Who is this dude and why is he such a big deal all of a sudden?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/08/27/aleksandr-dugin/
debateolavodugin.blogspot.com.br/
s1.webmshare.com/0KNJm.webm
archive.is/Jhkiq
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin
youtube.com/watch?v=quxWhp5y23E
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

russian water filter salesmensch

HE'S A DISGUSTING ANTI-WHITE, PRO-SOVIETIST, EURASIANIST SHILL

>spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/08/27/aleksandr-dugin/
Neo-Bolshevist

he looks just like this dude who keeps shitting in the grocery store parking lot

He strikes fear in the heart of the Mormon Mafia because his theories contradict notorious con man and false prophet Joseph Smith's "prophecy". So the hysteria about him comes from the ass-clown network inhabited by people like McMuffin and Beck

Which one, about the "white horse" saving America or something?
I remember they thought Romney was that prophetic fulfillment. Poor Mormons caught up in 18th century religion.

This bearded fuck probably forcing himself on Sup Forums. In Russia he has zero publicity.

Muslim infiltration

Yeah something about the Constitution of the US saving the world from some wrath of God executed by raging reformed Egyptians, or something. It's all so typically over the top arrogant which is a Mormon specialty.

In any case they uber freak over this guy and Russia because they're genuinely convinced they are totally red pilled and everyone else is stupid when in fact it's the opposite. If it weren't so pathetic it'd be funny.

fpbp

Anti intuitive piece of shit and morons that think that anything anti intuitive is smart praise him.

>all of sudden

Are you 16?

I have a buddy who went to live in Salt Lake City for a while. He ended up joining the Mormon sect and became an "elder."
Said the only thing that attracted him to Mormonism was his anti-government stance; since they basically went to war with the gov't back in the day.
Regardless, if you read Mormon account of "history" you will find that Smith made up out of whole cloth entire Indian tribes and wars that never occurred. It's comical. Not to mention that golden book that was never found. Too bad they don't know Joseph Smith was an opium addict fleeing Masons because he leaked secrets.

He's a piece of shit in Russia.

Some Sup Forums burger meme.

He's a dude who lost a debate to Brazilian philosopher Olavo de Carvalho. debateolavodugin.blogspot.com.br/

He's not nearly as influential as some would have you believe.

>bows to Rothschilds

Because Sup Forums has a pile of stock of threads for people with brains who don't belong on this site.

>Brazilian philosophers

>debateolavodugin.blogspot.com.br/

How did he lost the debate?

Was there a point system?

Unreal. Joseph Smith is the brain cancer in American Christianity. They are the pioneers of the "I can be stupid because I'm a "Christian"" mentality which is just mega blasphemy.

>Brazilian philosopher
s1.webmshare.com/0KNJm.webm

Well, they can't claim to be Christian because they reject the Trinity; a central tenet of Christianity.
But, I would say that American Christianity in general has always been cancerous.
Mormonism really is insane, though. Have you ever watched anything on the Fundamentalist Mormons? They're the ones that actually uphold the original teachings of Joseph Smith; polygamy and all.

He's a decent bloke with a good set of brains.
That's about it.
People attribute Russia's "interference scheme" to him, but really he just pointed out the obvious when it comes to society on a global scale.

He's a very smart man, I would let him stay at my house.

...

That's not Richard Karn frome Home Improvement?

sorry for google translate

And there was a story: we once lived with Kuryokhin - Dugin, I and Nyrych. We wake up, I open the window, Dugin lies on the bed, wondering: "But where does Omsk live?" I say: "Well, where: in the south of Siberia, next to Kazakhstan." - "Is Kazakhstan close to you? And what if the Kazakhs were poisoned by the wind? They can also poison the wind! Well, quickly close the window: the wind is poisoned!" And, in all seriousness: frightened terribly, began to walk about the room. "Kazakhs, damn it, the wind poisoned me - how can I go?" It is true, I know they have reed people, they have a lake named Balkhash, and there they grow large quantities of reeds and reeds, and there are reed, reed people who never stick out, only breathe through the tube. " Then he thought again, thought and said: "And in the middle of Balkhash there is a huge island, where there lives a giant, gigantic cat, to whom they all worship." This is Kuryokhin's affairs, unequivocally. Where else could he get this? He says: "Damn, reeds, reed people around, what to do? They can arrange an invasion, that's all - then it's over! If the reed people get out - and they'll get on with their cat! And the cat is huge, three meters tall! "

I don't think so, Tim

sounds rly interesting

>Im new

This.

What in the world is this

/leftypol/ on Sup Forums hates him so I guess he must be alright

Apparently his lectures on heidegger are very interesting but all in all, his is a medieval larper.
>muh tzar muh medieval church muh long beards

This is Dicky Spencers mentor.

He's the one turning the frog's gay

He ain't, there just are some shizos who have read his shit and think that he has the infulence to push the things he believes it. He doesn't.

I also forgot to mention that his statement about genociding Ukrainians was an inflammatory joke. He just has a grim sense of humor as well as Ukrainian ancestry himself.

I don't know why I find this so funny.

>leftypol hates EU so EU must be alright
>leftypol hates America so America must be alright

this.
>Israel is bad so Palestine must be good
non sequitur

Just settle down for a white woman...

R.I.P. my race. God damn you Jews. Curse you all to hell.

Because the new right in europe got their cryptosocialist agenda from him.
He and Benoist deserve the rope desu senpai.

>Neo-Bolshevist
National-Bolshevist actually, still the same scum.

both of those statements are unironically correct - the alternative that would fill the vacuum if those two entities disappeared would be FAR worse

Yeah, I know the nuance but I still chose neo because it's just Bolshevism with prettier wrapping paper.

We will win because we mastered the art of esoteric arts. There is no point in resistance, chaos is our shield.

screenshot this, this is the first shill thread of it's kind and the op person will be hailed as a leader in his country of the new name for the "alt right".
Typical co-intel pro, don't say nobody warned you, I warned you about richard spencer etc as well but you faggots didn't listen.

bad that many nationalists fell for this scam, but people in europe are stupid, they think right and left is defined by haten immagrants or not, so we see all those subhumans feeding patriotic socialist parties.
And self righteous students who never worked a day in their life citing him and benoist to justify the next spending of my tax money.
sorry for ranting, but I really hate them on the same level as I hate communists.

>chaos is our shield.
Order is our sword!
Libertarian Fashism > National bolshevism

No I agree.
All of this left/right nonsense stems from the French revolution; where the murderous progressives took the left side of the Court and the murderous conservatives took the right side of the Court. As is the nature of liberalism, which always tends leftward, the progressives (left) won.
Napoleon exported revolutionary politics to the rest of Europe which had already been prepared over the course of two hundred years by the earlier manifestations of liberalism: theological (protestantism) and philosophical (Endarkenment).
Marxism was simply the inevitable, natural process of classical liberalism; again, as all liberalism tends left and downward.
>pic related, Antonio Gramsci, intellectual leader in founding cultural Marxism

The truth is that the left & right were liberals; and "conservatism" of today is merely a further degraded form of classical liberalism; and are also liberals without knowing it.

>s1.webmshare.com/0KNJm.webm
>it's from Finland
>mfw

Bannon is a bolshevist.

wow someone on Sup Forums who realizes that the downfall began with the french revolution.
that's why I also prefer the traditionalist over conservative.

I highly doubt that's the case. Having one thing in common with one revolutionary hardly makes one a confidant of their movement.
I, too, want the destruction of classical liberalism and its descendant: neo-liberal republic. Does that make me a Bolshevik, too?

Well, not began, but it certainly was the final nail in the coffin of the Old World Order which birthed the secular republic.
There had to be a lot of footwork beforehand to prepare the sensibilities of the people for the rise of a libertine, secular order.
That began with the theological rebellion of the protestants (attacked "altar"), which then affected philosophy in the Endarkenment (so-called Enlightenment; attacked "throne"), which then manifested itself in the actual overthrow of altar and throne in classical liberalism (American/French revolutions), which then manifested itself in socialism and Marxism... the descendent of today's cultural Marxism.
Liberalism has a continuity and a lineage.

neo liberal and classical liberalism arent the same wtf?

Depends on the context of where you're looking from. If you're looking from the 16th century, the classical liberals would be called neo-liberals; as the protestants were openly called liberals and libertines among themselves and by the Church.
Conservatism of today is not the same as classical liberalism of the 18th century; yet it embodies many of the same principles. It is also a bit different in its manifestation between America and Europe.
Neoliberalism is marked by its departure from classical liberalism and the adoption of progressive values (what we'd call cultural Marxism).
>cf archive.is/Jhkiq
This is why there is no return to 1776, because liberalism never goes backward but always progresses further downward and left.

alright faggot believe whatever yo uwant.

Don't strain yourself too hard trying to comprehend a history you were never taught.

>Well, not began, but it certainly was the final nail in the coffin of the Old World Order which birthed the secular republic
that's what I meant, this was the time that the demons of the lower principle won the fight and took over, we had the restauration after napoleon but is was only a shallow imitation of the old order and with the lack of true spirituality it just led to a policestate.

>overthrow of altar and throne in classical liberalism (American/French revolutions), which then manifested itself in socialism and Marxism.
and democracy at first, I think only russia got a socialist revolution without going through democracy first and that's only because prussia decided to bring bring lenin to russia will lead too it to keep them out of the war.

call it what you wanna call it. You control language you control peoples' minds. Trump will restore the Republic.

Absolutely.
He can attempt to restore the republic all he wants; we are the first secular, godless State in recorded human history. It will all be in vain.
1000+ years of Christendom: Western Civilization
200 years of secularism: children confused as to which bathroom to use
The 'republic' can be saved, though, if we base our system on objective values rather than the relativist Pantheon of the State which relegates the same rights to error as it does truth.
It is likened to a merchant selling poison and the antidote right next to it, allowing the consumer to snatch himself away from death over and over again. It's abject insanity.
But, that's liberalism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin

Wow, that's deep.

> who dis
It's PewDiePie 2040

Cool.

Is that a cult leader? It looks like a cult leader.

Local schizo who was promoted to the main country's ideologist and philosopher due to the lack of better alternatives.

He went crazy from smoking too much weed, btw. He was a hippie liberal, married to a lesbian femenist who hanged out with punks and antifas and they were all blazing 24/7 until he hadn't become fascist after one heavy trip where he has seen Russia invaded by a giant cany cat from Kazakhstan. He then became a philosopher and moved to nationalism and eaurasianism

He is.
He also looks like he would rape the young boys in his cult.

he is some soviet wizard with a plan to take over the west.
you must love based black monkeys and agree with third world invasions or else dugin will force you to convert to orthodoxy.

...

You just keep on doing what youre doing

>Olavetes

Brazil has an over the top writer though, Coehlo. Tell me a Dutch writer who isn't a complete cuck rn.

Fun thing is Gramsci was an arberesh, or Italy Albanian, there still are some areas in south Italy and Sicily. But the forefather of fascism, Crespi, one of the generals of Garibaldi who was the chief operative for war and one of the first heads of the newly formed Italian state, also was an arberesh. So the arberesh, only a very tiny minority in the south, gave birth to the two leading figures of Italian far right and far left movements. You can look it up, Albanians are the Jews and the Aryans of Italy at the same time.

Al Bundy from Tom the Tool Guy Tanner.
When you do something stupid, he says 'I have my doubts on that, Tom.'
Many laughs ensue.

He legit looks like modern day Rasputin. Wouldn't be surprised if at some point in the future we discover he has been cucking Putin and his ex wife all this time.

Interesting. Thanks info.

You're right. What's overdue is a faith-wide denunciation of Mormons. they should not be able to use the word Christianity or Jesus Christ in their Harry Potter fantasy tale.

There are more interesting National Bolsheviks

So whats his name no one has posted it yet on this thread.

The Catholic Church used to be clear on their denunciation of heresy; now the hierarchy is too interested in playing ecumenism. Protestant sects began practicing ecumenism in the late 19th century stemming from the American experience, which inculcated indifferentism within the sects.
Granted you have small, independent Protestant churches that do call out heresy when they see it; sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't, but rarely taken seriously because churches within the same denominational sect do not agree with one another on simple matters of faith.
We have the tenets of classical liberalism spread into Christianity and Christian confessions themselves which inherently undermines faith.

I find it interesting how we all support 'religious freedom' because we all want to be able to worship freely, yet do not see that the very principle of religious freedom undermines and destroys Christianity by its very nature. A Christian society which allows the free expression of error is not a Christian society; and is a society that must give Satanism and Mahometanism the same rights as they wish to continue practicing.
It's a far cry from Christendom.

I googled him and clicked the shortest video that seemed interesting. He seems to describe the problem correctly but we can move forward with reason and will through Christianity without being fanatically archaic. Modernity doesn't have to lead to doom.
youtube.com/watch?v=quxWhp5y23E

not bad, i see it