Tennets of a 21st century National Socialist platform

This is a thread for working on a consice and cohesive platform for modern NS.
1. Societal Health
>An ethnically homogeneous state is necessary to ensure social cohesion and altruism
2. Personal Health
>encouraging exercise, nutrition, sleep
>eliminating hormones and chemicals from products, food, and water
3. Environmentalism
>clean air, soil, and water
>sustainable agriculture
>citizens are able to spend time in nature
4. Economy
>abolition of interest on debt
>a fully nationalized central bank
>no property taxes/low income taxes
>very stringent but simplified regulations
It is difficult to codify these components into individual points because they are so interconnected.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JDR5i6z4L8c
plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/
rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/idealism/v-1
philpapers.org/rec/ELLETP-2
philpapers.org/rec/SMIANE-2
philpapers.org/rec/HENHTA
gutenberg.org/files/4723/4723-h/4723-h.htm
gutenberg.org/files/4724/4724-h/4724-h.htm
gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=0DB12BBA4A197862E272211B7A059880
youtube.com/watch?v=4l1lQMCOguw
youtube.com/watch?v=i4DyfIsj8FU
youtube.com/watch?v=kdbs-HUAxC8
youtube.com/watch?v=iVbG90kr1B0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

Ethnically homogenous Sweden elected liberals to allow in diversity. It's a good idea but not foolproof in and of itself. You have to have strong morals beside it.

A redpilled ontology: Idealism

Giovanni Gentile, the "philosopher of Fascism", was influential in providing an intellectual foundation for Italian Fascist thought, and ghostwrote part of The Doctrine of Fascism (1932) with Benito Mussolini. He was involved in the resurgence of Hegelian idealism in Italian philosophy and also devised his own system of thought, which he called "actual idealism" or "actualism", and which has been described as "the subjective extreme of the idealist tradition.

Gentile's philosophical system — to him the foundation of all Fascist philosophy — viewed thought as all-embracing: no-one could actually leave his or her sphere of thought, nor exceed his or her thought. Reality was unthinkable, except in relation to the activity by means of which it becomes thinkable, positing that as a unity — held in the active subject and the discrete abstract phenomena that reality comprehends — wherein each phenomenon, when truly realised, was centered within that unity; therefore, it was innately spiritual, transcendent, and immanent, to all possible things in contact with the unity. Gentile used that philosophic frame to systematize every item of interest that now was subject to the rule of absolute self-identification — thus rendering as correct every consequence of the hypothesis. The resultant philosophy can be interpreted as an idealist foundation for legal naturalism.

QUICK RUNDOWN
>Dr. Godehard Bruentrup: What Is Idealism?
youtube.com/watch?v=JDR5i6z4L8c

>In philosophy, idealism is the group of philosophies which assert that reality, or reality as we can know it, is fundamentally mental, mentally constructed, or otherwise immaterial.

ENCYCLOPEDIA ENTRIES
>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/
>Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/idealism/v-1

ACADEMIC ARTICLES
>Eliminating the Physical
philpapers.org/rec/ELLETP-2
>A New Epistemic Argument for Idealism
philpapers.org/rec/SMIANE-2
>How To Avoid Solipsism While Remaining An Idealist
philpapers.org/rec/HENHTA

BOOKS
>George Berkeley-Principles of Human Knowledge
gutenberg.org/files/4723/4723-h/4723-h.htm
>George Berkeley-Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous
gutenberg.org/files/4724/4724-h/4724-h.htm
>John Foster-A World For Us: The Case for Phenomenalistic Idealism
gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=0DB12BBA4A197862E272211B7A059880

YOUTUBE
>The Introspective Argument:
Part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=4l1lQMCOguw
Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=i4DyfIsj8FU
>Dr. David Chalmers explains why materialism is false
youtube.com/watch?v=kdbs-HUAxC8
>Why substance dualism is roundly rejected in contemporary philosophy of mind
youtube.com/watch?v=iVbG90kr1B0

I would say drop the socialism, and just call it National Capitalism, the platform doesn't change, because free enterprise is encouraged so long as it doesn't harm the nation or it's people. Second steal the imagery of the left and make a mockery of marxist socialism.

The problem, statist, is that the government cannot make people good. Central planning is also a huge meme, and keynsian economics has been proven to be full of shit time and time again.

Again you say interest is evil, but by what other mechanism would banking and loans work? What incentive would banks have? And if all banks were replaced with a central bank, how the fuck would it not mutate into what we see the federal reserve has turned into?

The fact that you think that in the age of digital commerce and free information the government can enforce any kind of control is laughable.

Small government and egalitarianism are the wests crowning achievement. You don't need statist rule to enforce some sort of morally pure ethnostate. Without the governments of the world going out of their way to fuck with it, it is the natural state of man.

Just keep finding reason to go to war with everyone in africa so we always have strong men.

Read Gottfried Feder

>Within two years of Adolf Hitler being elected, the unemployment problem had been solved and the country was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.

>Economist Henry C K Liu wrote of Germany’s remarkable transformation: “The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.”

>In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry wrote: “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 and on, accounting for its startling rise from the depression to a world power in 5 years. Germany financed its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of public (government) schools today.”

>The problem, statist, is that the government cannot make people good.
The problem is that the state isn't trying to make people good, and neither can:
>"asking them to be noble self-less philosophers with no incentives or compulsion of any kind from the group, because they'll all want to love and respect each other -- trust me"
Your beliefs are contradictory hippie nonsense.

>MUH SUH MALIA THO
Please.
Give me some real arguments instead of ridiculous strawmen.

>give me real arguments
>ignores real arguments:

Thannk you for making a decent thread. About time. I agree with these tenets

Is there a group I can join?
We need to start gathering research and performing our own research, but we need a good anonymous platform.

>government cannot make people good
Certain conditions necessitate as strong state. The biggest problems in modern society are decadence and unearned income, the time is ripe for strong leadership.
>by what other mechanism would banking and loans work
The only time interest on loans didn't result in crashes was back in the days of debt jubilees. It's not a stable system, Hitler's Germany did just fine without it.
>thinking the government can enforce control is laughable
Martial law would be easier to enforce with today's technology than ever before. The NSA is most likely watching this conversation in real time
>egalitarianism is the west's crowning achievment
Topkek thanks for the laugh, the west's crowning achievement was colonizing the globe and putting every species of subhuman under the boot of white imperialism. The egalitarians have been ruining and reversing white victory over the inferiors ever since.

>no one mentions Somalia
>MUH SUH MALIA THO
If you don't want strawmen, don't reply to strawmen -- did you even know what a "strawman" was, or its just a word you nervously chirp when you're BTFO?

I want to start cranking numbers.
Who wants to do some research?
Finding a decent platform seems like the most important step.

That image is all wrong. We're not even close to 'hard times' yet. We're in degenerate, hedonistic 'good times' which has created extremely weak men.

>The inherited policies included a large public works programs supported by deficit spending – such as the construction of the Autobahn network – to stimulate the economy and reduce unemployment.[28] Following a Keynesian-style policy dependent upon heavy borrowing of “gigantic sums of money”, Nazi Germany’s national debt by 1939 “had reached 37.4 billion Reichmarks,” where even “Goebbels, who otherwise mocked the government’s financial experts as narrow-minded misers, expressed concern in his diary about the exploding deficit.

They used typical Keynsian trickery to inflate their economy. How would the system sustain itself once all the public works were done, and war time production ends? At best you would see a corporate circlejerk like the modern United States, at worst you'd see a total collapse.

China uses the same tricks, and they're building ghost cities in the middle of the desert just to keep the construction industry afloat.

Great economic model.

This.

Good times have created weak men. Hard times are coming. Certainly not passed; nothing has happened yet. Assuming that chart bears any truth.

You pretty much just ignored what I quoted and went with your pre-programmed response from (((wikipedia))).

Did you forget about:

>the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.

They issued debt-free and interest-free money. Money was not backed by the amount of money in circulation and the central bank was nationalized so it's not comparable to what's happening in the U.S. at all.

>How would the system sustain itself once all the public works were done

public works are never done. it needs constant maintenance and improvements/re-construction will inevitably occur as society becomes more advanced economically and technologically.

The difference is that Hitler didn't spend all the credit on luxuries for the upper caste or infrastructure geared for exports. You can see the difference when you look at poverty levels and overal standard of living, Germany was lightyears ahead of Modern China. They had the highest standard of living in the world in the 1930s.

>It's not a stable system, Hitler's Germany did just fine without it.
Six years before a massive war. Hardly a good sample size.
>Martial law would be easier to enforce with today's technology than ever before. The NSA is most likely watching this conversation in real time
What a great idea. How could creating big brother possibly go wrong?
And no, giving every single citizen complete freedom of information pokes a million holes in any sort of totalitarian regime. State propaganda control would be impossible to maintain. The fact that Sup Forums exists despite (((their))) impotent screeching is proof of that.
>The egalitarians have been ruining and reversing white victory over the inferiors ever since.
How do you think the West became so rich and prosperous? Was it because once aristocracy was removed and men could trade freely without government interference the highest IQ and hardest working people were allowed to rise to the top?

Nah, it was probably because of our anti-melanin magic. Europe was always superior.

Also the "egalitarians" of today are communists in disguise. Egalitarianism means equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. If blacks are low IQ you don't need stormtroopers to keep them from succeeding

You posted a fucking smuggie. Don't suck my dick.

>cities literally burning in chimpouts
>Detroit is now Somalia
>invasion by squatemalans
>leftist cities openly declaring rebellion to house them
>cops being assassinated to MSM applause
>white men dying by suicide in record numbers
>3rd world living in squatter camps on the Champs Elysee
>Says "We're not even close to 'hard times' yet."
-t. Sub-Urbanite Basement Dweller

It hasn't even started. The west has a sore throat right now, when in a decade it's going to be full AIDS patient

You are looking for this book user
>The eternal laws of nature

>It hasn't even started
If you keep waiting for everything to be collapsing everywhere to equal degrees, its too late. There's a forest fire, but you think it's not a problem because you can't see it from your mountain top yet.

Don't forget education. We need to create a national and mandatory version of what the Boy Scouts used to be, turning boys into men and patriots (and create a female version too). Clear out the schools and colleges of all liberal and Marxist propaganda. Stop teaching freedom, equality, and democracy as ideals that cannot be questioned. Learn from the mistakes of our history, but do not be ashamed of our past.

In addition, gun ownership is no longer just a right, it is mandatory. In fact, it is part of your education growing up.

>95% of normies don't give the slightest shit because they have a job, food on the table, no immediate personal discomfort and nonstop pop culture and distractions force fed to them
'hard times' will be when this neoliberal system actually collapses. The cracks are just starting to appear upon society as a whole.

Did you even read my post zipperhead?

>education

Mate, when things hit Great Depression levels, when our nation looks like Venezuela does right now, THAT'S when the bad times will have arrived. Our economy hasn't even collapsed yet, it's teetering on the edge of collapse but it is still holding on for now.

I was looking for that chart. Whoever designed that system is a fucking genius.

Yeah, did you read the post I was replying to? Leaf said "it hasn't even started, we're in the degeneracy good times", to which I replied, it's already underway, you just can't see it from the suburbs, to which you replied "it hasn't even started yet, it looks like a cold but it will soon be AIDS" which is a fucking contradictory nonsense sentence you stupid fuck. Go post in a "traps r ghey" thread

We need a "Keynesian" approach to cyclical civilizational patterns, rather than cyclical economic patterns.

>which is a fucking contradictory nonsense sentence you stupid fuck.
I said RIGHT NOW it looks like a cold, but in a decade or so it will be full AIDS. Meaning we are just seeing the beginning of something much worse

Fuck I hope rocketman nukes your yellow hide. Don't leave your fan on, it'll kill you.

What's the purpose of sending women to college and wasting their prime fertility years? They are physically ready for children by the time they are 16 to 18.

Public works and military production can't be sustained indefinitely. Do you honestly believe that it can?

Also if NS Germany was so economically efficient how did the monkey-slav-USSR managed to churn out far greater numbers of tanks and aircraft (of better design, too) despite having to move their entire industrial base past the urals? Keep in mind that allied strategic bombing didn't really pick up until '44

There are still jobs useful for women. Nurses, teachers, and the like.

>What's the purpose of sending women to college and wasting their prime fertility years?
Well, a great deal of the education was suited to their expected role: accounting, home economics, etc. In traditional marriages, women often managed budgets and ran the household, while men just funded it. There's also the matter of child development. Leftoids like to promote this factoid, but its true: educated women tend to produce better educated children. Early childhood development is influenced by more intelligent mothers, who the primary tutors of children before age 10. Also, if women are beyond child-bearing age, you've missed you chance to efficiently educate them, and they need to do something after the kids are grown.

>Military production

how many times do I have to keep reminding you of this:

>the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, EVEN BEFORE ARMAMENT SPENDING BEGAN.

Did you also forget about trade with other countries? The national socialist system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.

>number of tanks

Nazi Germany had top of the line equipment. Stalin thought quantity was a quality in itself.

He'll never get off that meme because it's on his bullet-point list of "Mises.org anti-statist talking points". He's never read more than 5 books since he turned 13 years old, and 2 of them were by Ayn Rand.

LOL lolbergs BTFO.

>National Socialist
>We'll rebrand ourselves as something about not killing a bunch of people

If you want good nutrition, sleep, exercise, and clean water, or whatever, why the fuck do you need to associate it with Hitler? It is never, ever, ever, ever, ever going to happen. Call it anything else but National Socialist and you have an actual chance at succeeding. So why do you need the Nazi flag to get exercise and sleep?

>rebrand ourselves as something about not killing a bunch of people
Why would it need rebranding if it was never about that?
>why the fuck do you need to associate it with Hitler
Where does it say we should in the OP?
> So why do you need the Nazi flag to get exercise and sleep?
Where does it say something about what flag to use -- OP is clearly talking about updating the ideology, the beliefs and goals, not minor bullshit things that don't relate to what Natsocs believe.

1.)
>ethnically
try again kiddo, ethically is better than ethnically everytime since good ethics leads to ethnic cohesion, whereas ethnic cohesion doesn't always lead to cohesion.
2.)
>eliminate chemicals
I get what you are saying, but "chemicals are bad" is an ignorant statement. Fucking everything is a chemical compound.
4.)
>interest abolition
makes loans and debt more pleasing. You can get rid of it on a state level, with limited loans (60k-ish max per person after the age of 30), but in the market this destroys the opportunity for banks to fund enterprises or houses.
>nationalized
>central
>bank
fuck off fed can die in a fire and be replaced with labor backed/energy currency.


Just kill politicians who take bribes or are convicted of misusing their power. Proven guilty? Whammo, you get death by firing squad. Embezzle 90$ from the state? Assets seized, liquidated, and you get dropped from a plane at 30k feet.

>fuck off fed can die in a fire
The Fed is a private bank.

>good ethics leads to ethnic cohesion
Then why do Africans still rape their own babies and burn witches, after centuries of colonial moral instruction? Why buy into that SJW bullshit about people being "blank slates", are you really a liberal?

>it's still good you guys we can salvage this just keep trying

It doesn't matter what it was about. It doesn't matter what you update, and it doesn't matter what you argue. National Socialism will always be a dead brand. It's associated with terrible shit. You can't make it work. So why are you bothering? Why are you using symbolism from the 1930's when you could make up any random symbol you want for your ideology which isn't pre-tainted? It's a stupid fight. You could be rallying around flags of anime chicks or whatever and no one would bat an eye. You can't make a second first impression.

>Nazi Germany had top of the line equipment
I thought you stormfags liked history. What happened?
Just looking at tanks

>PzII
kek

>PzIII
Germany's main tank, but the armor was a bit thin, the engine liked to break down, and the gun was rather weak. The turret was too small as well, so it couldn't carry anything larger than 50mm, making it almost totally useless against T-34s

>PzIV
Germany's OTHER main tank. Why did the Nazis pick two? Who knows. Much like the III but it had a larger turret and could fit a long barreled 75mm which actually could knock out a T-34 (if it was close enough). The armor was also a bit thin, and the engine liked to break down.

Now we get to Germany's super tanks!

>Tiger
THICC as fuck. They learned their lesson from before and gave it extra thick armor, but it was also heavy as fuck and liked to get stuck in the mud which Russian springs are known for. Sporting an 88mm (Heil Hitler) cannon it could knock out most russian armor from extreme distances. Also, the engine liked to break down.

>Panther
It was first supposed to be the PzV, a replacement medium tank, but the designers got a bit carried away and it ended up weighing almost as much as the Tiger (Oops!). It also had a strong gun that could knock out Russian armor at extreme distances, but the optics were bad and only had a very narrow fov which made acquiring targets very difficult. It also had a notoriously slow turret (it took almost a minute to fully traverse). And the engine liked to break down even more than its sisters.

>Tiger II
The Germans seeing that the first Tiger was too heavy, and liked to break down decided that they needed a newer tank. They made the Tiger II even heavier, and made the engine even more complicated! How clever our reich's engineers are! Sadly not very many were made. And the engine liked to break down.

>National Socialism will always be a dead brand
The most successful movement of the 20th century nver actually "died", that's how successful it was. Not one decade since the war has gone by without growth in the NS movement -- there are always more Natsocs in the world than there were ten years before.
>It's associated with terrible shit
If you watch TV and read comic books, perhaps.
>Why are you using symbolism from the 1930's
Because it's one of the most ancient symbols of our race, it's not "from the 1930s". That's just something historically illiterate normalcucks say.

>Yeah if you watch TV and read comic books you won't like Nazis, but how many people watch TV and read comic books?

Come on, dude. Just come on. It's never happening. You could literally call yourself ANYTHING else. The Sational Notionalists. ANYTHING. Why are you wasting your time? Do you hate white people or something? Work for the FBI? What's the deal?

What did the Germans mean by this?

What's the point of branding it national socialism though? You're just making the hill to climb five times steeper. Is it really worth all that trouble just to larp as a marxist boys club from the 30s?

>Marxist

I'm actually from CorrectTheRecord

Also explain this.

And you didn't answer the question

>Come on, dude. Just come on. It's never happening.

>This is not an argument, Nazism will be the next big thing

No, it's just reality. Do I really need to say anything other than "come on?"

>What's the point of branding it national socialism though? You're just making the hill to climb five times steeper
Until people like you stop cucking, it won't matter what you call it. "Nazi" is what all pro-whites get labeled. If you're white, you think race exists, and you think you have interests because you're white -- then you will be labeled a Nazi, every single time. Stop wasting energy trying to "trick" the world into thinking you're something else. "Nazi" is a label your enemies will always use to shut you down; until that label no longer has power, this will always be true. So your enemies and the weakest in your ranks will always try to get you to try, but you will always fail. This cycle will repeat until you realize it, or until your race finally dies out.

>You're just making the hill to climb five times steeper.
Wow, propaganda cartoons really work, huh?

Do you honestly think normies see swastikas and think
>Hmm, seems like a reasonable alternative to the current system, perhaps I should inquire more about these "national socialists". They are in no part of my mind associated with a perceived genocidal regime.

>They will call us Nazis anyway so why not just go full retard

Because it makes them look stupid if you don't actually act like a Nazi?

Yeah, that's exactly what they think. Every new recruit goes through the same cycle.

We were not fully homogeneous, there were jews here, and they pushed for multiculturalism so they wouldn't be seen as a outside group anymore (among other things).

David Schwarz Inga Gottfarb, Amadeo Cottio, Voldemer Kiviaed, Géza Thinsz och Lukasz Winiarki, all the names of the biggest proponents of multiculturalism, they have something (((else))) in common to.

In 1965 the Swedish prime minister said: "We're so lucky up here in Sweden for being so homogeneous, not only in race but in so much else"

To be fair, there does seem to be far more actual NatSocs in the world then I'd ever thought possible.

Make sure to never get caught on camera when you get BTFO

or else I'll die from laughter

oh god....I can't hold it in

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This was an admission of defeat. No one mentioned somalia. You failed to engage in his arguments in every way.

How many friends and family members have you "recruited".

Why do you care about what normies think?

Since I don't believe in universal democracy my goal is not to get 51% of the population on my side, I only need the strongest 10% that will stick together when SHTF, the vast majority of people are lemmings just following whatever ideas they're told to follow.

I expect to recruit people of good and strong character by living well and not giving an inch to my ideological enemies.

all of them

...

I thought you wanted to save your race. Wouldn't you want to save as many as possib-
>the vast majority of people are lemmings just following whatever ideas they're told to follow.
And this is the point where the statist larper reveals that he just wants to dominate, instead of guiding people.

Sure.
Nice flag by the way

>he just wants to dominate, instead of guiding people
You guide people by dominating them. If your guidance isn't backed with strength then people will not follow you.

This tbhfam.

Are you trying to tell me that the only thing humans respond to is coercion?

Not necessarily, but you have to have bite to your bark if you want people to respect you enough to follow you willingly. George Washington didn't need to force the people to elect him unanimously, but he did need to show the strength and will to both defeat foreign threats and put down dissenters within the United States.

>They will call us Nazis anyway so why not just go full retard
They will call you Nazi anyway, so don't waste energy disavowing it; they're just tricking you into exhaustion. Somehow you have to take the power away from their "magic words", and the most direct way to do it is simply to be ok being "a Nazi". Stop being a pussy, and smile instead of cry when that happens.

4 people at work, maybe 10 while I was at university, 5 of my best friends since childhood, my neighbor, some random people I've chatted with at bars or diners, my friend's brother and his dad, numerous people here over the years. I practice here, and have seen hundreds be converted.

You can't disavow the ultimate pro-white while being pro-white, you look weak and cowardly. pic related

"Platform" implies you are seeking election.

National Socialists do not beg for power. They seize it.

Here is your real """"platform"""".

>build sympathy in the military
>get them to support your coup
>launch coup
>no more elections
>do whatever you want

You're a faggot LARPer OP. National Socialism is not a mass movement. It's a top-down purification of the degenerate elements.

Atomwaffen Division
Check out IronMarch

>They will call us Nazis anyway so why not just go full retard

This argument is incredibly stupid.

>They will call us Men anyway so why not just go full retard

They can call me a man and I will reply "I AM A MAN"

They will call me a National Socialist and I will reply "I AM A NATIONAL SOCIALIST"

Some of us truly have beliefs that we truly believe in. If you are so scared as to back down from your true beliefs when challenged, then you are a coward.

But the truth is, you aren't a National Socialist. And if you are a man, you're likely a poor excuse for one. Stand for something or die for nothing.

What the fuck are you talking about? The Nazis were the largest political party in 1933.

Atomwaffen Division is the real deal. They don't pretend, they only do. They recruit and they act, not just for likes and retweets and shares on facebook.

Everything I've read of Ironmarch has been solid shit too. They just released a new book that was extremely entertaining as well. Check it out. Not a lot of new Fascist material being written/made now, so that was really cool.

Yeah, but they weren't running on a platform of abolishing elections. Hitler's seizure of power was enabled by establishment backing and control of the Chancellery and the military, not some faggot voters.

>I'm a man guys this is still gonna happen

If you're just dedicated to killing the Jews no matter the cost, then call yourself whatever you want. If you cared about the White Race, you'd think about what's best for your people. Running around trying to promote some long-dead ideology isn't doing shit. All it's doing is helping the FBI identify people to put in their databases and troll for potential arrests. So what kind of "man" abandons his race to fantasize about a long-lost war that happened in the 1940's?

>If you're just dedicated to killing the Jews no matter the cost

Dude. Do you even know what National Socialism is?

>If you cared about the White Race

Maybe instead of trying to save the White Race, some of us are trying to make the White Race worth saving? Did you ever think of that? Maybe instead of trying to save Racist Liberalism we are trying to create something new? Something that is WORTH preserving for our children?

>I'm trying to create something new
>But I'm going to name it after the worst thing in all of history

You're not going to save shit. You're going to doom your people to destruction because you're too stupid to realize that once you've made a first impression, you can't make a second one. You will never get more than a tiny proportion of the population to rally around something named after Nazism, no matter what the hell it stands for. You are fucking over your own cause and your own race for the sake of a drug addict who died 80 years ago. Call it "Neo-Bloopism" and you'd actually have a chance. Call it anything. Blank slate = clean slate. But no, gotta convince people the Nazis were right, gotta win the war that was lost in the 40's. Who cares about our children, fuck them.

>gotta convince people the Nazis were right, gotta win the war that was lost in the 40's. Who cares about our children, fuck them.
It's the same war then as it is now. Do you think the world is a video game someone rebooted at some point?

>Blank slate = clean slate
There is no blank slate, anything to the right of mainstream conservatism gets called a Nazi anyways.

>It's the same war

Yeah, and do the communists call themselves communists? Not the smart ones. They're "social justice" or "progressive" or whatever dumbass label they come up with that isn't communist. Guess who's been winning?

>implying it matters if they call themselves communist
For example -- who ever lost their career for being a communist?

>You will get called a Nazi

You call liberals communists, how effective is that? They just shrug it off. Trump got called a Nazi the entire election season and he won anyway. Quit being a bitch and quit worrying about what people say about you.

>You call liberals communists, how effective is that?
Wait, I thought "the smart ones" don't call themselves communist, but now you say it doesn't matter, the label is meaningless.

Then why don't they just openly call themselves communists then? They won't even call themselves "liberals" because they don't like the connotations. Yet you want to call yourself a Nazi. They like being in power, you don't.

we're not even in the hard times yet to be quite honest
we're still in the process of creating weak effeminate beta men

I'm guessing the strong men will be the ape niggers that pick apart this self-hating mess of a civilization. sorry but that's the way things are

You need to make up your mind about whether communist is a bad word or not.

Because they just ignore you and call themselves something else. And guess what happens? The label doesn't mean shit because they deny it. Which is exactly what would happen if you'd stop LARPing as a Nazi.

>They like being in power, you don't.
Except neither "communists" nor the "nazis" have ever actually gotten in power calling themselves something else. All the communists in power today aren't afraid of the label, the use it on themselves with no problem.

Strong men in hard times are treated as criminals, often murdered or otherwise isolated from society. Weak men in the good times deserve nothing less. If they wasn't permitted to exist then the bad times would never resurface.

>how did the monkey-slav-USSR managed to churn out far greater numbers of tanks and aircraft (of better design, too) despite having to move their entire industrial base past the urals?
financial aid from the Western (((banks)))

>abolition of interest on debt
>The only time interest on loans didn't result in crashes

If I have a lawnmower/car/bicycle/boat can I give it to you on the condition that you return it to me after a period of time and pay me some for the use of it bucks?
If no then why?
Why can't I instead of car/bicycle etc. give you enough money to buy one on the condition that you return it to me and give me some cash.?
Why should I buy the car myself?

The interest is nothing more than rent -- you loan out boats for boatrides or money for whatever-rides the loaner wants to ride wiht it.

Letting other people use your property for payment doesn't neccessarily crash anything.

What heats things up and causes extreme accumulation of wealth is the fact that credit organizations gave give out loans on money that they do not actually have - in effect printing their own money. Not only are they printing their own money the money also comes with an obligation to print out more money (as it's interest has to be payed also somehow) -- that's the thing with the current system that i seem troublesome.

Not allowing people to use their property by sharing it for pay* seems awfully commie like to me.

*The horror this will surely bring down our nation :(