So Sup Forums, is he a terrorist or not?

So Sup Forums, is he a terrorist or not?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XGAp5PTNgbE&feature=youtu.be
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Depends on the motive.

>motive

It was a false flag faggot.

Yes

Kill yourself schizo

we might know if the kikes in the Vegas police would release the motive.
Assuming it wasn't just CIA niggers of course

What was his political objective?

I was using the answer when dealing with normies.

They're only terrorists if they do it for political reasons and we don't know the reasons 100%. A loony shooting gamblers for no reason is not a terrorist but a deep state conspiracy to increase gun control is

Terrorists commit acts of violence specifically to instill terror into people. This guy just seemed to do it for enjoyment. Every baby brained bitch on twitter and fb screaming "waaah call da white man a terrorist durrr" are retards

They don't want to call him a terrorist yet in case it turns out he was a lefty.

1. Define what a terrorist is.
2. Is there evidence that he fits that definition?

Modern deffinition of terrorism is politicaly motivated violence. As far as we know, the guy had no motive whatsoever so it's not terrorism.

I personally think, he was a guncontrol advocate and a left wing loon who wanted to make a point. So if that's true, he is a terrorist.

Main differences
>asian women will date white men even if they're crazy
>white woman cheats on chang for chad or tyrone behind the scenes

FTFY

If there is a political motive, it is terrorism.

Nobody in your pic is white. All brown haired. Kek

im a bit confused by this

what is the definition of terrorism... and why would we then call the shooter a terrorist?

This
If he did it simply because he wanted to kill people for the sake of killing people, then he's a simple mass murderer
If he did it because he was inspired to do it by the teachings of some organization, then he is a terrorist
The key thing to remember when defining terrorism is that it's done to inspire fear of something, typically an ideology
We call Islamic attacks terrorism because the murders are committed with the intent to inspire fear of Islam and so on and so forth

Leftists really need to learn that not every mass murderer is a "terrorist". If you're not slaughtering people to make an ideological point, you can't be a terrorist, but of course they want to anoint every white spree killer with that label in order to frantically deflect attention away from actual Islamic terrorism

If he didn't make his intentions known, I don't think it qualifies as terrorism.

why are leftists pushing this "you alt righters aren't calling him a terrorist" narrative so hard I don't get it

The white man is known for its mongolian tier violence.

Here are some examples of white violence:
The native american genocide
The native australian genocide
The nuking of japan
World War I
World War II
Hitler and his attrocities
The genocide of the palestinians
The genocide of the Syrians
The crusades
The spanish inquisista

The white man is cancer upon the planet and deserves nothing but genocide itself.

White men killed more people in the last 100 years than the entire history of the superior asian people.

What's this about him leaving a note?

I'm going to go with the gun-running sting operation gone wrong theory.

yes. a white terrorist. put white people on the terrorist watchlist.

see
>they want to anoint every white spree killer with that label in order to frantically deflect attention away from actual Islamic terrorism

As long as we don't know the motive, we can't say for sure.
Terrorism is politically motivated.
Gotta prove that motive before he can be called a terrorist.

On top of that, there are larpers everywhere claiming is was an FBI-ISIS arms trade gone wrong.

Because they want to water down Islamic terrorism.

liberal terrorist.

Terrorism affords a motive, an agenda. intentions. Here we have nothing like that

btw what happened to his wife?

In one of the pics of the room there's a note on the table but we can't see what it says. Probably the motives but if he's a left wing terrorist then we'll never get to see it

I dont have any problem calling it terrorism

Left-wing scum, who routinely make excuses for actual terrorism when it's committed by Muslims, are so anxious to deflect attention away from their Islamic pets that they will call any white spree killer a "terrorist" regardless of whether or not he subscribed to a particular ideology, or was crazy, or sadistic, or had a brain tumour, or whatever else

I hate how everyone is so political these days. The top comments on most news articles always have to deal with someone smearing anither’s party, like everything is fucking political. Guess what, you’re all equally fucking useless.

As for this shithead being a terrorist, it depends on whether or not he his motivations were political, like everyone immediately assumes.

i see

90% of that post is bullshit and I could explain why point by point, but you wouldn't listen anyway because you're just some jealous mystery meat with a brain the size of a walnut

he was a left wing domestic terrorist and antifa should be labeled as a terrorist group immediately.

get to work anons.

Antifa revolution.

>I dont have any problem calling it terrorism

OK, so what ideology was he trying to terrorize people into accepting?

>"terrorist"
>doesn't have a motive

What populaions have brown hair and are not white?

I can't imagine going through all of that planning and NOT leaving a note. It sure wasn't his room service for breakfast order.

Last I heard she was in Tokyo.

I honestly don't know why this isn't being labeled as terrorism. Maybe because the casinos couldn't claim damages if it was (versus vandalism).

It's not terrorism, it's vandalism.

Technically he's not wrong

By the definition stated in Nevada law, he is a terrorist. By federal law, he is not, as there was no political motive discovered (as of yet)

>I could explain why point by point
please do.
its always entertaining to read these posts that rewrite history to fit their dillusions.

let me guess, native americans died to disease and the jews did everything else?

fpbp, terrorist implies an ideology

No

The lefties in the media know their rhetoric caused him to do this.

So it will all be swept under the rug and will be blamed on "gambling losses", "Lack of sleep" and "Family history of mental illness and violence"

Its so obvious its political. Shooting up a country music festival? That is a main demographic of Trump voters.

Thing is, we already know he was a registered Democrat in Florida and if he was an activist, it's only a matter of time before the truth comes out. You can bet Las Vegas PD and the media will do their best to suppress it. The deep state and the Trump admin too if they want to stop more violence from sparking.

Sandniggers are prone to terrorism and other forms of extremism.
More news at 11

Old news. Moving on.

I think a lot of people want to incorrectly label him a terrorist because what he did was without a doubt evil. He also seems to be of sane mind, so calling him a psychopath doesn't really fit either.

Either way, it's semantics. Call him whatever you want.

He was a patsy that fell in love with an ISIS girl, spent his life savings on all sorts of weapons for her and her "brothers," was drugged and carried to the hotel suite by the "brothers," then shot in the head by the real gunmen and left to take the blame, with the media hiding their escape behind a wall of "WE FINALLY HAVE A FUCKING WHITE MALE TERRORIST, FACTS DON'T MATTER"

He's white so Sup Forums will say no. Meanwhile the rest of the world will call him what he is, a terrorist.

Apparently there are pictures of him at anti-trump protests but I haven't seen any yet

>nothing ever happens
>except for when leftists or muslims do it. then its real

The girl in that picture looks half-Asian.

>Meanwhile the rest of the world will call him what he is, a terrorist.
But the rest of the world isn't calling him that. It's just lefties like yourself.

He's right but he thinks he's being right. "being a white guy" isn't a chosen belief structure founded on still sanctioning violent conquest of all outgroup members.

I honestly hate British people.

Look what they did to NZ and Australian soldiers in WW1. They sent waves of these men at Turk machine gun fire, while the British sat on ships off shore.

Absolute faggots. I'm glad the Muslims are going to take their country from them.

Ugly, degenerate, stupid, cowardly race of people.

Well yeah. If rich, old, white guys belonged to a cult that had been blowing themselves up, and running trucks into crowds for the last several decades we'd be all over him.

>let me guess, native americans died to disease

The vast majority did die of disease at a time when the European presence in North America was insufficient to account for their deaths at the hands of genocidal settlers... if there was a planned "genocide" of the Natives, why are there so many fucking Natives around today, you mong? The settlers wanted to convert them to Christianity, not to exterminate them.

Nah I think most of the time muslims are actually Mossad niggers.

I don't understand why the fuck it matters whether this guy is called a terrorist. Do liberals enjoy making words like racism, terrorism completely meaningless?

Of course I agree with you this guy's a fucking idiot you should see his other tweets

I agree, english men are by far the worse breed of the white race

the only reason they cry about terrorism and white people is too distract against all the terrorism that is happening from letting in refugees.
stop worrying about defending yourselves from what liberals say
attack

>carried to the hotel suite by the "brothers," then shot in the head by the real gunmen and left to take the blame

If that's true then the hotel security cams will show it; if the footage mysteriously happens to be "lost" then that will lend more credence to your theory (or to any other theory exonerating the shooter)

They just want to prove white people in the civilised world are as bad as goatfucking molesters in the middle east

maybe if they made his manifesto public we'd know for sure, but yea, it's probably terrorism.

lol nice try nigger.
90% of that post is bullshit and i could explain why point by point, but you wouldn't listen anyway because you're just disillusioned faggot that needs to rewrite known history to make an argument.

Because shitskins won't fuck off. This is a white man's world.

>Pot calling the kettle black

I see plenty of anti-government types online who think that jihadist attacks are "false flags" aimed at giving the State more power

>Do liberals enjoy making words like racism, terrorism completely meaningless?
Yes

If he was a Democrat he was definitely a terrorist

TERRORIST is a motive. If you dont know his motive, you can claim he is one but you dint know for sure. If he was just making a distraction so somebody could rob a bank, his motive isnt to create terror.

If abu mahar jabizi yells allah ackbar and then blows himself up hes a terrorist.

They constantly redifine words to suit their social engineering agenda.
>Racist
>Sexist
>Privilege
>Right
>Terrorism

>the British sat on ships off shore.

That's bullshit, 744,000 British troops died in WWI

Did he intend to cause terror though violence against civilians in order to further a political, ideological or religious goal?

If so, the answer is yes

If not, the answer is no

All further discussion is fucking retarded and you should feel bad.

You can't be a "terrorist" unless there is a political/religious/social reason for it.

terrorism has a political or religious motive. do you think columbine was "terrorism"?

OK, so are you saying that if I take the time to go through your original list of alleged atrocities and debunk them one by one, you'll stick around to listen and will accept any demonstration of superior historical knowledge?

>leftist ergo no terrorism.

t. ching chang wong

youtube.com/watch?v=XGAp5PTNgbE&feature=youtu.be


youtube.com/watch?v=XGAp5PTNgbE&feature=youtu.be


youtube.com/watch?v=XGAp5PTNgbE&feature=youtu.be

>I personally think
>commences spewing shit only a retard would believe.
Forrest fires are the work of anti smoking activists.
Oil spills are a ploy by the tree-huggers to get regulations tighter.
That food poisoning indecent at my last BBQ was a targeted PETA snipe.

There are many takes on an issue but you have found the dumbest one.

Terrorism is using violence or intimidation for political purposes. So no. He's just a spree killer.

Constant muddying of the waters is their goal. Create as much discord and inclarity as humanly possible.

The less solid people's perception of reality is, the less coherent it is, the more people can be manipulated towards their narratives.

>OK, so are you saying that if I take the time to go through your original list of alleged atrocities and debunk them one by one, you'll stick around to listen and will accept any demonstration of superior historical knowledge?
only if you stick to known historical facts

the joos and disease are not acceptable answers

They're probably withholding information because it was a liberal terrorist attack aimed at white conservatives.
That destroys the entire liberal narrative, given their extreme reaction to a single fat whale dying of a heart attack in Charlottesville.

Imagine holding these liberal assholes to their own standards, after one of their own murdered more than 50 people and injured hundreds.

No motives can be found whatsoever.
No political intent, no political affiliation, no ideology.

Can't be terrorism without motives, without any kind of 'purpose' or 'cause'.

>>

Won't be called terrorism because if it was terrorism then the target is conservatives.

Contrast with the reaction from Charlottesville where everyone from Romney, Rubio, McCain and even Ted Cruz came out and denounced Charlottesville as an "attack" and "terrorism" within 24 hours

So ANTIFAnts are CLEARLY terrorists.


Issit btw allowed to kill terrorists on sight in the USA ? ( No clues, im not US )

>Old lefty cunt finds life boring
>Marry his muslim fucktoy
>Get easily radicalised
>Send her back to the Philippines with 100k$
>ISIS asked their follower to send help there
it doesn't seem THAT impossible to me, its really easy to convert a leftist, plus ISIS claimed the attack, why would a multi millionaire just throw his luxurious life away otherwise? thats fanatics stuff

I refuse to believe he didn't leave a note/state a motive prior to this. It just doesn't happen. There is no reason he would do this and not leave a trail of breadcrumbs.

>the joos and disease are not acceptable answers

Disease is entirely an acceptable answer: look at when the greatest population declines of the Natives took place, at the time following European contact when the settlers were at their fewest and weakest. If you think there was an active genocide plan against the Natives then it is up to you to prove it (by referring to actual documentation, not just your vague hatred of Whitey) and to account for the fact that after 500 years since Columbus the Natives are still around

They're not releasing the footage (including the video ISIS filmed of the shooting itself) because there's an enormous secret manhunt under way for the real gunmen.

Which is stupid, because like the manhunt for the Dzokhar Tsarnev, their secrecy and refusal to get support from the public will result in them coming up empty handed, and only after they give up and tell the public the truth will anyone notice the trail they left and realize the terrorists slipped right past them, or even received help from them.

>Disease is entirely an acceptable answer:

>they lived for thousands of years on their own
>suddenly european warmongers come and they all die
>DISEASE
nope its not. i know you want to believe that, but its not.
No amount of lying to yourself is gonna change history.

This.
The guy had motives.
All of his relatives were liberals.
Strong probability he was one too.
But killing for left wing bias will never be called terrorism.
In france, a fascist was attacked by antifas.
Whole political spectrum and media presented the antifa as a victim.
Wasnt true, but they never stopped lying , even after the release of public transport cam video proving that he was the attacker.

You... are aware that isolated populations of people or animals are especially susceptible to suddenly introduced diseases... right? Or are you just another semi-literate moron with a personal grudge against WYPIPO who thinks that his perpetual grievance-mongering constitutes an actual education in biology, history, and any other subject at hand?