War = good

war is the purest and easiest redpilling device known to mankind. degeneracy is naturally vanquished by societies in brutal wars dealing with massive losses of life. Women become better mates to compensate for unequally skewed gender ratios.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Matrosov
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

War profits (((them))), always has.

Well...cook something up then!

War kills all good men and leaves society with a bunch of cucks and single moms which leads to the destruction of civilization

war is the hygiene of the world

Well they aren't very good if they're dead?

War should include the complete and literal rape of the defeated by the victor, for various reasons:
1. It allows war to work as eugenics;
2. Reduces the likelyhood of immediate ulterior conflict;
3. Fair punishment;
4. Makes men fight even more seriously because they know what the results will be.

sauce?

I'm starting to think that war was a part of being a man and it's an urge we've rightfully had for thousands of years; suddenly taken away in these modern times. And now all men do is vicariously have war through sports and videogames, basically hooked into a virtual reality because their very nature has been eradicated

>fight and risk life perhaps give your life for your country/what you believe in
I'd say they're at least above average.

The free market only functions in peace time. War forces a war economy aka socialism. It is therefore bad, however sometimes necessary to prevent full on socialism. The eventual goal of war should always be peace and the continuation of the free market.

Of course.

Hardtimes make good men, fool. And good men don't die. Not first, anyway.

wtf happened in that webm user?

The modern world is basically a construct to sideline masculinity and its insurrectionary nature. But I feel men are getting tired of being treated like eunuchs.

It's Venezuela.

And what is the eventual goal of """free""" market?

Living near niggers is a pretty decent redpill too.

Venezuelan opposition blowing up commies.

>fight and risk life perhaps give your life for your country/what you believe in
Haha, no. Grab a riffle and go die in a trench or rot in a jail/labour camp.

We Wuz Kaangs! looking at the jaw line..

Wars promote feminism. When women work in the factories, they start to believe that they can run society all on their own. After all, they did those men jobs fairly well. Maybe they're not so different from men after all.

war is also incredibly beneficial for technological and medical progress
nothing fires up those inventors like substantial government incentive and their countrymens' lives on the line
have you noticed how everything's been kind of stagnant in terms of innovation ever since ww2? I'm not just talking about the nazis, who made giant leaps in nearly every field, both sides made great contributions to the world during this time

there was a brief surge during the 60s during vietnam, but after that everything's been moving at a snail's pace
the airplanes we use today are pretty much technologically identical to the ones used in the 60s, as one example

in addition to that there's also the giant economic upturn that happens to the surviving people every time large segments of the population dies, property prices drop and the cost of labour rises, which is amazing for innovation in industry, it's exactly what ushered the industrial revolution

war would be the best thing that could happen, who knows what wonders we'd unlock after a third large scale war

War is the business of the devil,where his subordinates make billions off of armistice,he makes billions on lost souls
Ever wonder why (((they))) arm & fund both sides?
War is evil,only edgy teens & warhawks like Hillary say otherwise

They do with shitty tactics and machine guns.

nearly every forms of leisure we have or have had before or will have later has something to do with conflict (in groups, individuals or even just against our own perceived weaknesses) and winning said conflict. And what is the largest scale of conflict there is? War

that should tell you something about our human nature. That we inherently like it and perform best under duress against great adversaries and grow weak and restless during prolonged peace.

What? If all were left were cucks then that means all the soldiers fucking died and we lost. Besides, heavy wartime means that everyone has to contribute, which means you naturally work and become stronger as a man.

Since the Rothschilds funded both sides in the Napoleonic Wars, yes. But not always before.

>If all were left were cucks then that means all the soldiers fucking died and we lost.
Explains Europe.

There have always been profiteers in war. I remember reading somewhere about the spear-makers and breastplate beaters of Athens who one day became so frustrated with the fact that Athens hadn't gone to war in years that they piled up all their merchandise in the agora and demanded that the city declare war on someone, because it was unfair that the potters and shoe-makers were making more money than them.

I'm with OP on the war being good thing, but it begins to enter spook territory when nukes get involved.

All the benefits posted here are immediately made null and pointless when nuclear bombs, MAD, and devestation comes into play. Have fun developing anything when the entire world is being turned into an atomic wasteland.

I'm all for the progress made through war, but again, it's pointless if nukes are involved, which is why we are so hesitant on war nowadays. That's why we are only fighting countries that don't have nukes on missiles. That's why I'm both excited and nervous about Kim Jong Un. It would actually be a substantial war but what's the point of going into battle if the enemy just fucking nukes your ass?

>kangz
>stahlhelm
What?

I wonder who creates all this degeneracy and the subsequent 'cleansing' wars.

War is sweet to those who have no experience of it,
but the experienced man trembles exceedingly at heart on its approach.

>brutal wars
I'm sure the Balkan conflicts were full of upright morality and ethical conduct.

The ultimate degeneracy followed combat, mass rape, looting, blood sports.

I'm not saying I buy into the 'good guy vs bad guy' pre-school kikery, and I'm also not against the unchecked genocide of shitskins.

However don't be a fool who believes degeneracy and the insatiable darkness within man gets stamped out in the crucible of war.

Also all wars are now fought for Israel, dumb cunt.

True enough, but (((they))) have become by far the most proficient at it - because of their psychopathic readiness to manipulate the goyim to incessantly kill each other to achieve greater control over the financial system.

well if you're so sure your ass is getting nuked would you rather fight in case it doesn't or do nothing and hope nothing happens

i think the only way to fix the world is to have a war.

all the filth in our societies will be culled or leave.

for example, the uk fought tooth and nail against the nazi's, and everyone post war was hard as nails and it shaped their offspring.

70 yrs later and everyone to scared to offend anyone and degeneracy has run rabid in our countries. the west needs a serious intervention.

I'd fight either way, but I'm just saying that if a country gets nuked, specifically MY country, then my fight would be for nothing. If two nations completely bomb each other out, then I return home to a nation that is doomed to survive because it was reduced to a fucking wasteland.

...

I'd be inclined to somewhat agree (to a point) if all the wars weren't pointless and a tactic that the Jews use to push evrryone else into murdering each other. If we were in a Jew free world and wars were faught for dominance and power over inferior races I'd be inclined to agree

>everyone post war was hard as nails and it shaped their offspring.

boomers aren't hard as nails mate

Peace and war cycles have always existed everywhere. The kikes just know how to ride the waves.

A just war which is fought for your people is good.
Now, however all wars are bankers wars and are only fought to destabilise and tighten the Jewish grip on those nations which have managed to remain independent from international finance interests until recent times (Iraq, Libya etc.).

early boomers, not hippy fags born in the 60's

fucking idiot. War DRIVES degeneracy. During WW2 millions of soldiers got married to wives whom they'd only known for a few days or weeks, due to their deployments. Unsurprisingly, this led to a huge surge in divorce rates post war. In addition, during wartime resources (including working men) are scant, and so women will either cheat on their men, sell their bodies for money or enter the black market and deal in illegal and dangerous goods (which are more in demand due to the huge mental stress that war imposes upon a nation).

The notion that war rids society of degeneracy is foolish. Whenever there is war, there is also massive societal upheavel and confusion.

War is just the violent pursue of political ends. It doesn't necessarily involve countries. Civil war in the US, for example, would be an interesting scenario to imagine, where nukes won't be involved and kikery itself will be put to danger.

Nobody's advocating total, permanent war though. People just value what it brings. I mean you speak as if the 50's aka the American Golden Age didn't happen just after the largest war the world has ever seen.

must explain all the massive strides that we've made in computing and digital technologies huh fuckwit? The only way that technology today is stagnant compared to 50 years ago is non-digital and non-mechnised warfare.

Oh yes, the american golden age, what a great fukkin' time for everyone except the americans. The only reason it even happened is because Europe's economy and production capabilities were demolished, and thus, America had a virtual monopoly on developing the poor and barren western europe. All that concentrated AMERICAN wealth caused your degeneracy to spread exceptionally easily after your 'golden period' was over. Perhaps several hundred years ago war may have been valorous or good, but these days you die like a dog in a trench for jewish bankers. Have fun getting killed, kuk.

yes men are made to fight and some to die in the battlefield it keeps our society strong with battle hardened men in power.

Fucking niggers in Africa are at war all the time. Y'all are fucking retarded edge lords, it's a disgrace. Fuck off kikes. Peace is an attainment of civilization. War is degenerate nigger shit.

I already said war doesn't necessarily involve countries, and generally speaking must be conducted withing certain parameters to insure it'll bring the overall, multidimensional prosperity it should.

And of course war will be rough on the losers, that's the law of war: the spoils go to the victor. But your eternal peace utopia is on the long run more detrimental... because when man stops caring for extermination as the ultimate evil to avoid then all value is lost. Virtual war in video games can only exist in a relativistic world where the demand for violence needs to be simulated.

And no, I'm not even Unitedstatian, pal. But I stand on what I said even when war waged on a national level would most likely be detrimental for my country in an scenario of global belligerence, because rules are not agreed upon depending on our individual circumstances, but rather their independent value.

Like in Deutsches Requiem. You do the right thing even if it's you who must perish.

Peacetime is the real war. We have been in WW3 since 1945. The mindbenders have got themselves into an even worse position that before. And us along with them. No happy ending for anyone now. Any move they make damns them further.

War is not good

War is hell

It is also creative destruction just like sex is destructive creation

WAR IS THE DECIDER WHEN NEITHER SIDE IS SMART ENOUGH TO TRULY UNDERSTAND THE OTHER SIDE because all nations are manipulated into war by outside forces

War is in our blood.
Cowards deny it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Matrosov

It should still be avoided

Great power great responsibility

Not in modern warfare it seems. In Americas war against sand coons, I'd wager most Americans died before they even knew they were being attacked.

Aren't most deaths ied related ?

>riding along in a Humvee
>looking out the window at all the sand
>in a split second you hear a bang and then you cease to exist after being blown up by a ied buried under the road
>along with pretty much everyone else in the vehicle

At that point I don't know if the "best man" survives. I think no matter what, even In conventional warfare, it's all about luck.