Why are liberal places like Cali, London metro, Catalonia, etc, the most developed parts of their respective countries...

Why are liberal places like Cali, London metro, Catalonia, etc, the most developed parts of their respective countries? Even in my country, the most developed place is by far the most liberal one

Usually built at a port or other source of wealth. When you live under a waterfall of money, you lose perspective of the reality everyone else has to live in.

Fpbp.

Build city
Take care of your city
Invade city
Take take take
City crumbles

California was a Republican stronghold until the late seventies, after the industry and infrastructure had been built. By then the Spics, liberals, and niggers had helped change it to a swing state, which went full Democrat during the 80s when Reagan stupidly gave the Spics amnesty.

follow the money friendo

Join pol server to talk about Catalonia referendum and other happenings

6RvQDp - Discord Link

Join Voice Chat

>the most developed parts of their respective countries?
breathes in

Most of that innovation came from the 80s. And California was red until the mid 1990s. Just because a bunch of spics vote Dems for handouts, that doesn't make them "liberal".

The most developed areas of the world are also the most diverse and cosmopolitan. This causes them to be more liberal in two ways.

1) The brown people/immigrants/"outsiders" are themselves more liberal. If you are the sort of person to move to a foreign land, you will generally have less attachments to tradition, either your own or those of the land in which you have taken up residence.

2) Even the natives who live in these cosmopolitan spaces will be more liberal, simply because their friends/colleagues/family will be from the out-group. Its harder to hate black people when you work with a chill black dude every day.

This only explains the tendency to be more socially liberal- I'm not sure if there's an explanation for the increased economic liberalism.

>some people in a shitty area/country decide to leave for a frontier so they find their own destiny without weaklings/parasites holding them back
>frontiersmen settle on newly found/conquered land in a faraway place
>adventurous and entrepreneurial people from the old country hear about what's going on in the faraway land and migrate, building new businesses in the center of the newly settled land
>the previous two groups have lots of children who despite not being as rugged as their parents, still hold their traditions and transform their town into a prosperous city
>soon, weaklings and parasites find out about this new prosperous land over yonder
>they migrate to it and start agitating for gibs because they're not as wealthy and "privileged" as the descendants of the people who literally built the area from the ground up
>some naive politicians from the founding class feel bad and start handing out some gibs
>a tsunami of weaklings and parasites overrun the city once they learn that it has better gibs than their last
>the degenerate of the founding peoples start intermarrying/breeding with the new parasitic class
>parasitic class grows ridiculously fast while voting for more and more gibs
>area/country becomes shitty
>some people in the shitty area/country decide to leave for a frontier so they find their own destiny without weaklings/parasites holding them back...

Successful cities draw in a lot of idiots that are there just for protection.

>Why are liberal places like Cali, London metro, Catalonia, etc, the most developed parts of their respective countries?
Chicken and egg problem. The most developed countries are also the most diverse ones. They're not successful because they're diverse, but rather, they became diverse because they became successful. Success makes them create amnesties for their own citizens, like safety nets, and that's when the hordes come pouring in, looking for gibsmedats.

Maybe right can't have a decent country, but at least they can meme.

This actually brings up a great question. There are some countries that are wealthy without being diverse. Is the population of Tokyo anymore liberal than the rest of Japan? How about Seoul and South Korea? Taipei and Taiwan?

California is Liberal. It's Communist. And it was developed in the 1950s/60s and has been going to shit ever since.

*isnt Liberal

1. Wealth attracts those who want handouts and will vote for them
2. The left won the culture war, it's fashionable to be lefty so the establishment in these cities will lean that way

>I'm not sure if there's an explanation for the increased economic liberalism
hmmmmm.... :thinking:

False. Lived in Manhattan, Florida, Bay Area and now LA. Each have their own super shitty areas. San Jose for example, while retaining muh silicon valley and super high property values, has THE worst / most damaged roads in the country.

really fires up those neurons....

Cali is in Colombia you ignorant nigger faggot.

California is liberal now because faggots from Mexico and all shit hole states in America because they are promised more than $15 an hour. Dumb fucks move here and go broke then vote for liberal entitlements. I am hoping for a good shaker 6.0 or better and increased cost of living so they have to move. Soon we will remove all the niggers from political office.

when life is easy you become a faggot

really gets your noggin joggin', huh?

Kill us now.

When you build something nice, it attracts gibmedats

Now figure those numbers specifically for California? Don't want to do it, do ya? That would blow holes in your shorts like your farts. Argue the subject, don't make strawman arguments Faggot Liberal.

>republicans make the economy gro-

t. republitard socialist cuck

California? Where their dams are bursting from neglect, their transportation system is one of the worst in the world, their air quality is awful, in enough debt to enslave three generations, some of the highest taxes in the nation and still broke.... and they are running out of freshwater? You mean that "most developed" part of america?

>Califonia
>Developed

Try harder tard

>basing the effects of legislature on the party that holds the presidency instead of the party that leads the House and Senate
IIRC, for most of Clinton's years, the Republicans had a majority in both the House and Senate while the Democrats had far more power under Bush 43.

S-STOP POSTING THE TRUTH! IT'S ALL LIES! TRUMP IS GOING TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN LIKE HE PROMISED!

Mix of extreme safety and the fact that these places attract immigrants like nothing else

urban areas and especially port cities are super liberal because they forget that their food and goods require land, raw materials, time, labor, factories, and skill to create. They think everything comes off a truck, shelf, or out of a box and never see the mass amounts of people involved in creating what they consume.

People are also meant to develop around family with exposure to nature and free land to move around in. Through most of history, people have had to build fires, hunt, fish, build living structures, and distribute resources throughout a tribe effectively. ALL of this is lost to the urban environments, which is why you have so many underdeveloped males and emotionally stunted child-like adults.

>Yes Mr. Shekelberg! More tax cuts for you to hoard will make the economy grow!

They're coastal cities.

in short because liberals are spoiled brats thus they appear frequently in urban areas where they can parasite on society.

Hard times create hard men
Hard men create good times
Good times create soft men

People are fleeing Commiefornia in droves. The lefties couldn't stop voting for more tax and more regulation and now their economy is shit and no one can afford to be there.

That graph explains why economic liberalism is a good idea. However, it doesn't really explain why people living in urban environments would be more likely to accept that good idea than people living in rural environments.

>really makes you think

Maybe he means "developed" as in endless ugly low rise apartments to house hideous beaner goblins, or the stew of gray-roofed warehouses and mini-malls that span the entire horizon.

Yeah is not like there a jew forces about with money that play into it right Ivan? fuck you

First region becomes rich then it becomes decadent and therefore liberal. The societal decline ensues (you are here) and the region is destined to become shit again in a matter of few decades.

Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks.

after all the smart people build it up the leeches show up to suck the life out of the area, see Chicago, Detroit

are you lost?

Wrong. Democrats only had power in the last two years of Bush's term, and the first two years of Clinton's admin.

>Most of that innovation came from the 80s.
This is nowhere near true.

In Germany, it's the other way round. The most successful economically are the southern, deeply catholic and conservative state, while the most liberal commie shitholes Hamburg, Berlin, Bremen are hundreds of billions deep in debts.

t. retarded bootlicking welfare republican

/thread

>Why are there mice in the pantry instead of on the roof?

California is filled with a bunch of spics that managed to hop over from actual war-torn nations, but it still manages to excel most Red-states in life expectancy. Sad!

>German """conservatives"""
>literally the equivalent of US democrats

You want it as a percentage of gdp, not of the previous debt.

a lot of the infrastructure there is shit

>these places attract immigrants like nothing else
That happens in most places where citizens cant defend themselves

Cause high IQ people like programmers doing science n shiet live in places like san Francisco meanwhile us lower IQ poorer folks live in places like sacramento. But its real here in sacramento homie, I'm just trying to make a living and stay clean, I'm from the streets so I know what its like down here.

>When you live under a waterfall of money, you lose perspective of the reality everyone else has to live in.
this

Cali is a sinking shithole. As for your question, it's because when an area is a good place for jobs and development, young people will go there and make the area liberal.

Strong men create good life which creates weak men which creates bad life which creates strong men. Where abouts are the liberal cities in that chart?

Stockton I mean, jesus I'm such a low iq brainlet I cant even larp right.

Looks like republican Jesus - Ronald Reagan - and his successor is to blame for the debt US got itself in. Bill Clinton brought it down, then Bush fucked it all up for him and Obama.

Luckily, Obama was a smart leader who knew how to fix our economy, even while constantly being blocked by republicans in congress

pic related: how republicans fucked the US

/thread

Why did he take 5 years to halt the growth of national debt

>be republican
>be poor welfare leech with failing economy

have you been to cali? this state is falling apart. there is some kind of utility disaster every year. this year we almost had a dam break and we had to ask for federal money cuz we spent it all helping illegals. a lot of police departments are under funded and the homeless population is at critical levels.

every liberal city like Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, etc. are all shit holes because of liberals

Typical Democrat ignoring race.

Any party that defends non-whites who are genetically at fault here, since they cannot build civilizations, are at fault. Its the Democrats who turuned California from a white Republican state into a Democrat shitskin shithole by negating the vote to deport illegls.

if you are white, and you call yourself democrat, do your race a favor. Slit your throat.

>what is the 2008 crisis caused by George Dubya Bush?
it isn't easy to recover from a republican-pillaged economy, especially when republicans tried to block everything Obama did

>muh race

>Its the Democrats who turuned California from a white Republican state into a Democrat shitskin shithole by negating the vote to deport illegls.

Reagan did that, you dolt. He granted millions of illegals amnesty and California turned blue after-wards.

>bar bar white superior bar bar
go back to your trailer park

Lombardia and Bavaria prove you wrong.

The most developed parts of their respective countries, and relatively conservative.

>be in rich blue area
>be poorfag whose parents are all welfare leeches crammed into tiny apartments with all the other illegal immigrants
>taught about the evils of white people my whole k-12 education and in free Jr. College
>vote Dem 4lyfe because fuck whitey
>work retail and live on food stamps and public housing whole life
So progressive

>Bavaria
>run by the CSU, which is the smaller sister party of the German CDU
>which is headed by the "conservative" Merkel

>yes
>strawman
>strawman
>strawman
>strawman
yes, it is progressive

>Lombardia
>run by the centrist Christian Democrats
>who are probably even more left wing than the American democrat party

>Graphic by Remove and Replace Every Teapublican
You sure are a faggot, aren't you? Remember when Hillary lost? Hahahahahaha you nigger blowing faggot.

>Remember when Hillary lost
Good, because in 4 years I'll have more data to prove that Republicans collectively sperg out to shit up the US economy every 8 years.

The sole reason the stats are "higher" for Democrats is that Obama came to office at the exact same time the world's worst financial crisis ended. Without that, Republicans win.

Source? Whatever. Clinton was a centrist, not a liberal. Bush I raised taxes, basically a Democrat. Bush II was also big government. Get back to us with Trump statistics.

Virtually all the activity you are showing occurs under Bush II, who was a liberal Republican, and Obama, who was a bad President had the lucky coincidence of entering office at the exact same time the world's worst financial crisis ended. Lame!

Left-wing false propaganda. No state takes more than it contributes. This has been debunked.

pretty much

What is this unreadable crap?

The wealth is built from non-lib.

London for example was Child Labour and very non-liberal exploitation of other races.

The libs flock to the wealth.Then ruin everything with their ways. They're parasites.

>Obama came to office at the exact same time the world's worst financial crisis ended
what the fuck, are you retarded? He came into office right after it only started

>Clinton
he's a democrat
>Bush I raised taxes
he's a republican
>Bush II was also big government
he's a republican

>Virtually all the activity you are showing occurs under Bush II, who was a liberal Republican

>be Bush
>republicans love you and defenddc you all the time
>democrats always hated you
>"bush is a democrat"
fuck off retard
pic related

This is dumb. Nominal tax rates don't equal actual tax rates. When nominal tax rates are high, the private sectors reduces its actual tax rate over time through the creation and utilization of loopholes, until the actual tax rate is lower than under "low tax" regimes. That's a fact.

>no sources

>Clinton was a centrist
funny how a centrist that drastically improved the US economy was supported mostly by democrats, but republicans impeached him for having sex

Because they have no god besides economic development. They care about nothing besides money and wealth and don't care who they have to hurt to get it.

It's the neocons that fucked America up

You could say it was worth it if they actually achieved anything after crushing the Soviet Union

Republicans held the House throughout most of Clinton's terms, and the House is where spending bills originate. Republicans also held the Senate for most of Clinton's terms. Clinton governed as a true centrist.

>by far the most liberal one
2 reasons:
1) With "liberal" ideas you can fool and control better the population, it is what the oligarchs want to do to become more powerful.
2) If people have more money ir becomes easier fool them, because they have time to waste and don't need to understand reality to live, so they are ready to believe every romantic and fool idea.

>but republicans impeached him for having sex
You mean for lying to the nation...

The left gravitates to the cosmopolitan because it's allergic to culture. (Notice how their go-to insults are "hick," "redneck," etc--basically they call you working class as an insult.) The left prefers a malleable 'global shopping mall' with no pesky deeply rooted values and traditions that are difficult to control.