Why didn't they just pick their own cotton, why did they have to ruin america?

why didn't they just pick their own cotton, why did they have to ruin america?

>Implying we'd be in this mess right now if Yankee nigger lovers hadnt have freed them.

Stop trying to cover up for something that is manifestly your fault yankee

In all fairness they probably assumed we wouldn't be retarded enough to give people we fucked over rights and voting power in the country they were fucked over by. Slavery wasn't the problem, Arabs had slaves and they don't have the nigger problem we have. Being too nice was the problem, only retarded whites would think they could be best friends with the people they enslaved. If we had just drowned all the slaves after the end of slavery niggers wouldn't be a problem. But no, whitey decided to treat his pet monkey as his equal.

Nigger problems in America are 100% because of white weakness. Sorry but that's the truth, I would say 80% of niggers want you dead and you enabled them kek. Stupid whitey.

Nonesence. If they would've gotten their independence they would've just keep importing more slaves (they even had some south american colonies for slaves). Which would've lead into Haiti 2.0.

Unlikely the whites outnumbered blacks 2 to 1 in haiti the niggers outnumbered whites 11 to 1

Besides the fact that they breed like rats. And if not like Haiti, then like Brazil, which isn't really this much better

The aristocracy in the south wouldnt have been able to hold together if the south had won the war. There was already growing resentment amongst the lowerclass whites and attacks on the plantations toward the end of the war. If the yankees hadnt have won and freed them the whites would have hung the blacks and the aristocrats before the turn of the century.

The South would've been fucked the moment industrialization hit the US, would've started in the North and Dixieniggers would probably have fought it tooth and nail. Either way, they would've been fucked economically and be surrounded by niggers.

Also popping Ol' Abe in the head before he had a chance to repatriate all the niggers back to Africa was counter productive, fucking Dixieniggers I swear, its never their fault.

And the north would've just let it happen?

Democracies are inherently weak-willed the Norths electorate probably wouldn't want to fight the south again.

What about great Britain?

Yes, most of the North didn't like niggers either. Even the progressives didn't see niggers as a whole person. The only reason they would have intervened is to protect the wealthy whites whose families are still rich. In Nashville we have areas called old money areas where the descendants of old rich southerners still live because they never stopped being rich.

Then was the war really about slavery? or did they lie to Britain so they will stop funding the south?

Maybe. They didnt do anything about the Civil War why would they care about a resource-poor area when their armies are conquering Africa and fighting the Boers?

They funded the south at the beginning, but stopped when they were told the war is about slavery

Not true at all. The Brits supported the south under the table throughout the entire war as a way of checking American interests in the western hemisphere.

It was about slavery but the North intended to get rid of the niggers after the war. Keeping them and making them citizens was never the plan, that's why Liberia was started. The freed slaves in Liberia learned from the white man and dominated the rest of the people which is what led to Liberia turning into what it is today.

Well, I stand corrected.

Yes, I know about what happened in Liberia

(((British))) wanted triangular trade of slaves, molasses and rum. Forced and continued to force the slave trade on South until it was completely economically dependent on slave labor and debt from London (((Bankers))). Jefferson tried to get this in The Declaration of Independence as an example of tyranny but it was cut by South Carolina and New England opposition. In 1788 SC and NE pushed back against US ending international slave trade in Constitution. Compromise was that it would end in 20 years, 1808. Once international trade was gone, NE stopped protecting slavery in the South and within 35 years had channeled its commie, puritan, feminist religious zeal into slamming the South for slavery. In 1788 only about 600,000 nog slaves. But even without more coming from Africa after 1808, nog slave population exploded--it was a cash crop--supported by ((insurance brokers))) and prime (((market makers))) for slaves in deep south.

Why didn't they keep sending them Liberia?

>Also popping Ol' Abe in the head before he had a chance to repatriate all the niggers back to Africa was counter productive,
THIS.

New York Sen. William Seward (favorite for the GOP nomination in 1860) wanted in 1860 to set up a 40 year bond issue that would have paid off in 1901 to pay for buying the slaves and sending them to a colony in Africa or Central America. When word got out about his idea the future SJW's of the new GOP turned their backs on him and voted for Lincoln, a dark horse, for the 1860 nomination because Seward wasn't tough enough on the south in their view.

Seward was a smart guy. He bought Alaska for pennies an acre from the Russians in 1867 and was made fun of it by the same idiots who trashed his buyout idea for slavery.

They thought it would work, it actually did for a little while.

>A Jew and Nazi having a enlightened conversation on pol

I live in Alaska, Sewards folly is taught here in Alaska history class a lot. It's hilarious how right he was. Bought an oil and gold hot spot for pennies on the dollar.