Oh goddammit

Oh goddammit

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=cL8g7zy6qxw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Ayn Rand is shit-tier philosophy. Literally worthless.

Rand wasn't an Orthodox Jew, let alone Zionist.

Elaborate

You looked at her face and didn't guess?

A jew is a jew you dumb faggot

Pic related. There are only useful Jews.

...

>oppose gibs
>get lung cancer
>gets on medicare

>disagree with taxation
>pay tax so you don't get thrown into rape gulag

h-heh, whoa way to NOT stand by your principles mate :^)

>1 post by this ID

...

Rand was based, fuck off

youtube.com/watch?v=cL8g7zy6qxw

YOU DIDN'T KNOW THIS?

For fuck sakes. Do you think kikes would just sell collectivism (marx) and not sell the opposite side of the issue (Rand)?

user. Come on.

You never leave money on the table like that.

But if they are?

The "muh free market" jews are just as bad as the commie jews.

Both are completely shit tier political philosophies.

The thing is this kind of shit disproved Sup Forums's bmemes about jews

Jews are not "behind leftlist" or "behind marxism"

They are behind everything. Jews are smart

...

reddit spacing bitches need to lurk moar
you arent allowed to post until you have saved .01 btc

But they are presently, and historically Marxist.
Anti-Semitism was a punishable offense under Stalin.
(((The Frankfurt School))) pushed critical theory and Marxism in the cultural sense as a means of destroying the West.

No other economic ideology grants them the reigns to as much control as Marxism.

>he had to check wiki for this

The fuck is reddit spacing

newfag

>Rand wasn't an Orthodox Jew, let alone Zionist.
I've seen her on talk shows fighting with the audience that Israel has the right to do whatever the fuck it wants. Donahu I believe, youtube it

She was a HARDCORE ZIONIST

>Jews are not "behind leftlist" or "behind marxism"
The first Zionist created fucking Communism. Marx was just his writer.

How did you not already know this

>Rand wasn't an Orthodox Jew, let alone Zionist.
Doesn't matter. Read Culture of Critique.

What did rand contribute that hasn't already been said or done?

>women
>philosophy

wewest of the lads, never EVER take any advice from a woman

fpbp
muh individualism is a kike trick to make you ABANDON YOUR PEOPLE
14/88!

Good Goyim!!!
Who needs pesky inconveniences like "thinking for yourself" and "reasonin skills", just set those aside and let the Je-err..I mean your (((leader))) whom we totally aren't bankrolling to make them for you!!

I know right? What is wrong with these Americans, Ivan? Is that why they got conquered?

Sure thing, buddy.

Individualism is easier for Jews to manipulate than virtually any other political ideology. In individualist societies Jews are seen as individual people, rather than a historically toxic group.

fuck out of here normalfag

This allows the inherent Jewishness of academic movements like critical theory, for example, to go unnoticed.

Trump

Ayn Rand

Hitler

Lauren Southern

ALL your heroes are Jews, and we laugh at that

>95% of top leadership
>check the CENTRAL COMMITTEE of the USSR in 20s USSR
>Not even 20% Jewish

wut? did u lie?

it's because when individualism happens, so does a meritocracy. And in meritocracies the superior IQ of Jews leads them to dominate, which leads to resentment from low-IQ groups (like you)

Jude

lol no. (Why are you posting with a NatSoc flag, btw? Forget to change it?) Vox Day, of all people debunked the Jewish IQ myth during a twitter spat with Sargon. I'm not going to rehash it here because it isn't really essential to my retort.

Anyway, the reason Jews thrive in individualist societies is because they're notoriously nepotistic. They preach individualism for everyone else, but are collectivist in their own affairs. Again, like I told the other guy, read Culture of Critique for examples of this.

>be peasant girl in Russia
>Bolsheviks take over
>gtfo because fuck commies
>come to America, starts writing about how much commies suck
>leave behind a legacy that continues to trigger commies and college leftists to this day

she's better than any of you faggots

in individualist societies jews cant control you.
in collectivist societies (shitholes) they can.
pretty simple

The unrestricted capitalism that was promoted by Rand is just as Jewish as communism.

Unrestricted capitalism rewards the most sociopathic, rootless, amoral individuals
> (You)
> (You)
>in individualist societies jews cant control you.
This is objectively wrong. We live in an individualist society and Jews are our elite.
>in collectivist societies (shitholes) they can.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Racially oriented collectivism will forever be impenetrable for Jews.

>ITT: Surprised to find out a Jew is a Jew

Anyone surprised to find out that do-nothing faggot Speaker of the House Paul Ryan is a huge fan of Ayn Rand. Bunch of Jew loving faggots.

Cronyism leads to infestation
It can't really be called 'domination' in the sense of masculine control since your men are a cowardly, inbred, effeminate, embarrassments who can't fuck to reproduce without creating birth defects.
Sort of like a virus dominates a host or pond scum dominates a body of water.

>he didn't realize that Objectivism is a typically Jewish "individualism for thee but not for me" Jewish movement designed to promote social atomization and facilitate power consolidation by Jews

need to read the Culture of Critique baka f.am t.bh then you would recognize Jewishness In Philosophy like this

Not being a rootless kike capitalist scum or a rootless nigger kike commie scum is a centrist? As if they are the only.two positions. A third position exists that doesn't have materialism as it's foundation.

Something people from reddit get really worked up about.
It's spacing every sentence into a new paragraph. Really not a big deal.

>Rand had spent the last eight years of her life receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits. At the time of her death, her estate was valued at $500,000 (around $1.2 million in today’s money), suggesting her decision was motivated less by rationality than by the sort of parasitic greed she’d always claimed to despise

tl;dr jew

...

Most Nazi larpers are Zionist and/or Messianic Jews trying to stir up 'anti-semitism' because their garbage race has no identity outside of being horrible inbred.
The division created by Jew hatred is supposed to cull the sane Jews leaving the cult in droves back to impersonating the teachings of the elders like the rest of the Khazars.
A real white nationalism would just be the free market democracy of Andrew Jackson's America. An America that should have expelled the blacks after we had no more use for them.
>After slavery
>After urban decay
>After civil rights
>After more urban decay
>After crack and gansta rap
>How about after the sports thing implodes and NONE of them have a ticket 'out da hood' and shit get's really bad?
Let's give this spot in Mexico.

considering all the money the govt stole from her through taxes throughout her life, thats a fair deal

To be fair, everyone you dislike could actually be jews.
It's not really comparable to the original Hitler version

...

>Most Nazi larpers are Zionist and/or Messianic Jews
Thats actually true.

Most of the "Kill the Jew" types when pushed hate the leftist Jews but support both Israel and Israeli Jews.

>Muh based Netanyahu

you need somewhere to send them to m8

plus being pro-Israel lets you deflect anti-semitism charges

>Most Nazi larpers are Zionist and/or Messianic Jews trying to stir up 'anti-semitism' because their garbage race has no identity outside of being horrible inbred.
I wouldn't say 'most' but Jews certainly do have good reasons to promote anti-Semitism.
>A real white nationalism would just be the free market democracy of Andrew Jackson's America. An America that should have expelled the blacks after we had no more use for them.
Democratic capitalism is a time bomb for degeneracy. But why is this the only option for 'real' white nationalism?

>the woman whose whole philosophy is based around sociopathic self interest is a Jew
>this surprises Sup Forums

>Elaborate
She preaches the religion of Satan, worship of the self

What are you talking about?

>Democratic capitalism is a time bomb for degeneracy. But why is this the only option for 'real' white nationalism?
Nazism of a sort is Ok for Germany, I guess.
Heidegger was a Nazi and part of Nazi identity and I think most of his work has a place in America's future.

America has it's own history of purging the undesirables.
I wouldn't consider what we have a free market. When the Jew issues all the money out of this air through the banks and loans it with interest that can't exist but has to be paid with the loan.
A free market shouldn't allow diversity hires/admissions.
A free market should allow discrimination.
A free market shouldn't allow a welfare state or social safety net abuse.

We can have something else.
It should just allow whites to be free and the non-whites who can't compete fairly, which is pretty much all of them, to be rightly labelled as traitors. Commies in our case today.

I don't know. Taking two quotes from different people and saying it's proof of satanism is kind of a stretch. Yeah, she was a Jew, but have you ever read The Virtue of Selfishness? Quite frankly, some of the ideas would be important for white people to adopt. Seeing things from the view of "me first, fuck the others" can be used by any group of people. She happened to be a jew, but some of the ideas can be adapted to any group of people.

>In individualist societies Jews are seen as individual people, rather than a historically toxic group.
And?
Is this not the same argument niggers make to justify reparashuns from the white devil?
What makes Judaism historically toxic has nothing to do with anything inherent or genetic (to my knowledge), it is the ideas preached in the Torah, and more specifically the Talmud.

>[Individualism] allows the inherent Jewishness of academic movements like critical theory to go unnoticed
In the U.S, it was collectivism that enabled destructive notions like critical theory to become a reality. It is far easier to "convince" a (((public school system))) to adopt a curriculum than an entire population of individuals.

>And in meritocracies the superior IQ of Jews leads them to dominate
I'm not so sure they do have superior IQs, but even so. It is far easier to buy out a bureaucracy than it is to succeed in a meritocracy. Its the difference between my enemies being incentivized to compete, or to work together.

>Unrestricted capitalism rewards the most sociopathic, rootless, amoral individuals
No. Unrestricted capitalism rewards those who meet a societal demand. Since society, excluding anomolies, isn't "sociopathic, rootless and amoral", such individuals are not rewarded.

>We live in an individualist society and Jews are our elite.
Jews comprise a lot of our elite. That much is certain. But are we really individualist? Do you have any real choice as to where your tax dollars go? Can you decide not to fund Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, or even Israel itself through Foreign Aid. I didn't think so.

fuck you nigger

I see where you're coming from. I agree, National Socialism isn't really the character of the United States. However, maintaining the free market through banking reform and ending affirmative action shouldn't be our top priorities. Our top priorities ought to be maintaining the racial identity of America, and sometimes that might mean regulating the market directly, or indirectly through tariffs and immigration reform.

But I agree that the free market - George Lincoln Rockwell called it 'free enterprise,' which he contrasted to capitalism - will always going to be a part of the American soul.

This is amazing. Israel is turning itself into the world's biggest concentration camp!

He was. Now he isnt because he beliefs in god. How he ever was a fan of her and believed in god is beyond me since ayn viewed religion as evil.

>What makes Judaism historically toxic has nothing to do with anything inherent or genetic (to my knowledge), it is the ideas preached in the Torah, and more specifically the Talmud.
No. Again, read Culture of Critique. There are plenty of Jews who identify as atheists but are still influenced by a Jewish culture, for example every single communist Jew.

>In the U.S, it was collectivism that enabled destructive notions like critical theory to become a reality. It is far easier to "convince" a (((public school system))) to adopt a curriculum than an entire population of individuals.
It was individualism which allowed Jews to penetrate the height of academia and then promote their friends who believe exactly as they do to department head positions in elite universities where the most influential members of our society are educated.

>No. Unrestricted capitalism rewards those who meet a societal demand. Since society, excluding anomolies, isn't "sociopathic, rootless and amoral", such individuals are not rewarded.
What about all of the companies who use sweatshops and illegal immigrants as labor in order to keep their prices down (Walmart and Nike, for example)?

>Jews comprise a lot of our elite. That much is certain. But are we really individualist? Do you have any real choice as to where your tax dollars go? Can you decide not to fund Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, or even Israel itself through Foreign Aid. I didn't think so.
Let me rephrase, then: we *had* an individualist society, which Jews then took over via nepotism (which is extremely easy to do in individualist societies) and remade in their own image.

I think those racial identity fault lines have widened and the momentum coming to widen them further now can't be stopped.

Historically non-whites having a population majority over whites hasn't led to the non-white animals gaining power over whites. Whites will not allow it. I don't know what exactly will happen but it will be even more entertaining than Trump.
White's source of power doesn't come from our numbers or even our conscientious unity.
It has to do with our standards and sense of justice.

America's white revolutionary spirit and high standards simply won't allow the blacks and hispanics who work the shittiest jobs, who rightfully have the lowest status to just start running things in the nightmare scenario people fear, though it will be a trying time.
Whites are having problems but whites are also more powerful in certain ways.
We have control of new media, local and international.
AR and VR is going to allow the cave dwelling whites to interact in new spaces.
We have access to bootstrap ourselves into tech jobs and we are the only ones who invent and develop great things in tech.
Aside from white paranoia of the surveillance state, which I have plenty of, in actuality when AI starts sorting that data it's going to bring the hammer of justice down harder on non-whites.
If gene editing is a thing only whites will benefit from it because shit genomes of non-whites have no good traits to turn on.
Robots will replace the beeners.

Her philosophy is trash, so why does it matter what race she is?

You didn't know? Her and Milton (((Friedman)))'s philosophies are both trash.
>greed is good, altruism is bad
>consensual transactions between two individuals always benefit the rest of society - externalities don't exist
cancer/10

I think (hope) America will either split up, or elect a Caesar who'll fix our demographics, before we come close to being ruled over by non-whites.
>If gene editing is a thing only whites will benefit from it because shit genomes of non-whites have no good traits to turn on.
I've never thought of this. Good take, user.

Any other philosophy is worthless and trash tier everyone but me gotta learn

>The state rests on the slavery of labor. If labor becomes free, the state is lost.

This is why we started getting labor laws after the industrial revolution

You didn't know? Ancap is a kike tier ideology
>#notalljews

but if perhaps, by some strange coincidence, that as a matter of fact, all of the people Sup Forums has a problem with do turn out to be jewish, is that not something taking note of?

>Orthodox Jew

You bring those goalposts back right now faggot.

More exposition

Read Culture of Critique.

Jews are behind everything bad. You'll never see Jews advocating national liberalism or social democracy. They create cancerous, anti-human ideologies like communism and libertarianism.

...

A lot of Jews are extremely knowledgeable about the JQ. David Cole openly investigated and denied the existence of gas chambers. And even I'm 1/4. The smart Jews eventually find this kind of thing, and it comes down to whether they identify with Jews or the goyim

>what is prisoner's dilemma
If you buy into individualism but another group doesn't, you're put at an inherent disadvantage.

> never see Jews behind social democracy

First Democratic Socialist candidate here in Burgerland was Jewish

>Read Culture of Critique
Its on my reading list desu

>There are plenty of Jews who identify as atheists but are still influenced by a Jewish culture
>It was individualism which allowed Jews to penetrate the height of academia
This isn't a refuation to my argument.
Whether one's actions are influenced by faith, or culture (which, in the case of the Jews, is in of itself influenced by faith anyway) are irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that basing an actions on Judaism is a sufficient, but not necessary condition for ill intent. One can base an action on the Torah without evil intent. Likewise, one can have an evil intent without it being based on the Torah. If it is not individual actions that are a determinant of one's character, than...what?

>What about all of the companies who use sweatshops and illegal immigrants as labor in order to keep their prices down (Walmart and Nike, for example)?
What about them?
While the working conditions may be appauling my Western standards, applying Western standards to a third-world country isn't a very fair comparison. You have to realize that no one is forcing workers to apply for jobs at these factories. The fact that they are choosing to work there implies they believe the sweatshop is better than the alternatives (which often mean subsistence farming, prostitution, smuggling or black markets). If anyone is to blame, its their governments (a product of collectivism) which, in many countries have given sweatshops a monopoly such that competitors with better working conditions cannot compete.

>insinuating it is always in the workers' best interests to reinvent the wheel
>insinuating this isn't Marxist class consciousness disguised as a new edgy ideology
BE GONE STIRNERITE

>xkcd faggotty

*faggotry

DON'T FORGET THIS KIKE BITCH DIDN'T HAVE ANY CHILDREN BECAUSE SHE WAS TOO IN LOVE WITH HER CAREER

TELL ME Sup Forums WHAT KIND OF WOMEN DON'T HAVE CHILDREN?

MENTALLY ILL WOMEN IS WHO

>implying hyper individualistic lolbertarianism coupled with muh free market and open borders doesn't end in a pseudo Marxist totalitarian distopia
Just substitute the state/collective/etc. with mega foreign corporations indirectly controlling your government. This is why modern day USA, despite being diametrically opposite to USSR, is so similar to it in many aspects

>Whether one's actions are influenced by faith, or culture (which, in the case of the Jews, is in of itself influenced by faith anyway) are irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that basing an actions on Judaism is a sufficient, but not necessary condition for ill intent. One can base an action on the Torah without evil intent. Likewise, one can have an evil intent without it being based on the Torah. If it is not individual actions that are a determinant of one's character, than...what?
Are you implying that groups don't actually exist? Either way, I hope you don't think this is coming from a place of bad faith, but the JQ is a pretty huge topic. Culture of Critique, as well as Kevin MacDonald's other two books on the same subject, should answer all of your questions about Jews.

>What about them?
My point in highlighting those conditions was to illustrate that, even though some companies might have moral qualms about exposing their workers to those sorts of conditions, the companies that don't have similar qualms will be more successful. (I was mobile posting though, so I was trying to keep it a bit short.) Without even addressing the conditions of sweatshops and illegal immigrant labor, it's worth noting that both scenarios involve selling out one's own countrymen. Like I said, capitalism rewards rootless, sociopathic, and/or amoral behavior.

>If anyone is to blame, its their governments (a product of collectivism) which, in many countries have given sweatshops a monopoly such that competitors with better working conditions cannot compete.
It's even more the fault of capitalists who choose to patronize sweatshops. If no one was willing to use sweatshop labor, they wouldn't exist.

>implying [libertarianism] coupled with free markets
That's like saying "cars coupled with engines". Libertarianism can't be "coupled" with free markets because Libertarianism *implies* free markets.

>...and open borders
Privatized borders are not "open borders". Does the government force individuals to build picket fences along their property line, does the government force individuals to live in gated communities? Clearly a demand for border security exists, even within a governments so-called
"""closed borders""".

>doesn't end in a pseudo-Marxist totalitarian distopia
As opposed to what? Governments, by nature have inherently less check-and-balances than the lack thereof. There's no guarentee that a Libertarian/AnCap society WONT end in dystopia, but it is inherently further from one than more govt.

>Just substitute the state/collective/etc. with mega foreign corporations indirectly controlling your government
The smaller a government is, the less value a corporation obtains from lobbying within it.

>This is why modern day USA, despite being diametrically opposite to USSR
>US
>Limited Government
O I AM LAFFIN

>Are you implying that groups don't actually exist?
No, not at all. In fact, I think groups are fully compatible with individualism. In many cases, it is in an individuals best interests to unionize against a common foe.

>even though some companies might have moral qualms about exposing their workers to those sorts of conditions, the companies that don't have similar qualms will be more successful.
I disagree. If that were the case, then all companies in the U.S right now would be paying their employees minimum wage. The most sucessful companies have to balance the demands of clients with that of their workers.

Amazing argument, retard

crazy catlady confirmed

>If no one was willing to use sweatshop labor, they wouldn't exist.
If no one was willing to work at sweatshops, they wouldn't exist either. You screw over the consumer because the price for their goods rises proportionally, and more importantly, you screw over the workers in the 3rd-world because they have to be laid off and resort to more even more depraved conditions. Another thing I forgot to address is inflation: $1/day has a lot more buying power in 3rd-world economies than it does to our own.

>both [sweatshops and illegal immigrants] involve selling out one's own countrymen.
On first glance, this is true. But its only half of the equation. The increased productivity means increased marginal revenue for employers. More revenue means employers are free to invest this capital back into the economy (either into their own operations or another), which enables them to lower costs for consumers, give employees raises, and hire more people (including fellow countrymen).

she was a sabbatean cultist

Forgot to link oops

she is disgusting