What is the most red-pilled movie of all time and why is it Bloodsport?

What is the most red-pilled movie of all time and why is it Bloodsport?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_Down#Production
youtube.com/watch?v=j1L8ZQDOdJ8
youtube.com/watch?v=FAUW0eq0BLA
youtube.com/watch?v=ZjsufO9hZwo
youtube.com/watch?v=FzrBurlJUNk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

sorry OP, movies are not generally redpilled, but as far as they go Falling Down comes the closest.
it was created by jews as a way to demonize the white male and basically laugh at him for his impotent rage in his homeland that was increasingly becoming "not his own". the jews who made it even openly came out and said as much.

but it's one of those rare cases where the hollywood propaganda backfired. they thought they could portray the plight of the white male and then portray him doing all sorts of fucked up shit, and people would just say "wow he is a bad man", but instead they accidentally created a moving and sympathetic picture. they created a very dark antihero that people could relate to, as much as he made them uncomfortable.
and in the end when the cuck cop unceremoniously kills him, and the hero says "i'm the bad guy?". it pretty much just sums up how screwed whitey is getting, rather than make him seem like a bitch the way the filmmakers intended.
also it literally says "pepe" on the cover if you look closely.

honorable mention to Starship Troopers, which is by all objective accounts a redpilled movie, though liberals stupidly claim "it's satire and you're supposed to root for the bugs". yeah, no. nobody was rooting for the bugs, they were all rooting for the literal nazis who were the good guys in the movie and the bugs basically represented communists.

That guy was a fucking bitch.

Yea he's been a cuck his entire life and then they make him act out like a maniac. Sound familiar?

Branded (2012)
Metropia (2009)
Brazil (1985)
Dark City (2998)
12 Monkeys (1995)
Clockwork Orange (1971)

i don't get it, how was d-fenz a bitch? he went on a rampage, killed gang members, held up a restaurant, killed that golfer, took a family hostage, trashed that asian guys store, blew up the city construction site with the rocket launcher, fought off those gang members that tried to mug him and all sorts of other shit, just because he wanted to get him to see his little girl. he def wasn't a bitch. when you do things even 1/10th as badass as all of that then your opinion might matter.

I did enjoy this movie, because the main character wasn't out of grasp for anyone. Anyone could just lose it and go out with a bang at any given moment. Who know's what is keeping the majority of humanity sane. Maybe its a massive blue-pill that holds society together?

Literally finished watching this 5 minutes ago. D-fens literally embodies the Sup Forums mindset---someone who recognizes the degeneration of society around him but is powerless to stop it. I'd say he falls into the "1476" libertarian white nationalist category. Also lol @ the
>"Oy vey how many kikes do you think this baby took out?"

Shortbus

You don't see the narrative in that?
You're right about one thing. You don't get it.

You spelled Death Wish wrong.

Saló or 120 Days of Sodom is the most redpilled movie of all time no competition

>Bloodsport

Made by Jews.

>Falling Down

Made by Jews.

>Starship Troopers

Made by a Dutch communist.

The poster you're replying to is a shill. His definition of a "bitch" is someone who doesn't conform like a good goy and just allows immigrants to invade his country while the (((corporations))) hike up the prices.

My nigger. Jean Claude is a beast in this movie. The film has splits, a chick, fighting, and a chink with dancing pecs. Everyone needs to take the Van Dam pill.

i see, as i stated above, that the jews specifically made this movie in order to forge an anti-white-male narrative, yeah. but that doesn't mean they succeeded. the reason it's a good movie is because they fucked it up so hard. they were a little too fair and objective and they ended up humanizing "the evil white male" in a way that has never been committed to cellophane before or since.
the reason is because the white male is ultimately a very sympathetic character, and no matter what you make him do, you can't do a real in depth character study on him without making him seem sympathetic.

sucks that the closest thing we have to a redpilled movie is an antiwhite propaganda piece that the jews fucked up, but they did still fuck it up and it's still probably one of the most raw and real movies out there examining cultural marxism, the disenfranchisement of the white male, and everything else.
the part where he kills the nazi is kind of serious kike propaganda, but at least he does it "because he's an american and believes in freedom" and shit like that. there was a time when "the american dream" and "freedom" were nice things that we had in a america, before they were exploited by the jew to tare us apart from the inside out.

It's American History X and it's not even close

MANJA!
MANJA!

Found an edgy 13 year old. Can you share some of you dark poetry?

D-Fens:
I' m the bad guy? How did that happen? I did everything they told me to. Did you know I build missiles? I help to protect America. You should be rewarded for that. Instead, they give it to the plastic surgeon. They lied to me.
Detective Pendergast:
Is that what this is about? You' re angry because you got lied to? Is that why my dinner's drying out in the oven? They lie to everybody. They lie to the fish!

>Made by a Dutch communist.
you sure he is a communist? i watched flesh and blood and he pretty much says on the commentary track that the movie is an indictment of socialism.

also flesh + blood is a really really REALLY fucking redpilled movie on women and existentialism and survival of the fitttest.

Too much little boy anus

Fight club, Clint Eastwood movies

Death Wish is good, but I always liked Death Hunt better.

I chortled

pendergast is a literal cuck and bitch though. the message the filmmakers were going for was that pendergast was the "good goy" and d-fenz was the "bad goy", so they let him get unceremoniously shot. but i mean, IMO, it's pretty much impossible for any reasonable, half intelligent person to watch that movie and see that and not say "wow, this is totally wrong, that guy got totally screwed". that's why it failed as a propaganda piece. it ended up eliciting the wrong set of emotions from the crowd and it actually made people sympathize with white males despite all of the shit he does in the flick.

Sure, but it's not redpilled like Wish.

...

You spelled Conan the Barbarian wrong

It's always sicario in these threads so why even compete

this movie is actually turning out to be scarily prophetic aside from some of the technology parts and the three seashells. there is almost no way this flick didn't get made by someone who hated hollywood liberals but still managed to claw his way into the movie business.

you have to be operating under several compound layers of mental gymnastics and delusion to think that the protagonist of falling down wasn't meant to be a sympathetic character

>director sets out to make an enjoyable movie
>heh, stupid movie thought it would make me feel bad but instead i enjoyed it, what retards!
this is american history x all over again

>inb4 flag and no argument
t.evil kike

I stopped watching Hollywood movies more than ten years ago

Sicario was definitely pretty red pilled, especially for a (((modern))) film.

In the beginning where he beat up Lee, it's pretty obvious that they intended for us to see dfense as the bad guy, but the thing is, even though Lee was an asshole himself to the docile and reasonable dfense, and he attacked him first, dfense still stuck to his values and paid for the soda but at a reasonable price. The Jews behind this film tried to criminalize standing up for your own rights as a white and sadly the underlying message may be lost due to
>Muh poor Asian immigrant was abused by racist whitey
Also the plastic surgeon was probably a Jew. Hell, it could've been the summer home of the actual plastic surgeon Jew who financed this piece of propaganda.

Click with Adam Sandler

Its a comedy on the surface but deep down its a cautionary tale on not wasting your life working for your boss/company, and a reminder that you have to enjoy the little moments.

He ran into a couple of trivial problems (like getting stuck in traffic or being too late for McDonalds breakfast and flipped his shit and had a tantrum like a 4 year old child. The only legitimate problem he had was he wasn't allowed to see his kid, but he caused that problem himself.

>he doesn't use the three seashells

It's based loosely on Brave New World.

Bullock's character is Lenina Huxley. Lenina is the main female in BNW and Huxley was the author.

>you have to be operating under several compound layers of mental gymnastics and delusion to think that the protagonist of falling down wasn't meant to be a sympathetic character

he really wasn't, he was really supposed to be just representative of the dying evil white male.

>In an interview less than a week before the Falling Down's release, screenwriter Ebbe Roe Smith gave his interpretation of what the movie was about. "To me, even though the movie deals with complicated urban issues, it really is just about one basic thing: The main character represents the old power structure of the U.S. that has now become archaic, and hopelessly lost. And that way, I guess you could say D-FENS is like Los Angeles. For both of them, it's adjust-or-die time...

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_Down#Production

they tried to turn him into a psychotic murderer man. the whole thing was an anti-white propaganda piece from day one. it just so happens that the white mans plight is actually quite sympathetic. he goes to work, supports his family, supports his society, does as he is supposed to, and then he gets fucked over and villainized. that's what happened to D-Fenz and despite what the filmmakers wanted that's how the audience saw it.

Using Asians in any sympathetic way won't make anyone sympathetic in the country that's the mistake right there unfortunately.

This guy gets it

>but he caused that problem himself.
if you rewatch the movie you'll see that it's basically directly stated that he was never violent or anything and that his wife was just neurotic and paranoid and ended up slapping him with a restraining order, which the courts granted, because she "worried that one day he COULD do something".
sort of a really important point of the movie, which may have even been unintentional on the part of the filmmakers, that most people dislike this film tend to overlook.

Why do you fuckers need to stick your schnoz into everything?

I showed this movie to a black guy in my platoon while deployed to Afghanistan and he fucking loved it and identified with dfens just as much as any white guy. He was from the Virgin Islands and saw his island degenerate due to government corruption and cultural marxism firsthand over the course of his youth.

Yea but they are always the woke ones. Never happens to people from places that matter.

Has become more frightening than funny lately.

>144348733
White Dog

Does anyone here even know about de niro anymore?

pointing out that the main character represents the old power structure doesn't change the fact that the movie portrays him in sympathetic light, effectively vindicating said power structure. it boggles my mind how anyone who knows anything about basic storytelling could watch this portrayal of the classic protagonist archetype, this down on his luck everyman and come out thinking it's trying to demonize the devil white man.
>but the exaggerated violence! he's a nutcase!
this is catharsis, the movie knows you enjoy this, it's not a moral condemnation.

The director is a viscious pedo jew.

He raped the Corey's on the set of Lost Boys.

Kiefer Sutherland is a major player as well.

i don't think dinero's movies are redpilled though. travis bickle was totally cucked. he almost assassinated a politician just because of some woman he was obsessed with. then he went through all of that shit and got shot to save a prostitute. he was kind of an idiot, and that's def his most redpilled character.

who else? sam rothstein? or jimmy the gent? those weren't really politically themed characters. they were just gangsters and all they really did was beat people up or kill people to further their own ends. being "sociopathic" is really no the same as being "redpilled".

>muh nigger lover

No fucking shit you retard. It's the overall story that's important.

But hey, it's so much easier to label everything and continue to live in blissful ignorance.

this movie is the quintessential western male experience

10/10, amazing sountrack, holds up extremely well

yeah i mean you say "hurr durrrr don't mention my flag" but then you start with this crap which is clearly using intentional tunnel vision and disregarding "the bigger picture" here, which makes it pretty clear what the filmmakers intentions were.
>effectively vindicating said power structure.
you're saying the filmmakers were trying to vindicate the power structure they were openly trying to condemn and celebrate the death of? and they did this by creating a psychopathic, mass murdering main white character? (((judaism intensifies)))

INB4 "muh flag not an argument" yes, at this point, it IS an argument with the insane judaism you are spewing.

>This movie is intended to be a comedy
>Watched it without being aware of this
>I thought it was a political drama with comic relief in between
>Realize that it has become so accurate to reality it is no longer a comedy anymore

A great movie nonetheless.

I'd argue this one is more Sup Forums related than redpilled unless you can explain your reasons behind why you think it is redpilled.

It's probably eyes wide shut anyways besides all the based western movies that are before anyone's time that lurks here. 12 angry men and so on. Can't tell if this thread is worth anything though I believe I answered my own question.

Dan? Go to bed. You're drunk.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind is the best movie ever.

In Wag The Dog he plays a deep state agent but as long as these halfwits just see "joos" they'll never truly be redpilled.

That's the normiest fucking "red pill" you could have ever conceived of, retard.

Irony

youtube.com/watch?v=j1L8ZQDOdJ8

Demolition Man was a Social Commentary neatly packaged as a Satirical Action-Comedy.

since hollywood is full of pedos, who are naturally far lefty, the only "redpilled movies" are the ones that happen unintentionally.

except for mel gibson, who is /ourguy/ and uses his influence to make good christian and patriotic / nationalistic movies like Braveheart and The Patriot, and even his father was a famous writer who named the jew and wrote about what plagues upon humanity they were.
>"Jews are responsible for all of the wars in the world" - Mel Gibson /ourguy/

This could have been a great thread about Bloodsport. You intellectual Jews ruined it with your philosophical musings and artistic critique.

2998? holy shit, a film made in the future is on that list!

I kinda figured The Last Samurai would be Sup Forums's theme movie...loosely based on a true story...Westerner (a fucking bong tho) goes to Japan, fights in Samurai battles and likely gets knee deep in geisha pussy...is there even another choice?

Bloodsport is about as blue-pilled normie-tier as it gets.

I find it amusing that cucked 80's normies are idealized by modern faggots as somehow being anything other than bluepilled.

Ya'll motherfuckers are dumb.

The dog cannot be changed to love niggers no matter what once he has been redpilled by his previous owners, at least that's what happens in the movie.

Fucking masterpiece but you can't be an ADD autist, you gotta pay attention to every fucking detail.

>inb4 boring and slow

Stick with Transformers or Hunger Games

Don't make an attempt to quantify why or anything.

>He raped the Corey's on the set of Lost Boys.

No, he got molested by someone while working on "Lucas", not "The Lost Boys".

Either that, or Richard Masur molested him during the making of "License to Drive". Schumacher had fuck all to do with what happened.

Damon de niro baldwin top zozzle

>muh tunnel vision and bigger picture
so do you nothing nothing to say other than spouting meaningless buzzwords, or do you want to elaborate on what other elements of the film constitute this "bigger picture"? surely you're not suggesting that looking at the film itself when analyzing the film is tunnel vision, and some backroom quote by the director is the bigger picture to which we should give more weight?

flag never has and never will be an argument, but the fact that you're perfectly content for settling for it as a substitute is an indicator of your mental level and standards.

epic post

>pointing out that the main character represents the old power structure doesn't change the fact that the movie portrays him in sympathetic light, effectively vindicating said power structure.
It's the same story structure of Breaking Bad where the hero becomes the anti-hero. By the end of the movie we are supposed to see him as the antihero/villain when Pendergast suggest that he intended to murder-suicide his wife and child. I'd argue that most passive viewers would agree with this assumption, but I don't think he would have, and that's why D-fense is the hero for me throughout despite what the intended message was.

This many responses in and no ones mentioned They Live?

>normiest
It is. But why is that a bad thing?

On Lucas he was raped by Sheen, this was the first rape he experienced. After that he was place into the game.

Feldman was already in the game. They were cast together for the first time in Lost Boys. This was on purpose. Party favors for Schumacher and Kiefer.

Look how often Sutherland works for Schumacher.

Kiefer is who Feldman was elluding to in the recent interviews.

Masuer always creeped me out.

Red pill doesn't mean shit like "just be yourself" and "love, live, laugh". That's kindergarten shit, are you kidding me? If it's not some sort of social commentary on jewish political influence, it ain't redpilled, and that's just the end of story.

I still listen to the soundtrack on its own once in a while. It really is one of the best ever made.

youtube.com/watch?v=FAUW0eq0BLA

>so do you nothing nothing to say other than spouting meaningless buzzwords, or do you want to elaborate on what other elements of the film constitute this "bigger picture"?
it's a movie about a "psychopathic, mass murdering white male" who goes on a rampage throughout a city because he's angry. the filmmakers came out and said they were basically making the movie to celebrate the death of the white male. the quote i posted is sufficient, but not the only one, find more if you want to. you are just a jew shilling for your jewish friends in hollywood and trying to deny patently and plainly obvious, pretty much fully admitted fact, so until you renounce your judaism and stop being a retard i have nothing to say to you other than............

(((JUDAISM INTENSIFIES)))!!!!!!!!!!!

(See Pic Related For An In Depth Explanation Of JewAnon, Hollywood, And Many Of Our Other Social Ills In The World Today)

>why is it Bloodsport?

Because you can hear cats meowing during the final battle.

I love how it ultimately turns into a jew raping someone unironically

i guess i'm having difficulty buying the premise that the audience was supposed to see the main character as a villain by the end. call me a passive viewer if you want but just like with breaking bad, it's completely predictable that the audience will root for the anti hero all the way until the end even to the point of being biased towards an "objectively" evil character, and i find it unbelievable that a filmmaker would be surprised by this reaction.

Because it's a critique of Reagan's America, that is pretty much commie propaganda.

I ain't your pal, dickface.

Dude, he was 16...I think molested is a bit of a misnomer. He was either violently raped or a closet faggot...there's not much middle ground at that age. Vid related.. youtube.com/watch?v=ZjsufO9hZwo

>it's completely predictable that the audience will root for the anti hero
That's a byproduct of the writer and director's incompetence, not because that's the intended effect.

>pedo apologist

Kys pervert.

>there never would be free city Hong Kong with underground martial arts tournaments ever again

Inside Job

youtube.com/watch?v=FzrBurlJUNk

Yea I'd be hard pressed to be raped at 16 LUL. pretending Hollywood isn't a bunch of fruit cakes to begin with

Reagan was a globalist tool. He was Bush Sr's bitch.

Sorry, but the conservative wet dream of Reagan as some great hero is just cringey.

As bad as the lefty's vision of a utopian future under Hillary.

Well yeah I guess that'd be all you'd take from the film if you were a fucking idiot.

>2998
Wow dude, I need to see that movie

>Hillary
>lefty
She gets flayed, and the libshits that support her unironically get turned into slurry to fertilize the collectivized farms.

Young dudes selling ass in Hollywood isn't any different than young broads selling ass in Hollywood I can't believe in even saying this but let's be real.

i'm sorry, but is "psychopathic, mass murdering white male" a direct quote from the director or are you being a literal heretic and fucking with the sanctity of quotes? i already addressed your quote in my last post, saying that the main character is a stand in for the old, traditional way of living, is not the same as condemning it, and given the sympathetic light with which the main character is presented, it only hurts your argument. and no, calling him archaic and hopelessly lost isn't a condemnation either, it's saying he's out of place, an underdog.

flag has never and will never be an argument, only a crutch.

I don't think this movie implies any of that. In a country where anyone with a corporate job is expected to be a workaholic, as America is, a movie that challenges that view and says "no, there are things more important than pleasing your boss" is valuable in my book. It goes out of the way to remind that family is the most important thing.
And, as a reminder, the protagonist (!= actor) is a white guy with a white family.

There are more red pills than commentary of traces of jewish political influence. Perhaps you're obsessed about that because you get your opinion from Sup Forums and can't think for yourself.

There are so many people covering for Hollywood pedos, I bet. Probably why most of them are democrats.