Why does fascism fail or get crushed by a superior military force every time it's ever been tried?

Why does fascism fail or get crushed by a superior military force every time it's ever been tried?

Because of The Jew.

>RoC
Just because it's a provisional military dictatorship doesn't make it fascist
>Chile
Peaceful transition, a success while it lasted
>Portugal
Peaceful transition, a success while it lasted
>Brazil
The intergralists never obtained power.
>Spain
Peaceful transition, a success while it lasted

>Germany, Italy and Japan lost a war

Spain and Portugal had peaceful transitions and kept out of WW2.
RoC > PRC
And I don't know anything about S. America, but I know Pinochet is pretty much still loved in Chile.
So, no, fascism didn't fail or got crushed everytime, you utter faggot.

somewhat ignorant here
based on this, fascism seems to be a a kind of temporary crisis mode government? i.e. you bring around fascism for a few decades to get the "trains running on time" and then drop it for something more long-term, like a democracy or monarchy or something?

pinochet failed har-
>Chile third country behind USA-Canada

Fascism comes to fix gaping issues. Thing is, we don't really know if there's a good long-term solution after it, since the peaceful transitions IMO were still done under a fair bit of external geopolitical pressure.

How do people feel about Codreanu in Romania now, compared to the communism that followed and wtv it is like today?

have their been any facist governments with good plans for succession? Everyone always talks about Germany having a lot of infighting in the event of Hitler dying, wouldn't the others have the same problem when the cult of personality around the leader is rendered irrelevant?

bc socialism fails every time

Codreanu has been largely forgotten, he was never in power really.

Antonescu on the other hand is largely liked and defended by most of the population, despite being declared essentially illegal (statues torn down, stuff like that)

Comparatively, hard to tell. People ate commie propaganda on bread, so some are hardcore commie-era nostalgists.

I think Singapore pulled succession off, depending on whether or not you think Singapore can be classified as fascist.

>superior military

That's not how you write "outnumbered"

Seems to he thriving in Israel.

fpbp

>Peaceful transition, a success while it lasted
A backwards, poor country with a very high illiteracy rate embroiled in an unwinnable war for 10+ years. A tremendous success indeed.

>Pinochet still loved in Chile

Israel is still doing good.

Why is Taiwan on this list?

Wikipedia makes it out to be a single party parliamentary system, which I think really sets it aside from the other examples. Traditionally, people serve the office of King or President much more so than they do the actual man or woman holding the office. In Italy Musolini IS Il Duce and in Germany Hitler IS Der Fuhrer. In Singapore presumably people serve "the Prime Minister" moreso than Loong.

The progress done from 1933 to 1974 in education, infrasctures etc... was never so big. Do you even know what was the illiteracy in the first 20 years of the xx century and what was the difference in the 60's?

Ethno-fascism or Ethno-Nationalism (like Germany or Japan) has failed miserably. As for temporary, anti-communist, pro-Liberty Fascism like Pinochet? It's worked every time. Pinochet is practically still worshiped in Chile to this day.

99% of the time, jack-boot fascism fails. But if we're just talking about killing commies during a civil war, heavy-handed against commies, yes, that works quite well.

Overall, anti-communism/socialism is the way to go. Fascism always fails in the long run.

>The progress done from 1933 to 1974 in education, infrasctures etc... was never so big. Do you even know what was the illiteracy in the first 20 years of the xx century and what was the difference in the 60's?
Just because the previous regimes were even shittier does not make Estado Novo suddenly good. It was a regime uncapable of renewing itself and learn from its errors that ultimately did more harm than good.

At least Portugal was probably 100% native-white.
What about now? importing hundreds of thousands of third worlder, the future is bright.

>an UNwinnable war for 10+ years
.
Angolan theatre won
Mozambican almost won.
Guinea Bissau stalemate or lost
Goa, Damão and Diu lost forever
Those other Indian enclaves lost in 1954 forever

Pretty much. Remember, good times create weak men, weak men create bad times, bad times create strong men, strong men create good times. Fascism is that last part of the sequence.

The only failures I see here are Nazi Germany which was not even proper fascism but autistic kraut interpretation and Japan.
Portugal, Spain and were comfy (again, not proper fascism but a mild interpretation) and Chile under Pinochet was not fascist at all.
And Italy would have been find if Mussolini didn't ally himself with Hitler. So the fault was not in the system but in single political decision.
Don't know about Brazil and China.

But Spanish fascism didn't fail? They obliterated the Republicans in the war and ruled for 40 years.

> a very high illiteracy rate
The end years of monarchy and the first Republic dindu nothing wrong.

...