What would your ideal government be?

What would your ideal government be?

A slightly reformed version of what we already have.

You cucks are traitors to The Queen

>Says the former colony
Aye, awright big man

>cut down tenfold
>nobody is appointed all officials are elected
>only handles defence and law enforcement
>evety social and economuc issue is handled by public vote
>public executions for corruption, nepotism and violation of constutution

>You cucks are traitors to The Queen

Fuck you. I wasn't implying getting rid of the Queen. If anything I would bolster her constitutional standing by allowing her to actually use her royal prerogative to veto legislation if it meets certain conditions.

Libertarian Fascist Monarchy.

Technocracy:
>Open borders
>Open trade
>No minimum wage
>Welfare simplified to just an NIT
>Progressive consumption taxes
>Carbon taxes

Probably something like a fully decentralized group of voluntary states that just provide defence and courts with varying cultures people could gravitate towards if I had to have one. Like every town + seasteading on the coast where people could attach/detach at will and go to whichever one had the rules they liked but it's pretty unrealistic, I'd rather Anarchism obvs.

A strong, national state that provides jobs and equality for every citizen.

(checked)
neoliberalism.jpeg

Democracy
Government limited to Infrastructure, law/justice and healthcare
Crony capitalism and corruption punished with the death penalty

Classic fascism (Mussolini tier before hitler influenced his views during the war) with slightly less focus on religion, and more focus on nationalism (either aggressive or not) and stuff like more funding for nuclear energy, and perhaps solar and wind energy.
Perhaps also a strong focus on the military.
Also, physical removal of commies, socialists, and greens party members, along with AntiFa members.

Monarchy with elected council of advisors by direct representation reporting to the King. Notice I said King since itd be strictly by progenitor lineage. Ambassadors, civic servants, etc., except anyone handling finances or budgets are hired or appointed. In cases of finances only choose those meeting highest of standards in academics and signing of what would be the equivalent of the ethics path you would take as a lawyer. Keep the military on the council and have a police commissioner on council - both answerable to the King. Provincial, regional and local governments rule as a sub-state or nation, wherein they rule as if they were King of that section of the country. The aforementioned rules would apply.

The King would be vetted at an early age with confirming evidence that he is both ethical, intelligent and social adept. The lineage would start from there with the same people mentoring the original King to train the Kong's son and so on.

>phoneposting

>me
>waifu
>a dog

that's it.

Shitposts are the reserve currency and all debts must be repaid in the form of shitposts.

one that is not held hostage by jewish owned depth and has not been hijacked by jews

Monarchy.

World government with me in charge.
duh

Single party dictatorship with "corporations" like guilds that represent each field and aspect of life, ie healthcare, engineering, motherhood, and work with the government to ensure the needs of the nation and people are met.

As small as possible, most of it's entities delegated to private institutions.

Ancap monarchy, right to secede or get rid of the monarch or parliament held by the people, so they'd always be on their toes to keep people happy. Basically.

Why do people think that corporations would meet the needs of the people? I mean their job is to maximise profit for shareholder, not provide for the customer. They might do so but it is never a priority for a corporation by their definition.

You're using the capitalist definition of corporation, I'm talking about the fascist usage of the word, hence the quotes around the word. A fascist "corporation" isn't a corporation at all, but rather more like a guild, representing a particular industry. For example, in Michigan you would have the automobile "corporation", the lumber "corporation", the fishing "corporation", and the shipping "corporation". These corporations are actually guilds where both the workers and business owners work with the government to ensure that the needs of the people and nation are met.

>planned econiomies work
The entire asian continent would like to have a word with you
>b-but it's different under fascism though
No it isn't, and you know it.

I'd need to look into those definitions myself, currently it sounds like the same shit. Thank you for the explanation though I will research further before I comment on that subject again.

Ahh there's the usual discourse of Sup Forums

Because people tend to their needs first and if corporations aren't meeting the needs of the public they'll go under without government assistance.

>reforming parliament

Decentralized?

That's...not how corporations work. By definition corporations by provide services or goods for consumption but the main focus is maximise profit for the benefit of the Shareholders. They don't necessarily get Governmental assistance in anything as usually that's the point of private investors in the form of Shareholders

Hang the queen and all the loyalists

>The entire asian continent would like to have a word with you
Singapore and China seem to be doing pretty well for themselves.

National Socialism without the autism.

>the two places that first removed centralization of the economy, allowed freedom of enterprise and securisation of private property again are doing well
thanks for helping me with my point brah

Techno-Amish-tribalism.

>thinks fascism is about centralizing the economy
Were you listening? You're allowed and encouraged to have private property and freedom of enterprise in a fascist nation, so long as you benefit the nation.

All white.

/thread

A nightwatchmen state.

>literally just proposed the idea of centralized state-corporations handling production and controlling what little freedome of enterprise there is under the guise of "what benefits the nation"
protip : if you are "free" to do things onlyf if they are approved by a comitee, you are not free at all.

Peer to Peer

Then it's not private fuckin property now is it?
If I don't control what I own, then I don't fucking own it now do I? You fucking pratt.

The one that governs least

Basic libertarian "you can have as many memes as you want" system with an immortal genius leader who would only interfere if people are doing dumb fucked up shit or ayy's invade.

>centralized state-corporations handling production
They don't produce shit you moron, private businesses do the production, it's like how the Department of Defense doesn't produce the nation's equipment but hires private businesses to do it instead.

White people everywhere.

The idea of total freedom is an impossibility in itself. All forms of freedom comes with restrictions, and freedom in politics is more about choosing which restrictions you can live with.

The one that trows commies out of helicopters.

Doesn't mean that the restrictions or systems we agree to, have to be involuntary, taxation funded violent coercive monopolies with little accountability, little recourse and little feedback for services rendered, now does it? What's wrong with "you freedom ends where my nose begins", if its voluntary and you're not hurting anyone some prick in a funny hat shouldn't get to say otherwise that's how we get collusion and corruption.

I can always count on you Brits being civil.

>ancap
Just why?

None

Australia is the new ZOG.

Because I don't trust you cunts. Especially cunts in funny hats. I trust people that I have mutually beneficial interactions with, not one sided interactions by cocky dictators in a uniform with a hard on for domination.

Ancap means freedom. Abolition of state doesn't mean abolition of government, it just means an end to the lack of self-determination.

>What would your ideal government be?

Myself as supreme leader.

>What would your ideal government be?

...

Ron Paul style minimal government

Elected absolute monarchy chosen by an aristocracy from the aristocracy made up of the great families of state and a small selection of people who rose through the rank of society.

A monarchy where the married families could vote on the government ministers.

you're welcome

The original US constitution plus the bill of rights and one more ammendment limiting political terms to one term

...

Hereditary monarchy

Spacefaring autocracy.

Marxist communism with closed borders so no one can come or leave.

Artificial intelligence, run on FOSS code. The singularity is coming.