Is globalization inevitable? I just look at history and it seems we've been moving towards a more globalized/connected/open world for many decades now and it doesn't seem like it will really stop.
Is globalization inevitable...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
unvis.it
twitter.com
Only death is inevitable.
we will die off before then
Pretty much a logical consequence of increased speed of movement and communication.
Unless both are removed (which is very unlikely unless a massive technological regression happens) then a global world is unavoidable.
Not that it's a bad thing m8, it's the reason you're not a piss-poor rancher lost in the outback right now
Is it possible to have a intensely globalized world but without a One World Government? A One World Government is what I fear the most because it will be put too much power in the hands of so few people.
>borders somehow make trade impossible
It is impossible to have a world government as long as there are conflicts of interest within it.
The OWG is a pipe dream for UN dignitaries, corporate heads and bankers, communists and theocrats.
There will always be far too much dissension and political interests generating power-plays to create a full union.
Yes, but there will always be shitholes. I wonder how they plan to fix retardism in people. We need some kind of brain stimulant that makes people smarter, more rational and less violent. I think globalisation would be perfect, if they know what to do first.
If we survive long enough to expand from off of this planet globalism will become the new nationalism.
cheaper ? fuck yes, short & mid term cost analysis makes it rain any way from here till sunday. Long term anyone is possible to fail (aka law of large numbers). In that sense it's just as possible to go Armaggedon & a whopass meteor will wipe us all.
From a X-right political point of view it's a clusterfuck of aids and fail all the way.
It's another 50+ years of capitalism and we go global anyway you look at it.
>born too early to shitpost your shitty base on a rock in space into independance
globalism does not exclude capitalism. In fact, it's the only viable long term drive it has.
Yeah, If you want to create a society where the worst leach off of the Best in society.
That's what (((they))) want, of course (((they))) are exempt and keep themselves separate, only the White man has to cuck himself
>Is globalization inevitable?
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of border-less, race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.
In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.
The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide
The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com
Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com
The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com
Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com
also see
The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com
The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com
Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be
The Holocaust:
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
>youtube.com
The only type of globalization necessary is infornation. The idea that no boarders are needed and diversity is strength is jewish propaganda.
>power in the hands of so few (((people)))
>jewish propaganda
money drives information and vise versa. It complements and enhances one another.
One will lead the other and ballance them on any scale possible, even when we go to Mars and beyond.
Globalisation wouldn't necessarily be bad if every continent was as equal as the other.
If that was the case most Africans would stay in Africa, the same with South Americans, Latinos, Indians etc.
>everyone Nazi saluting the earth
kek
Even the most liberal of people will drop globalism in a heartbeat once their daily comforts start being taken away from them.
So we're going to have globalization of information, trade, economy, culture but you expect there to be closed borders? KEK
It already exists.. It's called the international Monetary Fund.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" - Nathan Rothschild
exactly like that matt daemon movie
bunch of poor people of all colours and a couple of rich guys isolated
Wrong
never forget taxes. UNCLE SAM RELIES ON IT
what is the
>internet
>information revolution
That man is a kook. Your digits confirm that life extension is a big brother lie.
Afghanistan will never be globalized. I plan on returning there once it's somewhat stabilized.
We whites will stop it soon kike nigger.
>Is globalization inevitable?
no, politicians say this because love globalization, lots of big $ to be made for corrupt businessmen who doesn't care about the outcome of the world.
>open world
I think you misunderstand user, its not about an "open world", its about control
I think what he's trying to say is open borders are a mistake unless everyone is equal.
The problem is that people in less well off places think that simply moving to a wealthy area is enough to guarantee them a better life, so they move. In the millions.
Unfortunately, a flood of lower quality citizens (not in an ethnocentric regard, but rather untrained, or less educated) into an area would cause more desirable workers to not wish to associate with these new neighbors, moving to a new area.
This means the area the migrants moved to because the same as the first area, and they look to a new location with greener grass. Causing some sort of slow motion musical chairs where no one wants to live near low quality workers, low quality workers included.
We are getting there, the only thing that is preventing a true one world government is people who question and hold up to their values and traditions instead of (((((accepting other cultures))))). Once (((them))) fully indoctrinate over 90% of the world population into multiculturalism, socialism and liberalism, it'll be over.
For those reasons, don't fall into degeneracy, love your nation no matter how fucked up it is, if you don't like your country, don't be a self-loathing cunt and IMPROVE IT.
Don't fall for (((acceptance))) for other cultures, respect them instead (if they deserve it)
To each and everyone there is only one lanb, and it's the one where they aren't labelled as immigrants.
Socialism won't be REAL until mankind stop thinking as individuals and starts thinking as a group (probably never or until the NEET/gibs mentality is eradicated). Until then, capitalism will be the system that will refine the population and lead humanity towards progress.
Too much work for a small amt of people to govern smth so large effectively.
Likely, there may be more collaboration between governments, which will lift up most countries. Or at best a unified government that agrees on some high-level principles important for world stability. The rest will be up to local enforcement/interpretation.
...
The problem is not globalization. The problem is a regulatory environment which stifles competition from new businesses. Established brands are the biggest beneficiaries of regulation. Protect people and the environment, but make life easier for small businesses
Golman Sachs is running you
it's hard to fight globalism when every attempt of resisting it means getting your ass kicked from global trade
I just read "Last and First Men" and I am convinced that the people who want one world race and one world government because they think it will bring unity are actual, insane mental deficients.
>Is globalization inevitable?
Probably. That said, there is more than one flavour of """globalism""". It doesn't necessarily need to take the current form - centralization, almighty state, 1% controlling wealth and making decisions. The current implementation needs to be opposed at every turn; communism never worked once.
Globalization is the attempt to eliminate national governments, reducing them to secondary bureaucracies.
In the west, governments are still under the partial control of the masses, and fixing election & playing party politics is expensive & time-consuming. So those who want absolute & tyrannical control of ALL masses, everywhere, are the driving force behind the idea of globalization.
But this group, while united in the idea that THEY want absolute control, is made up of many cartels. This is the seed of disunion & internal strife.
So while governments and individual rights, and nations may disappear, new battles for ascendancy will start among the plutocracy, and the rich will once again be at each other's throats.
For, you see, the degeneration to a rule-by-the-wealthy is nothing more than a return to a "nobility" class, a huge step backwards for the common man, and a return to undeserved privilege for the money-mongering few.
All you need do is look to the dark ages to see what globalism brings. And they were at constant war, even with their own family members, mostly over trivial nonsense.
>Is globalization inevitable?
No. But the Zionists want to deceive humanity into believing it is, so we don't fight back.
Use the synonym "global slavery" the next time you ponder that question, it'll help you see it more clearly.
Good ol' Stanislaw.