She successfully turned an entire generation of kids worldwide into liberals...

She successfully turned an entire generation of kids worldwide into liberals. Her work continues its mass conversion of young fertile minds into OUR way of thinking. It is the left wing Qur'an. What can you insignificant INSECTS do in the face of this power? You have all already lost. Trump was elected by pensioners. The next generation - the Harry Potter generation - will NEVER vote conservative. You're finished!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tHGNf6nWUm0
youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9Mtos
twitter.com/AnonBabble

British people, destroying the world once again.

I have not read those books because I am an adult.

Are they really liberal propaganda, examples?

Yeah I read Harry Potter and loved it. Voted Trump. Fuck Rowling and her shit games.
Day of the rake when?

>Time magazine said in 2005, "Rowling adapts an inherently conservative genre for her own progressive purposes. Her Hogwarts is secular and sexual and multicultural and multiracial and even sort of multimedia, with all those talking ghosts."

>In 2007, responding to a question from a child about Dumbledore's love life, Rowling revealed, "I always saw Dumbledore as gay." Filling in a few more details, she said, "Dumbledore fell in love with Grindelwald.... Don't forget, falling in love can blind us. [He] was very drawn to this brilliant person. This was Dumbledore's tragedy."

>The Washington Post's Michael Gerson says "tolerance is one of the main themes of the Harry Potter books. In a marvelous social comparison, lycanthropy is treated as a kind of chronic disease, with werewolves subject to discrimination as if they had AIDS."

>According to Philip Nel of Kansas State University, the Potter series can be seen as "political novels that critique racism and racial superiority. Rowling, who worked for Amnesty International, evokes her social activism through Hermione's passion for oppressed elves and the formation of her "Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare."

>Hermione is depicted as starting a campaign to emancipate the enslaved House elves, using the methods of real-world campaigns on social and political issues such as badges with slogans.

>Rowling said in an early interview that Hermione and her political conscience about the rights of elves was fairly autobiographical.

>Rowling says her feminist conscience is saved by Hermione, "who's the brightest character" and is a "very strong female character".

>Rowling acknowledges being left-wing and said "there is a certain amount of political stuff in [Harry Potter]."

>Rowling told a Spanish newspaper in February 2008 that "I want a Democrat in the White House. It's sad Obama and Clinton are rivals because they are both great."

You should listen to Roger Scruttons opinion on J. K. Rowling and her fanbase.

youtube.com/watch?v=tHGNf6nWUm0

She wants to be attractive so bad

Jesus christ man...

My children will read Robert E. Howard.

youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9Mtos

I wish she would shut the fuck up on Twitter.

I dont know.

What I do know is that the only people destroying our country are liberals in the coastal cities who voted for Hillary. Everyone else voted for Trump.

>the only people destroying our country are liberals ftfy britfag

>[He] was very drawn to this brilliant person. This was Dumbledore's tragedy."

*sarcastic remark about how shallow this shit is*

this is considered "good" these days? jissis

...

...

Oh how surprising
a fukken Leaf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

...

The main goal of the 'bad guys' is preserving the purity of blood lines. In the films they're also exclusively white.

Definitely love HP. Not a liberal.

Love JKR as a writer. She's fucking retarded politically and a hypocrite.

Actually Dolores umbridge turned me into a fascist

WTF I LOVE VOLDEMORT NOW

Good video, thanks user.
The books were certainly well written, but the messages in them are damn dangerous. It's hard to tell if it was calculated genius, or it was all an accident by Rowling.

I watched every movie (inb4 read the book), don't remember much being liberal about it it's just some shit about magic.

>Harry Potter
>well written

Brainlets detected.

I bet I could kick your ass at harry potter trivia. I'm a right wing minarchist.

I swear, I see this woman and my Jew detector goes crazy.

IDK... I thought it was cancer.

>We must secure the existence of magical people and the future of pure-blood children.

idk why we've never appropriated harry potter from them, death eaters are definitely /ourguys/

clearly mis-fucking-represented by JKR.

The minds of youth were already spoiled of they decided to read the same book seven times lol

Not a good idea to co-opt pantomime evil guys as an analogue.

Been a while since I watched Harry Potter films, but im 99% sure there is a Black Death Eater.

>what did he mean by this

>tells fans to die
>calls opponents lonely virgins
>seriously thinks she is living her own stupid story and fighting voldemort

How did she descend so deep into the abyss?

>The books were certainly well written
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>The next generation - the Harry Potter generation - will NEVER vote
ftfy

I've read all her book and I'm not liberal

>The next generation - the Harry Potter generation - will NEVER vote conservative. You're finished!
The beautiful thing about socialism is that it kills socialists. + generation Z is more conservative than millenials so KYS (or vote socialist and die of starvation 10 years later) SAGE

She's a cat lady that struck gold with a compelling concept that kids liked. Even though she's rich, she's still a cat lady.

they're just books.

>muh harry potter is satanist liberal propaganda
why is this meme still around?
fuck off it's a kids book. Most likely drawing inspiration from WWII and nazism. Like Lord of the Rings, did that also turned entire generations into hopeless liberals?
Oh right, no one cares because over simplified achetypes and silly good vs evil rhetorics are the core of every story ever written that got remotely profitable

The irony being that the more the magical breed with the non-magical, the less magical there will ultimately be. The protagonists in Harry Potter are just as self-destructive as the left is in reality.

Like pottery, really.

Good. Once I retire I'll be sucking on the public gib teat like a newborn and all of you young cunts will be paying for it. It'll be the ultimate fuck you to the younger generation of liberals and socialists.

Boomers win again.

To be fair, hippies loved LotR in the 60s.

Lord of the Rings isn't meant to be about WWII or Nazis in the slightest. Tolkien detested allegory. Not saying you can't view it from that perspective, but it's not the author's intent in the slightest.

>tfw if LoTR were to change political views of youth it would make them more conservative due to traditionalist values portrayed in a good light
Is Lotr /ourbooks/?

>mudbloods want equal rights from magical peoples
>blood traitors and half-blood support them
>pure-bloods just trying to protect magic and the future of magical people
>billions of muggles would destroy them completely if they ever merged worlds

this sounds familiar...

Eh, it was well written in a technical sense. Te prose was well constructed, even if it didn't really say anything worth reading.

In a general sense, I think, it worked because the target audience isn't going to be bothered the fact that by the midway point of the book they've conveniently forgotten spells from previous books that would solve their probelm. Or the fact that they display very little creativity in the use of their spells. Or the fact that few, if any, of their combat problems couldn't be solved best with an assault carbine.

>Few loose ends

Kek'd audibly, but otherwise good very good listening.

> harry potter
> a good piece of literature

intellectual midget detected

You know...

Has she accepted any refugees inside her mansions yet?

Pretty sure this is bullshit. I'd read the first 5 before I was done with these books, and I read the last 2 because I'd pread the previous 5. They were alright. I always knew they were a sort of half-baked fantasy series, as I read them after I read LOTR, but I enjoyed them nonetheless as a sort of easy reading for nerds - and they were great.

Rowling didn't go fullretard till well after she became a millionaire.

>Dumbledoor
His sexuality was never touched on. His relationships with anyone were barely touched on. He was amysterious wizard character. In my young mind, its because he was conducting secret wizard research and casting fuck off awesome as shit spells in his timeless magic lair - it was not apparent that he was actruall just busy sucking dicks the whole time. This insinuation is total bollocks.

>tolerance is one of the main themes of the books
Parcel touchues were hated (people who spoke snake language), muggles were 'othered' (the idea of the muggler was my first real way of understanding the term goyim - it's simply another way of saying 'not us'), harry himself was treated with suspicion and mistrust the entire time. Bullies existed. I can't say people went around kicking blacks and spitting on jews because they didn't, but 'tolerance is a main theme of the books' is the brain-fart of a retard at best, and a dirsty scheming lie at worst.

>Hermione is depicted as starting a campaign to emancipate the enslaved House elves, using the methods of real-world campaigns on social and political issues such as badges with slogans.
THis is true, and even at the time of reading I remeber thinking - HJermoine you fucking berk - leave it out - you're just liek those shit-tier feminist retards. Her actions were not penned as universally accepted and favourable.

If she would let me sit on her lap and suckle her mommie tits while she strokes my cock, all would be forgiven.

>Is Lotr /ourbooks/?

It's pretty anti-modernism, so yes.

I propose that all copies of Harry Potter should be covertly replaced with For My Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.

yay it's not been posted yet

2/2

I remember being slightly surprised but mostly a bit sad when rowling started her public and retarded crusade against sense and reason - I remember seeing that in stark contrast to my enjoyment of her previous work.

Rowling taught me liberalism only works in fiction.

Lmao, kids reading books, and the movies are already considered old.
Her time's up, she's done what she could, now she desperately clings to attention by being "woke"

...

Oh dear.

>technically well written

It really wasn't. Within fantasy contemporaries she's eclipsed by the likes of Gaiman and Mitchell. Compare her to a mogul of children's writers like Roald Dahl and she's a rank amateur. Within the greater pantheon of literature she's a speck of fly shit next to slabs of painstakenly polished granite.

not particularly

average cartoon/tv show with diversity being pushed is infinitely worse

It's just the generation of shitlibs we see now grew up reading those books and so they refer to it because they know other people their age know what they mean.

Rowling obviously had to do some nasty initiation for the ZOG blackmail camera in order to make it big. Now ZOG is using her and the retarded tendency of Humans to worship celebrities to propagandize their agenda.

0/10
saged

This is what I meant. Obviously the plot has a billion holes and some characters are one dimensional, but there's a reason it's the biggest children's series ever. It touches on certain narrative and character archetypes that are immediately appealing for starters, Jordan Peterson talks a lot about this. But the overall flow is very easy to follow, and it's generally just exciting for children to read. That's what I meant by "well written".
To an extent achieving a story that hundreds of millions of children enjoy is an act of genius, or crazy luck. I wasn't implying it's crime & punishment or whatever, fuck.

Harry Potter is for nerds.

in the context of the book it made sense though, considering wizards can be born of two non wizards

white people can't be born of two niggers though, so this analogy fails

B8 sage this shit.

Read it a long time ago before coming to Sup Forums thought most of the charaters were stupid to not realise that less MAGIC blood means less magic overall.
JK also pretty dumb

Honestly ive been thinking about this for the past few days idk why but i have.

This bitch could really get a whole new teen cast and reshoot the movies, i'd imagine it would be full with niggers though.

No she didn't you retard, children are naturally liberal until they grow up

>it was well written

Fuck off and read some decent books amerifat.