>"Man can't a guy just enjoy his deeply sad misogynistic desire for a "woman" that he can have sex with any time he wants that never ages, complains or have a single thought of her own in peace?"
I prefer celibacy approach to the problem. To train yourself in celibacy as a road to self-improvement. Killing two birds with one stone. Actually three because then woman has literally nothing to complain about.
>That was sarcasm, by the by.
Some say that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.
>Female sex bots pose a danger to society
True, but so does abortion, anti-conception and welfare state, and those things are socially acceptable, so it's not the matter whether something is dangerous to the society, it's the matter whether something is socially acceptable.
>declining population and the swarms of men who have adopted the sexist MGTOW or PUA lifestyles and are not marrying women as they did in previous decades.
Most of those men don't marry woman because female sexuality allows woman to marry only up the social status. Woman getting high social status is the reason why marriage institution as a whole collapses and only top 20% of best males live in more or less happy mariages these days. MGTOW and PUA is merely symptom of total and utter collapse of family values of western world.
>The danger is that these robots are literal slaves to the patriarchy and are not given the rights they deserve?
Now you get to the trolling but anyway, Robots are not humans, nor creatures, they don't have feelings, they are just humanoid computers with a bit of programming and they don't need rights, just like your vacuum cleaner doesn't need rights.
>You want to have sex with one of these women without her consent?
Not a woman, not even a living being.
>That's okay, says the patriarchy, but in reality this is rape.
Rape is heaving sex with someone against their will, but machines doesn't have will ergo we cannot consider this to be rape.