Britains worst atrocities

Out of all the European powers, the British were by far the most ruthless.

In your opinions which atrocity was the worst that was commited by the British. Explain why.

Doing this for an assignment for college, teacher said we are evil, I told her it wasn't me and she is just mad, She's Kenyan so that probably explains a lot. Anyways, explain what atrocity is the worst and why.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bengal_famine_of_1770
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

we didn't kill your ancestors.

Or maybe explain why the bad may have been justified if it can be justified at all.

hmm what about giving out their underage daughters to old Pakistanian shitlike looking rapists

We did horrible things.
We starved the Indians, kill many blacks and Asians too.

What's happening now to Europe and America is karma.

Whites won't exist in a few years.

The worst atrocity we comitted was not seeing it through til the end.

America

Yeah, I think you have gone off topic, nobody gives a fuck about that since pakistani men always get caught in the end. I'm talking about past atrocities. Name them, don't say general statements like liberal retards.

Siding with the (((allies))) instead of helping Hitler

The biggest atrocity the British committed?

Depends on perspective. Their invention of the concentration camp and their use of it to mass murder Boer women and children is pretty horrific.

Worse is how they educated a hoards of 3rd world primitives.

Their problem was that they were the power base for the Rothschild world central banking empire.

That's more like it. Don't think she will be pleased to hear that though.

Yea okay pretty sure white are going to reconquer and enslave everybody including weak faggots like you

Uh, yeah, they suuuuuuuure will.

The attempting genocide and ethinc cleansing of Ireland. Nothing the british did in Africa, India or North America was close to as proportionately terrible as what was done to the Irish. Do some really good research and you will find almost 200 years of total atrocities. No treaties were signed in good faith like North America, no local power structures were allowed to benefit like in India, Africa was largely managed later in the 19th century when the British were much less brutal. Plus your nigger teacher will have a freak out if you present a well researched case, worth it for that alone.

Get out Pajeet.

No.

Africa : The Zulus were slaughtering everyone.

Middle East : They started as pearl fishermen, lots of in fighting between tribes, they find oil, British army show up and bring peace to the region, huge amounts of wealth builds the entire area and feeds a lot of people. The Empire is falling apart, we leave and the Middle easy descends into perpetual war.

New Zealand : The Maoris were an invading force, they ate the tribes people who were there before them. We went in and really did civilize them, brought medicine, then took some of their land and gave them guns so they could kill each other.

The list can go on and on. Just look at what Spain did in South America, if you want slaughter, just look there. And a lot of Maoris will tell you they are happy the British landed on their shores and not solely the French because the French were into divide and conquer.

>Their invention of the concentration camp

That's a meme. The spanish used them in Cuba before us.

Concentration camps in the Boer war was the worst thing we did to others.

The worst atrocity once you include things we did to ourselves was letting in millions of immigrants.

not fully committing to the hooten plan,
europe would look very different today if we had

Less powdered wig faggotry and more Arthurian Legends.

....and more Warhammer Fantasy Battles...

>She's Kenyan so that probably explains a lot
no shit
>explain what atrocity is the worst and why.
the worst atrocity was giving niggers the means to govern themselves which is why we went from a civilized modern Rhodesia to the current hellhole that is Zimbabwe.

Creating America

>not having a bodycount in the hundreds of millions

Do your own fucking homework, lazy Ahmed.

But

Tell her to define 'atrocity' and ask her to explain why them being comitted by one group (British) makes it worse than any other group.

Every single act that can be labelled as an atrocity has been comitted by every race / religion / nationality etc etc.

Typical leftist nog that has fallen for the propaganda-news Jew - British = bad.

Tell her our worst atrocity was not genociding them like we apparantly planned to do - then she couldnt indoctrinate her destructive opinions to young British guys and gals.

Right, because the British Empire only wanted to bring civilisation, right?

Oh wait! Let's steal their resources.
Oh wait! Let's starve their people.
Oh wait! Let's meddle in their politics to benefit only us!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bengal_famine_of_1770

>hooten plan
In 1943, Hooton had an article entitled "Breed War Strain Out of Germans" published in the New York newspaper PM. In the article he proposed four measures with an objective to "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities". Hooton wrote these measures as follows:

Execute or imprison for life all leaders of the Nazi party; permanently exile all professional army officers.
For a period of 20 years or more utilize the bulk of the present German army as rehabilitation labor units in devastated areas of the Allied Nations in Europe and elsewhere. These laborers should not be treated as prisoners of war or convicts but as paid employees (supervised and restricted as to movement from the area of their work). Men already married should remain in Germany for a period of years, but might eventually be permitted to join the fathers. The latter should not be allowed to return to Germany. The objects of this measure include reduction of the birth rate of "pure" Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding, and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.

Break up the German Reich into several states (probably its original component states), permitting each, after a suitable interval of supervision and government by the Allied Nations, to choose its own form of non-Fascist government. The object of this measure is to destroy the national framework of unified German aggression.
During the period of supervision and occupation of the several states by armies and civilian staffs of the Allied Nations, encourage members of these groups to intermarry with the German women and to settle there permanently. During this period encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males

You've seen Germany now haven't you? The Hooten Plan was enacted successfully you nigger.

They were having famines well before we arrived.

And the problem is?
>welcome to Earth.

All the salty ass Brits in here saying "creating America."

More like "losing America."

>56% white
>spread their butt cheeks to the Rothschilds
>made Brits lose America because of high taxes, despite being taxed even higher today
>1/2 Americans are obese
>created ISIS

this

Not to that extent.
The mentioned famine was man-made due to the policy of the british east india company, tens of millions of people died because of that, George.

Worst atrocity would be GB allying with the communists in WW1 because they saw an opportunity to destroy the economic powerhouse of the world at the time which was Germany.

GB saw WW1 coming to armistice in 1916 before it was a complete bloodbath and decided to expand the war to its extreme heights, for the sheer purpose of economic competition. Sets in motion the rise of communism...ww2...etc.

No, nobhead.

Can you provide me with details to a single patch of land on this entire planet that hasnt been fought over? Or conquered / colonised / genocided etc etc

You and your ilk are the worst kind. Lets all point fingers at the British, they are the worst you say, simply because you can. If anyone debates this opinion then they must be racist - whilst you sit there on your high horse.

Its easy to point fingers at the Brits for 'being the worst' because you get your brownie points you fucking cunt.

We werent angels but I can guarantee we werent the worst (whatever that means). According to your logic, murder committed by a Brit must be worse than murder committed by a person of another nationality by default.

Fucking div.

They were and still are servants of the joos. Are you seriously this fucking stupid.

>In your opinions which atrocity was the worst that was commited by the British

Enforcing worldwide slavery prohibition

>explain what atrocity is the worst and why
apologising

Feels good the Britain won't be white in a few years.

L-O-L!

>It's ok when brown people kill each other, just not when whites do it.

Yes. Basically this.
Just kill all white people.
Execute them. NOW!

>In your opinions which atrocity was the worst that was commited by the British. Explain why.
Not letting us have a say in parliament. Could have avoided the while rebellion if they weren't dicks about it.

Any you think that will end well for you?!

If you arent fighting us then your kids will.

Stay mad brown boy.

boer concentration camp

>Stay mad
Riiiiiight :^)

The British weren't the worst.....

The Dutch I believe were the most brutal (ruled the Congo)

In fact the British were somewhat enlightened in their approach to colonialism.

In fact they industrialized most the world, and educated the populations. Brought culture Philiisophy and art. Roads, electricity, Medicine, and ideas.

They then bequeathed these to the native inhabitants.

To judge the colonialists by modern values systems is idiotic.

>Out of all the European powers, the British were by far the most ruthless

I wouldnt say the brits, but the serbs, the germans, the spanish and the portuguese, also the belgians

Crimean War, which prevented Russia from retaking Constantinople.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War

There is litterally nothing wrong with colonialism and imperialism

We must be mad, literally mad...

'Murican education right here.

Anyway, the Congo was actually one of if not the best-run colony in Africa in the end. AFAIK in 1955 the Belgian Congo was actually wealthier on a per-capita basis than South Africa.

actually that title would probably go to belgium

But sweden, forcing the world to abolish slavery and attacking ships of countries who refused to abolish the practice was so evil and brutal, white men clearly deserve t die out for committing such a crime against humanity.

...

Our only mistake was pulling out of Palestine.

Dresden, not because it was the worst but because it's a clear example of doing terrible, inhumane things to human beings solely on the basis of being the "evil enemy". You should teach her the meaning of the words she is using.

Otherwise, all the man-made famines Britland did to keep food prices low in London. Don't forget the Indian famine in WW2.

Absolute exaggeration. Sure the private-run Congo Free State was not exactly a model of compassion, once the Belgian Government took it over from the King, it rapidly became both wealthy on paper and enjoyed high living standards and education.

Why is there a lion in front of the United Khaliphate flag? Are those cucks the original WE WUZ? They are aware there are no lions in that shitty island right?

...

Your a business, not even a country, you are all employee's to the Jews corp. I mean, 60% of american whites are fucking cucks.

The Scottish animal is a fucking unicorn. Don't expect sense.

8million killed under king leopold. the congolese population was cut in half within 20 years of occupation

It all worked out in the end, though.

Well... not The End obviously. But the end before The End.

Your history teacher is trying to get you to write about "the worst atrocities" committed by Britain?

This is what you need to do. The worst Atrocity committed by the British Empire was breaking itself up and giving its former colonies independence. None of them were truly ready for it and the break up of the Empire led to mass dislocations, ethnic cleansing and civil wars from India to Africa commited by the former subjects upon each other after the guiding hand of Britain was withdrawn.

Write about that and come back with what she says.

The fact that the entire internet is at your fingertips, but you're too fucking worthless to search for information is pathetic. Fuck this modern age.

>1929 Canada supreme court rules women aren't classified as people
>Britcucks overturn it

APOLOGIZE

This.

Alternatively, leaving Africa and India to their fate.

Worst atrocity was not giving the head job to this fellow.

OP was asking about British atrocities

Worst British atrocity? Not finishing the job in Africa, India, Australia, etc.
Worst Sup Forums atrocity? Some Sup Forums users STILL have not taken the hapa pill.

>In your opinions which atrocity was the worst that was commited by the British. Explain why.
They didn't genocide the aboriginals wherever they went. Now we have a billion Africans, a billion poos-not-in-loos and millions of Australian aboriginals and amerindians. The gargantuan damage these animals cause to the environment and the number of problems they present for humans are so ridiculous that no words can even describe. And all the Brits would have had to do was some rudimentary control in terms of bounties.

The worst atrocity was allowing the Empire to collapse before the civilisation process was complete. Imagine an alternate universe where the Indians all had toilets by 1959, Pakistanis became Anglicans instead of Al Qaedas, and Africa, enabled by British concepts of law and property, became the wealthiest continent on the planet due to vast mineral reserves and its immense quantity of arable land.

Instead, the Brits fucked off back to their rainy island and let all these half-formed adolescent societies collapse into barbarism with parliaments.

Creating Israel, how that ever seemed a good idea is beyond me.

>Apefricans
>people
Don't you have a Tumblr blog to run?

It's a containment for Jews. It's an amazing idea.

Our worst atrocity was not exterminating the dark menace whilst we had the chance

8/8 nice b8 m8

not following through with white man's burden and civilising african savages

I'm English, and it was unironically this: Helping the Ottoman Empire stand against the Russians in the nineteenth century, thereby preventing the liberation of Christians in the Balkans, Anatolia, Caucasus, Mesopotamia and Levant. This led directly to the torture, rape and murder of millions of men, women and children, the destruction of priceless architecture, artworks and literature, eradication of entire dialects and folk cultures, and the expansion of Islam to become the threat it is today.

>civilising african savages
Their greatest sin is that they tried.

>obvious divide and conquer is obvious
This is an 18+ board.

The worst thing we ever did was entertain women and weak faggots on the left that think their distorted view of history should be used to reallocate resources in the present day, like some karmic welfare.

That and let Piers Morgan on TV.

I like America bruh.

you know what to do Sup Forums

Oh yeah........
They're all more or less satisfactory, though. Should have added a hambeast for added risk excitement.

Funny thing. Indian famines were never as deadly as when the British were in charge. All of the famines put together, equals a higher body count than Hitler and Stalin put together. Oddly enough, parts of India that had a higher than usual British administration/control were the areas hardest hit by poverty.

Another funny thing, not a single famine has occurred in India since the British left. Odd how that works out.

Yeah, let's just sweep the mass genocide of the people to the side, a crime so heinous that it prompted European powers to tell Leopold to chill tf out. Kek.

oh shit trips

That we didnt wipe her family out.

>trips
you can keep catalonia

> not a single famine has occurred in India since the British left.

bihar famine of 1966—67

>parts of India that had a higher than usual British administration/control were the areas hardest hit by poverty.
Is that because we made improvements that reduced child mortality, thereby allowing these irresponsible profligate savages to breed themselves to death?

You colossal fucking faggot

Neck yourself

Lion heraldry is common in europe, descends from the now extinct european lions.

Fuck, it's actually quite difficult to choose. None immediately stand out. I don't want fake tits, and would appreciate a more voluptuous figure... damn. Well, sod it, I'll take this one instead.

That one time there was a gigantic famine out India way and Churchill ordered that no help be sent because the Battle of the Atlantic was just slightly more important at the time. That one gets brought up a lot.

He would of (probably) helped if you know. We weren't in a fucking world war.

>muh hitler is killing jews
>1943 Britain starved 5 million indians

Well yeah, what else could I have meant by the Battle of the Atlantic?