was hitler a good leader? why or why not?
Was hitler a good leader? why or why not?
he was extremely skilled, but can you really be considered a good leader if you lose so badly?
He was pathetic leader. Had no idea how to wage War and lead his own country to ruin, together with whole europe. If Hitler was wise it would be germany first to have Nukes, germany would have moon bases by the year 1970 and by the year 1990 would start terraforming Mars.
This. Fuck Hitler, he killed Europe
He was a good leader, but a terrible war leader.
This. He should have left the war to his generals. They were literally only a kilometer or two from Moscow. The Soviet generals were even planning their surrender and had TNT placed all over the city. But instead he tried to siege Leningrad with the Fins and told his men to move South to Stalingrad.
bump
Hitler would fail even if he won eastern front. The moment USA developed nukes axis was doomed either way.
Also you don't start war when you are outnumbered, that was his first fatal mistake, he was doomed before he even started the war .
hitler borrowed money from jew bankers to build tanks. he grew the german economy with a military build up that was paid for by a loan. germany couldnt pay the loan back
every one knew what that meant. it was a simple obvious opening move that was doomed to fail
>"hitler is at fault for what he tried to stop" meme
ok shekelsberg
If he actually tried to stop it then he is double failure.
There are roads that you mustn't traverse
There are armies that you mustn't attack
There are fortresses that you mustn't storm
There are terrains that you don't fight for
And there are orders from the monarch that you cannot accept.
That's art of war 101
>reddit spacing
You are just mad that i mixed your idol with mud. Hitler was retarded, the moment he captured paris he should do everything in his power to negotiate peace at all cost start normalizing situation and take defensive position. Forget about fucking africa and focus his troops in europe.
Don't even attempt bombimng britsbongs. War to be successful should be short because otherwise your soldiers get tired together with whole population. War economy is a bitch.
he alright
Finally a thread that's not gay.
...
Hitler was a demi-god.
Nothing you say will refute this eternal fact.
Thread over.
...
...
>good leader
>loses a war he started because if his own incompetence despite being the master race
lol Hitler was a retard and the people who defend him are the same retards who think unsourced jpegs are real arguments
He lost the war.
That should answer your question.
He lead a nation to ruin. Look what Germany has become, a disgrace of the whole continent.
>implying the Axis couldn't also develop nukes
>implying that nukes back then didn't suck and could be mass produced
He was a phenomenal leader of the people, and by far the worst military commander in German history.
He lost the war and ruined White Nationalism forever. He also declared war on America and the Soviet Union while at war with the UK and expected to win.
Also don't forget most of his war tactics were shitty and never let his generals do what they wanted.
DELEEY IT
No. WW2 would have still occurred except now it'll be against Communism instead of Fascism. Germany would have been on the side of the Soviets if Hitler didn't rise to power and they would have the bombs since all the German scientists would have still remained.
...
...
prett
They could if they as i said focused on defending territories of poland and france and actually stopped the war at all cost then and there.
Most of your own rocket technology was stolen from nazi germany, they would need what 10 years to develop transcontinental rockets?
I repeat Hitler was a retard and squandered potential that germany had.