Why are republican states so dependent on federal funding to stay afloat?

Why are republican states so dependent on federal funding to stay afloat?

Niggers, desu senpai.

Why are nigger cities in red states and states with the most federal land so dependent on federal funding to stay afloat?

If blue states don't need federal funding, then why do they panic when the federal government threatens to cut them off for harboring illegals?

Probably because the white people were too lazy to pick their own cotton.

Who said they were panicking?

I had no idea California was a republican state

incorrect!

Cities aren't red.

yes and texas is about to turn blue, rly makes u think.

because they are the party of rural retards, all educated city people vote the democrat party.

California actually gives back to the federal government. So that's just incorrect.

>One state
Last time I checked there are 50 states man.

And?

>Why are republican states so dependent on federal funding to stay afloat?

Because they tax less money from their constituents. Let me guess...

>muh californian tax surplus

Why would you want the state you live in with the highest income tax and cost of living in the nation to take so much extra taxes from you that it gives some of it to the federal government? You already pay taxes to the federal government separately, you goddamn dummies.

>texas is about to turn blue

Says the increasing nervous Pollack for the 30th year in a row.

keyword in federal income tax is 'income'. Also the federal money going back to states is dominated by federal matching of state spending on welfare, and its generally all being literally thrown down the toilet by blue counties to feed the dependent and lazy.

blue states on the coasts or in new england think its fine because they're dominated by a combination of the lazy and dependent voting themselves more money and the ivory tower liberals that don't know what they're doing.

When you control for income, capita, and political leaning by county this becomes obvious: red counties aren't even close to getting out of the government what they pay in taxes, and blue counties in red states are just leeches.

>California actually gives back to the federal government. So that's just incorrect.

a large part of that income+corporate tax revenue comes from jobs in international industries, they could (and do) leave in the blink of an eye.

Yea but why would I want to live in a shitty state full of poor negroes that constantly gets tricked by their white overlords into having them give more money to them instead of social services (Schools, Libraries, etc), while seeing my money that does get paid into taxes get so poorly misappropriated that the democratic states have to pay additional taxes to keep the republican states afloat.

If the republican states taxed more, then the democratic states could tax less and everyone achieves the same parity.

I mean I could take that to the extreme and "get fired" so I could live off welfare.

And that's the one thing I was hoping that Trump could change is to bring manufacturing and business back to the US as it was in the first half of the 20th century before globalization and cheap labor stole the jobs.

But that doesn't seem to be happening anytime soon as I can see the moment is people bitching about how expensive everything has gotten, or not taking the job offered.

>gets tricked by their white overlords into having them give more money to them

Cool story, bro.

>If the republican states taxed more, then the democratic states could tax less

Or the surplus states just could stop taxing people into poverty.

>being this proud of paying more taxes

Fine, whatever, just keep your filthy mitts out of my pockets.

farm subsidies

Maybe the surplus states wouldn't need to tax so hard if the red states would start taxing the rich at equal parity that they do the poor on income.

>Keep your filthy mitts out of my pockets
Only if you never go into a library, attend a public school or use anything that relies on socialism (public roads and infrastructure)

I guess the south really needed to have slaves to make up the difference.

>California gives back
Is that still true if you removed Jewlywood and NorCal wine (white) country?

That, silicon valley. As well as all the educated people as well.

>Who said they were panicking?

Jerry Brown

I'm going to need a bit more then that. I pulled up Sanctuary Cities and Jerry Brown but he's looking into putting Califonia onboard with it despite his prior opposition.

Democrat voters need their gibs
>inb4 these are red states
Regardless, it's the democrats in these red states who are soaking these funds up, and these funds keep them in contention for control of these states.
Only 3% of whites owned slaves, basically the upper crust who controlled the political process, the Bushes and Clintons of their day.
The other 97% of southern whites were unjustly burdened by this situation, as can be gleaned by comparing their per capita income versus northern whites.
To top it off, these 97% had to fight for and be slaughtered on behalf of this evil 3% planter aristocracy, to maintain a system that was unfair to them.
You are flinging ad hominem attacks against all whites, when it was actually a small number of bad actors.

Yeah. So 99% of california is nigger-spic state still. They got a few areas of huge industry though, but the rest is dead weight.

niggers.

But the democrats are in the cities in the red states. And even then we go to Arizona and the republican states in the north and they are still takers in the country.

Yea, the republican parts.

That accounts for the southern states but what about the republican ones in the north?

The vast majority of Republicans vote against their best interest.

Every single time. Even in red states like Texas blue cities give the most money back

ignore the white trash then

Well then. Maybe we should cut those programs...

fpbp

Red states in the south are full of niggers

Red states in the southwest are full of spics

Red states in the northwest are full of federal land

it's so simple a leftist wouldn't get it

>Yea, the republican parts.
How are the republican parts dead weight? It's the spic-zones my friend. You can't even safely travel in some of those areas.

>Implying they didn't help send them to those states through propaganda and rumor.

fpbp