There is a hierarchy in the world. There are powerful, more attractive men, and weaker, less attractive men...

There is a hierarchy in the world. There are powerful, more attractive men, and weaker, less attractive men. There are sexier, more attractive women, and plainer, less attractive women.

In monogamy with a class system, the marriages would fall out as I have arranged them here. Without a class system, sometimes Charles Kleinhahn (who HATES his childhood nickname Chad and punches anyone who calls him that) would end up with Joanne Doux-Seins, or Ewan Thundercock would end up with Stacie Jones.

Because of hypergamy, all of the girls would be fine with Chad. In a world where Chad was a king of old, Stacy would be his wife and mother of his heir, Joanne a second wife or concubine, and Stacie his favorite whore/mistress. He wouldn't give Jane a thought.

In this world, everyone is unhappy. I'll explain it more below.

In monogamy, everyone marries and has kids and has an investment in society. Everyone gets to feel like Chad and Stacy. In hypergamy not even Chad and Stacy feel like Chad and Stacy.

Hypergamy:
Charles and Ewan hate Chad because he has all the girls. Eugene hates all three because he's outranked.

Jane feels entitled - her sister is the king's mistress - to Prince Ewan or an upstart knight like Charles. She can't conceive of Eugene as a potential mate. Ewan and Charles find her repulsive and beneath them. Jane hates the three girls for having Chad. She hates everyone.

Stacie is happy because she's mated way up, but resentful of the official wife and concubine who outrank her, cause she has sex with him more and she knows he loves her more. She looks down on Ewan because he's kinda in love but never asked her out. He could have made her an official wife. Charles is a nice guy if crude, a good match for Jane.

Joanne hates Chad because he fucks her once a month, tops. She hates Stacy for being headwife and hates Stacie for being a lowborn whore that Chad likes more. She finds Charles cute and funny but far below her level. Ewan just isn't manly enough. Ewan seems resentful because she's his equal but he couldn't have her. Eugene is creepy and stares at her. She hates him a lot.

Stacy hates Joanne and Stacie for dividing Chad's time and attention and resources away from her and her children. She loves Ewan. He's so kind! He's a good a male brother-in-law she can confide in and trust. He's such a good friend. She distrusts Charles because she thinks he wants to rape her. She has never heard of Eugene. She thinks Jane is a sweet shy servant gal who would be a good wife to Ewan if she weren't lowborn. She also likes Jane because she isn't a whore like her sister Stacie.

Hypergamy is stupid. Accept hierarchy, know your place, find your place, and thrive in it. You can change your place by changing yourself. Part of it is in your hands.

But Chad will always have Stacy. The others don't have a chance. Let's be real. So Chad should be a bro and enforce monogamy so that everyone else can find spouses of equal sexual market value.

this is the most retarded thing ive seen on Sup Forums. it saddens my soul that you typed this shit out

Evolve beyond hierarchies.

You are retarded and autistic. And gay.

Op is a faggot

I'm sorry Stacy hurt you.
What does that even mean? The only way that any living thing is equal to another is in death. As far as I can tell the only way to eliminate human hierarchies is to literally kill everyone.
Hi Eugene.
Haha yeah Chad does look a little gay. He just has good fashion sense and is secure in his sexuality.

If you give yourself labels, you will mould yourself into it without even realizing. Freedom is a tricky process because many mentalities exist in your head to restrict your individualism, posts like what you shitposted here are like that.

Live each moment as what's most needed in the situation, do not be a Chad if you're in the office rather than the club.

I also imagine medieval feudalism.

Prince Chad marries Lady Stacy in their teens. They become King Chad and Queen Stacy.

Prince Ewan becomes a priest and then becomes the Archbishop of the Cathedral.

Lady Joanne dies a spinster.

Serf Charles starts hooking up with fellow serf girl Stacie in their teens. She gets pregnant and they get married. He has ambition and gets unbound from land so they are now peasants. He becomes a squire for hire during a war. Ends up becoming a cavalryman because he is so good in battle. He gets knighted. Then Sir Charles wins a great victory in battle and is awarded land and titles by King Chad. King Chad and Baron Charles consider each other bros.

The serf Kleinhahn is concerned at his eldest son's failure to marry. He approaches the serf Jones and suggests they arrange a match. Eugene and Jane consent and are married and live out their days as serfs.

See! Everyone is happy in this scenario. Except Joanne hahaha that's what you get for not being as hot or as nice or as pretty or as talented as your sister Stacy you dumb bitch.

Make a gay friend, and have him hook you up with hot girls that he knows. It's the easiest way to bypass displays of social approval and status. Referrals are how you get jobs. They're also how you get women. Submitting your own application is for suckers.

I wish I could take all the r9kukolds who shitpost on here and do something REALLY evil to them.

At first I used to think:

> whatever it's just a permavirgin, let him be

But then, as time went on and turbovirgins just kept on mouthing off about the most pathetic shit and making the saddest threads, I realized that unless we remove this scum from the gene pool, our planet is doomed.

If you're a permavirgin who can't redpill a girl to suck on your dick, you should honestly just kill yourself or at the very least stop coming to the designated redpill board, like this is some sort of gathering place for your pathetic kind

wisdom that's worked and gotten me to a pretty comfy point in life desu

Well, anyways, I was pretty proud of my artwork "The Chad Virgin" versus THE VIRGIN CHAD. Pic related made me cringe.

I think thought of the perfect girlfriend memes and it seems like it would go together very well. And then it seemed like it would also be a great way to explain game theory and demonstrate the societal problems caused by polygamy.

there's nothing you can do about it, faggot.

post orig then

Any gay friends I make usually end up resenting me because I don't return their affections. I don't have a problem finding women who like me. I have a problem finding women I like.

And yes it's all about who you know. And good jobs a huge pussymagnets.
Thanks for not giving me a (You) tovarishch. I didn't make this because I'm an incel. I made this because I thought it was funny but also that it was funny because it expressed a fundamental truth about hierarchy and sexual market value, which are very redpilled concepts.

Run the image I posted in the OP through reverse image search. It's original work of mine.

Here are the skeletons I worked from to rework the virgin into Chad and Chad into the virgin.

...

Yeah. This is why societal enforcement of monogamy is so key to its success. Otherwise we end up with the mess that we live in today.

You need to get a job dude. This is sad.

actually it's a pretty good idea for all the shitskins on here to go mgtow
you see them going crazy and running people over in trucks otherwise? much better to accept life as a betabux turbovirgin, get to do shit like watch cuckpornos and play videogames that way at least instead of taking the pislamist heaven virgin gamble or shooting up a school

technically they're removing themselves from the genepool though

You do realize that the whole point of this is that even with "chad" genetics one can still end up doing the virgin walk, and even with "virgin" genetics one can still end up doing the chad stride.

The point is that there are things in life that you cannot choose and you must accept, such as your race, your gender, your IQ, your physical attractiveness, your particular insulin metabolism, and so forth.

What do you with those things is what matters. If you think I am complaining that I am a NEET incel in having made this cartoon and written out these amusing stories to explain game theory and the issues that hypergamy causes if it's not controlled, then you're mistaken.

I have not much tried my hand at making cartoons on the computer and I'm rather please with my efforts, even though I worked from models. It felt good to create something like this, even silly chad memes. That is not sad.

Wizard here. I think most ugly and low status men are profoundly unhappy because they've been sold a lie that there was "someone for everyone." There's not and there never has been. You climb the male dominance hierarchy or you go bitterly jack off. It's such a fucking cancerous lie. But it it's own way it selects the people pretty enough to not have to believe it or smart enough to not believe it for reproduction.

For the small minority of deformed/very ugly men you just have to accept facts and pay for hookers or really get into fapping. Spending time moping about it won't help you.

Stop believing in fairy tales and start looking at the world with your own eyes.

The stupid fucking boredom thing. It applies to more than just marriages, obviously. It's a reason men leave women too, but far less often. Women are literally children in adult bodies. If you bore them, they leave. They think that's acceptable behavior. Since when did they get so fucking interesting? I've N E V E R in my entire life met a single woman who I could have any kind of enlightening conversation with that lasted for any significant span of time. Never in my life had any sort of woman in any way shape or form make me laugh for any reason besides them saying something dumb. So what I have to do instead is just pretend. I won't lie and say men do a much better job of it, but at least they succeed every now and then. It's not their fault though which is why I can't stay angry. It's our society. It's drugged all of us in one way or another, dumbed us down with media, and effectively muted us in the cesspool that is the widely-used Internet. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, whatever it is, your voice, and the voice of any other common person, will NEVER be genuinely heard. Maybe a few thousand, even a hundred thousand, even a couple million could see something insightful that you post. It is forgotten in mere seconds afterwards for some dumb meme they've seen a thousand times with slightly different wording. I don't even think I'm smarter than anyone else either. After I post this, I'll probably forget about it in ten minutes or so. Life in this era is a numb, empty void, robbed of any sort of meaningful interaction thanks to the curse that is the Internet. The Internet is what has ruined our women, along its myriad of other factors, it is the strongest. It conditioned them to think they can be and deserve to be entertained by their partner for the rest of their lives.

Matthew 26:11
"The incels you will always have with you, but you will not always have me."

Only 40% of first marriages ever end in divorce though

'Boredom' was his interpretation of the stated reasons 'no longer in love' or 'grown apart'. A bit misleading

>Wizard here.
You speak very confidently for a wizard.
>I think most ugly and low status men are profoundly unhappy because they've been sold a lie that there was "someone for everyone."
Totally agree. Sometimes life deals us unfair hands.
>There's not and there never has been. You climb the male dominance hierarchy or you go bitterly jack off.
My cartoon was an attempt at showing how the hierarchy can work out to make everyone happy.
>Stop believing in fairy tales and start looking at the world with your own eyes.
And that is the redpill.

>sold a lie that there was "someone for everyone."
It's not a lie, they're just retarded for thinking it meant they didn't have to put in the effort.

There are some who are called to be eunuchs for the kingdom's sake. In a well-ordered society, there's someone for most people. In a poorly ordered one, it's not as good. In either society...

There are some people that will simply not find romantic love. It sucks for them. And telling them otherwise will only make them angrier and more frustrated.

BUT you are still right that there are angry and frustrated people who could find someone if they put in the effort.

That's one of the points of this graphic. A virgin Eugene can become a chad Charles if he tries.

Medieval feudalism type social hierarchy seems so natural.

Serfs
Lords
Knights
Kings
Nobelmen.
Maybe Merchants & Tradesmen as well.

I think whites need defined hierarchy, I think it's natural for them. It needs to be very rigged too, moving between classes should only be possible with considerable effort.

...

Perhaps. I like to apply the 'kingdom analogy' to my everyday life, I haz the autism and it seems to help me identify social status (Which I don't seem to be able to grasp very well).

You cant have a class system without monogamy though, how would it even work?
Women would just resort to being one of the 40 wives of the king (alpha gorilla).
Maybe these kings would tolerate eunuchs (castrated men) around their many women but what purpose would all the other men even serve?

I wish people could talk to me about kingdom based social status analogy's...
I could talk about that all day.

OP isn't wrong. Women''s lib is exactly why we have a bunch of single moms who'll never marry, manwhores who'll never marry, and bitter men and women who hate the opposite sex. It's the reason why women complain about there not being enough "marriageable men." It's the reason why feminists un-ironically write articles about how horrible it is that men, rejected by women their whole lives, have the audacity to have sex dolls.

in the future the Chads will continue to get all the filthy loose 3DPD whores they want, and the intelligent men will have far superior loli waifubots with forever-tight ultra vaginas that pleasure you in ways no human vagina is capable of.

>Maybe Merchants & Tradesmen as well.
GET OUT REEEEEEE

I think the Chads and Jews are colluding to create a war that will kill off as many rival males as possible.
They have no need for 'common men' any more but 'common women' can still be used as a degenerate sportfuck.

Merchant/Tradesman aren't really a desirable class but they aren't undesirable either.
Just neutral.
Basically anything except serf is acceptable.

>Male social status & acceptable wife limits.
Serf = 1 woman but must share here with lords & any other superior class of male that wants her.
Lord = 3 full time 'wives' & up to 10 mistresses.
Knight = 1 wife and up to three mistresses
King = Up to 5 'wives' abnd any number of mistresses/concubines.

Merchant & tradesmen are allowed one wife and one mistress.

>tfw literally dating a Stacey Lynn

She's only banged 12 dudes (including me) so I'm not sure she qualifies.

A high born woman would not sleep around.
Only a common serf woman would sleep with many men since she has no social value.

How autistic are you to spend time making this weird cuck fantasy to post on Sup Forums? This is honestly pathetic.

I think its important. We need to explore the 'social status systems of old' to further understand social status.

It was backwards actually. A highborn woman could afford to sleep around, without any damage to the goods. A serf, however, would totally not find marriage if losing virginity.

I also think it's fun. This is interesting autism instead of the usual bland variety.
Every one on Sup Forums should be in this thread.

The autism is real

...And social status doesn't correlate with sexual life: nor then, not now.

OP thanks for reminding me that it's time for a break from Sup Forums.

But a high born woman would be playing games with her own social status. It depends on the social status of the men she is sleeping with.
What if she fucks a serf? A pissed-off king might banish her and behead the serf in public.
A serf would never dream of touching a high-born woman!

Yes it dose. It just doesn't affect people today as much as it used too. I think the invention of the pill for women has seriously messed with the ancient systems of female social status.

>t. Pussy whipped

>She's only banged 12 dudes
I conceive of Stacie Lynn as like a white trash girl who's super hot. She can either gun really hard for Chad (likely lose as Chad goes after the both hotter and prettier Stacy), gun really hard for Ewan, who she has a chance at getting, and she herself will infuse alpha genes into her son thereby. If she marries a Charles she's just marrying her equal.

If she has sex with a bunch of different dudes riding the cock carousel. then it'll be mostly Chad and Charles, and occasionally she'll find a really hot Ewan that she can't help but bang.

Nowadays Stacy will sleep with that many men, but is correct. A high born woman couldn't really sleep around. It DID happen, though. There are recognized bastards of noblewomen from higher ranked noblemen.

A very sexually attractive lowborn woman who realizes her value and plays it well can use her physically attractiveness to gun upward. Do you see how I have Stacie Lynn in front of Ewan (Scottish for Eugene, just as Jane is an English variant of Joanne). Lots of Ewans in history have been very happy to marry a super hot shiksa. If she doesn't sleep around, woman who is an outlier can marry a lot higher than her parents' station.

One wife is the acceptable limit. Anything else is heresy.
They're fine as long as they're accountable. I was joking. And serfs are fine. Being bound to the land is good for them, good for the land, and good for the landowners. Serfs had longer life expectancy than gentry because they weren't generally expected to fight.

I think that's why IQ in Europeans centers around 100. You need a high IQ upper class because you want your leaders to outsmart other nations' leaders, but it's dangerous to be at the top. The tall blade of grass gets cut.
Jews: yDNA Semitic, mtDNA Southern European, autosomal DNA particular locality. It's like a race of beta chads.

>I think whites need defined hierarchy, I think it's natural for them. It needs to be very rigged too, moving between classes should only be possible with considerable effort.
Regression to the mean and outliers are both real. A rigged game is good, but our game got broken. We don't know how to play within the system because we had a particular way and style of going about getting married. And thus a whole generation of men who would have been happy and contented Ewans married to Joannes are bitter and angry and pissed off feeling like Eugene. Many Joannes are bitter Janes. And so are the Chads because everyone hates them. This game makes no one happy.

Think about it if Ewan marries Stacie Lynn and Charles marries Joanne. Ewan is happy because he has a super hot girl and he thought he'd have to "settle" for a Joanne. Stacie Lynn is happy because she has gunned up. If Charles is sufficiently fun, Joanne will accept the decrease in status in exchange for the love and the unconscious knowledge that her sons will be alpha, as well as intelligent.

Too rigid a hierarchy and you end up with leaders of average IQ ruling people smarter than them. Which causes resentment and rebellion. Let people slide naturally, and gently. After all, the sons of upstarts often end up more like their grandfathers than their fathers.

...

I agree. A super hot low-born woman, peasant or serf girl could marry very, very, highly indeed if she didn't sleep around or was a virgin.

However a super-hot low born peasant girl could NOT marry a lord if she sleeps around. The best she could probably be is a knights concubine.

Also no low-born peasant girl could EVER marry a king.
Even if she was a virgin the best she could be is a kings jizz-rag for an evening.

Hi -- I recognize you -- you're just like me. You're a liberal elite artist/writer that came here to shillpost or you're just attracted to macabre shit and then got sucked into the potential literary possibilities of the memes.

Checked and kekked, as they say.

>Jews: It's like a race of beta chads.
Such a thing shouldn't exist in white societies. It's creates dysfunction. Instead social status should be more rigged.
ie: You CANNOT be a 'top chad' without being 6'2 or above. Its simply part of the job requirements.

Where do you live? That's really sad -- there are tons of cool and smart women out there. When I read posts like this, I feel like you're probably not that clever or entertaining, you just live in a place where everyone is kind of stupid and maybe you're like 5 IQ points above the idiots that surround you -- like a kingdom of the blind thing -- and women at your social status are like trailer hos.

Crawl up to the lower middle class where humans are normal bright and fun...

Whites however SHOULD be able to move in-between classes.
But the requirements to do so should be STRICT.
The classes themselves should be VERY RIGGED.

Class mobility has to exist, but there are individual limits.
At present the classes are not rigged enough. They need to be solidified for the good of the whole.

But the trade-off for that is that women are are only functional as a counter-point to men and are breeders. I mean, if you're a fascist, fine, or some Christian wacko. Otherwise, your opinion is just one dumb opinion.

Women are childless and they have no one to marry because men are either dumb or losers a lot of the time. It fits the IQ pattern thing -- sure, there are a lot more smart males who are outliers intellectually, and a few who are rich, but women are better equipped to run the middle of the bell curve on everything. Men commit some ridiculous percentage of crime and white men with no college education are basically the equivalent of couch stuffing. Toss in alcoholism, porn additions, entitlement, testosterone rage and the entire half of the bell curve that are under the average height of 5'10" and you have yourself one gigantic pile of dog shit.

Men are responsible for the situation they're in -- not because they lost control of the women. They just didn't have to try until the last 200 years, because they took by force. Now that there's liberal democracy, most men are a dirty penny. Sorry to say, but true.

Also -- most women aren't all that great, either. But small margins feel big in society and women are just, generally, winning the game.

It's difficult to follow your train of thought here...
Like maybe the middle of the bell curb is just the best place evolutionary speaking for women to be.
It gives them access to both established males (inter-generational wealth and social status) and outliers.

The break down of the class system and institution of marriage here in Australia is having strange effects on people.

Deep confusion about social status is observable in both males and females.
Degeneracy seems to flourish in such an environment.

A super-hot peasant girl could be the legal wife of a knight easily. Peasants were freemen and not bound to the land. A serf would have more trouble. If the knight had a title then it would be more problematic.

A super-hot serf girl who played her hand well could end up the concubine of her Baron, I think, and her bastard son might end up inheriting everything if he never took a legal wife because she was careful.
uh no I'm a liberal elite writer type who accidentally became a redpilled national socialist (really more of a monarchist national socialism is what I support). The Chad memes are jokes and satire but they reflect reality. And this isn't about being attracted to macabre shit or anything. I have a taste for the macabre but what I really have a taste for is the complexity and the beauty of human interrelations. Soap opera tier shit haha. I'm no better than a 105 IQ housewife!
"Beta Chads" have always existed. If you know your place and don't try to go above OR below it, you can feel confident in yourself and be an Alpha Beta. Nothing wrong with that. Not all men are meant to be kings.

But the issue is the particularly parasitic ways that Jews go about it. It does cause dysfunction because having the two separate racial and religious groups living side by side, when intermarriage eventually happens it causes catastrophe.

The IQ and behavioral differences between blacks and white are so severe that the South Africans were right to do apartheid and the Southron Americans right to do Jim Crow. It was an attempt to live together in peace. Getting "blacked" is a just meme and most of that porn made for black guys, not white cucks. Most white girls don't like black guys and very few of them actually end up sleeping with them. But black men have no sense of the future and thus no fear of rejection. White men are careful and thoughtful and we evolved to have our marriages arranged, often. The careful dance of a white woman silently but carefully inviting a man to speak to her is interrupted by 100 negroes willing to go up to her and say "muh dick." The white man often foolishly thinks that his chances are 1/101, same as the 100 uninhibited negroes, but that he will simply be the last to try so it's pointless.

Then a lonely black or Mexican girl hits on him. This is a real problem.

I'm assuming you have no idea who JD Unwin is, and are also unfamiliar with the Calhoun Mouse Experiments. The point is that a society based around monogamy forces men and women to pair up and take each other off the market. Without this, women will not pair up but be promiscuous amongst men they perceive as the best, and this will be largely based on the fact that these are the men who other women have chosen -- social proof in other words. The result is the destruction of families as a concept. The men who are having the most options of easily replacing one woman with another certainly have no incentive to get married. Marriage itself as a concept is dead without monogamy. Now lets consider the men excluded from having progeny. They have no posterity, so they will look upon emotional appeals like "think of the future, think of the children" with utter contempt, and righteously so. All men suck under this system, and all women suck too. No matter whether you're at the top of the pecking order or the bottom.

Try again, roasty.

>Like maybe the middle of the bell curb is just the best place evolutionary speaking for women to be.
>It gives them access to both established males (inter-generational wealth and social status) and outliers.
DING DING DING DING DING
and that is why the real winner in all of this is Stacie Lynn, the white trash ho.

There is no such thing as a beta-chad. It's an oxymoron. Kike-think.
(The JEW brain despises fixed terms and definitions).
Instead there are levels of Chadom. Just like serf, pesant, knight, nobel, lord, king.
Today there is virgin, neet, gymbro, chad, rich ultrachad.

Do not engage in kike-think.
>Hurr-durr; Israel doesn't have fixed borders because my genetic reject kike brain likes abstract things and not fixed things.
Hurr- durr don't you want to be neighbors of a race that doesn't belie in fences and fixed lines!
JEWS ARE IN THIS THREAD.

GO AWAY JEWS.

I NEED A RIGGED CLASS SYSTEM BECAUSE I'M A WHITE MAN.

This kind of autism should be on the front page as a warning about what can happen if you spend too much time reading mgtow

Jews wreck the 'mating dance' as well. Whites had elaborate courtship rituals and ANY non-white race generally fucks them up.
>Hurr Durr just be a nig-nog and cold approach 200 women. Fuck all the ones that you can.
r-selection.
Whites have a mating system that involves taking status, wealth, looks, intelligence, prospects, family and many other factors into play.

lol Chad is a theoretical concept. He doesn't exist. Except Chad Messiah.

>Checked and kekked
that's only if they get a GET you fucking newfag piece of shit

It's a useful term for describing a real-world phenomenon.

I wonder if normies will ever understand why Chad is in such an awkward body position.

Interesting views and explanations for game theory. Very funny

That's all fine and good - I'm not saying I'm against monogamy -- I'm saying that men are losers and that women are, on average, pretty much better. We shouldn't have to be dominated into marrying losers. Men need to be marriageable by sorting themselves out. You're assuming that men are, somehow, the prime mover in this equation. I'm saying that only holds true under force. When all things are equal in terms of force, women are the superior beings on average. So the problem here -- robbing posterity of its white babies -- is not women, it's men.

>Le hypergamy face
more like hypergayme lmao

But Stacie Lynn isn't a good model of the middle of the bell curve. Jane Bank Teller who has a B.A. in social work and lives with two roomates and is working on couch to 5k everyday is the middle of the bell curve. Sure, she gets dressed up like a slut, but her parents made her go to church and she's really only fucked three guys. She's gonna be a good mom some day and can cook reasonable weeknight meals.

>Crawl up to the lower middle class where humans are normal bright and fun...

The 'middle class' is historically an aberration. A tiny fucking blip of light in the shitstorm of history, it has no relevance to 90% of humans who have ever lived.

where the fuck do you get these names from?

Right end bell curve normies will not. Left end bell curve normies will. The answer is "Because he wants to be."
Do you even see the subtlety and thought put into this?

"Eugene" means "well-born" and is a stereotypically nerdy name. Ewan is a Scottish variant.

"Plain Jane." Joanne is a more high class sounding version.

"Thundercock" is a very Anglo name. "Doux-Seins" is a very French name. It means "Soft breasts." "Kleinhahn" is also a fake name that means "Smallcock." And it's vaguely Jewish sounding.

Chad and Stacy's name plaque looks nice, but Ewan and Joanne's looks like a pale copy. Charles and Stacie Lynn's plaque is incredibly tacky and was obviously designed by Stacie Lynn and places special emphasis on her. Both Stacies have shorter dresses and more complicated hair than the Janes because they both know to put in more effort and try.

It's clear that Ewan wants to fuck Stacie Lynn and Charles is busy fending off guys who want her. Eugene doesn't even care and is walking away from Jane. Chad is pointing and laughing at Eugene and Jane while ignoring Stacy. Joanne is getting ignored while Ewan stares at the curvy redhead in high heels.

There's a lot of autism in this that's actually intentional and not stupid "mgtow" stuff. If anything, this is anti-mgtow. This says men and women belong together in peace and harmony.

>who accidentally became a redpilled national socialist

Sorry -- I just messed up the timeline! lol

Also, both my sons are alpha betas -- I think these are just general good guys. There really aren't that many kings -- most men are crap, sorry to say.

I want to say that for every piece of shit woman there is an equally piece of shit man but women seem to be pretty amoral anyway.
I think they are out to secure the best genes at ANY cost. Even at the cost of their society.

Either men enforce monogamy or it won't happen at all because women have every incentive to undermine it for evolutionary gain.

Men, in contrast (apart from the top 20%) have every incentive to enforce monogamy since without it most men are worse off.

I think it's good shit, OP. enjoyable presentation, autism harnessed to tell a tale with a good moral: monogamy makes cohesive societies.
Next time you post it, you should do pictures for each scene, it was kinda hard to read and then scroll back up to the picture and then read some more and repeat. Especially if you're getting better at making them and enjoying it.
Thanks for a fun thread before I sleep

I think you sliced Stacie too close to Stacie and there should be a Joanne-Stacie hybrid that represents the true middle -- I guess that's my quibble with your chart - the quadrant. I think you need a middle. Also, your chart doesn't take into account percentages. There are like 10 percent real chads, because fuck muscles and owning it like a manlet -- only about 8 percent of men make an actual fucking decent wage that would make them anything like an actual Chad. You can't even call yourself a Chad under six figures. The percentages tilt the equation.

Stacie Lynn is the norm today. (pesant)
Jane Bank Teller is a good catch. (nobelwoman or merchants daughter/ aspiring nobel).
You have to update the social classes to modernity to get some type of model.

In this case, Stacie Lynn's parents have an average IQ of 100 but she is an outlier up near 115 and she is super hot. Stacie Lynn is a Stacie insofar as the working-class is concerned. She's the outlier. Stacy is a Stacy for elite class (not super-elite, but like American intellectual elite, the WASPs and Jews and such who aren't millionaires and billionaires).

Jane is the other outlier in the downward direction.

One thing I forgot to mention is that the implication is that Charles Kleinhahn is Eugene's younger brother, and Stacie Lynn Jones is Jane Jones' younger sister.

Stacy needed a last name about tits. Doux-Seins means "soft-breasts" and seemed appropriate. Also the high class associations of a French last name. Eugene is nerdy and someone else has called the virgin Eugene. Jane had to be the plain girl because of Plain Jane. Joanne is just more exotic, like Ewan for Eugene. Stacie Lynn because a white trash shiksa with a taste for the finer things will use her middle name like that.

Their is other social class terminology emerging among normies.
Chad and Stacy are terms autistic males use.
Normie females use the term 'fuckboy' which seems to somewhat correlate to chad.

I don't think anyone's taking into account a truly bohemian white society. I'm not talking about shit nog and barbarian values -- but white bohemia -- polygamy, extended families, actual free love, supportive communities and non-forced collectives. I don't think you can outright argue that enslaving women because you are fucking lonely and pathetic is a good enough reason to limit people's rights. There are untold combinations of possibilities for better societies out there, that we could be working toward.

I'm actually curious about how you became orthodox monarchist -- because most people with your intelligence are extremely skeptical of everything.

>I don't want to be forced to marry a man I feel is beneath me.
>I'm not against monogamy.
You can't have it both ways.

It boils down two simple rules that apply only to men:
1. No premarital sex
2. No extramarital sex

That's hardly "domination."

Go for it. polygamy, extended families, actual free love. Go nuts.

But don't ask me to defend it. Because I couldn't give a rats ass about such a hippie bullshit mental case of a society.
I'll stick with my mom & dad in a cottage with a white picket fence on a nice piece of land thank you.

You could be right -- my opinion is colored by the fact that I'm upper middle class and I just delegitimized my own argument. We are more rare -- maybe I just don't know enough trashy women. But even the hick hometown I escaped seems to have had decent girls. Maybe it's just millennials that are the problem -- I'm in my 40s with two alpha beta chad sons who are both dating Asian qts, so I probably don't have a damn clue with the average American young woman is all about.

That said, I'm not going to trust the average American young male's opinion of that lol

>I think you sliced Stacie too close to Stacie and there should be a Joanne-Stacie hybrid that represents the true middle -- I guess that's my quibble with your chart - the quadrant. I think you need a middle. Also, your chart doesn't take into account percentages. There are like 10 percent real chads, because fuck muscles and owning it like a manlet -- only about 8 percent of men make an actual fucking decent wage that would make them anything like an actual Chad. You can't even call yourself a Chad under six figures. The percentages tilt the equation.
Pride and Prejudice is a good example.

Mr. Bennett (gentry) m. Mrs. Bennett (merchant)

That's a morganitic marriage, and it's because Mrs. Bennett was "a great beauty." She's a Stacie Lynn who didn't ride the cock carousel but played her hand well.

Daughters;
Jane (Stacy+)
Elizabeth (Joanne+)
Mary (Jane-)
Kitty (Joanne- to Lydia's Stacie Lynn-)
Lydia (Stacy Lynn-)

Lt. Wickham is a total Charles. He tries upwards with Georgiana Darcy and Elizabeth. He succeeds because Lydia is a horny idiot. He is an upstart. Lydia plays her Stacie Lynn hand poorly.

Jane is perfect in every way so of course Mr. Perfect in every way and the center of attention Bingley falls for her.

Bingley is Chad
Darcy is Ewan (too terrified to hit on a Joanne from an equal but poorer family, proposes and insults her simultaneously - takes responsibility for everything).
Wickham is Charles
Mr. Collins is Eugene. Gross.