>>144688627

The fact that you dumbshit lefties constantly fantasize about conservatives getting killed by tanks and drones seems to be a pretty good case for why people should be armed.

You should study the historical effectiveness of small arms in the hands of the populace, even when facing tanks and planes. Think Vietnam. Plus it's unlikely the US army would level NYC with bombs. Instead it would be a police action. An unarmed citizenry would be much easier to tame. But I assume this is bait from the taunting Canadian

>american understanding of history

you realize nva had mig aircraft and lots of advanced weaponry supplied by the soviets. not everything is as you saw in cod black ops.

retard.

>you realize nva had mig aircraft and lots of advanced weaponry supplied by the soviets. not everything is as you saw in cod black ops.

He's clearly referring to the Vietcong, you filthy fucking leaf.

>vietcong not part of nva
>american arguments

I suppose the taliban is flying their migs too, right?

Please faggot, dont underestimate the power of a small determined armed group

one rifle doesn't. but 300 million guns in america do.

The Cong often operated deep behind ROV lines and often didn't get any sort of support from NVA. Learn your history fucking leaf.

yes cause the thing over his shoulder was spawned into existence by allah

Do you know the difference between an insurrection and a civil war ?

what is guerilla warfare

>Implying foreign powers wouldn't arm US partisans in the event of a civil war.

>Korean War - protracted battle against rice farmers will assault rifles. Govt spends shit-tons of money, only to stalemate.
>Vietnam War - protracted battle against rice farmers will assault rifles. Govt spends shit-tons of money, only to stalemate.
>Afghanistan War - protracted battle against goat herders will assault rifles. Govt spends shit-tons of money, only to stalemate.
>Iraq War - protracted battle against goat herders will assault rifles. Govt spends shit-tons of money, only to stalemate.
Shit, it's almost like you're wrong.

>teehee us government is being totalitarian
>please help us communist china, russia or iran

/thread

>american understanding of history

Your fag argument is only applicable to a place like China, where guerilla warfare will prompt swift mass civilian killing from the government because they suspect an insurgent of being among them.
In America the government still fears the people, hence the flimsy pushes to ban guns instead of the outright confiscation.
You're closer to that than we are thanks to your commie leaders creating a totalitarian state of absolute power over your people.

fpbp

>korean war
>rice farmers
what is human waves of chinese for 500 Alex

You don't think a foreign power would try to interfere with a civil war of the current global superpower for their own benefit?

There is literally no chance for a rebel force to defeat the US military. They can certainly fuck up the country and cause significant damage, but not much more than that.

Logistics, gas, people, family, supply lines, etc.
Shall not be infringed.

Underrated fpbp

It won't be 100k rednecks vs 100k army with all its tech you retard. That's not how guerrilla warfare works. And yes when most of the army desert and the rest has all communications cut off and is getting shot at from every corner they try to enforce their rule they have absolutely no chance. Tanks, drones and planes can destroy a country, but not enforce tyranny, for that you only need disarmed population.

>Korean War: Rice farmers aided by the Chinese military and Soviet airpower
>Vietnam War: Huge Soviet military aid and logistic support
>Afghanistan: Defeating the Taliban was never the goal; US military was therefore successful
>Iraq War: Military victory, major strategic failure

...

this t b h f a m

You dont need to fire a weapon to win a civil war

You do need to be armed so your voice is not silenced

>goes to prison for misgendering someone

They've overthrown you. leaf.

It's depressing how true your post is.

I like how the gun store is right next to a dentist. two things bongs will never see in their country.

Do leafs even understand that American soldiers know how to fight a conventional army unconventionally due to the fact for the last 2 decades we have been a conventional army fighting an unconventional army?

>Leafs assume we didn't learn anything from the Iraqi's and Afghani's

Are you FBI or something? Can't be, even they are not that fucking stupid to fuck with a combat-experienced populace.

Add me to screencap

...

>all wars that required a strong foreign power to thwart guerillas
Idiot, our military would be fractured by sympathizers, and anyone inviting a foreign power to stomp out the opposition would be killed for treason.

>WAAAAAH MUH FASCISM
>WAAAAAH MUH POLICE PIGS
>W-wuh do you mean you think that the government shouldn't be the only one with weapons? T-that's...racist?

A.
FUCKING.
LEAF.

>HAHA DUMB LEAF THINKS THE US MILITARY WOULD SIDE WITH A CORRUPT REGIME AND KILL THEIR OWN FAMILY AND FRIENDS FOR NO REASON

A fucking leaf

>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LMFAO
>YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>DUMB RETARD AMERICAN ACTUALLY THINKS HIS PUNY RIFLE HAS A FIGHTING CHANCE AGAINST THE US ARMY
Look up guerrilla warfare.
Look up how conventional armies (including the US army) fared against that.

Wow, you made the same exact thread that already appeared a hundred fucking times following the LV shooting! Good job!

That thing isn't a mig.

Gorilla tactics, sweetie.

No (You) for you, you cancerous leaf. May one of your stronger brethren end you.

You are missing the point. The US has a ton of allies that have their interest in maintaining the US government. Moreover, no country would risk going to war with the US or its allies by helping the rebels. Also sympathizers work both ways and many civilians will join the government in the war. Not to mention just how strong the US military is compared to most countries experiencing rebellions.

Dude you need to seek out some classes in critical thinking.
Those countries with a vested interest have joke military resources compared to the ones that would arm the resistance. Not to mention Russia especially is versed in providing support to smaller unconventional armies much like our military. And the majority of gun owners who will fight will defect not to the government.
DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST OUR GOVERNMENT? EVEN MY DEADBRAIN LEFTIST FAMILY MEMBERS HAVENT TRUSTED THE GOVERNMENT FOR YEARS.

is this going to unironically redpill britfags?

/thread

You don't have to fight against the army, you just kill the politicians families.