I have left wing economic views but right wing social views, what am I?

I have left wing economic views but right wing social views, what am I?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XFkzRNyygfk
archive.org/stream/germanytomorrow019874mbp/germanytomorrow019874mbp_djvu.txt
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

a retard

a faggot

awful.

correct

thank you for the constructive responses

A National Socialist? Your literally a Nazi...

A nazi.

Cursed to stride the umbral planes alone for eternity.

an annoying cunt

Retard
And also attention whore

A poor citizen

Bad with money and antisocial

...

A massive faggot

THIS

>what am I?
Well balanced

>Bad with money and antisocial
So... a Nazi?

Why do you say such mean things? I care for the well being of my material fellow citizens and also that that my country remain white and follow traditional morality.

fpbp

I also care about the well being of my folk. But socialism is not gonna help them, it's inherently destructive and bad for the economy. Only individual self-improvement works.

Trust me, i'm from a country where the far-right lost because it was full of socialist nutcases.

Same here man, its pretty hard to vote when its election time, Liberals (aus conservatives) are pretty based when it comes to social issues but labour generally runs a better government, unfortunately they push SJW shit constantly

fucking hard decision.

I wish there was a political party for right wing economic views but left wing social views.

left wing economics isn't immediately socialism.

Im a commie, but the government should play a heavy hand in regulating certain things and making sure people are paid a fair wage. For example, pornography companies should be shut down.

Ideally, something like national syndicalism wouldn't be too bad

National Socialist

A faggot.

Social Nationalist

aka

Strasserist

*im not a commie

inb4 freudian slip

Hold on, I might be socially conservative, but I'm fiscally liberal. Bet you've never heard of that?
-reverse libertarianism

that's republican party platform

National socialist pawn.

A nationalist
You want closed boarders and a strong state to regulate commerce

too bad the country is full of niggers and mexicans sucking the welfare teet dry, if this was white country we could afford nice things

Fascist in terms of being with the actual ideology fascism

Probably a strasserist. People who are saying you're natsoc are wrong since Nazi Germany was barely even socialist.
I for one am a naztrot though.

fpbp

>I have left wing economic views but right wing social views, what am I?

Saddam Hussein.

Isn't straserism the more "left wing" of the NatSoc party? I've always seen the NatSoc movement especially before taking power on a political compass as being towards the top and in the middle spanning a few squares into both red and blue

>People who are saying you're natsoc are wrong since Nazi Germany was barely even socialist.
This meme again.

Wrong. Incorrect. Misguided. Fooled. Jabberwocked. Plum-pickled. Fiddle-dandied. Spoon-fed. Upsy-daisy'd. Hoo-dangled. Wee-diddled. Hum-dang-ding-donged.

Or just stupid.

Probably a catholic?

You want everyone to be equal but you still want to make sure social customs dont degenerate?

in traditional american politics means, a hardhat

NatSoc.

#nazbol gang reporting in

NazBol?

Yes it is, while Nazi Germany did have some socialist elements, most strasserists are full socialists and are much more anti-capitalist. On the political compass, I think NatSoc is really authoritarian and only slightly right.
Was the wealth of the bourgeois shared with the proletariat?
Did the workers own at least some of the means of production?
Did everyone have equal opportunities and chances?
Was most privatization in the country gone?
Were Trade Unions legal?

A nazi. I'm not joking.

Someone who feeds the birds and wonders why more shows up.
Someone that clogs the toilet and keeps shoving toilet paper in to stop it from overflowing.

Or you're an idealist that hopes only for the best in a dream land that doesn't exist, in hopes that people would be responsible and caring and not exploit anything, and that it wouldn't breed the dregs and weak.If you culled the degenerates and the takers, you'd be a Nat Soc.

Libertarian? That's sorta how they've been trying to frame themselves. "Smoke gay weed with guns, bro! (Oh and also say yes to corporate tyranny)"

A person who would rather be socially edgy instead of reasonable

>Was the wealth of the bourgeois shared with the proletariat?
Nope, the wealth went straight to the state just like in the Soviet Union.
>Did the workers own at least some of the means of production?
Nope, the state did just like in the Soviet Union.
>Did everyone have equal opportunities and chances?
Nope, just like in the Soviet Union.
>Was most privatization in the country gone?
Yes, the only difference is that Hitler privatized some industries to hide what the state was doing. The state still controlled all of the capital just like in the Soviet Union. If you weren't loyal to the state you wouldn't receive capital. If you were loyal to the state you would receive capital and the state would dissolve all of your competition.
>Were Trade Unions legal?
No, everything was ran by the state just like in the Soviet Union.

Aaaand you've just proved that the USSR wasn't socialist. The USSR was state capitalist and Nazi Germany was a capitalist nation masquerading as socialist.
Using the USSR as an example of socialism is really stupid because they aren't a very good example of good socialism.

>The poster child for communism and socialism wasn't really socialist.
That's some mighty fine mental gymnastics there. To clarify (because NatCucks are fucking retarded) when we refer to NatCucks as "socialist" we're making the reference because of their state intervention.

Left wing economics and right wing social views is the kind of position ZOG fears most.

Brainwashed. They are both on the same team. It's one big puppet show by our oppressors.

yeah its libertarian. no state, all rights. probably closer to anarchism in practice.

Lenin himself even said that the USSR was state capitalist, Stalin was the one who by pushing propaganda to boost morale said the USSR achieved socialism.
Now, Communism is a different can of worms entirely. A Communist society is a stateless, classless, moneyless society and that doesn't describe the USSR at all.

Fuck off cunt, I don't want to pay for methheads.

Sure black people are other minorities are awful for crime and welfare but whites aren't great in that regard either. This whole "we need to look after our own" shit to justify socialism is completely fucking stupid.

you are literally a national socialist.

Me

youtube.com/watch?v=XFkzRNyygfk

Nothing wrong with right wing social views though.

Hitler

fpbp

fascist

A well balanced person who wishes to look after his people while keeping the immigration horde at bay.

I am opposite.

I generally do not give a fuck if people want to be gay or pretend to be different gender, but I would destroy all welfare programs.

National socialist, welcome.

A Nazi.

It's why China and Norway work so well, left culture is cancer.

strasserist/nazbol

archive.org/stream/germanytomorrow019874mbp/germanytomorrow019874mbp_djvu.txt

Depends how leftwing, if you just mean free education, healthcare, pensions for old people and welfare you should be NatSoc. If you meam full blown economic Communism then NatBol.

rare

Not OP, but I really want to know if my political platform is stupid or not:

>against immigration/globalism
>against gun control
>anti-feminist/ pro family values
>pro renewable energy
>pro free helathcare
>pro market and banking sector regulation

I also think university admissions should be more selective and vocational training encouraged.

disregard previous flag

You have a swing set installed on your fence.

>tfw Nationalist
>tfw Socialist
>tfw not Nazi

what am I? I don't think gays should be killed (deserve equal rights) and womeme are fine (there's more "good ones" than you r9k faggots think)

But muslims should be mass deported, and it should be very very hard for anyone who's not white to enter the country. I don't think blacks or asians or whatever are inferior, far from it, but I think racial groups need to be kept seperate for everyone's safety and benefit. Africa for the Africans, Europe for the Europeans and so on.

What would my political denomination be called?

Social Nationalism

Look it up

a retard you got the worse of both polarities

Perhaps natsoc--do you want universal healthcare among whites?

Thanks

Since libertarianism is the only morally correct political movement, you are the opposite, which makes you a giant faggot.

A fucking retard.

Garbage

Sure is nu/pol/ ITT

A national socialist

Considering joining the nazbol gang. Give me a quick rundown.

Stalin and Hitler did nothing wrong

Give me policies, seems like Nazism but wealth is redistributed

state control