you can!

vote no because it is the right thing to do

Even Cali voted no

Vote yes. How does allowing gays to marry affect you in any way?

how about you both kill each other, cut each others dicks and eat as much of them as you can before passing out from bleeding

Vote no so fags cry

PRAISE KEK VOTE NO

THE NATURAL ORDER MUST BE MAINTAINED!

flip a coin.

>Wtf do i do
Gotta shit inna bag mate

I say vote no. How does not allowing them to marry affect you in anyway?

Vote yes

You'll just energize the left more by voting no and give them actual grounds to complain

You can't answer a question by asking another

Gay people are fags. Vote no.

I was pointing out how retarded your argument is

It wasn't an argument, it was a simple question.

wth they'll just complain anyway like they always do.

would you vote yes to pedophilia if it shuts them up?

It doesn't affect me in any way, and I really don't give a fuck what gay people do.

However. It changes legal definitions of "marriage". And lets be fair, how fucked is the family court already without gay people getting divorced?? Jesus. How do they decide who the "primary carer" is out of two males??

I hope I did the right thing

because im not a subhuman knee bending retard that thinks society should be made up of castes

You're doing the right thing user.

why not? because you would be on the bottom?

good lad

If it doesn't affect you, why do you care? Just let them get married

Good going m8, don't let your country go down the slippery slope like we did...

Good on you

I'm from QLD too so it looks like i did the right thing

Independence from Australia WHEN!!!

>Suck your own cock and pretend its not gay
>Suck your Priest's cock "" "" ""

If it doesn't affect you why do you care if he votes no?

Vote no. They already get civil unions. They just want to use the word marriage to annoy more conservative folk

you've got it wrong, straya. the question should have been "should a marriage between a man and a woman be constitutionally protected". pic related. za = yes, ne = no.

>Have you seen my glasses?
>Have you checked on top of your head?

I ain't licking the sticky shit on the envelope either.

I don't want them creating a gay version of me with trace DNA

double sided tape should do the trick

How can you vote for same sex marriage and not assume someones gender ? I thought there were 69 genders or some shit ?

who said it doesn't affect me?

exactly this. why do they want to get "married" in a church that supposedly hates them anyways?

doesn't that nullify the vote? use a sponge instead

Vote NO, or you Eat Da Poo Poo

Vote no because then the trannies will be angry and soerg out.

Well does it?

Either way Australia allows civil unions, so what's to complain about if you can't get "married"

"mark" is vague. draw two penises rubbing in the no box with a fine tip pen.

Just an anecdotal story user. We have legal gay marriage here in Burgerland. I love in Los Angeles. I rarely, ever, even see same sex couples holding hands or kissing in public.

I barely see them at all.

You've done well.

Because (((they))) want to pervert Christendom entirely.

yes
because it's not the same

fuck that we just need to cleanse Melbourne and western Sydney, maybe the Gold Coast as well

>want to vote yes because it means gays can nominate next of kin and will shut up

>yes voters call the act of voting no homophobic and hate speech


Do I vote no just to defend the right to disagree? Also this whole thing is a joke and the entire Parliament is spineless and pretty much useless.

ur a mad cunt

Just vote yes, it gives them one less thing to complain about and who really cares if fags get married, it doesn't effect my life.

Feels good to be a bigot

Dude, write something offensive on it and post it on Facebook. Something like "Marriage is between a man and his wife".

Vote NO

Otherwise people will come and stick a giant dildo up your ass !

No will get more salt and make them more desperate which brings more chaos

2 years ago, I would have said vote Yes, but seeing where it's taken my country, I advise you to vote no.

If they kill each other how are they going to do the rest you tryhard edgemaster

Let me give you an analogy.

Imagine if we have a string that suspends a large piano over your head. Now, if I say, can I cut the string? You say, no no. It will affect me.

And I just keep asking you, but HOW does cutting the string affect you? It's just a piece of string ! Who cares???

It doesn't affect me DIRECTLY. But it MAY affect me. This is how changing laws works.

>clearly mark one box
>his mark doesn't extend to the right lower corner

Bitches won't count this as valid, dude

(mark one box only)
Did you just assume my binary box choices, shitlord?

Mark both boxes. It is the only answer.

classic libtard, if it doesnt affect you why can't they vote no? the left wont stop complaining until the last white man gets lynched.

Also I'm sick of Christianity getting shit on in this country. Can't offend Muslims or Jews, but open season on Christians.

>he comes to an anonymous Angolan Leather Working imageboard to get validation/shitpost/virtue signal that he's on the electoral roll.
Just fucken fill it in and post it you twit.

>effect

You did good user!!!

Jap makes a good point.

It gives them all the contractual and tax statuses as marriage. It just means they dont get to force churches to host their fag fairs.

Shouldn't the ballot be instead that civil unions are recognized nation wide instead of simply on a state level?

Its a win win that way. Both sides happy. Which is exactly why theyre not doing it.

Aussies rambling about fucking nonsense

doing god's work. based.

You say that, but no matter what, it will be passed, they want to be diverse, if it wasn't meant to be, they wouldn't have the vote, face it breeder, your reign of marriage is over

damn it feels good to be a bigot
a real bigot-ass nigga plays his cards right

a real bigot-ass nigga never runs his fuckin mouth
cause real bigot-ass nigga's don't start fights.

calling it a marriage has a greater emotional impact, and allows and 'proves' that their relationship is just as valid as a straight couple's

What's not the same? Because it's not by the same name? Literally nothing is different between the two besides the name, accept that you degenerates are even allowed a civil union

you better do this, just to be safe

Tick yes, post to facey, get laid its what i did user.

I literally printed blacked porn from here and glues it to my form.

t. Ernie Dingo

see

classic retard, I didn't say they couldn't vote no

>it gives them one less thing to complain about
How do you get so cucked that you start thinking this way?

so basically muh feelings and no logic
gotcha.

so when do we find out the results of this?

Argument in the form of a shitty question you kangaroo fucker fag

please tell me you are trolling? no one is this retarded. having a piano drop on your head has direct, catastrophic, observable repercussions in the form of death. this is obvious to anyone with the right amount of chromosomes, ask yourself why you are struggling with it.

but go ahead aspie, try and explain how gay marriage directly affects you? i need a good laugh

Muh feelings and no logic

Fucking degenerate

Did I hear right that this fucking drama wouldn't get settled until november?

yes, and your response isn't an argument

not an argument

I thought this as an America :( I never voted on this exact thing but I wished the fags would shut up if they got marriage but then they started tranny shit.

I noticed what actually happened. When gay people got gay marriage the gay lobby basically died. They mostly don't give a shit about politics anymore and tons of gays are turning to the right since their only issue was taken care of.

So basically its just feelings? We are to change laws so people can simply feel better about themselves now?

That's just ridiculous. Even now more than before you should vote no.

Toughen up faggots.

Croat makes a good point about the Jap making a good point

slippery slope, kys faggot

>yes supporter counting ballot gets this
>"oh i see, they CROSSED OUT the no box"

Since this ULTIMATELY comes down to parliament, Ideal situation would be if no won, only for parliament to pass it anyways. Just like how homophobes wasted MILLIONS of dollars fighting prop 8 in California, only to lose it a year or two later

Stupid fucking breeders

Awful analogy. Why the fuck is that relevant. Are you implying gay marriage will lead to your death? Just admit you don't like gays, jesus Christ it's pol and you're anonymous. Why are you trying to act like you have a rational explanation when being a bigot is widely accepted here. You don't have one, you just hate gays. Maybe you're in denial and want to think you're a nice person to everyobe

Vote No
Osullivans law: anything not entirely right wing decays to full left wing

Vote no. First is fags, then it's transgender bathrooms and (((pronouns))), after that... only the nose knows.

yeah, just like retaining the law so the opposite people can feel better about themselves

Of course it's not an argument it's a declaritive statement.

Claiming it has an emotional impact isn't an argument, degenerate

seriously? "slippery slope"? the best known logical fallacy is your best argument? you would unironically kill yourself if you truly cared about the well being of our society. but we both know you dont, this is just a convenient excuse for you to vent your virgin neet hate