(((They))) created the Jesuits AND the Bavarian Illuminati. There were many groups generally called "Illuminati" but the first group that used that name (though in greek but not in latin) is the one made by Pythagoras of Samos, an Ionian Greek Mystic. The original Illuminati had been dead ever since the last Neo-Pythagorean died. The renaissance had failed to grasp Platonic logic as well as what the hell Zeno was trying to convey in his supposed "paradoxes" which aren't actually paradoxes but a failure to understand incommensurability. The second "Illuminati" is the Los Alumbrados, it was formed in the kingdom of Aragon by former Knights Templar that escaped persecution for their discoveries in the fertile crescent as well as their cooperation with the Venetian banking system that pretty much bankrupted Europe and created the economic dark age and their Genoan merchants brought the black plague through their boats from exotic lands. It's the Genoan flag that England uses. The St. George's flag, a red cross on a white field, was adopted by England and the City of London in 1190 for their ships entering the Mediterranean to benefit from the protection of the Genoese fleet. The English Monarch paid an annual tribute to the Doge of Genoa for this privilege. The Knights Templar paid tribute to the Venetians and are more loyal to them than to the Vatican, and it's from the Venetians that they had developed their own banking system, which some of their wealth was transferred to the Knights of Malta which their presence is also strong in England. Freemasonry is based off of Templarism. The Rosicrucians are merely a form of Templarism. The Los Alumbrados and the Rosicrucians were more or less one and the same time frame although one is Catholic as the Los Alumbrados became the Jesuits, another is Protestant, both funded the destruction of Christianity, both are full of Jews.
(((They))) created the Jesuits AND the Bavarian Illuminati...
The Jesuits became irrelevant but they had fled towards England with their Venetian masters while the Bavarian Illuminati that Adam Weishaupt had created (though a student of a Jesuit school and is merely a front for the Venetians via proxy through the Jesuits of which Ignatius Loyola himself was an agent of the Venetians). The Venetians used their knowledge in the bible as well as the Babylonian Talmud to dissuade certain monarchs from marrying for political gain. The Venetians are so intertwined with modern Pharisaic Judaism to the point that there's rumors of them making edits to some copies of the Babylonian Talmud. Sir John Dee (AKA: 007) the "Enochian" cooperated with Rabbi Judah Loew in the dark arts to guide Queen Elizabeth Stuart I based on astrotheological principles of which all forms of "magic" is based on alignments of the celestial bodies first and foremost, sacrifices and sex rituals are more secondary.
The real enlightened ones are those that understands both the Kosmos Aisthetos and the Kosmos Noetos.
You're still a faggot for even (hopefully) ironically claiming that Hitler was a Jew with one testicle, that's the exact same words that gay nigger spammer had said.
The Jesuits became irrelevant (because they were kicked out for general kikery tier militant mystic "Catholicism") but some of them had fled towards England with their Venetian masters while the ones that stayed in Europe kept it on the down low and kept on subverting the people through their Jesuit schools of which Adam Weishaupt went to a Jesuit college and is the "poster boy" leader of the Bavarian Illuminati which the Bavarian government kicked them out, but they were wherever there were revolutions in Europe among the Jacobinites and French Freemasons that sought to destroy France which was already independent from the Normans. The Normans were Venetian puppet monarchs but they later became the Venetians. Queen Mary Alexandra Elizabeth II has ancestry of the House of Guelph. the Genoan noble houses are a part of the Venetians which are sister republics.
There's two main concepts that makes up what I call "Templarism": the banking system of monetarism practiced in the temple of apollo, and the intel gathering spy network with any front, whether religious, political, economic, academic, militaristic, doesn't matter. In order to justify their own evil, they look good in all aspects of life while internally, doing the opposite among themselves internalizing and suppressing their evil through externalization and oppressing innocent people behind closed doors away from the public view. The Juden as the Israelites always did this and were exposed by their own God for such evil that they've created a bullshit excuse to depart from the Levitical system. I call anything that isn't of the Levitical system to be either anti Juden Christianity, or modern Judaism of which modern Judaism is primarily Pharisaic, secondarily a Jewish attempt to reconcile their cult with Hellenic rationalism and with other Eastern cults. Pro Juden Christianity were bred out as they've no longer have a physical king and their religious king/savior gone up to heaven long ago while they were ashamed to be by any cultural extension to be associated with Pharisaic Judaism, abandoned their own tongue and learned Greek and Latin.
Is Pharisaic, Rabbinic, Talmudic Judaism original Judaism/Israelism? No. Did Templarism come from the Pharisees? No, but they've sure adopted its model. So what is Templarism? Fundamentally, it's metapolitics. They use money to bypass anything and everything. A byproduct of metapolitics is "demonic" in its original sense since demons deal with distribution of fortunes, so they distribute fortunes for more fortune. In their irrational mindset, or rationalized attempt to explain the irrational, they partake in orgies, degenerate behavior, etc., at the expense of innocent children, which drinking their blood at the peak of adrenaline rush from fear and stress for adrenochrome is merely a coincidental attribute of a sick fuck that again, tries to rationalize the irrational, ignorant things that they do. Why the hell do Rabbis eat baby foreskins and suck the blood off of it? There's no rational answer to that.
...
...
Goebbels is so cute
...
Moar
Where is the global warming? lol. The propaganda has changed, and you haven't even noticed. They changed it to"climate change", to cope with the failure of their propaganda.
But even here, you should know that climate always change. There is nothing like a static climate. Climate have always changed.
Now on what scale is the current changing?
CO2 rate in the earth is really growing up, that's true, but at what scale? Are we truly the responsible?
That's the question.
Now, about the question of where does the CO2 comes from.
Since 1993, the temperature haven't changed a single bite on earth (if you remove the Al nino etc..). During this period, we have emited 40% of all the CO2 humans have even emited since the 19e centurie.
We have moved from 0.03% to 0.04% of CO2 in the air during the 20e centurie. So we are certainly not in cause. What is really in cause? In fact, we don't know at all. There are some hypothesis, but nothing strong enough to be applied (solar activity for exemple).
About the question of the warming, and certainly why they have removed it from the propaganda, François Gervais, a professor at the university of Tours in France confirm that in the american studies, EVERY recent studies and high american professor are all saying that if we consume every single bite of fossil energy on earth, we would moved from 0.04% to 0.06% of C02 in the air (50%), and this will result according to the temperature variation of the last 25 years, to a raise of the temperature of 0.3°C (if the CO2 is doubled, then the temperature raise is of 0.6°C, from an article published in Earth science review, and a lot of others). This variation is btw very difficult to measure since the variation of temperature of the climat is at a higher scale. In fact, more recent are the articles and studies, the lower the variation of temperature is, since the models are being confirmed false.
So, to conclude, if we ever consume every fossil energy on earth, the temperature will raise by 0.3°C. So yeah, the temperature will raise, but at a ridicule scale, so little that it's hardly measurable because of the regular variation of temperature on the earth.
Now, is the question, why this gigantic worldwide campaign about the global warming - sorry - the ozone hole - sorry - (h ttps://archive.fo/UseLX) - climate change.
Why is europe spending a huge tone of money on this?
Why have they made a very easy hackable system of carbon trade exchange, that allowed monstrous VTA scam?
Dig my friend, dig down the rabbit hole. Search about who have all of these "eco-friendly" and solar panel/wind turbine companies. About how this global thread is actually a tool to push globalism. The entire world united against a common thread. How romantic.
What can you say about Eastern Europe's rejection of migration plan? Is this legitimate resistance or just being play for the long game?
Some elite Jews became a part of the European "Black" (as in evil) Nobility, they cooperated and merged with each other. Venice harbored Jews, was a Jewish state, and had a Jewish ghetto. Much of the Jews merged with the so called "Papal Nobility" as well. I don't really care about endless genealogies. There's Jews in India (Brahmins, Abrahm was a Brahmin h ttp://w ww.hermetics.org/Abraham2.html ) and China (Kaifeng Jews), etc., and they won't truly all come together in one location just as you will never see all the slaves (black as well as white slaves) that the Jews and Muslims had sold off return to where they've came from. This cruel world will always have evil wherever there is any amount of good left, while if the vermin by any slim chance succeed in slaying all those that don't submit to the Noahide laws, they'll fight even more among themselves and polarize from each other even if the people in said nightmare scenario world share a much more limited gene pool, all before they become even more genetically damaged due to a multiracial Judean Unitarian global policy, and permanently sterilizing mankind at the latest, 2000 years later, which by then, the world goes much backwards in technology.
A world with only Jews is guaranteed self implosion of its own system genetically as well as economically, yet they won't really have anyone to blame but themselves, they will suffer from their own insufferable behavior and go out with a nuclear explosion because they hate their own more than they hate others. My realistically positive way of looking things is that the more evil a cult is, the less likely it would last long enough without changing into a weaker form of its former evil to the point where it no longer resembles anything like what it once was, while it then creates more room for good to exist. Society will find a way to live on, and even if we don't, they won't either as they become more cannibalistic and self destructive, and eventually the sun will grow and make the earth inhabitable while Titan slowly melts and potentially harbor new life.
The Grail myth is not biblical and so is not original Christianity, but from other myths (mostly of druidic origins) that is retroactively reapplied into syncretic Christianity which is not radical (root, core, true, authentic) Christianity. The Templars merely found an more ancient form of the basis behind the same druidic myth of which has nothing to do with Christianity. The whole holy blood theory is a newer theory that first assumes that Jesus Christ was real and that he got some pussy. If I was an anti-Christian (BTW, I'm not an anti-theist, atheist, agnostic nor a creationist, just saying an hypothetical statement), if I even assumed that there was a historical Jesus, then I've unwillingly claimed that the biblical Jesus of which fulfilling at least one prophecy, of which the chain of prophecies that lead to that prophecy are also to be taken to be true, all the way to the point of believing that the first chapter of Genesis was true. Trying to blaspheme the biblical account by admitting that more than half of the bible canon to be actual historical events is still a huge defeat. At least Naturalists are completely fine with assuming that such events might had happened, while leaving out why it happened yet of course that would mean they're "agnostics" because they don't know what subjectively happened and merely assume what objectively might had happened, and you can't objectively verify an event that you weren't there to see it. It's like the whole chicken or egg thing, you can't ever objectively answer the question regardless of what you believe or a belief in a denial of what others believe. h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=wRb0-ZtAp9A
>The Templars merely found an more ancient form of the basis behind the same druidic myth of which has nothing to do with Christianity.
I believe their excavations in Jerusalem led them to uncover the truth of the fictional nature of Christianity as well as the sources from which the Abramahic traditions stole, namely the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Persians with Christianity incorporating more Greek ideas as well. In the modern day, the Dead Sea materials have confirmed part of what they found, that Yeshua is a fictional amalgam of several hundred years worth of Semitic revolutionaries. This explains why the Christ myth so closely matches other religious traditions, because it was a Semitic adaption of those concepts for the purpose of justifying an eternal proto-Marxist revolt and the subversion of Rome.
The Templars themselves, or at least a cadre within the organization who studied what was found in Jerusalem and then the Egyptian tradition, took up a set of symbols which go back to pre-Christian religions. Based on their usage of the grail and the ark of the covenant together, it's also likely that they found the resting place of the ark in Ethiopia as well as uncovering its origin as a technology of Egypt. The message which seems to come down from the Templars and early Freemasons is "Ignore Abrahamic traditions, look to Egypt."
What's your read on the Templars? As far as I can tell, they were good goyim who went to Jerusalem and at some point were exposed to the ancient evidence showing that all of the Abrahamic religions are degenerated copies of the Old Way (Egyptian, Sumerian, Aryan, and other European religions which are successors to the pre-Younger Dryas civilization). This would be the point where they take up the symbolist tradition which is seen as alchemic knowledge encoded in their later works. From that time onward, the grail of the templars is the truth about the falsehood of Christianity itself, which is why they hid their message and came under attack by the Vatican (whose highest levels of authority already knew the truth, but have kept it hidden so that they can participate in the destruction and enslavement of Europe). After being dissolved, the Templars became the Freemasons, with their syncretic traditions leading back to the truth they found in Jerusalem. However, it seems after that point the Freemasons were simply infiltrated and re-aligned to the Semitic hegemony.
I am not 100% sure, but yes, that seems to be the most likely scenario. There seems to be a continuity, one might even say the succession, starting with certain ancient secret society, moving towards Egypt, various Gnostic sects and the ancient Greek Illuminati, then to other parts of Europe (spread by pagan Romans), then further north by various "heresies" of which the Cathars and Templars (at a later stage) were most prominent, then even further, to Scotland and overseas (by various privateers that later became the original Freemasons, albeit a very specific rite). They had a strong foothold in Germany which later brought us a knightly order that Hitler and the inner circle of NSDAP were initiated in. All along the way they were followed by the Jew who was always just one step behind, making them face heavy persecution (while being responsible for the persecution of the Jews by revealing their schemes and crimes). The question is, were they bringing a foreign element into Europe, or returning something that was lost long ago? The scientific discoveries that followed their presence were not a coincidence either.
Clearly, ((they)) shut it down. Lets see.. Berlin July 13, 1934. Sage because this is going to be extremely long.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Acting on behalf of the Reich Government, the President of the Reichstag, Hermann Göring, has called you together today in order to give me an opportunity to enlighten the Volk before this body, the highest appointed forum of the nation, concerning events which will hopefully live on in our history for all time as both a sad reminder and a warning. Out of a combination of objective circumstances and personal guilt, of human incompetence and human defects, a crisis arose in our young Reich which all too easily may have brought about truly destructive consequences for an indeterminate period of time. The purpose of my remarks is to explain to you and thus to the nation how they came about and were overcome. The contents of my remarks will be completely frank. Only in respect to scope must I impose upon myself limitations necessitated, on the one hand, by consideration to the interests of the Reich and, on the other, by the boundaries drawn by the feeling of shame. Street riots, barricade fighting, mass terror, and an individualistic propaganda of disintegration today trouble nearly all countries throughout the world. In Germany as well, a few isolated fools and criminals of this type are still making repeated attempts to ply their destructive trade. Since the defeat of the Communist Party, we have experienced, albeit growing constantly weaker, one attempt after another to establish Communist organizations with varying degrees of anarchist character and to put them to work. Their methods are always the same. While portraying the present lot as unbearable, they extol the Communist paradise of the future and, in doing so, are practically only waging war for hell. For the consequences of their victory in a country like Germany could be nothing other than destructive.
However, the trial run of their capability and of the consequences of their rule have, in the concrete case, already produced results so clear to the German Volk that the overwhelming majority, particularly of the German workers, has recognized this Jewish-international benefactor of mankind and inwardly defeated it. The National Socialist State will wage a Hundred Years’ War, if necessary, to stamp out and destroy every last trace within its boundaries of this phenomenon which poisons and makes dupes of the Volk (Volksvernarrung). The second group of discontented is comprised of those political leaders who regard their futures as having been settled by January 30 but who have never been able to reconcile themselves to the irreversibility of this fact. The more Time veils their own incompetence with the merciful cloak of forgetfulness, the more they believe themselves entitled to gradually reintroduce themselves to the mind of the Volk. However, because their incompetence then was not a matter of time but a matter of inborn incompetence, they are equally unable today to prove their worth by positive, useful work but instead perceive their purpose in life as being fulfilled by voicing criticism which is as underhanded as it is false. The Volk does not belong to them either. They can neither seriously threaten the National Socialist State nor seriously damage it in any way. A third group of destructive elements is made up of those revolutionaries who were shaken and uprooted in 1918 in regard to their relation to the State and who thus have lost all inner connection to a regulated human social order.
They have become revolutionaries who pay homage to the revolution for its own sake and would like to see it become a permanent state of affairs. All of us once suffered from the horrible tragedy that, as obedient and dutiful soldiers, we were suddenly faced by a revolt of mutineers who actually succeeded in gaining possession of the State. Each of us had originally been trained to abide by the laws, to respect authority and to show obedience to the commands and orders it issues, and instilled with an inner devotion to the representatives of the State. Now the revolution of deserters and mutineers forced us to inwardly disassociate ourselves from these concepts. We were unable to muster any respect for the new usurpers. Honor and obedience forced us to refuse to obey; love of the nation and the Vaterland obliged us to wage war on them; the amorality of their laws extinguished in us the conviction of the necessity for complying with them-and hence we became revolutionaries. However, even as revolutionaries, we had not disassociated ourselves from the obligation to apply to ourselves the natural laws of the sovereign right of our Volk and to respect these laws. It was not our intention to violate the will and the right of selfdetermination of the German Volk, but to drive away those who violated the nation. And when finally, legitimated by the trust of this Volk, we drew the consequences from our fourteen-year-long struggle, this was not done in order to unloose a chaos of unreined instincts, but with the sole aim of establishing a new and better order. For us, the revolution which shattered the Second Germany was nothing other than the tremendous act of birth which summoned the Third Reich into being. We wanted to once again create a State to which every German can cling in love;
to establish a regime to which everyone can look up with respect; to find laws which are commensurate with the morality of our Volk; to install an authority to which each and every man submits in joyful obedience. For us, the revolution is not a permanent state of affairs. When a deathly check is violently imposed upon the natural development of a Volk, an act of violence may serve to release the artificially interrupted flow of evolution to allow it once again the freedom of natural development. However, there is no such thing as a permanent revolution or any type of profitable development possible by means of periodically recurring revolts. Among the countless files which I was obliged to read through in the past few weeks, I also found a journal with the notes of a man who was cast onto the route of resistance to the laws in 1918 and now lives in a world in which the law itself appears to provoke resistance; an unnerving document, an uninterrupted sequence of conspiracies and plots, an insight into the mentality of people who, without realizing it, have found in nihilism their ultimate creed. Incapable of any real cooperation, determined to take a stand against any kind of order, filled by hatred of every authority as they are, their uneasiness and their restlessness can be quelled only by their permanent mental and conspiratorial preoccupation with the disintegration of whatever exists at the given time. Many of them stormed the State with us in our early period of struggle, but an inner lack of discipline led most of them away from the disciplined National Socialist Movement in the course of the struggle. The last remnant seemed to have withdrawn after January 30.
Their link with the National Socialist Movement was dissolved the moment this itself, as State, became the object of their pathological aversion. As a matter of principle, they are enemies of every authority and thus utterly incapable of being converted. Accomplishments which appear to strengthen the new German State only provoke their even greater hatred.
For there is one thing, above all, which all of these oppositional elements principally have in common: they do not see before them the German Volk, but the institution of order they so abhor. They are filled not by a desire to help the Volk, but by the fervent hope that the government will fail in its work to rescue the Volk. Thus they are never willing to admit that an action is beneficial but are instead filled by the will to contest any success as a matter of principle and to extract from every success any potential weaknesses. This third group of pathological enemies of the State is dangerous because, until a new order has begun to crystallize from a state of chaotic conflict, they represent a reservoir of willing accomplices for every attempt at revolt. I must, however, now devote my attention to the fourth group, which on occasion-perhaps even unintentionally-nonetheless plies a truly destructive trade. I am speaking of those who belonged to a relatively small class in society, who have nothing to do and thus find the time and the opportunity to deliver oral reports on everything capable of bringing
some interesting-and important-variety to their lives which are otherwise completely meaningless. For while the overwhelming majority in the nation is made to earn its daily bread by toilsome labor, in certain classes of life there are still people whose sole activity consists of doing nothing, followed by more of the same to recuperate from having done nothing. The more pathetic the life of such a drone is, all the more avidly will he seize upon whatever can fill this vacuum with some interesting content. Personal and political gossip is caught up eagerly and passed on even more eagerly. And because these people, as a result of doing nothing, have no living tie to the masses of the nation’s millions, their lives are delimitated by the scope of the sphere within which they move. Every bit of prattle which becomes absorbed by these circles throws its reflection back and forth endlessly as between two distorting mirrors. Because their very beings are filled with a nothingness which they constantly see reflected in those like them, they believe that this phenomenon is universal. They mistake the view of their circle for the view of all. Their doubts, they fancy, constitute the troubles of the entire nation. In reality, this little colony of drones is only a state within the State, without any living contact with life, with the feelings
hopes and cares of the rest of the Volk. However, they are dangerous, for they are veritable germ-carriers for unrest, uncertainty, rumors, allegations, lies, suspicions, slander, and fear, and thus they contribute to creating a gradually increasing tension until, in the end, it is difficult to recognize or draw the natural boundaries between them and the Volk. Just as they wreak their havoc in every other nation, they do so in Germany, too. They regarded the National Socialist Revolution as a conversation topic just as interesting as, on the other hand, the fight of the enemies of the National Socialist State. But one thing is certain: the work of rebuilding our Volk and, with it, the work of our Volk itself is only possible if the German Volk follows its leadership with inner calm, order and discipline and above all if it trusts in its leadership. For it is only the trust and the faith placed in the new State which have enabled us to take on and solve the great tasks put to us by former times. Even though the National Socialist regime was forced to come to terms with these various groups from the very beginning and has, in fact, come to terms with them, a mood has nonetheless arisen in the past few months which, in the end, could no longer be taken lightly. The prattle of a new revolution, of a new upheaval, of a new uprising- while at first infrequent-gradually took on such intensity that only a foolhardy leadership of state would have been capable of ignoring it.
(3)
It was no longer possible to simply dismiss as empty chatter what was put down in hundreds and ultimately thousands of oral and written reports. Even three months ago, the leadership of the Party was convinced that it was simply the foolish gossip of political reactionaries, Marxist anarchists and all sorts of idlers, completely lacking any substantiation in fact. In mid-March I directed that preparations be made for a new wave of propaganda. It was to make the German Volk immune against any new attempts at poisoning. At the same time, however, I also gave certain Party Offices the order to track down the recurring rumors of a new revolution and, if possible, to locate the source of these rumors. It was found that tendencies had appeared in the ranks of several highranking SA leaders which naturally gave rise to serious doubts. At first, there were only isolated manifestations, the inner connections of which were not yet quite clear.
1. Against my express order and contrary to reports given me by former Chief of Staff Röhm, the SA had been blown into such proportions as to necessarily endanger the inner homogeneity of this unique organization.
2. Education in the National Socialist Weltanschauung was becoming more and more neglected in the ranks of these certain SA offices I have mentioned.
3. The natural relations between the Party and the SA slowly began to weaken. Methodical steps were taken, by means of which it was ascertained that endeavors were being made to disengage the SA from the mission which I had assigned to it in order to utilize it for other tasks or interests.
4. Promotions to leadership posts in the SA revealed themselves upon review to be based upon a completely one-sided evaluation of purely external capabilities or, in many cases, on a merely assumed intellectual capacity. The greater number of our oldest and most loyal SA men were increasingly neglected when leaders were appointed and posts filled, while those who had enlisted in 1933 and who are not favored with any especial regard within the Movement were incomprehensibly given priority. In some cases, only a few months of uninterrupted membership in the Party or even only in the SA sufficed for promotion to a higher SA office to which an old SA leader was barred access even after many years of service.
5. The behavior of these individual SA leaders who, for the most part, had in no way grown to become part of the Movement, was as un-National Socialist as, at times, it was positively revolting. However, it could not be overlooked that these circles contained one source of unrest in the Movement, which lay in the fact that their lack of practical National Socialism attempted to veil itself in quite uncalled for demands for a new revolution.
I drew Chief of Staff Röhm’s attention to this and a number of other problems, but this did not result in any noticeable improvement or even in any recognizable reaction to my censures. In the months of April and May, there was a constant increase in these complaints. For the first time, however, during this period I received reports-with supporting documentation-of discussions which had been held by individual high-ranking SA leaders and which can be described in no other terms than “gross insubordination” (große Ungehörigkeit). For the first time, there was undeniable supporting documentation in several cases that references had been made to the necessity of a new revolution in such discussions and that leaders had received instructions to prepare both inwardly and materially for such a new revolution. Chief of Staff Röhm attempted to deny that any of these incidents had in fact taken place, stating that they could be explained as disguised attacks on the SA.
(4)
The gathering of evidence for several of these incidents by means of statements of parties involved ended in a most serious maltreatment of these witnesses who, for the most part, came from the ranks of the old SA. As early as the end of April, the leadership of the Party and a number of State institutions concerned were convinced that a certain group of high-ranking SA leaders had deliberately contributed to the alienation of the SA from the Party and other State institutions or at least had failed to prevent this from happening. Repeated attempts to remedy this through normal official channels failed each time. Chief of Staff Röhm gave me his personal assurance time and time again that the cases would be investigated and the guilty parties removed and, if necessary, punished. However, no visible change took place. In the month of may, several Party and State offices received countless complaints of offenses committed by high-ranking and middle-ranking SA leaders which, accompanied by supporting documentation, could not be denied. The offenses included everything from rabble-rousing speeches to intolerable excesses. Minister-President Göring had already previously endeavored in Prussia to give the authority of the National Socialist will of the State priority over the individual wills of certain elements. In other Länder, Party offices and public authorities had been forced, on occasion, to take a stand against certain intolerable excesses. A number of the parties responsible were arrested. I have always stressed that an authoritarian regime
Bad behavior, drunken excesses, molesting peaceful, upstanding citizens-this is unworthy of a leader, contrary to National Socialism, and detestable to the utmost degree. Thus I have always insisted that higher demands be placed upon the behavior and conduct of National Socialist leaders than upon the other Volksgenossen. He who would command more respect for himself must in turn achieve more. The most basic thing which can be expected of him is that his life not be a disgraceful example to those around him. Thus I do not want National Socialists to be more leniently judged and punished for such offenses than other Volksgenossen; rather, I expect that a leader who forgets himself in this way be punished more severely than an unknown man would under identical circumstances. And I do not wish to make any distinction here between leaders of the political organizations and leaders of the formations of our SA, SS, HJ, etc. The determination of the National Socialist leadership of State to put an end to such excesses committed by unworthy elements who serve only to heap shame upon the Party and the SA evoked extremely vehement counter-reactions on the part of the Chief of Staff. The first of the original National Socialist fighters,
a number of whom had struggled for nearly fifteen years for the victory of the Movement and now represented the Movement as high-ranking State officials in leading positions in our State, were called to account for the action they took against such unworthy elements; in other words, Chief of Staff Röhm attempted to take disciplinary action against these persons, the oldest supporters of the Party, in courts of honor composed in part of the youngest party comrades and even of persons who were not members of the Party. These conflicts led to very serious talks between Chief of Staff Röhm and myself, in the course of which, for the first time, doubts as to this man’s loyalty began to arise in my mind.
Although I had rejected any such thoughts for many months, although I had personally protected this man in unshakable loyalty and comradeship for years in the past, warnings gradually began to leave their mark on me-above all, warnings from my deputy in the Party leadership, Rudolf Hess-which, try as I might, I could no longer refute. From May onwards, there could no longer be any doubt that Chief of Staff Röhm was involved in ambitious plans which, had they become reality, could have resulted only in the most violent disruptions. The fact that, throughout these months, I hesitated again and again to make any final decision, was due to the following:
1. I could not simply reconcile myself to the idea that a relationship which I had built upon trust could be nothing but a lie.
2. I still harbored the secret hope of being able to spare the Movement and my SA the disgrace of such a confrontation and to repair the damage without bitter fighting.
However, the end of May brought even more alarming facts to light. Chief of Staff Röhm began to depart, not only inwardly, but with his entire outward behavior, from the Party. All of the principles with which we had become great lost their validity. The life which the Chief of Staff-and with him, a certain circle of others-began to lead was intolerable from any National Socialist point of view. As if it were not terrible enough that he himself and his circle of devotees broke every single law of decency and modesty, still worse, this poison now began to spread in ever increasing circles. But worst of all was the fact that, out of a certain common predisposition, a sect gradually began to form in the SA which made up the nucleus of a conspiracy directed not only against the normal conceptions of a healthy Volk but against the security of the State as well. Reviews conducted in the month of May of the promotions granted in certain areas of the SA resulted in the terrible realization that men had been promoted to positions in the SA without any consideration to their accomplishments within the Movement and the SA for the sole reason that they belonged to the circle of these persons with this particular predisposition. Individual incidents which are well known to you, for instance the case of the Standartenführer Schmidt in Breslau, revealed a state of affairs which could only be regarded as intolerable. My order to intervene was followed in theory, but in fact, it was sabotaged. Three groups gradually crystallized from the leadership of the SA:
a small group, the elements of which were held together by a common predisposition who would stop at nothing and who had blindly delivered themselves into the hands of Chief of Staff Röhm. In principle, these men were the SA leaders Ernst from Berlin, Heines in Silesia, Hayn in Saxony, and Heydebreck in Pomerania. In addition to these men, there was another group of SA leaders who did not inwardly belong to this circle but felt themselves obligated to obey Chief of Staff Röhm simply from a soldierly point of view. And these were faced by a third group of leaders who made no secret of their inner aversion and disapproval and, as a result, had in part been removed from positions of responsibility while others had been pushed aside and, in many respects, simply disregarded. At the fore of these SA leaders who were rejected because of their basic decency stood the present Chief of Staff, Lutze, as well as the leader of the SS, Himmler. Without informing me at all and, initially, without even the slightest suspicion on my part, Chief of Staff Röhm had established contact with General Schleicher using as intermediary a thoroughly corrupt swindler, a certain Herr von A., whom you all know. General Schleicher was the man who gave an external framework to Röhm’s inner desires. He was the one who upheld and defined in concrete terms the viewpoint that:
(6)
1. the present German regime was insupportable; that
2. above all, power over the Armed Forces and all national associations was to be united in one hand; that
3. Chief of Staff Röhm was the only man who could be considered for this post; that
4. Herr von Papen would have to be removed, and he was willing to assume the position of Vice Chancellor; and that furthermore, other major changes would have to be made in the Reich cabinet. As always in such cases, the search for men to make up the new government began, under the condition that I was to be allowed to remain at my post-at least for the time being. The implementation of these proposals from General von Schleicher was bound to meet with my unconquerable resistance as early as item 2. It would never have been objectively or humanly possible for me to have given my consent to a personnel change in the Reich Ministry of Defense and to have appointed Chief of Staff Röhm to the vacant post. First of all, for objective reasons: For fourteen years, I have consistently upheld that the fighting organizations of the Party are political organizations which have nothing to do with the Army. In my eyes, it would constitute a disavowal of my view and my policies of fourteen years to appoint the leader of the SA to head the Army. In November 1923, I proposed appointing an officer to head the Army and not my SA leader at the time, Captain Göring. Secondly, it would have been humanly impossible for me to ever consent to this proposal on the part of General von Schleicher.
oy vey. kill me.
Yeah, this spam is cute. But where is it from and what good does it have for solutions today?
the end
I hope someone screencaps these posts
ill finish these posts at a later date
bump
Thank you user, fun read