Let me guess: It wasn't REAL socialism?

Let me guess: It wasn't REAL socialism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rJ1nlgIj7D0
youtube.com/watch?v=jmNmGEf-gSg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP
youtube.com/watch?v=FFm_4E5WiQE
youtube.com/watch?v=QqHqCyjeugI
youtube.com/watch?v=u_LHwKxcOIM
youtube.com/watch?v=YR_LrB4tfew
youtu.be/FKn_XxYRe1o
youtube.com/watch?v=ZoPyi7yGjSo
youtube.com/watch?v=9jhogG3evd8
youtube.com/watch?v=E5dGzDcF2kQ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Hitler was 95% reunification plebiscites after he abolished democracy. His regime was an overwhelming success and it took the entire world funding, feeding, and arming the Red Army to take down tiny little National Socialist Germany. Not to mention the million tons of bombs we dropped on his women and children.

youtube.com/watch?v=rJ1nlgIj7D0

Hitler won

...

>people answering a phone poll = votes and seats in government
Wow user, great image

Wages high no unemployment good socual benefits, economy booming, industrial expansion, world army, world production, free edu, free healthy, wlrld scientists, brought a new tech era, gibe me 1 bad thing about nsdap that isnt because they hated a nomenclature.

of course it wasn't because the economy was booming and they weren't starving

That freedom includes hordes of illiterates and undevelopment less than an african country with all wealth concentrated in a few.

>national socialism
>not socialism
Hmmmm

Hitler predicted exactly what would happen to America seventy some odd years ago.

youtube.com/watch?v=jmNmGEf-gSg

I have no idea all I'm saying is that they were on the path to great prosperity.

National Socialism had a free market for consumer goods but the German Labour Front (a NSDAP organization) lobbied heavily for their workers and the state would intervene to arbitrate any disputes that couldn't be solved internally. They nationalized all banking and virtually all insurance. They had a currency pegged to a basket of goods so the German worker would never lose his purchasing power ever again.

The NSDAP taxed the 'worker' (farmer -> lawyer) far less than the most lolbert county, in the most lolbert state, in the most lolbert country. They required industry to match production to consumption and forbade social dumping (partly forced due to mass international Jewish boycotts) and this and the guaranteed sustenance government work turned out to be the solution to unemployment. The NSDAP solved unemployment for the first and only time in history.

A shoemaker in 1936 Germany got more vacation time (and free vacations at state owned KDF oceanliners/vacation camps than I get in 2017 as a boilermaker in one of the richest countries in the world.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP

...

...

SACRIFICE - National Socialism

youtube.com/watch?v=FFm_4E5WiQE

...

...

...

...

Quit the diarrhea. Are you a communist?

It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave and the world will know that I was right.

Yes it was because natsoc Germany was very successful.

>supports socialism
>think's hes not a bolshevik

it was real autism

This mindset is why America is irredeemable. Your lolbert garbage was invented by communist kikes and their endgame was always Jewish communism.

With the collapse of Christianity and small communities some kikes argued for complete government control, and some kikes argued for no government control. Both had the same endgame in mind and Hitler warned that both paths would lead to extinction. NSDAP Germany taxed labour income at nearly half the rate of the average American income tax burden. They nationalized their banks and taxed unearned (passive) income heavily.

The jewish finance system?this motherfucker knew wtf is this

...

shills or idiots

>This mindset is why America is irredeemable.
They've really fucked us up. My felllow "right wing" burgers are so scared of the world "socialism", and just the word alone. It's a boogeyman at this point.

English is my third language. I'm working on it.

I mean if you want to get technical, no. It wasn't real socialism because it wasn't Marxism.

The lolbert shilling allowed American media to be completely bought up by kikes without resistance. It killed the immigration debate when it was still fixable. It split churches. It allowed kikes to vacuum up hundreds of billions in goyim assets.

>not real socialism ree
Back to leftypol

youtube.com/watch?v=QqHqCyjeugI

Oswald Mosley - Fascism .. which he considered as another term for NatSoc

I mean, if we have to pinpoint one very specific form of socialism without addressing any branching off.

What this thread is really about is meritocracy, being called socialism. Probably a poor choice on the part of Hitler in the first place.

...

Hitler was undoubtedly a socialist, unfortunately modern socialism revolves around handouts. The "winter relief" program which is the closest thing to welfare the NSDAP had was funded entirely by donations.

youtube.com/watch?v=u_LHwKxcOIM

Goebbels touches on this cryptically in this video. The NSDAP modernized the pre-modern community structure that collapsed during the industrial revolution.

Six years of peace during the great depression. Imagine where we would be now.

youtube.com/watch?v=YR_LrB4tfew

>they nationalized all banking
They also literally invented mass privatization of industry. The banking part was only done because it was literally the only way to unfuck the economy
>they had a currency pegged to a basket of goods
All (real) currencies start off like that.
> he NSDAP taxed the 'worker' far less than the most lolbert county
According to Wikipedia (I know), "German workers paid 15-35% of their income" in taxes. That's less than me.
> They required industry to match production to consumption and forbade social dumping
By producing weapons; and more weapons. A valid solution to unemployment I guess, until the debts catch up to you.
>The NSDAP solved unemployment for the first and only time in history.
So did the Soviet Union among others. Not a tankie btw.

Hitler was privatizing industries at a time when all other countries were moving towards nationalization. This had huge positive effects on the economy.

The "socialist" aspect came from printing debt-free currency and using it to provide a higher standard of living for his citizens and fuel economic growth. The only reason Hitler called himself "Socialist" was to take back the term from marxists who were trying to appropriate it for themselves and turn it into newspeak for "communism phase 1".

>They also literally invented mass privatization of industry.
All non-war industry was privatized virtually everywhere else, which continues to this day. What's your point? Unlike in Australia or Canada the NSDAP had complete control over all business in the country and could, and did, intervene when it harmed the public interest.

>All (real) currencies start off like that.
Not an argument, and it was the only nation to not have a metals or fiat currency since antiquity.

>German workers paid 15-35% of their income" in taxes.
The average tax burden in Australia is almost 40%. Wikipedia no doubt includes the significant union dues paid to the DAF which through the KdF renovated factories, funded vacations, bought cruiseliners, etc. Germany didn't have the resources Australia has either, they essentially had fields, coal, iron, and wits. They were under international Jewish led boycott that one can assume contributed to higher tax rates. There were massive one off infrastructure programs that needed to be funded.

>By producing weapons; and more weapons.
Another Jewish myth. Countries get rich through the arms trade through export. Germany eliminated unemployment through their currency and through guaranteed (and expected) sustenance employment. This program was complete by 1936 and they had to draft young men to the RAD due to the lack of free workers. This shortage of workers is what drove the industrial productivity innovations/inventions under the NSDAP. Turns out that factories don't close when they can't find cheap labour, they just replace the workers with increased efficiency. Which leads to even more growth and even more wealth for workers and business owners. Whether they planned this runaway efficiency growth that everyone in the world now knows is debated but it happened nevertheless due to policies.

>it was only called "socialist" to help steal support from the dangerous, corrupt lefties who were dominating german politics at the time

Funnily enough, the original antifas helped push the NSDAP into power by making lefties look incredibly stupid and violent (exactly what they are doing right now lol)

>So did the Soviet Union
They didn't solve unemployment. Neither did the Americans when they armed the Soviets and drafted millions of men. They put a temporary unsustainable check on it.

>Hitler was privatizing industries at a time when all other countries were moving towards nationalization.
This isn't true. Sure the Americans and Brits quazi-nationalized their armaments industry but that's as far as it went. You never bought HM Beef or an HM Kettle. Hitler didn't nationalize his armaments industry because he didn't have too. The state had the ultimate say and business owners by and large liked the NSDAP. They witnessed the collapse of British/French industry and they seen the red menace parked in the east.

>They were under international Jewish led boycott

>Let me guess: It wasn't REAL socialism?

It was. And it was the only type of socialism that actually worked in practice.

The left always has to lie and distort in order to propagandize.
It must suck being on the side that's just all lies and manipulation.
How stressful.
No wonder leftists are always so tense.

youtu.be/FKn_XxYRe1o
truth will eventually win

>leaf
>communist
not remotely surprised
Why is anyone engaging this little beta?
He's a leftist, you think they're ever going to be fair or truthful?
'By any means necessary' ringing any bells for you anons?
That's their motto.
They're literally telling you that they're not above lying right to you, so long as it serves their ends.
Fuck all leftists.

Real national socialism has never been tried

I am an anti-communist. Your lolbert garbage was invented by kikes, six of the eight mises founders were inbreds, to pollute the right and flood America with human garbage that would eventually usher in Jewish communism. Thanks to this obsession with individualism and not caring about society or values Americas future is demographically guaranteed to be Jewish communism.

Bernie Sanders was but a tiny taste of your future, and you can put this on the shoulders of the people who let these Jewish lolberts subvert the right in the 1970's and 1980's. The selfish kikes already had their private community centers, private scholarships, private welfare, etc. They could tolerate a few decades of shitting on the poor white families before they got their mongrel slave race.

You know why liberals always just use our own insults against them, back onto us?
It's because leftism by nature, was built to manipulate those of the weaker, beta, follower mindset.
They're all followers; they can't create, they can only remix and regurgitate.
They follow, they don't lead.

What is a lolbert ?

>t. communist subversive
good stuff leaf

Suicide.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZoPyi7yGjSo

it wasnt implemented right.

so ofc we have to try again. this time we gonna implement it right.

>I'm totally one of you, it's just hopeless
Okay user, you go off and kys now and do us a favor.
We need the strong, not weak bitches that are already buckling.
That is, if you're not in fact a subversive, which I think you are.

>anyone who calls out my suicidal hedonism is a communist
You're worse than the JIDF posters that try to force people into choosing muslim vs. kike.

""""""national socialism""""""" was more like syndicalism if any. Many fascist regimes were syndicalist

>Guess what

You just lost the game.

It was implemented right.
It was done perfectly.
Had it not been for the war, it likely would have continued to do well.
See, the thing that's different with National Socialism, than with Communism, is Communism failed because it just doesn't work.
Over and over, it wasn't losing a war, it was the slow erosion of it due to its unsustainability.
National Socialism was never given the opportunity to succeed or fail like that.
The allies beat them and changed their system to the Jew one they have now.

It was implemented alright, and it took the entire world, six years, and one million tons of bombs dropped on women and children, to defeat it. Hitler won 95%+ reunification plebiscites after he abolished democracy.

youtube.com/watch?v=9jhogG3evd8

I'm subversive alright. Here's some more propaganda.

youtube.com/watch?v=E5dGzDcF2kQ

lolbert = jews taking over the republican / conservative side ?

Libertarianism. People that believe this shit is absolutely 100% okay.

No it was

It was real socialism. It wasn't Marxist though.

Fun fact; "National Socialism" filters into "Not Socialism" on leftypol

...

...

This. I love that the left completely ignores that National Socialism is just Socialism with extreme Nationalism. Also love that they hate Hitler so much because he proved the only way Socialism works is when you remove the trash from the system.

>I love that the left completely ignores that National Socialism is just Socialism with extreme Nationalism
That's not what they're saying with that filter, buddy. They're saying it's not socialism, and they're right, it wasn't. Just go there and ask them why NS isn't actually socialism, they'll be happy to bury you with references to the capitalistic policies of the Third Reich.

The basis of their economy was Socialism though, their mental acrobatics on this topic is insane.

>The basis of their economy was Socialism though
It literally does not fit the definition of socialism. It doesn't fit the definition of capitalism either though which is why there's so much confusion on the topic. NatSoc follows more of a fascist economic model, basically economic centrism. Some aspects of NatSoc society resembled socialism, other aspects resembled capitalism, it was neither full-on capitalism or socialism though. That's why people call it the third way, because it's inaccurate to plainly call it capitalism or socialism.

To be fair, Germany had a fair amount of allies as well, and it's a bit of a stretch to call America an "empire"

(((They))) can't destroy his memory so easily. He calls out from history to us now and we answer more loudly every day.