Stupid right wingers are so intolerant of HIV victims

Stupid right wingers are so intolerant of HIV victims

twitter.com/Scott_Wiener/status/917495703869386752

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2014/09/18/upshot/san-francisco-politician-says-hes-on-pill-to-prevent-hiv.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Fags gonna fag.

>we think it's okay to give someone an incurable disease that could cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of their lifetime to treat if they want to stay alive
>why u mad?

>modernizing

they always do this. fucking with language do disguise their shit.

Someone's gonna murder this happy faggot for proposing and subsequently passing such a heinous law.

If I ever needed a blood transfusion, and I got HIV as a result, there would be only one thing left I would need to do with my life, and that would be to capture, torture, and murder the ever living fuck out of that piece of shit and anyone he loves to send a message to all the other virtue signaling faggots out there that this shit has to stop.

(((Modernizing)))

You beat me to it, but yeah. I can't stand how they redefine words and workshop things out to make a terrible as outright harmful change sound like progress. They've even ruined the word progress. Fucking outstanding.

These degenerates are going to give HIV to the wrong person and it could end up with people dying. They are fucking retarded for thinking that knowingly giving someone an incurable disease is ok. What possibly could come out of this that is good for anyone?

Someone should intentionally give this guy HIV.

Why do I get disgusted at the sight of this man? Something about his appearance just makes me revolt and want to puke. And I do mean just physical appearance, not even counting what he really does.

Vote Wiener: A poz load for every neg hole

spot on

The faggot already has it.

I think you mean, someone needs to off this guy for intentionally endangering American lives.

We're to protect this nation from enemies both foreign and domestic, and this motherfucking faggot is a goddamn enemy if I've ever seen one.

>so you are telling me i can inject politicians with HIV in california and not face any repercussions. my sexual fetish involves needles deal with it scott.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. How about everyone who voted for it?

FUCKING KIKES!

...

>right wingers?

Shouldnt fags be the ones most upset. Theyre the ones who will get aids and die because now its a $50 fone for pozzing someone.

They're culpable, but you can't go around offing everyone.

Mindsets change when punitive punishment is overwhelmingly dastardly.

...

Natural reaction to seeing a jew

It's fucking 2017! everyone should have aids! It's a modern disease! Come on!

give this man aids everyone who has aids we need to find his address and give him aids

Yup, that motherfucker is a kike to the extreme.

World would be better off without him.

World would be much better off if the last few painful and miserable moments of his life were broadcast for the whole world to see, and watch as that bitch begs for mercy that will never come.

The motherfucking faggot already has it.

The thinking process of liberal progressive democrats is beyond insane.

Now it is a minor misdemeanor to DELIBERATELY infect someone with HIV/AIDS

BRILLIANT!!!!

>get pozzed
>assrape this fucking fool
>only charged for rape, not murder

What criminal laws are under attack?
Knowingly giving someone an incurable and often fatal disease should be considered manslaughter.

it's just so tolerant to give someone an incurable disease that kills you in a horrible excruciatingly painful way

It's ok the taxpayer will pay for it because socialism

(((wiener)))
every fucking godamn time

they changed it to a misdameaner

inject him with an aids infected needle that way you get of scot free

I want the cunts supporting this shit to smear poz blood on their face while trying to defend purposely infecting another person.
Scratch that I want them to down a vial of poz semen and defend inbetween shots.

>(((Modernized)))
I think this is my new codeword

These fucking bigots. Why can't they get it through their thick, cishet skulls that being infected with HIV via tainted blood transfusion, is no big deal anymore. You can turn that negative in to a POZitive experience.

Fucking breeders, I swear.

every time he makes a public appearance just have a bunch of dudes with HIV trying too shoot a load of cum into his mouth soggy cracker style

Isn't that the same as saying AIDS is a gay disease?
I realise that image is paraphrasing him, but still.

This guy should actually be in jail for this shit.

>When the Jared AIDS joke from South Park becomes legislature.

Better yet have them shoot loads on his family and friends in attendance while screaming "THIS ISN'T ILLEGAL!!"

>it's just aids
>stop being a bigot, this couldn't possibly cause a public health crisis
The only solution for the dumpster fire that is California is complete removal.

California is actually having a hepatitis A outbreak right now
Wonder why

i have actually read his article, is it actually that Cali jailing people if they have HIV even though they are not expose it to anyone?
> SB 239 doesn’t eliminate criminal penalties for reckless behavior by people living with HIV
What is the"reckless behavior" that he is talking about? it means rape or it means that you infected someone with HIV?

Because it's fucking disgusting and, most faggots are fucking phyco. It also seems like a really sick method of pushing socialized medicine.

>Implying he isn't already pozz'd

YES! YES! YES!

>implying it might not be a benefit
>implying a accidentally infected HIV guy won't go all 'HATRED' (game) on their asses

I have a theory on this. This faggot is probably HIV positive. There was an article in the NY Times that he 's taking a medication to prevent HIV. Supposedly this shit prevents transmission of HIV.

I bet the fucker wrote this bill because he fucked some other faggot without protection and only is using the fact that he is on this medication to not use protection. The articcle came out in 2014.

nytimes.com/2014/09/18/upshot/san-francisco-politician-says-hes-on-pill-to-prevent-hiv.html

>giving someone AIDS on purpose isn't a crime
>using correct pronouns is literally assault and you can go to prison
I can't take this world much longer. I'm prolly gonna snap at some point.

Can you write that in English?

He already has it. The only reason this law is going into effect is so that he can continue to fuck dudes' asses and not have to tell them he's a fucking walking quarantine. Totally selfish motives, what a surprise from the Left.

When you do snap, make sure you take some of these fuckers with you.

>"""""modernized"""""

mfw

just forget about my shitty English
Do you have the answer?

>here are the facts.

Scott Wiener is a domestic biological terrorist and is a danger to every person on this planet. Both Gov. Brown and Wiener are risking a massive, potentially world-wide infection and will be directly responsible for any person who gets HIV as a response to the loosening of the laws.

There are bound to be connections Wiener has to pharmaceutical companies so they can push for a massive epidemic. This man is a domestic terrorist and should be executed before a wildly out-of-control infection occurs. Brown and Wiener have given up their rights with their radical social justice terrorism. They do not care about anyone but their own profits, all while they call everyone who disagrees "homophobic" and a "bigot".

Social justice warriors are a bane to humanity and must be purged from society. If officials will not go after Scott Wiener for his terrorism, Scott Wiener must be placed into a citizens arrest and/or executed by members of society who are not willing to see humanity die off all because a fucking Jewish faggot wanted to virtue-signal. Wiener and Brown are dangerous and must be taken care of by any means before society itself is destroyed over their hunger for profits and social justice retardation.

It's for if someone deliberately transmits AIDS to someone else.

Also a non-violent misdemeanor now.

>oey vey goyim we 'modernized' it. dont you know that old laws are bigoted and racist, they need to be 'modernized'

this is a fucking disaster.

yeah kike, you "modernized" the poz, congrats.

Modernized.com

Gay people in this state now assume that 100% of people take preventative anti-AIDS medicine every day already. There's no room in their worldview for the idea that there are people who don't take it up the ass daily.

Why arent the wildfires working harder? Fucking mexican fires always looking for handouts and already burnt to a crisp objects.

This law is much more sinister than just knowingly giving someone HIV.

The following will be switched from violent felonies to non-violent misdemeanors come January 1st, 2018 in California:

- Knowingly Transmitting HIV or donating blood with HIV
- Abuse of the Elderly
- Child Abuse
- Domestic Abuse
- Rape/Sodomy/Oral Rape
- Use of "date rape" drugs
- Assault with a Deadly Weapon
- Battery with a Deadly Weapon
- 1st Degree Burglary
- Solicitation to commit murder
- Manslaughter
- Child trafficking


These are just the ones I can remember off the top of my head. But this law is DANGEROUS for everyone in California.

Armed robberies where you shoot someone will be considered non-violent misdemeanors.

Also, there will be a push to repeal bail in California, just like New Jersey already did, and if that happens, it will be the wild west in California.

There's nothing wrong with your English, he's just a retard. It means infecting people with HIV through unprotected sex without telling them you're pozzed, lying to donate blood, and other things like that.

California is not reality. Just calm down.

maybe I don't want aids you nigger, you fucking degenerate faggots killed Isaac Asimov

But on the other hand, you can get jail time for "misgendering" someone now

Even sticking someone in the arm in a bar with a HIV tainted needle would still be a non-violent misdemeanor.

If that ever happened to me, I'd take advantage of the new law, and beat them to death with a blunt object.

Yeah, I'll call someone whatever the fuck I want.

Let's see them enforce that bullshit.

People will die.

>pass a bill that allows (((hospitals))) to give people HIV in blood transfusions without any legal recourse

I've now read some of it, I don't think this will be the case.

But this bill should be repelled as it is degenerate as FUCK.

Also people in possession of child porn will reportedly be removed from the sex offenders list after 10 years

Final straw for anyone with kids.
Time to move to Texas!

>vote blue or suffer!
it's truly disgusting

((((Modernizing+))))
Scott belongs in a bog

"Who’s being prosecuted? An awful lot of women, particularly African American women and transgender women. Women constitute about 12% of HIV-positive people in California, but they account for 43% of prosecutions under these laws."

So basically, what he is saying is that niggers and trannies are pretty much the ones spreading most if not all of the HIV, and are getting most if not all of the arrest.

That's what this is all about, an evil psychotic Jew shielding his soldiers spreading the AIDS epidemic for him to enrich his chosen friends in the pharmaceutical and medical industries, who lobbied him for this change no doubt.

He will spew a bunch of vitriolic venom about the evil right wing though now that he is exposed, it's all he can do.

California's state legislature think they're genius social scientists and have for the last few years now. They keep passing weird coercive laws nobody actually wants. See the $10 pack of cigarettes, an effort to price poor people who are struggling to pay rent out of smoking.

>implying his neghole hasnt been pozzed.

Doesn't this just legalize a potential form of biological warfare? Could you literally infect thousands using needles etc. Punishment free?

Here is a fucking scary thought for these morons, what if the HIV virus mutates like all viruses have done so in the past and almost all viruses are guaranteed to do so left unchecked to spread across a population, this happened with the flu virus multiple times, we will be back in the 80's when we had almost nothing to fight back against AIDS,

drumpfies BTFO

Is there a legal difference in "exposing" and "infecting"?

Meme this:
SCOTT WIENER IS A DOMESTIC BIOLOGICAL TERRORIST

max jail time 6 mos.
slap on the wrist compared to what it used to be.

>max jail time 6 mos.
>slap on the wrist compared to what it used to be.
For essentially attempted murder. Fuckin disgusting.

Im right wing and I think this is the greatest law since Jim crow.

day ofe th 2nd Amendment when?

Where did you get this information

Wasn't this the law that makes it legal to infect people knowingly with HIV?

If I shot someone on purpose, then I'd be a criminal. I'd have legal responsibilities (civil and criminal). Getting shot permanently changes your life.


If I get HIV, then it permanently changes my lifestyle.


If someone knowingly infects me with HIV, then why is it not criminal?


Also, if such is permissible then why aren't gun owners rights respected? Why is owning a gun stigmatized?

Can the 8th admendment be used here?

Someone should inject him with Ebola-chan so he realizes his hypocrisy

gays just want to get married user

This guy gets it.

>Premarital whores
>Fags
>Druggies
>Hookup culture.
All pozed.

Shut up and bake the cake bigot

uh... isn't that pretty much murder? you might as well give out a $50 ticket for shooting people in the face wtf california

literally can lie about health check and say you are HIV negative, and infect EVERYONE in the porn industry, when you are HIV positive. Only get a minor slap on the wrist punishment.

Cant wait for your mom or new born child to get a blood transfusion

Porn industry do their own checks, usually every 30 days