Guns kills people

>Guns kills people
>we need a Gun Ban
>Cars kills people
>we need a Car Ban

Youre not thinking far ahead enough. There will be a car ban. Likely in your lifetime. You might live long enough to see the meat ban.

Is this how you think?
By that logic we need no laws.

Cars serve a purpose other than killing living things.

Guns only have one legitimate purpose.

We should ban mouths too since all the leftist cucks wanna ban the first 5 amendments anyways.

Just look at these reddit cunts. Anything you do to have fun with a weapon apparently makes you an instant "nut job".

>you need a drivers license to drive a car

>a thread died for this

Were gonna see a car ban. Maybe not in our lifetimes but it's going to happen if we continue on the path we're taking.

Ban assault elevation, nobody needs to be higher than 50ft above ground level.

And you need a license to own a gun

See THIS is the problem, half of the debate has no understanding of the facts of the issue. Guns are insanely regulated

Some states dont even require you to get a license.
Getting a license in some states is very easy

And some states go so far as to regulate bullets
Post by still stands, guns are highly regulated, and in the states where they are he most regulated the most gun crime occurs

Yes because nevada had such a strick gun control law.
Also how hard is it for people to get a gun from another state.
Wew so smart

Cars have more utility than just killing people, dumb texan.

Nevada doesn't have high gun crime. It just had a horrible shooting, but that doesn't change the fact that loads of gun owners in Nevada DONT commit crimes

As for the second point, that's exactly why I don't trust gun legislation. In CA the regulations are high but most criminals bring guns in from out of state
A liberal would blame the other state, but that would just end up disarming both people
If people in CA felt more familiar with guns, and like they were allowed to own them, the atmosphere would probably change as most street thugs who commit the majority of gun crime don't like robbing armed people

We had a photo from his gf's FB in Dubai hours ago. Did he go with her? Did they stop by Mecca? Is that why the Sherrif said they "knew of him"?

BAN ALL MUSLIMS NOW!

The solution is to remove people so that they can't get killed!

The high gun regulation is a reaction to high rates of gun violence. Its not (gun regulation) -> (gun violence), but (gun violence) -> (gun regulation).

Even so called high regulation doesnt do the job properly. Either tighten it more or just out right ban it nationally. What use does a gun even have unless your living in a forest.

giving birth guarantees a kill
ban birth

>Don't ban cars because their intended purpose is transport
>Don't ban assult rifles even though their only purpose is to kill humans as effectively as possible

Design does not trump usage retard. This argument is so fucking bad. Something being designed to kill does not mean usage of that item will result in more deaths than something designed not to kill.

>what is a repeating cycle?
Let's not do the whole chicken egg thingy, they affect each other in many ways

>Oxygen kills people
>we need an air ban

>u only need a gun if you live in a forest!

Holy fuck you are retarded.

case in point something like cars and cigarettes. it's way easier to run someone over yet cigarettes kill 5x the amount of people.

Faulty Comparison. Your argument is shit

Really though why do you need a gun. You need a car to get around places.

>muh safety
Have you heard of non lethal weapons?

>bu but wat if they have gun
If there is no gun, there is gonna be no spooky man with a gun

>niggers kill people
>we need to ban whites

Cars also cause global warming and shit, so ban those first.

A gun makes it way too easy to kill people in large amounts and doesn't help our economy function in the way cars do. Cars are a necessary evil. Guns are an unnecessary one

hue

>a gun makes it too easy to kill people in large amounts

Wrong. See trucks of peace. The nice attacker killed 86 people just by running over a crowd. You are absolutely retarded.

>muh economy

Freedom isn't dictated by needs or if it benefits your economy retard. I implore you to kill yourself.

Yes because other first world countries extremely strick gun control also has high gun violence rates

Because a gun is the most effective means of defense idiot.

>non lethal

Holy shit this is bait or this is legitimately a leftypol or reddittor shill. Non lethal weapons are garbage for defense.

>Guns only have one legitimate purpose.
Yeah, fun

>niggers kill people
>we need a nigger ban

Police officers in first world countries with heavy gun control carry non lethal weapon. If the suspect doesnt carry gun, you dont need a gun to defend yourself retard

>redditor shill
>when youre shilling arms manufacturing coorperations

> More people drown in bathtubs than are killed with firearms
> Bathtubs are unnecessary with the creation of the shower
> Ban baths and save thousands

No you retard. They carry a non lethal AND lethal weapon for backup dipshit. Only dregs like the UK don't carry guns.

Non lethal weapons only work if backed up by a lethal weapon. Please stop talking, nobody can be this retarded.

>muh nra conspiracy

Nope. It's freedom and nothing else. Get back to gargling Brock's pedophile dick shareblue shill.

>Mosquitoes kill people
>we need to ban Mosquitoes

Is it...
...providing food?
...sporting competitions?
...being highly desired collectibles by history buffs?

Can you consult Rules for Rebels and get back to me? Your liberal sound bite wasn't specific enough.

>redicules someone of believing in conspiracy but believes in the dumbest conspiracy himself

>if heroin is illegal why can I still get heroin?