Where was the 'good guy with a gun'? Running away like everyone else?

Where was the 'good guy with a gun'? Running away like everyone else?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Mcf9CLMQuRQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

...

>YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY THE ISLAMIC TRUCK OF TOLERANCE
>______________¶___
>|religion of peace ||l “”|””\__,_
>|______________|||__|__|__|]
>(@)@)*********(@)(@)**(@)
>POST THIS IN ANOTHER THREAD OR YOUR MOTHER WILL DIE TONIGHT
1. No one needs a commercial truck this large.

2. The Founding Fathers never envisioned large commercial trucks, and did not intend for people to drive them.

3. These “assault trucks” are designed for killing large numbers of people quickly, and that is their only use.

4. We need a “no truck” list immediately, one that does not require due process to get on or off.

5. No where in the Constitution does it mention the freedom to own these killing devices called trucks.

6. Large commercial trucks should only be owned by the police, military, or politicians, NOT normal citizens, who can use horses.

7. We already have licensing, registration, titles, inspection, and multiple taxes on large commercial vehicles, and STILL they are used for mass killing. Enough is enough. We must ban them entirely.

8. We must follow Australia’s example – we must have a massive government buy-back of all trucks currently owned by American citizens, then, they must be destroyed.

9. We must empower the police and military to go door-to-door to forcibly remove these “assault trucks”. Deadly force is reasonable when “disarming” people of these killing devices.

10. If it will save the life of even a single child, we must rid our society of trucks.

11. And lastly, we must continue to resettle enormous numbers of Muslims throughout the United States, primarily in rural, white, Christian areas.

>open carrying a pistol
>think you can hit a gun in some random spot in a hotel shooting at you with a full auto machine gun

LEL

This doesn't probe anything you fucking idiot

>see gunfire from a building two football fields away and more than thirty floors up
>"I know, I'll shoot my glock!"

Shut the fuck up. No one could do anything about what was happening. Also, sources for the "20 people with concealed carry"?

Concealed carry is meant to stop an accessible deadly crime in progress, a threat within your immediate vicinity.

The effective shooting range of a pistol is 100 yards max. Yes the bullet will go further but beyond even 20 yards aiming a pistol is difficult.

Do you honestly think someone getting shot at by a full auto from a concealed window position at night is going to have any chance to shoot that guy.

This is an insane comparison

No one walks out of their home and expects to be shot at from a machine gun nest.

Maybe if you walked around with full body armor in a platoon you could have responded appropriately. But even then I doubt a bunch of Navy Seals could have done much in that situation.

You are in a thick crowd and someone just starts ripping full auto bursts into you and you have no idea where the shots are coming from

Im just hoping this is low quality bait

>Where was the 'good guy with a gun'?

On the 32nd floor.

dallas?
salad?

>222
>444
Incredible sight to see.

Are you honestly advocating that people at the concert should have shot back 500 yards at a casino filled with bystanders with pistols?

Can you retards really not see the point? You're being baited into admitting that there is no defense against this attack, building up the case to ban FA weapons entirely.

By your logic, we should get rid of the cops too.

Based on my knowledge from PUBG, a gun battle between a fully modded SKS with 762 ammo against a regular pistol with 9mm ammo at that range at that height discrepancy would've been a wasted effort. Especially without a scope for the pistol.

Ya open carry is going to work at 350 yards away. Anybody shooting from the crowd into the hotel room is just as likely to hit the perpetrator as anybody else in the hotel room.

The weapon is already banned you commie faggot.

God DAMN!

Open-carry is designed to keep niggers at bay. The Las Vegas terror cell had military training and military-grade weapons supplied by the Deep State. No amateur stood a chance.

Depends on the gun. .357 SIG would be able to reach him, at least accurately enough to make him stop shooting for a second.

If you can hit a human target about 100+ yards out and above your position with a fucking 9mm handgun while they're firing back with an automatic rifle, you're a fucking cyborg. It's not like a law-abiding citizen can just lay cover fire at the shooters general location; more people would just die in cross-fire. Carrying a sidearm is for closer range protection, like a thug pulling a gun out in a convenience store. Your pistol ain't doing shit about the guy who converted his hotel suite into a fucking land battery.

>You're being baited into admitting that there is no defense against this attack, building up the case to ban FA weapons entirely.
He could have done just as much damage if not more with a bolt-action rifle, they were literally lying down like sheep to be slaughtered.

The "good guy" was the womam screaming "you're all going to die" to anybody who would listen before being dragged away and discreetly executed.

Probably out of the zone they couldn't bear arms in

>dallas open carriers were all niggers that supported killing cops and one of their fellow niggers did so
>post pictures of white men

If there had been a good guy with a gun in the hotel room next door, probably be a different story.

Even highly trained ISPCA competitors could not take a sniper out of a birdnest with a handgun. Your argument isn't valid.

What would you have them do, fire a bunch of pistols at the side of a hotel full of innocent people 600 yards away? Are you retarded?

A 'good guy with a gun' won't stop every shooting, but if they stop one shooting, or a shooting here and there, isn't it worth?

Scenario 1:
Good guys have no guns. They can't stop the shooting.

Scenario 2.
Good guys have guns. They can't stop the shooting.

Scenario 3.
Good guys have guns. They do stop the shooting.

The result of armed and unarmed people in a shitty situation like this is the same - they can't stop the shooting.

But there are scenarios when they can. No one carrying a pistol is going to be able to return fire against a gunman in an elevated position 450 yards away. Even if they had rifles, that's really hard to return fire against without peppering the whole building full of bullets.

For what it's worth, even a team of police with AR-15s would find it virtually impossible to take a sniper out of a birdnest. The only way is to breech the room.

Open carry protects you from niggers and drug addicts NOT ANTIFA WILL MACHINE GUNS

youtube.com/watch?v=Mcf9CLMQuRQ

>i'm going to shoot my CC pistol at a window some 500 yards away while on low ground with pinpoint accuracy surrounded by panicking civvies and pray to god i don't do collateral damage

I know the OP is bait but come on

>dragged away
Time to adjust the foil hat

I would lick Dana's butthole

.357 would be irresponsibly used to shoot at anyone 350 yards away with. Especially as there's people all around his hotel room. Even a rifle would be irresponsible since it could shoot out the other side of the hotel. Though arguably, it would make sense if it stopped his carnage halfway through.

This. what the fuck is your point OP

Scenario 4
No one has a gun. The shooting doesn't happen.

Following your logic, since most gun deaths are from legally purchased firearms, this would protect more people than an armed good guy.

She would like mine.

LICK**** LoL

Read the OP image again, it is talking about Dallas

the fucking last thing you want to see during a shootout is a guy pulling out a gun without having a clear shot for the ennemy.

people could just rush you thinking you are the attacker.

open carry is great for small confined spaces like polytechnique was, or the batman movie shoutout, or the thing in the church.

Scenario 5
No one has gun. Machete attacker kills a bunch of people.

The gun is a mere tool, just like the machete. Banning guns won't protect people from violent crimes.

Hard to shoot someone you cant see, 1000 feet away, 30 stories up, and in the dead of night. Of course no one stopped him. Not to mention that you would be putting the lives of people in the hotel at risk, randomly firing in the general direction of gun shots.

Which part of "GUN FREE ZONE" don't you understand or has black cum finally eaten through your grey matter?