Epic "State" you fags have got here, what's the mode of government? Is there a tax policy? How are international relations going, has Canada and the US government gotten mad about you attempting to annex chunks of their territory yet or are you just Larping faggots?
Isaac Barnes
Someone needs to make a NatSoc literature flowchart
Sebastian Ross
This thread needs more Strasserism
Ryan Green
This thread needs more fuck off with your dumb leftist ideologies and walls of text.
Aaron Hill
Your anger only fuels me.
Isaiah Scott
>American flag/symbols
Aaron Turner
I agree. It needs more Strikes as well
Ian Carter
I have more. does it trigger you?
John Fisher
In other terms, Communists are often statist in practice, but Communism itself is not in theory. Strasserites and Nazbols are therefore not Communist, as they reject Communist theory.
David Jenkins
It certainly does well to make you look like a bigger fool than you already are. That dishrag of a flag has nothing to do with our people, nothing to do with freedom, and nothing to do with national socialism. Strasserism is a leftists ideology just short of Communism. It's egalitarian in nature and doesn't belong in this general.
Josiah Diaz
>muh freedumb Imagine my shock. Your freedumb and "muh constitushun" literally means nothing to anyone outside of dumbfuckistan.
Carter Myers
I'm sorry what was this general called again?
William Flores
Then why the fuck are you posting American flags? National Socialism =/= Marxist Socialism.
Carter Walker
> Communists are often statist in practice, but Communism itself is not in theory. So (((in theory))) who's going to prohibit me from hiring my neighbourette to suck my cock? Every jewish doctrine promises not what it delivers.
Ryan Cruz
Good thing Strasserim isn't Marxist socialism then
Gabriel Lee
I was entirely certain that it'd trigger you, and I was proven correct.
That's all for now, I had quite some fun posting here, but I have other things to do as well. I may come back tomorrow if I'm bored enough.
Ethan Jenkins
>lol umad when I post American flags >lol what America stands for is dumb I'm just not seeing your logic here, are you trying to antagonize or what? What are you trying to accomplish? It's 100% Marxist. That's why A to the double H dolf had Strasser killed, because he was a Commie cuck who was trying to derail the movement kind of like what you two fuck boys are doing. Nice try though.
Michael Reed
>/leftypol/
Brody Peterson
>It's 100% Marxist Can you give me a definition of Marxism then? Are these people fascist >Falangism (Spanish: Falangismo) was the political ideology of the Falange Española de las JONS and, afterwards, of the Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista (both known simply as the "Falange"), as well as derivatives of it in other countries. In its original form, Falangism is widely considered a fascist ideology
Wyatt Adams
redpill me on the northwestern front
Angel Wright
>National Syndicalist economics Falange leader José Antonio Primo de Rivera advocated national syndicalism as the alternative to both capitalism and communism
Falangism supports a national, trans-class society while opposing individual-class-based societies, such as bourgeois or proletarian societies. Falangism opposes class conflict. José Antonio Primo de Rivera declared that "The State is founded on two principles—service to the united nation and the cooperation of classes".]
Originally Falangism in Spain as promoted by Primo de Rivera advocated a "National Syndicalist" economy that rejected both capitalism and communism.[ Primo de Rivera denounced capitalism for being an individualist economy at the hands of the bourgeoisie that turned workers "into a dehumanized cog in the machinery of bourgeois production" while state socialist economies enslaved the individual by handing control of production to the state.[
Falange's original manifesto, the Twenty-Seven Points, called for a social revolution to create a national syndicalist economy that creates national syndicates of both employees and employers to mutually organize and control the economic activity, agrarian reform, industrial expansion, and respect for private property with the exception of nationalizing credit facilities to prevent capitalist usury.
Falangism is staunchly anti-communist. The Spanish Falange supported Spanish intervention during World War II against the Soviet Union in the name of anti-communism, resulting in Spain supporting the Anti-Comintern Pact and sending volunteers to join Nazi Germany's foreign legions on the Eastern Front to support the German war effort against the Soviet Union. >Falangism is staunchly anti-communist. Wait but how could they be anti-commuist if they were commies?
Nathan Reed
It's the only movement that actually matters.
Luis Gray
Can anyone ID this flag? I've seen the Wolfangel used on it's own before but never stacked three times with the swastika.
Jackson Davis
>Syndicalist lol
Noah Allen
So is that fascist organization actually Communist?
Should we throw out this image?
Ryan Cox
WHY THE FUCK DIDNT WE LISTEN!?
Xavier Myers
Reminder that Strasserists are divide and conquer shills.
Gabriel Nguyen
The really big ants would listen
Michael Cox
A bullet for every Strasserist
AKA socialized executions just like they wanted
Samuel Ross
Because Libertarians are fucking dumb and want "muh freedom" over actually addressing problems in society.
Mason Foster
...
Christian Cruz
and they will lose that freedom as long as one kike is still breathing
Jaxson Price
Implying a rejection of anti right wing nationalistic Bolshvism is bad especially since a natsoc state would have no problem with a libertarian society next door Implying there had to be a war against the Soviets, if Hitler didn't take such a anti-soviet stance. (look where it got a bullet in him) The "criticism of bourgeois antisemitism" is on the same level as Mosley and Mussolini. May as well just call Mussolini a kike shill. Since he defended Italian Jews >National and social integration of the working class. Just means uniting the workers under the nation for the good of the nation. >"These demands show clearly that strasser wanted to make Germany a bolshevik state No you dense retard look up exactly what a bolshevik is. Strasserism is not Bolshevism Strasserism is not communism. Strassersists beat up and killed Communists
Look up where fascism and it's economics come from. Protip Italian and French National Syndicalism. >implying strasserism was going to kill the aryan race when they were first and foremost nationalists. "We must take from the right nationalism without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism" Go ahead and tell me that means kill all white people
I hope you know the Strasserists also had plans too return German borders to 1919, which includes getting Danzig back from Poland along in a union of All Germans in Europe. Yeah totally not nationalists Gregor Strasser also was in the freikorps and participated in the beer hall putsch with Hitler and was also found guilty of high treason.
They also wanted to kick Russia and the United states out of any future agreements between any European nations since he classified both of them as non European
Jordan Barnes
Correct. Most Libertarians and AnCap, except for a few on Sup Forums, don't even look at race/Jews, and even the ones on Sup Forums don't agree with each other on fucking anything. Libertarianism and AnCap are literally "divide and conquer" the ideology. They are societies that could work in a pre-industrialized society, but they cannot last forever.
Eli Bennett
You left because you have no answer to my question. You left because you're left. You're left because you're left behind.
Christian Perez
national socialism must rise. nothing else can save the west. how can we get a majority of whites onboard when were so hated. its the only way that will last for all time. what do?
Nathaniel Sullivan
You don't have questions. You Claim Strasserism is literally communism when it's very obviously not. Go ahead and refute these
Connor Powell
its kike poisoned natsoc
Angel Sanchez
I'll tell you what we do and I'll tell you now. We need to concentrate our numbers in one area, after the economic collapse of the United States happens we'll be able to assemble an army and reconquer the west.
Joseph Turner
>Implying a rejection of anti right wing nationalistic Bolshvism is bad especially since a natsoc state would have no problem with a libertarian society next door A Libertarian state can go from friendly to not friendly very very quickly. It all depends on what large companies are the main driving force behind the economy. >Implying there had to be a war against the Soviets Read Icebreaker. It's entirely plausible that the Soviets were planning to invade Europe. >No you dense retard look up exactly what a bolshevik is. Strasserism is not Bolshevism Strasserism is not communism. Strassersists beat up and killed Communists I don't care. Strasserists want a form of Marxist economics when they want less free enterprise. Taxes are OK, because any functioning state needs some form of them, but "muh proletariat" over everything else is dumb. The free market isn't entirely bad, we just have to enforce the moral and cultural side of things while making sure people don't abuse the system.
Ian Williams
how do we get them to do that? our women are disgusting party sluts who care more about taking bbc than their own lives, our men are assholes and faggots who would rather play videogames than get a job or start a family. they wiill never get onboard
Kayden King
It doesn't matter if a hundred trillion people say 2+2=7. Get a woman of your own, and get your ass to the North West Front. The time is now, we have each other and no one else.
Lincoln Watson
This guy has a good point. Economic collapse or not, if we can start moving into one area, we can hugely influence local, then state gov. State gov still has a lot of say in how things go. Eventually, we can work our way up to national gov, or if the U.S collapses, we can still group together.
Adam Clark
Either that or errupt in chaos and start anew, but yes. We need to concentrate.
Samuel Wilson
i cant stand moderates and conservatives that think they can save america. america is already dead! compared to even the 2000s its like a different country. there is nothing to save. we need to tear it down ansd build anew, like the founding fathers would have expected us to do 60 years ago
Caleb Sanchez
We need to wait for collapse or win in the polls. Hitler, GLR, and WLP all recognized this fact. Public perception is still too much against us for anything like that.
Eli Campbell
It's most likely going to tear itself down tbhfamalamadingdong.
Dominic Rivera
>A Libertarian state can go from friendly to not friendly very very quickly. It all depends on what large companies are the main driving force behind the economy. Germany was not about to invade Denmark because they weren't fascist. >Read Icebreaker. It's entirely plausible that the Soviets were planning to invade Europe. Because Hitler took such an anti-soviet stance. Writing vast pages in his book about the Soviets. Even then it's more obvious and plausible Stalin was not going to invade since his one state socialism was very different to Trotsky and Lenin's continuation of the revolution though force. And if Gregor had his way Hitler would of actually allied them. Imagine if Hitler didn't need to invade the Soviets and just snagged half of Poland and fought off England >I don't care. Strasserists want a form of Marxist economics when they want less free enterprise. Taxes are OK, because any functioning state needs some form of them, but "muh proletariat" over everything else is dumb. Not really a point considering many different fascists all over ran different economic and social plans. Take the Spanish fascists for instance they were violent anti-communists yet ran off the same economic system (National syndicalism) Which just happens to be the fundamental basis of Fascist ideology and economics. Many early writers about the ideology were nationalists,anti-Semites.
Even then Syndicalism still has a free market you would still buy products with money and see ads for different brands or cars on tv. It's a form of corporatism
Julian Adams
how can we improve our image? we are an edgy subculture, but we dont have 60 years to become the establishment. we will be living under the North American Socialist Republic by then
Brandon Cox
>Germany was not about to invade Denmark because they weren't fascist. And they invaded anyway because depending on (((who))) was in charge, they could have been backstabbed. >Because Hitler took such an anti-soviet stance Because they don't believe in free enterprise. Marxists, including Strasserists, will always be our enemies because their economics will literally leave people eating each other. >Not really a point considering many different fascists all over ran different economic and social plans. We aren't "many different fascists", we are NatSoc specifically. Read (or at least skim) pic related for Franco and Spanish fascists. Italian Fascists sure as hell weren't Marxists, so Hitler allied with them. Move into one place and change the local gov and state gov to NatSoc. Once people realize we aren't literally gassing Kikes and just murdering every nigger we see, things will change. I already live in the Northwest (in PA right now though) so my part is done.
Christian Reed
>And they invaded anyway because depending on (((who))) was in charge, they could have been backstabbed. No they invaded cause Briton was going to use Norway and Denmark as a stepping stone and he needed the oil for the war. He didn't invade because they weren't his ideology >Because they don't believe in free enterprise. Marxists, including Strasserists, will always be our enemies because their economics will literally leave people eating each other. Wrong the fascists who Hitler supported in the Spanish civil war were economically national syndicalists >Read (or at least skim) pic related for Franco and Spanish fascists Franco wasn't the first Spanish fascist, he was an opportunistic general with right wing authoritarian views. The actual fascists during the war were national syndicalists.
pic related
Samuel Cruz
>No they invaded cause Briton was going to use Norway and Denmark as a stepping stone Yeah, they were going to backstab him. The oil thing also helped, yeah. >Wrong the fascists who Hitler supported in the Spanish civil war were economically national syndicalists Hitler regretted supporting Franco. Read the image. >Franco wasn't the first Spanish fascist, he was an opportunistic general with right wing authoritarian views. The actual fascists during the war were national syndicalists. Read the image, it explains what I mean in section 3-4.
Dominic Anderson
>we want an independent white state to break away from america because america is corrupt and jewish >we love the founding fathers
Kayden Russell
Last post in the image.
Camden Ward
...
Adam Price
>Yeah, they were going to backstab him. The oil thing also helped, yeah. But not necessarily because they weren't fascist. That's my point. Hitler was more then happy to ally right wing authoritarian Poland if it was an actual ally >Hitler regretted supporting Franco. Read the image. Franco wasn't the first fascist nor did he follow the party doctrine. He took over leadership when the leader was executed by the communists, possibly even being let to die since Franco didn't like him and Franco was a strange combination of Republicanism,monarchism and fascism >Read the image, it explains what I mean in section 3-4. I gave it a quick scim over, that other guy before Franco also wasn't fascist
Ryan Hughes
I'll post a few of the their point plan
Here are just some from the Falangists point plan
6. Our State will be a totalitarian instrument to defend the integrity of the fatherland. All Spaniards will participate in this through their various family, municipal, and syndical roles. There shall be no participation in it by political parties. We shall implacably abolish the system of political parties and all of their consequences- inorganic suffrage, representation of clashing groups, and a Parliament of the type that is all too well known.
8. The National-Syndicalist state will permit every private initiative which is compatible withe the collective interest of all, and will even protect and encourage beneficial enterprises.
9. Our conception of Spain in the economic realm is that of a gigantic syndicate of producers. We shall organise Spanish society corporatively through a system of vertical syndicates for the various field of production, all working toward national economic unity.
10. We repudiate the capitalistic system which shows no understanding of the needs of the people, dehumanises private property, and causes workers to be lumped together in a shapeless, miserable mass of people who are filled with desperation. Our spiritual and national conception of life also repudiates Marxism. We shall redirect the impetuousness of those working classes who today are led astray by Marxism, and we shall seek to bring them into direct participation in fulfilling the great task of the national state.
Just remember these are the people Hitler sent aid too.
Christian Walker
woops ignore that misspost I had saved this one in another thread since I copy pasted your responses
11. The National-Syndicalist State will not cruelly stand apart from man's economic struggles, nor watch impassively while the strongest class dominates the weakest. Our regime will eliminate the very roots of class struggle, because all who work together in production shall comprise one single organic entity. We reject and we shall prevent at all costs selfish interests from abusing others, and we shall halt anarchy in the field of labour relations.
12. The first duty of wealth- and our State shall so affirm- is to better the conditions of the people. It is intolerable that enormous masses of people should live wretchedly while a small number enjoy all kinds of luxuries.
14. We shall support the trend toward nationalisation of banking services and, through a system of Corporations, the great public utilities.
Nicholas Gomez
this is the problem with your northwest front movement, you want to break away from america even when it was supposedly founded as a white nation, yet you praise the founding fathers of the country you want to abandon, can you be any more canadian or mexican tier?
Blake Baker
So Either their not fascist despite "fascist" being a relatively loose term and even looser on it's economics and most people considering them a type of third potion politics since they varied vastly. Or there is more to being a fascist or a Strassesit then simple economics
Just two quick example I found >a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
>a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
Daniel Nelson
It could be identical to the US Constitution, just with the original European-only immigration system, no central bank, and more PE.
Aiden Foster
Pretty sure the founding fathers would abandon the current America too t b h
Chase Cruz
>But not necessarily because they weren't fascist. That's my point. Hitler was more then happy to ally right wing authoritarian Poland if it was an actual ally Fair enough. The thing is, some states have a much higher chance of being kike controlled than NatSoc ones. So being allies with Libertarians would probably be temporary unless they had some anti-Jew policies or something. Also, Hitler and NatSocs still didn't ally with Marxists or Libertarians, which was my original point. >Franco wasn't the first fascist nor did he follow the party doctrine. He took over leadership when the leader was executed by the communists, possibly even being let to die since Franco didn't like him and Franco was a strange combination of Republicanism,monarchism and fascism This is what the image says, that Franco was doing shady non-Fascist shit as well as some Fascist shit. Some things he did were good, others not all all. >I gave it a quick scim over, that other guy before Franco also wasn't fascist No, and as both you and I have said, Hitler didn't care about allying with Fascists specifically, just stable, nationalist, non-Marxist, non-Jew controlled govs. Libertarians can turn into Marxists fast if they get too comfy. >So Either their not fascist despite "fascist" being a relatively loose term and even looser on it's economics and most people considering them a type of third potion politics since they varied vastly. Or there is more to being a fascist or a Strassesit then simple economics There isn't specific economic policy besides generally being free enterprise and anti Marxist, as even your list says on points 8 and 10. But Strasserism IS Marxist because it wants to deny those who have earned their wealth fairly and according to the laws of the land the fruits of their labor. It seeks to provide equality where it is not needed.
Liam Cox
they certainly would. the cook county soda tax would be enough reason for them by itself. they fought a war against the most feared nation on earth becuase they didnt want to pay an extra few cents on fucking tea!
Joseph Anderson
...
Nathaniel Price
...
Ryder Diaz
...
Brandon Collins
>Fair enough. The thing is, some states have a much higher chance of being kike controlled than NatSoc ones. So being allies with Libertarians would probably be temporary unless they had some anti-Jew policies or something. Also, Hitler and NatSocs still didn't ally with Marxists or Libertarians, which was my original point. Fair enough as well I'm just point out that Strasserism isn't really Marxist thought >This is what the image says, that Franco was doing shady non-Fascist shit as well as some Fascist shit. Some things he did were good, others not all all. I agree with that, I was just pointing out the original actual fascist party pior to Franco was of a National syndicalist economy, yet very religious,nationalistic,authoritarian,militaristic and wanted closer ties to their South American fellow Hispanics and most certainly did kill and purge lots of actual Communists >No, and as both you and I have said, Hitler didn't care about allying with Fascists specifically, just stable, nationalist, non-Marxist, non-Jew controlled govs. Libertarians can turn into Marxists fast if they get too comfy. Yes I agree however he did ally with the Spanish fascists who were economically, you know what by now >There isn't specific economic policy besides generally being free enterprise Not necessarily it's more corporatism and state control rather then free enterprise Free enterprise >an economic system in which private business operates in competition and largely free of state. Not Hitlers Germany. Fascism is more controlled then open in economics. eg minimum wage worker rights etc
I'll get to your last point, this one is getting pretty large
Justin Walker
...
Levi Nelson
...
Evan Long
What did he mean by this?
Matthew Gutierrez
...
Ethan Morales
On the Free enterprise thing, I was just saying what GLR said, I just didn't change the wording. Of course by free enterprise, he meant that businesses compete, but the state watches over the whole thing to make sure Jews aren't making things unfair or other such things.
Tyler Edwards
1: He was sucker punched 2: He was dumb enough to show powerlevel in public ALONE 3: He's wearing skinhead tier clothes
Liam Ross
>But Strasserism IS Marxist because it wants to deny those who have earned their wealth fairly and according to the laws of the land the fruits of their labor. It seeks to provide equality where it is not needed. Marxism is not just it's economic theory, it is just one part of a much larger more glablized part. We don't call our democracies ancap because we share capitalism and money.
The matter of the fact is Strasserism and the Falangists are economically "Marxist" (Taking into account fascist economics actually comes from national syndicalism) but these parties socially and in how they rule the government Fascists. Since Marxism is for free association, no government,no nationalism, globalism,no religion all for the end goal of Communism
Since these Strasserism does not intend nor does it aim to reach the end goal of Communism they are not Marxists. They are third positionist rather then capitalistic or marxist.
Landon Morris
The founding fathers are rolling in their graves. >relaxing around niggers
Gavin Bailey
With you all the way brother better your minds better your bodies do away with the commie larger faggots in here we will all meet sooner rather then later and we will unleash one hell of a roar! Hail victory!
Joseph Jones
>What did he mean by this?
He meant: >I'm autistic and/or mentally ill. I came across this website on the internet and now this is my thing for the next week or so. I lack self-awareness and don't know how to behave in public. If I had picked any other thing to be my thing this week people wouldn't have cheered when I was violently attacked. I don't really understand what I did wrong. I will probably not repeat this mistake but I won't really understand why what I did was wrong.
There.
Luis King
>Since these Strasserism does not intend nor does it aim to reach the end goal of Communism they are not Marxists. It doesn't matter whether you intend it or not - you are Marxist economically. I remind you that Commies don't intend to be mass murderers. They want a world where everything is sunshine and rainbows. Nonetheless, they end up as mass murderers. There is no reason or excuse to lean towards the Marxist economic theory when NatSoc was proven to be economically solid besides unfounded idealism.
Ethan Murphy
how can normies hate us? we have the swaggiest army in history. they rockin the hugo boss!
Caleb Price
>ifunny.co ISHYGDDT
Lucas Watson
They do not intend to be marxists nor do they intend to follow to Marx's dream utopia. By Definition they are third position not communist. All the arguments from many other Natsocs I have seen is, if you have some sort of """""marxist""""" economics you are full blown commie instead of third position
They follow something very different your going down the ancap line of thought of Nazi's have collectivization so do Communism therefore nazi's are Communists.
They have similarities. Yes. As do Nazi's to Commies and Stalinist's but they are not one of them
Some definition of "Third position" The Third Position or Third Alternative is a political position that emphasizes opposition to both communism and capitalism. Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right", while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.
>opposition to both communism and capitalism. Correct they beat up commies and didn't like capitalists, they were a key factor in Northern Germany dropping Communism > typically present themselves as "beyond left and right" Correct >while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views. Right on point
Carter Bell
>I'm autistic >and don't know how to behave in public. Read a book nigger. Posting this made YOU look retarded.
t teacher with autism dealing with a fuckton of students and colleaes each day.
Jason Bennett
I did not imply his autism was the cause. But you cannot deny many autistic people lack-self awareness. Either way, it can be both.
Maybe video clips like this one can help in red pilling the blue pillers.
Robert White
Hey, I could easily see something like pic related being used, since it draws from the two hundred years of American symbolism and the idealic Roman influence early American "mythology" had to it.
E Pluribus Unum or "Out of many, one" works pretty well as a fascistic motto.
Jackson Anderson
...
Owen Garcia
I like how leftypol is going whole-hog on this "third positionism" nonsense to normalize leftism. You think we're going to start accepting communism "by another name", or just because you classify it alongside things we normally overlook? All you're doing is making people more literate about the nuances, and wearing out the wedges. You have to pick an environment to shill this nonsense that is like /ptg/ where no one knows anything and they're just there to bandwagon like lemmings.
Caleb Murphy
Hi leftypol. You have to go back.
Eli Cruz
>your going down the ancap line of thought of Nazi's have collectivization so do Communism therefore nazi's are Communists. I'm not calling you a Communist, I'm calling you a Marxist. This is completely valid because unlike AnCaps who don't even read their oppositions arguments, I understand that you want a Marxist Socialist take on economics. A state with a relatively free market doesn't make the country Capitalist, I'm sure you'll agree, just as a state with come collectivism doesn't make it Marxist. After all, you can some private companies, and some nationalized ones. A capitalist state, in it's purest form, puts material and profit at the pinnacle of society. Nation, country, and race do not matter and aren't prioritized. Strasserists are Marxist because they accept Marx's ideas on a socialist economy and act according to it.
Nicholas Martin
Tell me where to improve. I got really heated over the quote "Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" today and decided that I will never be the sheep. I will always be the wolf, and I refuse to comply with these cowards when it is Nature's will that I pursue strength and put enforce my pack's will over the lesser beings.
Gabriel Cooper
Trying hard to move the Overton Window left huh?
Henry Stewart
I'll say it again. It doesn't matter if a trillion people say 2+2=5. Democracy is flawed.
Andrew Jenkins
Does anyone have a link to the ESG discord? Hoping to move out to the Northwest soon, in the process of selling some websites/apps that I was using for income.
Jaxson Barnes
>This is completely valid because unlike AnCaps who don't even read their oppositions arguments, I understand that you want a Marxist Socialist take on economics. For starters simply being economically similar does not make you one. You are not an ancap because you keep free enterprise and money? Are you not using the same back at me?
Second it is third position since it does not fit into the first category of capitalism nor the second Communism. It is a combination of both putting it into the third position. You wanna actually debunk this or not? Suddenly 3 different 1 post by this id's all posting similar images in the same order I've seen in other threads. Lets not forget leftypol would play both sides. I think we can assume these specific posters and the faggot Belguin are leftypol D&C
Chase Morales
pic related
Brayden Parker
So, what ideology were you guys before you became fascist? Almost no one grows up believing in fascism, so I'm curious what you converted from.
Liam Powell
>I think we can assume these specific posters and the faggot Belguin are leftypol D&C Do you have a Spanish flag?
Nolan Flores
>You are not an ancap because you keep free enterprise and money? Are you not using the same back at me? No because we do not accept the AnCap view of economics that "all private businesses are good". You accept the foundation of Marxist Socialist economics that allows it to "work": "all private businesses are bad". I have no fucking idea about the ID shit though. I'd be still glad to have you share the flag (numbers are important and you understand other Marxists and can convert them easier), I just would never give any Strasserist a chance to gain power or spread his views. Also, Night of the Long Knives if you try anything funny.
