The Alt-Right needs to disavow homosex

I'm sick of this rainbow bullshit being our official flag. The Alt-Right was supposed to be this really clever way to bring about the 4th Reich. All it is now is a bunch of fag-enablers and assorted degeneracy for the sake of "muh PR". We're being subverted, not the other way around. If we don't purge faggots from our ranks, instead of the 4th Reich we'll have The Dildo Reich. Don't let it happen to us familia. Bigchasers need to be purged.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/orZVG
counter-currents.com/2017/09/greg-johnson-interviewed/
counter-currents.com/2017/09/under-cover-with-the-alt-right/
youtube.com/watch?v=oN4w8e432_o
soundcloud.com/user-684478690/the-third-jimpact-the-third-jimpact
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

saged
Nice fake spencer account
And i think he's a kike shill
>fuck off with your bait

>Nice fake spencer account
You're not too bright, huh?
archive.is/orZVG

As the notorious hacker Sup Forums, leader of the alt-Right, I disavow homosex.
there...

Sup Forums disavows the Alt-Kike.

(((spencer))) and the (((rebel))) retards have my permission to die.

How can the alt-right be pro-gay -- isn't that a contradiction somehow?

Who literally cares? You have straightfags who won't even touch the JQ.

>9 months into the current year
>still posting this out of context bs
Spencer's git plenty of flaws but the shills are fucking retarded still pushing this.

The alt-right was always a trick to subvert the far-right and 3rd position. It's run by a bunch of gay liberals who drop Sup Forums memes for street cred. What did any of you gullible faggots expect?

>muh context
Everyone has seen this shit "in context" for 9 months, that damage control doesn't work anymore. Even Daily Stormer admits he's a clown: archive.is/PwiwG

Nothin' wrong with a little homosex, user. Live a little and 69 with another man once..... it's fun!

LGBT have to go

of all the groups in the SJW coalition, they are probably the most purely degenerate and opposed to any sort of restoration of the West

i'm not saying they're the most powerful, just that their vision of an ideal society is the more purely evil than that of hysterical feminists who are at least trying to prevent rape or minority activists who just can't accept the race-IQ link

I some how always knew you'd be australian

WRONG. the alt-right are a bunch of secret homos who are secretly up for the BBC

Do other gay right-wingers actually think you ethnonationalists are our friends? I wouldn't touch the alt-right with a 10 foot pole. You dumb niggers think people like anglin and weev are decent leaders for your movement.

Reminder to other gays: buy a gun.

the alt-right has been dead since charlottesville

yeah, so you can shoot yourselves you filthy faggots

>buy a gun
>leaf flag
I thought guns (and fire extinguishers) were banned in your gay republic.

source?

I've read that 6 to 10 percent of the population agree that the Alt Right did nothing wrong.

And 4% agree with gneo-nazism.
>4% of people openly admit to being nazis

The alt right will exist for as long as the media gives it attention

This is true. 25 million or so people.

you'll get a chest full of buckshot through my frontdoor if you ever stepped foot on my property

>you'll get a chest full of buckshot through my frontdoor
And they'll sentence you to give your home to an immigrant family as punishment.

>implying I wouldn't be subtle about it

>the alt-right has been dead since charlottesville

thanks to neo-nazis and kkk.
every thing they latch on to they fuck it up.
reform party, tea party, and now the alt-right.

We will find a cure for it!

>thanks to neo-nazis and kkk
What did they do?

he's a kike, let him do his job

>The Alt-Right was supposed to be this really clever way to bring about the 4th Reich.
The "Alt-Right" is a media term invented to separate Trump supporters from the Republican party you shit eating kike. Make your shilling less obvious.

I just want to hear what the "Nazis and KKK" did. I didn't know they did anything to anyone there that day. Seems like Antifa did stuff to them, not the other way around.

Lol, Trump supporters are separate from the Republican party.

Some fat girl got murdered by a neo nazi who was upset that his circlejerk was being interupted, and because the rest of the alt-right has no class, morals or integrity, they immediately took to the internet to damage control. Writing articles saying she deserved it, that it was a false flag, resulting in Stormfront being shutdown and pretty much destroying any outside interest in the movement by showing their true colors.

...

The Alt-right needs to disavow homosexuality and purge them from their ranks. All of the degeneracy that we see happening is because of homosexuals and their allies. This rise in transexualism is happening because of the support of homosexuals. Hell, homos keep harassing bakeries to cater to them under the threat of prosecution. Enough is enough.

with all the other issues, faggotry is the least of my concern. let people live their lives how they see fit, you totalitarian cuckolds.

>Some fat girl got murdered by a neo nazi
She got scared and had a heart attack. Turns out the car never touched her. Her mom admitted it.
>bunch of butthurt tl;dr
What I asked was what the Nazis and KKK did, you just spewed a bunch of insults and didn't answer the question.

>let people live their lives how they see fit
So you're pro-pedo?

Alt-right is a jewish term for goyim they control, made up by Paul (((Gottfried))), who also made up the word paleoconservative, look it up.
No one jew wise uses these terms unironically.
Get a brain.

It works really well when getting the point across. It means pro-white, anti-semitic.

The moron still plowed through a crowd of people for no reason. Even if he didn't kill anyone, there is no way you can say that is a sane or humane decision. He set out to injure someone. Yeah, her mom said she died of a heart attack but never said anything about not getting hit by a car. That was Sup Forums desperately trying to cherry pick different pictures and quotes from the interview so their little alt-right angels could get away with driving a car through a crowd of people.

As for Nazis/KKK, are you dumb? These don't exist, but there were a bunch of alt-right basement dwellers playing dress up and cosplaying as such and possibly one (two if you count Spencer) CIA plant with a Nazi flag. The whole thing was set up to destroy the alt-right and Trump presidency and dumbshits fell for it without a second thought.

Counter-point: you should get over it. Not the pride parade lunacy or tranny delusions, that shit I support getting rid of. But wanting to purge your already tiny ranks of people who agree with you on 99% of the issues just because they're attracted to the same sex is pants on head retarded.

if you are white and know about the jews i don't care if you look cute in a dress

>facts are damage control
I also said he has plenty of flaws you stupid nigger.

I'm glad Milo threads died.
>abloo bloo bloo why don't you like my pedo fag hero milo
>he does more good than harm a bloo bloo bloo
Disgusting fag was a contradictory to any conservative that isn't a pop-culture subhuman.

...

How about Ironmarch deal with their muslim members first

I'll take homosexuals any day over jewish child mutilators.

Pic related is TRUE sexual degeneracy.

fake but spencer is seriously gay and his dating a russian tranny, america is doomed

Ironmarch doesn't allow Muslims, that's why that one went allahu snackbar, because they kicked him out for converting and he got too triggered.

Homos are the majority of pedos. Didn't you learn anything from Milo?

>fake
Look for yourself: archive.is/orZVG

Alt-right does disavow homosexuality.
Why are you presenting that as if Spencer approves of it? Spencer hates Milo.

>Alt-right does disavow homosexuality.
How so?

Funny how the people posting this garbage never post this tweet. They must've seen it if they searched for Spencer mentioning homosexuality.

They cherrypick the ones that fit their false narrative.

> 10 years until a majority conservative backlash
I don't know, man. The SJW's may need physical removal before we see anything like NS Germany's rise.

If anything, Western Parliaments and Congress have carefully constructed things to avoid such sweeping changes. We may have to go underground soon if the Internet keeps getting choked out.

All that shows is that he's wishy washy on the issue. Clearly he said other things that defend homos or dismiss them as a non-issue. Clearly they are a serious issue. So how does that make sense, if you say the ant-right "disavows" when their statements range from approval to "neutrality"?

>We may have to go underground soon
There is no underground once the internet is choked off.

No, it was a term developed by paleoconservatives in a call for a new reactionary form of conservatism after the death of "paleoconservatives" around 2008. It was coined by Paul Gottfried. Richard Spencer (yes, THAT Spencer) took it and ran with it.

counter-currents.com/2017/09/greg-johnson-interviewed/

That's certainly way too gay.

>There is no underground once the internet is choked off.
WN and others existed before the Internet and could likely organize without access to the clearnet. Sneakernets, mesh networks, Tor, anything's possible.

I just worry it'll spook off 90% of potential converts and lead to a """third option""" soon to be offered by the GOP in 2022.

>The Alt-Right was supposed to be this really clever way to bring about the 4th Reich

No it wasn't, it's literally just a made up term from some unaffiliated random guy's blog from years ago that the media used to term and then villify Sup Forums-like thought. It's now just an automatic OFF SWITCH to any productive conversation for half of the population if they think any of your ideas are similar to the media-manufactured straw-man. It's the same as racist/nazi/bigot/etc.

Note, Richard Spencer, the government-installed de facto "leader of the alt-right" that appeared immediately after the media adopted the term. Oh wow, all he does are things that make this manufactured group look bad, nothing odd about that at all.

If they try to ban us from the internet its a pre-cursor to cracking down on us IRL. It's possible that could work out in our favor PR-wise, but it's a coin toss. If they try to criminalize wrong think, then every last shred of the Constitution is dead, and all oaths to obey the government are void.

Saying "it's a minor issue compared to our real problems" is not the same as "approving" homosexuality.

It's not a minor problem though. It's bright red line. You're playing semantic games to dismiss or gaslight the issue. It makes more sense just to discuss it openly. Spencer very clearly has no problems with homosexuals. The alt-right clearly doesn't either because they permit so many homosexuals in their highest ranks. They don't discourage it, and they infight about it, so there's obviously a lot of acceptance of it. Spencer is vague or approving of it. Greg Johnson is gay and Spener works with him a great deal. Jack Donavan is openly gay, and Spencer works with him too. He dismisses homosex as a non-issue, that's not the action of someone who thinks its wrong. Be honest, don't waste my time now.

He considers it a non-issue compared to the bigger issues. In his mind it's something to discuss when the race issue is solved.

>He considers it a non-issue compared to the bigger issues
Why would he have to choose between "bigger things" and homos being in the movement? That's a really big thing to most people. He's telling people to ignore homos as a non-issue, when he doesn't have to. He's signalling people to approve of it and not resist homos in the alt-right.

>implying homos don't destroy our race
that's pretty bluepilled m8

He's making a calculation that individuals like Greg Johnson are so useful to the race issue debate that who he fucks in private doesn't matter.

Daily reminder these e-celebs pull more people to the Alt-Right than anyone posting on this board.
Blaming Spencer for Charlottesville is the same as blaming Trump for Hillary not getting elected.

Gas the kikes, race war now. Deal with Fags later.
I'm okay with this.

Generally inclined to agree. He's one of the few people in the movement who responded to the """totally epic infiltration""" reported in the New York times with something other than stonewalling. Namely, "If he came to us as a left-wing reporter, I'm pretty sure we'd have told him exactly what we did 'in confidence'."

counter-currents.com/2017/09/under-cover-with-the-alt-right/

>He's making a calculation
That's the problem, he's betraying on a major issue related to the health of our race. What's the difference between letting in based gays and based jews, or based blacks if he "calculates" that it helps us? What if letting in trannies and muslimes helps us? What if being pro-pedo helps our race?
>inb4 those things don't help
Having gays in a movement is cancer. You're sowing the seeds of your own demise by being so morally flexible. No one actually needs a bunch of based cancer.
> who he fucks in private doesn't matter
Even if he fucks little boys?

>Deal with Fags later.
>I'm okay with this
If you let fags in, your race dies. If you let kikes it, your race dies. How are you all so confused about such basic things -- oh that's right, based Spencer told you some fags were based.

>letting in based gays and based jews, or based blacks if he "calculates" that it helps us? What if letting in trannies and muslimes helps us? What if being pro-pedo helps our race?
Totally disingenuous argument, those are not even close to being the equivalent. You are not arguing in good faith.

>Even if he fucks little boys?
Do you have proof of him fucking little boys?

It's an insane non-issue. You have one (1) faggot in the movement, who's saying exactly what a non-faggot would say.

By the way, Greg Johnson is the only reason we're having this discussion. There's no gays in the Alt Right. There's Greg Johnson in the Alt Right.

>Totally disingenuous argument
No, I really, really meant it.
>those are not even close to being the equivalent
They obviously are, since the slippery slope has already been applied to letting in certain "based jews", and based "other things". The truly disingenuous argument is that these fags "care more about their race than buttsex" because if that was true, we would never hear about them being gay. Instead, what we get is them arguing that gays are fine, gays to so much for movement, muh based gays, etc. If they truly cared about the health of their race, they'd publicly say gays should be institutionalized because of the threat they post to society. They would say "no gays in the alt-right because it kills our moral credibility". Instead they shill that "some gays are /ourgays/". That's the truly disingenuous argument here.

>You have one (1) faggot in the movement
There's far more than one, and they seem to want more to join.
>who's saying exactly what a non-faggot would say
No he's not, all the alt-right fags are pro faggotry. They aren't taking vows of celibacy and saying "if you're gay don't fuck men". They're doing like they always did before, and telling you all to be fine with it. And you're actually listening to them, that's the insane part.

Greg Johnson isn't the only fag in the alt-right.

>Do you have proof of him fucking little boys?
If I did, would you still accept him, because "what he does in private is ok"?

You're on a forum with a gay flag banner.
Please do kill yourself.

Sage

Fuck.

I'm willing to have Greg Johnson as our Milo, but if it's widespread then the Alt Right needs to fuck off.

I remember a Jared Taylor interview on Red Ice where they tip toed around the topic of faggotry. I thought they were just covering for Johnson.

>They obviously are
No, a jew or a black guy in white nationalism is not the same as a gay guy because they pose no threat to the race.
>Instead, what we get is them arguing that gays are fine, gays to so much for movement, muh based gays, etc
This is not what they argue though, all you have is some private messages where Woes says there are good gays out there, he has never said that homosexuality should be accepted by society.
Obviously not

Hell, Spencer called himself the new Milo in one of the latest podcasts.

The SA was largely run by homosexuals in the 20s and early 30s. Don't you know history, user?

Shit, is that why they appeal to emotion so much?

This is what I'm saying. Homosex is seriously fucking cancer, its literally killing our race to tolerate it. Its a weapon against anyone taught to tolerate it, that's why Cultural Marxist do too. If GJ or whoever kept their degeneracy private, or denounced it as said "gays get out" and then didn't fuck other men, then fine. But they don't do that, they argue "gays do so much for us, they care about race more than buttsex" -- well, maybe there are Jews who "care about white people more than Jews" but they have no place in a pro-white movement. We need to practice what we preach, and if we practice tolerating degneracy then we are degenerates too.

Anyone who doesn't realize just how degenerate gays really are should watch this:
youtube.com/watch?v=oN4w8e432_o

>gay men pose no threat to the race
wew lad
>wouldn't accept Greg Johnson if he fucks little kids "in private"
Why not, if you accept one form of degeneracy, especially homos who are disproportionately pedophiles too, why draw the line at one and not the other? Why accept any form of degeneracy, and pretend it doesn't hurt our race? Homos are natural agents of subversion. Everyone here knows this.

Richard Spencer is gay. We all know it.

He also sucks at speaking, and is an all around embarrassment

I know faggots are pure cancer, but I thought it was just Johnson, and the rest were just effeminate. They're all faggots, aren't they?

Not all of them. I don't even think Spencer is really gay, I just think he's morally flexible. And probably a closet liberal, just a racist one.

Fucking children and being a fag are not on the same level of degeneracy.

>They're all faggots, aren't they?
You haven't heard this yet:
soundcloud.com/user-684478690/the-third-jimpact-the-third-jimpact

Only Woes and Johnson are confirmed to have engaged in homosex and Woes is bisexual and looking for a woman to marry.

>Fucking children and being a fag are not on the same level of degeneracy.
They're both degeneracy, and not that far apart. Why are you excusing one because its kept private, but not the other if it's kept private?

>The Alt-Right was supposed to be this really clever way to bring about the 4th Reich
Kill yourself, nazi LARPer. All nazis disavowed the alt-right until they wanted to co-opt it. Kill all socialists.

The Gates of Poz must NEVER prevail
Every homosex should be assumed a subversive

I understand why the Night of the Long Dildoes happened now. I was called gay in HS (because virgin), which fucked with my gaydar. My jewdar is state of the art though.

>Only Woes and Johnson are confirmed to have engaged in homosex
Jack Donovan, Brendan Kissam the "Fashy Faggot", and Ghoul are gay.

Spencer is gay. Unquestionably. But his biggest problem is that he just isn't a leader. He's weak, unintelligent, and petty.

His whole role seems to be going on tv and embarrassing white people.

>Homosexuality has been a part of European societies and culture for millennia.

Counter argument: so has been pedophilia. Often linked with homosexuality.

Where is that Kissam quote from? Why does that picture dishonestly include the upper tweet when it's obvious Spencer is not defending homosexuality with that tweet? I don't appreciate psy-ops like that.

>dishonestly
You're trying too hard to shill. Are you saying Brendan Kissam isn't gay?

Fags are like 1% of the population, they literally do not matter.