Can someone link some images of writings on cultural marxism, including those posts about the break down of the family...

Can someone link some images of writings on cultural marxism, including those posts about the break down of the family, destruction of religion, and specific issues caused by feminism/women's rights movements, etc.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YkmXwByGmjc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Are you debating somebody?
Why do you want me to do your homework for you?

Why

I have some older family members (60+) that are confused as fuck at the world right now in regards to what's happening (multiculturalism, feminism, religion, single mothers etc) to Australia and other western countries like the United States, England, Canada etc.

I have seen a lot of images on here with long reads that really made sense and "clicked" when it came what's going on in our countries right now, very easy for people to connect the dots.

As an american, its easier to visualize and explain.

They want to infringe upon liberty and impose marxist collectivism

That may be harder to explain in Australia because you guys don't have the concept of liberty.

Sorry user but I’m out atm and they’re all at home. There’s one on ‘know your meme’ dot com, but it’s missing all the Jewish citations for each part. Probably better for your famalam though lol if they don’t see that one just yet. Try googling it and see if you find it

Here

Lmao fuck nobody look

...

Post modernism = Cultural marxism
Jordan peterson is very good at exposing it.

youtube.com/watch?v=YkmXwByGmjc

...

I have so many of these

>Can someone link some images of writings on cultural marxism, including those posts about the break down of the family, destruction of religion, and specific issues caused by feminism/women's rights movements, etc.

Sure italian marxist antonio Gramsci came up with the idea of changing language literally political correctness

One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society's cultural "superstructure" rather than on the economic substructures, as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.

Antonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini's jails where he wrote his famous Prison Notebooks. Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new "Communist man" had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society's institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.

Georg Lukacs was the son a wealthy Hungarian banker. Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist culture to emerge, the existing culture had to be destroyed. He said, "I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch", and, "Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries".

When he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary in 1919, Lukacs launched what became known as "Cultural Terrorism". As part of this terrorism he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs' campaign of "Cultural Terrorism" was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later bring to Western European schools.

In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. In 1933, when Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled. Most came to the United States.

The members of the Frankfurt School conducted numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they believed lay behind the rise of National Socialism in Germany. The Frankfurt School's studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism. These criticisms, known collectively as Critical Theory, were reflected in such works of the Frankfurt School as Erich Fromm's Escape from Freedom and The Dogma of Christ, Wilhelm Reich's The Mass Psychology of Fascism and Theodor Adorno's The Authoritarian Personality.

The Authoritarian Personality, published in 1950, substantially influenced Western European psychologists and social scientists. The book was premised on one basic idea, that the presence in a society of Christianity, capitalism, and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial and religious prejudice and German fascism. The Authoritarian Personality became a handbook for a national campaign against any kind of prejudice or discrimination on the theory that if these evils were not eradicated, another Holocaust might occur on the European continent. This campaign, in turn, provided a basis for Political Correctness.

Critical Theory incorporated sub-theories which were intended to chip away at specific elements of the existing culture, including "matriarchal theory", "androgyny theory", "personality theory", "authority theory", "family theory", "sexuality theory", "racial theory", "legal theory", and "literary theory". Put into practice, these theories were to be used to overthrow the prevailing social order and usher in social revolution.

To achieve this, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School recognised that traditional beliefs and the existing social structure would have to be destroyed and then replaced. The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy, the belief that men and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with androgyny, and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the belief that homosexuality is equally "normal".

As a grand scheme intended to deny the intrinsic worth of native Christian European heterosexual males, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. Many believed that oppressed Muslims, non-European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the vanguard of a communist revolution in Europe.

Trotsky's ideas were adopted by many of the student leaders of the 1960s counterculture movement, who attempted to elevate minority revolutionaries to positions of leadership in their movement.

The student revolutionaries were also strongly influenced by the ideas of Herbert Marcuse, another member of the Frankfurt School. Marcuse preached the "Great Refusal", a rejection of all basic Western concepts, sexual liberation and the merits of feminist and black revolution. His primary thesis was that university students, ghetto blacks, the alienated, the asocial, and the Third World could take the place of the proletariat in the Communist revolution. In his book "An Essay on Liberation", Marcuse proclaimed his goals of a radical transvaluation of values; the relaxation of taboos; cultural subversion; Critical Theory; and a linguistic rebellion that would amount to a methodical reversal of meaning. As for racial conflict, Marcuse wrote that white men are guilty and that blacks are the most natural force of rebellion.

Marcuse may be the most important member of the Frankfurt School in terms of the origins of Political Correctness, because he was the critical link to the counterculture of the 1960s. His objective was clear: "One can rightfully speak of a cultural revolution, since the protest is directed toward the whole cultural establishment, including morality of existing society..." His means was liberating the powerful, primeval force of sex from its civilised restraints, a message preached in his book, Eros and Civilisation, published in 1955. Marcuse became one of the main gurus of the 1960s adolescent sexual rebellion; he himself coined the expression "make love, not war". With that role, the chain of Marxist influence via the Frankfurt School was completed: from Lukacs' service as Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Hungarian government in 1919 to Western European and American students burning the flag and taking over college administration buildings in the 1960s. Today, many of these same colleges are bastions of Political Correctness, and the former student radicals have become the faculties.

One of the most important contributors to Political Correctness was Betty Friedan. Through her book The Feminine Mystique, Friedan tied Feminism to Abraham Maslow's theory of self-actualisation. Maslow was a social psychologist who in his early years did research on female dominance and sexuality. Maslow was a friend of Herbert Marcuse at Brandeis University and had met Erich Fromm in 1936. He was strongly impressed by Fromm's Frankfurt School ideology. He wrote an article, "The Authoritarian Character Structure", published in 1944, that reflected the personality theory of Critical Theory. Maslow was also impressed with the work of Wilhelm Reich, who was another Frankfurt School originator of personality theory.

The significance of the historical roots of Political Correctness cannot be fully appreciated unless Betty Friedan's revolution in sex roles is viewed for what it really was - a manifestation of the social revolutionary process begun by Karl Marx. Friedan's reliance on Abraham Maslow's reflection of Frankfurt School ideology is only one indicator. Other indicators include the correspondence of Friedan's revolution in sex roles with Georg Lukacs' annihilation of old values and the creation of new ones, and with Herbert Marcuse's transvaluation of values.

But the idea of transforming a patriarchy into a matriarchy - which is what a sex-role inversion is designed to do - can be connected directly to Friedrich Engels book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. First published in 1884, this book popularised the now-accepted feminist belief that deep-rooted discrimination against the oppressed female sex was a function of patriarchy. The belief that matriarchy was the solution to patriarchy flows from Marx's comments in The German Ideology, published in 1845. In this work Marx advanced the idea that wives and children were the first property of the patriarchal male. The Frankfurt School's matriarchal theory and its near-relation, androgyny theory, both originated from these sources.

"the long march through the institutions"
That's about all you need to know, goy.

When addressing the general public, advocates of Political Correctness - or cultural Marxism, to give it its true name - present their beliefs attractively. It's all just a matter of being "sensitive" to other people, they say. They use words such as "tolerance" and "diversity", asking, "Why can't we all just get along?"

The reality is different. Political Correctness is not at all about "being nice", unless one thinks gulags are nice places. Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order, and, ultimately, a totalitarian state. If anything, the cultural Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than the old, economic Marxism that ruined Russia. At least the economic Marxists did not exalt sexual perversion and attempt to create a matriarchy, as the Frankfurt School and its descendants have done.

>He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.

>"Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries".

>To achieve this, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School recognised that traditional beliefs and the existing social structure would have to be destroyed and then replaced. The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy, the belief that men and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with androgyny, and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the belief that homosexuality is equally "normal".

>the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. Many believed that oppressed Muslims, non-European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the vanguard of a communist revolution in Europe.

>the ideas of Herbert Marcuse, another member of the Frankfurt School. Marcuse preached the "Great Refusal", a rejection of all basic Western concepts, sexual liberation and the merits of feminist and black revolution. His primary thesis was that university students, ghetto blacks, the alienated, the asocial, and the Third World could take the place of the proletariat in the Communist revolution.

...

>2017
>still thinks 'cultural marxism' is real and not just a Sup Forums meme

...

...

Yup. The idea was not that Gramsci was replacing something with something better. But that he was replacing something with anything in order to destroy it to create a fertile plain of chaos for communism to take over. i.e. destroy the exiting cultural hegemony as communism could never take over with it in pace.

...

>the break down of the family,
Men and women walked away from marriage. The birth control pill saved men from premature commitment thru accidental pregnancy.

>destruction of religion,
Safe advanced societies which do not encounter mortality in day to day life become less superstitious & religious

>and specific issues caused by feminism/women's rights movements, etc.
Feminism is post rationalisation for technological change which created job opportunities for women. Feminism as you know it, could not exist in an agricultural economy which relies on manual labour.

Since feminism is inextricably linked to the level of technology it can not be said to be an ideology which is advanced, it is merely an aspect of modern life.

The 50s were the perfect expression of white western culture.
As much as I love the music, the 60s started every evil that roams today.
Was the hippie movement an experiment started by the Russians via drugs ? Or maybe it was the CIA.
Who has any information on this ?

So you believe these outcomes are predictable? Would you wager they're inevitable?

...

...

...

...

we know that Yuri here loved to exploit people smoking hashish in part, to be it seems that people get more vulnerable to subversion etc.

He also speaks about how the soviet agents(him included) would always try to get for instance diplomats and other high ranking gov people drunk. They would just let the vodka and other kind of booze come flowing, them self they would pretend to drink with them, but discarding it at any oppertunity.

The goal here was obvious, to get them shitfaced and get intel out of them. Even the day after they would start etc. I don't got link but he speaks about it in one of his movies.

But yeah they were present at the very least with these (((hippie))) faggots. He him self was with a bunch of them in india before he went to the us, so the soviets really did their thing on them that's for sure

Those fucking boomers, those fucking useless idiots, it's were all this cancer starts... with those god damn hippie boomers

I think it is mainly related to the rise of women in public discourse, and a safer, more feminised society overall. Lacking external threats and internal material needs.

When every citizen has a full belly, they can obsess with trivialities like sportsball and being offended.

The cultural marxist theory is dogshit.

...

an example from irl with stoners you know, I used to mess with them
>You know like crown prince is doing drugs at the castle right
wut? he does... Hell yeah, Håkon is doing drugs at the castle and shit! What about the King and shit
>I'm sure he's puffing the herbal Jew too
Fuck yeah, you know I fucking knew it! Called it! Fucking knew


And... that's really all it takes, and they fucking believe in it. Not only that, then they start with that to their friends too. When they quit and get off that shit, they later go
>What.. ?
>WTF.. I really believed that?

And by cutting it out, I mean like quit it and like months later and shit.

Yes, it is all inevitable.

Human beings do not act according to obscure political theories. They act within a physical world which is hugely effected by technology.

Why is the divorce rate in Saudi Arabia and Iran soaring? All those dastardly cultural marxist jewish academics?

Did cultural marxism create office jobs for women? Or was this the outcome of the invention of the personal computer and the mass electrical grid.

We may as well claim that cultural marxism destroyed the horse and cart and forced motors cars on society. It's total bullshit.

Its hard to make sense of what you wrote but I get the idea.
It's true, drugs, when used without a purpose and guidance, make one stop being a productive individual and enhance his selfishness

It was both. The world is changing but you can't deny some of the cultural ideas were just planted.
There is a beginning that you can trace for everything.
Look at what's been posted, they apply 100% to modern society. Kind of high coincidence rate, don't you think ?

...

'Brentwood Christian Press'

What is their agenda?

Bullshit, conservatives are the ones who support the individual.

right, I forgot, it's the left that has all the family values, my b

Yeah sure, it's TOTALLY conservatives who want socialism, sure.

>family values = socialism

They are opposites, that's why Liberals who promote socialism are anti-family values, you're dense.

No one is promoting socialism

Liberals advocate for single women

Conservatives advocate for married women

he was a russian shit stir-er tasked to spread right wing paranoia in a gamble that would lead to deep and crippling political division. He understood marxists critiques of capitalism well and amplified the contradictory values of western liberalism of americans and the latent authoritarian conservative tendencies in capitalist societies. Given the right moment, a capitalist crisis will, liberals will have no recourse, and fascists will come out of the wood works and start policing everyone to make personal sacrifices for the "common good" (capitalism). Guess what?

>capitalist crisis of 2008
>liberals/"conserva"cucks getting cleaned out from politics
>growing number of neo-nazis, KKK, facists, and right-wingers
>incompetent and incapable politicians at levels hardly anyone can remember before


>Agree, Amplify, Extrapolate

>liberals
>socialists

you mean those liberals who want the gays and blacks to replace the jews as the greedy capitalists? sure is "socialism" bud

suuuuuuure