According to MW, you can't criticize Christianity, because it offends people. Therefore, Christopher Hitchens was a bad person. It's totally okay to criticize other things that offends people but not Christianity, apparently, because Christianity is so damn sacred (even for a non-believer like MW).
I honestly don't know what to think of him after watching this. This is the first video of his that I've disliked. He went full retard in this clip.
Man do I want to fuck her throat. Her body's gross but I'd go balls deep between those lips Also 6
Brayden Lopez
Am I not allowed to call someone out for acting like a complete retard?
Andrew Diaz
That is not at all what he says in the video you fucking moron. Did you make this thread too?
Samuel Bell
WHO IS SHE
Thomas Long
Yes it is. It is exactly what he says you fucking idiot.
And no, I did not create that thread.
Benjamin Carter
>Being this new
Justin Williams
Zoe Quinn, some skank from the beginning of Gamergate. Did some porn but she's really fucking ugly in it, judging by those tits she might look better now.
Austin Cruz
No he is not saying that. At no point does he say you can't criticize Christianity. You're a complete liar.
What he wants is a society with moral homogeneity as opposed the nihilistic society we have now where anything goes. You're another nihilistic millennial scumfuck if you don't understand what he is talking about.
Xavier Hughes
Nah, it's the makeup and picture, man. No adult woman undergoes that kind of transformation.
Jackson Roberts
>oh noo i'm not one of the 24/7 neckbeards...
Elijah Rogers
She looks nothing like the picture anyway bro. You're wasting your time on this degenerate cunt.
Nolan Peterson
That image cracks me up, half of those people talk shit and denounce the other half. This meme describes nupol perfectly too, because they have no clue what differentiates the ideas around them. Anyone criticizing anyone = shareblue. If it wasn't so cringe, and spreading like a cancer, it would be funny.
Alexander Garcia
isn't he that 35 years old unemployed nigga that lived with his momma? saged very hard
Ian Perry
He shits on Hitchens and other atheists for doing just that. For not stopping because someone gets offended by them criticizing their beliefs. You are obviously very stupid, so I don't think there's any real point in arguing with you, but anyway.
Michael Gutierrez
look its another eceleb shill thread fucking christ
Justin Foster
>He shits on Hitchens and other atheists for doing just that You're a retard. He shits on them for taking pleasure in being offensive not because they dared criticize Christianity. He never says they should've stopped because they offended people. You are either misunderstanding what he is saying because you're low IQ or you're intentionally misinterpreting. In either case you should kill yourself.
I don't even give a fuck what's true or not about any of your alt-lite husbandos and waifus, you strike me as a thoroughly cancerous NEET autist. How do you stay awake 24/7 to shill for youtube celebs? Are you some kind of refugee they pay to patrol Sup Forums, "correcting the record" for them?
Owen Foster
>criticize Woes It's a character Shareblue assassination!!!
Not sure if bait, or if Sup Forums has unironically become like this....
Ian Taylor
You are the one willfully misunderstanding what he's saying. He calls out atheists for offending people, he NEVER calls out the alt-right for doing just that. He has never done it, because in that case, he deems it okay.
He's also wrong about Hitchens, whose purpose was not to offend people, but to make people realize how fucking retarded Christianity and other religions are.
Eli Brooks
>wrong about Hitchens I hope that piece of kike shit who praised the Dresden bombing and other war crimes against Germans rots in hell. I'm an atheist, but that rotten asshole couldn't die soon enough.
Charles Lopez
>meme flag >no arguments, just personal attacks Yep, it's a kike. Shoo shoo, kike.
He doesn't find the "fuck yeah let's offend people" schtick impressive, never has no matter who did it. Because it's nihilistic and doesn't build towards a society with moral homogeneity. That's all he is arguing for.
Isaiah Brown
OH NOES ITS A SHAREBLUE CHARACTER ASSASINATION ON BASED HITCHENS OH NO SOMEONE DOESN"T LIKE WHO I LIKE OH NOE ITS A PAID ASSAULT BY SHAREBLUE LEFTYPOL CTR BERNIE BROS REDDIT ISIS RUSSIA PUTIN NORTH KOREA!!!!!!
Do you deny that you're the same Fingol in every thread?
Jeremiah Wood
That image is one of the funniest ones on all of Sup Forums
Aiden Sanchez
Guess you'll have to update your memes, kike. Why are you hiding your flag? Is it Israel?
Dylan Bennett
Why should people criticise their own culture into complete irrelevance?
Adrian Hill
>Cucktianity >My (((culture))) pic one
Anyway whatever. Not gonna sit through a no content thread with finnknight around. Bye
Matthew Brown
you've missed the point of his video.
hint: it's making the comparison that trying to always be offensive in order to normalize degeneracy is left-progressive behaviour, and that right-wing conservatives have spent too long just taking it, as long as they can have their spaces.
coincidentally, Sup Forums has always used this method of being hyper-offensive in order to trigger groups. it's actually one of the biggest reasons why Sup Forums has made such an impact.
the only reason people here would view it as him becoming SJW is because they hate the idea that constant shitposting is actually retarded.
>t. aussie
Jaxson Campbell
Is this really the same person in these threads? The memes are real, this place is full of autistic NEETs.
Hunter Turner
They deconstruct and insult everything, the religion held in Europe for 1,500-2,000 years is just a single aspect.
They also deconstruct the idea of whiteness, why not do something about that?
Adam Morgan
You're really bad at this. "I honestly don't know what to think" is a huge tell. No one except a concern troll has ever said that. It's not your only one.
Bentley Ross
To follow a Chesterton analogy, when the left dismantled the fence the right just used the wood as clubs rather than rebuild it.
Parker Hughes
Literally impossible outside of a racially homogeneous society. Then again, I do believe a "white" Christian society could work, where you have multiple white European nationalities mixed together.
Otherwise the moral homogeneity will never happen.
Tyler Miller
>Literally impossible outside of a racially homogeneous society That's what Millennial Woes advocates for.
Samuel Clark
What's his plan to repatriate the brown masses in white countries?
Austin Nguyen
OP is a kike angry that someone is defending Christianity for once.
Isaiah Clark
He thinks it's okay when Sup Forums or "alt-righters" offend people for the sake of it, but not when atheists do it. This is because he agrees with Sup Forums/"alt-righters" and not with atheists.
Anthony Cook
Wait, do they actually pay you to correct the record?
Wyatt Lee
Millennial woes is a sodomite. Defending Christianity is no reason to hate him. Nothing more Jewish than hating Jesus
Jack Cooper
Not sure what you're asking. I would imagine it would at first be financial incentives and if that doesn't work, forceful repatriation at the end of a gun.
Andrew Williams
Who?
David Thompson
Unsurprising, the guy can't even explain why he deserves to exist.
Justin Watson
All the ecelebs you correct the record for, do they pay you? Is it your business? How do I get some of those shekels?
Jack Gomez
She's been working out, now she has digivolved into a butterface.
Jacob Jenkins
a feminist sjw cunt named zoe quinn. she's the whore responsible for gamergate and the recent collective push for censorship in gaming.
Ryan Nguyen
Maybe I'm just not a lying shitbag and I am annoyed when people spread false information? Is that a difficult concept for you to comprehend?
Cameron Myers
You could. Just have something she wants and she'll suck the chrome off your trailer hitch before you can say "Five Guys".
Henry Morales
Jew with nazi memeflag. Cares more about pro-Christianity than ethno-nationalism. Fuck you, Fuck your parasite race, and fucking sage shill threads.
Nicholas Lewis
>Maybe I'm just not a lying shitbag You sound way too upset, it weird. >I am annoyed when people spread false information So you correct the record, I'm trying to find out if you do it for free. >Is that a difficult concept for you to comprehend Yes and no. It's easy to see what you're doing, and that you're the same person in multiple threads. It's just really hard to understand why anyone would waste their life trying to keep piss out of our sea of piss. I'm just curious what mental state results in your type of behavior.
Jeremiah Mitchell
>pro-white >defends a sodomite This is why I love the alt-right. So tolerant!
Christian Thompson
Kikes/commies/Shareblue try to subvert this board for a reason. It's not irrelevant. It's not just memes. It's not 2007 anymore.
Carson Young
No he does it for free. It's his hobby.
Robert Martin
>tfw Zoe Quinn is hot now
Gavin Diaz
Damn, Zoe Quinn looks like THAT?
Grayson Jones
Did you actually watch the video before mass disliking it with all of your sock accounts? >106 dislikes already This is brigading. OP is a shill.
Luke Ward
Zoe Quinn sex bot when?
Josiah James
Sjw doesn't really mix with christianity. These blasphemers must be burnt at the stake
Austin King
christfag?
Landon Adams
>Kikes/commies/Shareblue try to subvert this board You make me want to role play as each of those just to see how much I can wind you up.
Anthony Adams
Also when will they make a sex doll of her, asking for a friend
Sebastian Davis
So what you are saying is that we shoud let them shit this place up with even more disinfo because it is full of shit and disinfo already? No.
Hudson Wright
>Finkike >Latkike The two of you always appear together, it's weird.
Easton Rodriguez
You'd get bored long before that would happen.
David Diaz
>Damn, Zoe Quinn looks like THAT?
No. She was able to get a picture of herself to look like that. Very different thing. You could spend the next ten years with her and never see what you're seeing in that picture.
Levi Nelson
I don't know that he's approached this from the right perspective, but I've always felt this is an important discussion. The real question is, 'Does free speech have a qualifier?' And in terms of the liberal conception of free speech, the answer is, of course, yes. For Mill the qualifier was essentially a combination of progressing knowledge and self-improvement, so it is a qualified freedom of individualism and science. Where freedom of speech rests now is more along the lines of, 'I have the liberty to say whatever I want, even if it is offensive.' The qualifier of freedom here is essentially selfish liberty and the pursuit of egoist joy.
Taken to its extreme this can result in the contrarian perspectives we see today. Many believe that 'whatever is the opposite of the establishment is right and true.' This is a reactionary perspective, and essentially the precise opposite of what Mill was suggesting. It is also the flipside of the liberal-marxist idea that 'opinions that infringe on the pursuit of equality must be shut down.' (Which is, again, just a contradiction to the perspective of Mill.)
Which brings me to the question of freedom. Shouldn't free speech be fundamentally tied to the notion of freedom? It is quite clear that the dominant positions today have no interest in freedom itself, or at least the liberty of contrarian positions takes precedence over the idea and pursuit of freedom. My own understanding is that freedom of speech should entail the attempt to say what is true and good - because freedom entails not only self-improvement and knowledge, but a specific type of these areas that can overcome falsehood and evil. As such, there is already a necessary limit on what can be said, and by its very nature freedom of speech has nothing to do with 'saying whatever you want to.' The latter is the freedom of fools.
1/cont'd
Anthony Perez
I believe she has had some work done
Brody Morales
wrong board
Andrew Wright
it's a forced meme
Jayden Johnson
Probably yeah. Enjoy your cancer finfaggot, I gotta go to work. Get a job and a girlfriend. You're going to anhero if you spend your life on this board doing it for free.
Austin Wood
Finally you memed me too. About fucking time.
No argument then? Just ad-hominems?
Tyler Edwards
Don't care. I don't listen to Millennial Woes. I think he is a gross fat NEET who doesn't add any value to anything. >boohoo, a dumb youtuber is being a hypocrite Whatever dude. Whether this is a shill character assassination thread, or just some e-celeb bullshit, who the fuck cares? Stop talking about people and talk about ideas.
Cameron Cooper
>No argument then? Just ad-hominems? You and finkike constantly ask, right before you use ad homs. Your strategy of boring me to death is crude, but effective. You win this time Kosher Internet Defense Force.
Evan Butler
damn so fucking hot i would give up Sup Forums to be with that damn
Oliver Carter
I know this girl. Please remove this pic.
Grayson Hall
Calling a shill a shill ain't an ad-hom, but deflecting a topic by attacking the person raising an argument is.
Nolan Harris
Sure are a lot of Latvians, Leafs, and Finns in this thread (just forcing Finnkike to find some new proxies)
>NEET noises No one fucking cares, newfag. You're too autistic to learn how this board works if you think you're fighting a crusade against "subversive shills". This is who we've always been, you're just too new to understand it.
Ian Brown
e-celeb and youtuber bullshit should only be allowed in /bant/
sage you fucking faggot. die.
Camden Bennett
I'm an ex- christcuck, but you cannot deny, that it was white christian culture that gave us the constitution and america as we know it. The downfall of religion and rise of atheism is just what marxism wants. like it or not, we need christianity.
Samuel Gomez
>we've always been /leftypol/ rejects shitting up Sup Forums with character assassination threads insulting irrelevant youtubers because irrelevant youtubers scare us What did he mean by this?
Jonathan Smith
because like it or not, people are fucking retarded and need religion to tell them right from wrong, and not to have babies before marriage.
Brayden Fisher
>AnCap >Libertardianism that's (((pol)))
Christian Perry
now remove the makeup and perfect angle
Jordan Jenkins
Freedom does not exist without the freedom to fail. Freedom works because it makes people take responsibility for their own lives, they reap what they sow. This is the case with free speech too, even if you wish to connect it with a greater goal. In a free discourse, truth persists. Attempting to guide it is at best useless, at worst counterproductive.
Evan Butler
>Christianity is fundamental to our civilization >"hey guise, let's just fuckin' like kick out the pillars from under this building lol" >"WE CANT! WHAT? WE REMOVED A BRICK FROM THAT PILE OF DIRT OVER THERE WHY CANT WE REMOVE THE CORNERSTONE FROM THIS GIANT HOUSE?"
Blake Powell
spics are super christian and look at them m8
Easton Morales
>it's all just shitposting!!!
Except you know it's not. You know about JIDF, Media Matters, Shareblue etc. You're just playing dumb by pretending there are no actual shills here.
Caleb Edwards
Cont'd 2 One very interesting position is that of the Frankfurt School (I know, I know, but interest doesn't mean I am saying they are correct). One of their most cited texts from the opposition suggests that tolerance is a necessary component of free speech. It is not what critics suggest, not that the minority is always right, but that the situational minority must be tolerated and defended. The ideas of those in the current minority must be defended, which suggests that this is a fluid understanding of freedom and dialectics. Although this suggests an overdetermined support of opposition as a form of freedom, it is also interesting to consider how this perspective is closer to the original liberal conception of free speech than anything promoted by liberals or conservatives. And perhaps most interesting, it is the precise perspective that has caused the Alt-Right: people are moving towards Alt-Right ideology not because it is necessarily right or in the interests of freedom, but because it defends the situational minority which is under threat.
The obvious problem here is the negational and defensive understanding of freedom. Bureaucratised liberty has become the replacement for freedom, and people no longer even pursue any positive creative endeavours with freedom at the core.
Which suggests the most important question, do people even understand what freedom is anymore? Can anyone here give me a definition of freedom and how freedom of speech helps with the pursuit of that? I think one of the reasons people get offended is the underlying stupidity of how and why things are said, not necessarily what is said.
Juan Hughes
Again, completely ignore my arguments and proceed to attack my (nonexistent) person. You really are in no place to lecture anyone here about how this board works if you yourself are a hypocrite extraordinaire who employs tactics that would work only in non-anonymous chatrooms and forums.
Liam Thomas
>The obvious problem here is the negational and defensive understanding of freedom >defensive understanding of freedom Negative liberties are by definition defensive.
Logan Davis
>hating on based finnbro i bet you shill against norsebro as well, cunts
Jason Clark
I thought that's who it was. She looks better now. Her porn name was locke for anyone interested. Apparently she had a bj video too but I've never found it.
Wyatt Gonzalez
Reminder that Europeans were a bunch of white nigger savages living in huts and chucking spears at each other until Christianity showed up.
Julian Ortiz
I don't think this works. How can anyone take the responsibility for themselves if they do not understand what responsibility means? And if the definition is tied to the concept of failure then there will inevitably be a push towards failure, 'Try again, fail again. Fail better.'
You are defining truth as the pursuit to say anything the collective wants, which is circular logic. it is true because truth is pursued. Which implies that truth does not even need to be pursued, as it exists in the definition.
Isaiah Hughes
I stopped watching when he started to talk about Hitchens and misrepresanted his beliefs and world view. I just think MW was wrong as he was wrong on many points before that so it was just enough to me. Doesn't mean I can't agree with his other videos, doesn't mean the info on other videos is wrong. I just don't worship any content creator and if I disagree with someone about something, I can move on as an adult. I use youtube to listen different ideas on subject matters that interest me. One video doesn't turn me off, not even two. But if the content creator goes full TYT or TJ (Kirk) and I just find the content to be too disagreeable and not entertaining, I just move on.
Seriously how many content creators you have that you agree 100% the time, because I'm yet to find a single one. That's not even the goal.
William Baker
I recognize these people and their tactics. These faggots do not actually believe in JIDF, shareblue etc, these people are from /leftypol/ These autistic sub-humans simply come here and they pretend to be regular Sup Forums users by trying and failing to mimic what they see on Sup Forums Just look at what these people post. They hide behind ''Nazi'' and other meme flags, and the second anyone picks up on the fact that these people don't belong these /leftypol/ faggots start calling everyone a shill and insulting their flags, but they're overdoing it to the point its comical.
These people act the way people in their /leftypol/ echochamber believe people act. These people believe that we sit around all day calling everyone a shill for having a different opinion and going ''hurr ur flag is Finland, ur a fucking Fin LOL FIN!!! FIN!!!'' These people are legit autistic.
Camden Davis
nice cherry
Jeremiah Barnes
even if that was true and I guess in some cases it is. you have to remember that blood is thicker than water.
William Lopez
Not necessarily, they can result in more serious methods of attack - but attack without defined purpose.