Be honest. Assuming no corruption wouldn't a one world order be optimal?

Be honest. Assuming no corruption wouldn't a one world order be optimal?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5qDsqPaJht0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Assuming no corruption

And unicorns would make great pets.

No, they are rapists.
youtube.com/watch?v=5qDsqPaJht0

define "corruption"

>one world order
How would you even define this

No, you would run into classic empire problems, such as the leaders living in an isolated glass house dictating the ways of life people living in entirely different conditions thousands of miles away.

>Assuming no corruption
That's a pretty damn big assumption.

Nope but smaller neighborhood sized governments would be. Voting would only be from owners who would also leverage all costs. So pretty much the Constitution as written originally. One world Bureaucracy would be a Vogon nightmare.

>S-stop shitposting our legitimacy away you filthy goyim!

YES absofuckinglutely.

But it needs to be ********PERFECT********
And when I say perfect, I mean, there has to be an actual 0 percent chance of it becoming corrupt.
Not 0.00000001%
Not 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%
Not 0.00...(grahams number of zeros)...001%
No. It must be actual 0%.
Now how the fuck are you gonna manage that? Because if by some lucky occurance the world is managed to be united and that isn't 0, sooner or later, when shit gets fucked, it will be truly fucked. By having a fragmented world, we end up wasting a lot of time with a lot of bullshit, but we also avoid situations which are much worse, situations which could actually wipe out humanity.

Same way that communism would be hands down the best system, would be, if humans weren't shit.

Evil exists, it must be dealt with. Ignoring it and building more power than has ever existed before would only give a perfect platform for evil to take hold at a scale never before seen.

>define "corruption"
baby raping

What a scary image

Assuming you are gay, how many straight girls would you bang?

>let small group of people rule the world
>no corruption
Being this fucking stupid.

A one world government is inevitable. It's natural progression. That is, unless we destroy ourselves beforehand.

People that are against globalism are just simple minded moron's, who fear anything they don't understand. They're the same type of people that were responsible for events like the Salem witch trials. They hold humanity back.

>Assuming no corruption
How in the fuck, would one assume that? Given that all governments in the history of fucking man have been corrupt? Turn your fucking brain on.

>communism would be hands down the best system

communism isn't a system, man
it's only a means to an end
a few generations of communism
would have normalized a work ethic
amongst the the people

socialism failed because peasants didn't want to work.
communism was intended temporary, and it would have worked, if it hadn't been killed

a one world order isn't optimal because competition between rival nations drives progress

no. because different countries and different regions of the world can't simply be governed under one blanket of rules.

One world order is an inherently communistic idea.

a one size fits all approach that ignores the nuances of global differences. You can expect the approach that works in say, the US, to work in fucking africa. or the approach that works in sweden, to work in afghanistan.

It's all falling apart you ignorant, authoritarian faggot. Men in the long run will not be slaves. Your system is falling apart and this is just the beginning of your exposure and destruction. Your time is over. The age of men is returning.

That's because all humans are corrupt.

I-it would have worked you guise I-i swear!

>one world order
Worldwide anarchy would be optimal. Assuming everything is good.

The problem is that corruption is not avoidable. Humans are, at the core, corrupt. You cannot eliminate this. If we were an optimal species, we would not be at odds constantly and separated into several countries.

Simple. Use an AI.

By a World Government that's styled after the U.S. Constitution?
Very Yes.
By a World Government that's styled after socialist "utopias"
FUCK NO.

perhaps I wasn't clear

communism failed because of corruption
inevitable corruption, when an any group holds power over another.

the peasants of russia refused to work or contribute to socialism. they had to be forced to work. the enforcers who made them work, took power (communism)

socialism won't work, because liberals will never work, or contribute. we learned from communism, that they can't be forced to work.
thus elimination of the liberal is necessary for socialism to succeed.

An A.I, if given the resources and power, would eradicate half the human species if the directive was to "direct humanity to the right path," as defined by the normal non-psychotic human being. You and I would both be on the list to be absolute destroyed in a blaze of nuclear fire.

fpbp.
An hero, OP

If nobody ever tried to take advantage of anyone else and everyone acted moral and decent then literally any system would work.

Want youto be clear of your definition of liberal.

But please, keep talking dirty..

at the heart of corruption we find
"investment"

the stock market, is nothing but corruption
steal money from fools is what it's all about

banking is nothing but corruption

trying to make money off the labor of others

Only sociopathic brainlets.

>because liberals will never work
They are actually the only ones who work and contribute for free.

i enjoy fiction as much as the next person, but you seem to have trouble distinguishing it from reality.

could you give some examples of liberals who work. be as broad as you'd like with your definition of "work" prostitution, drug dealer...

...

Hey I know that bread. It's sangak a persian bread.

Wow, it's almost as if people had some kind of "free will" and were not just pawns to be controlled, used and thrown away.

Literally no need. THe larger a government body gets and the larger the constituency gets the less connected it becomes to the plebs it purports to serve. To the rootless world order elite we are nothing but numbers in a database. Really bad ideology to build a society around.

Optimal for who?

>'Next item on the agenda: Vote for the former United States of America to be turned into the world's largest landfill: All for...'
>Six billion Ayes
>'All opposed...'
>Three hundred million Neighs
>'Ayes have it. Transfer of global garbage dumping begins tomorrow.'

>Assuming no corruption
lost me there

Not much would change desu

spoken like someone with experience being a landfill. how many millions of acres of radioactive waste is -down under?

Fuckers made my doggy into a naan bread!

Sage is optimal answer to your gay question. Sage

>Assuming no corruption
>Hey guiz, assuming all the problems with a one world order didn't exist, wouldn't it be perfect?
Why yes, friendo, it would. What an insightful point you have made.

A few bureaucrats in New York can't make good decisions for New Jersey, let alone Paris or a village in China.

micro-management is best management

Humans are screwed up.
No corruption is a fools dream. Sorry.

Let's examine countries currently controlled and managed by the United Nations (one world order) and see how they are doing...

This Brit gets it.
Competition is literally the driving force behind improvements.
And, no, you can't replace it by some very well educated commission or something — there needs to be actual competition with actual ability to both win and lose in it.
One government will rot in stagnation for the very same reason communism-tier "equality" bullshit does.

...

>Assuming no corruption
lol

>wouldn't a one world order be optimal?
no

you'd still have different groups of people forced to live together in a single value system

this

just look at spain and see how retarded it is

no government would be better, but you need a better educated population for that. better systems and A.I.

competition is a sin.
there is no win without a loser

why is football subsidized by governments?
because it is divisive.
it's not to support sports, and encourage athletics. It promotes hatred of all the opposing teams.
nearly as bad as the two party system in politics. divide and conquer

Nope, optimal would be for humans to live in small tribes, but that's not possible because we have this thing called civilization, WITCH HAS FAILED MISERABLY, if you have not noticed.

No. Confrontation is absolutely essential for growth. Without competition we will stagnate. Constant war is optimal for the growth and development of our species.

>your definition of liberal.

those who are so open minded, that their brains fell out

>competition is a sin.
That's literally what commies believe.

...

Wait for civilization to collapse and in the meantime prepare like Varg.

I don't see any chihuahaus

by the time world order is feasible communism will win

yes

Too many greedy corrupt people for it to work. The NWO has to be built on their bones and ashes to have any meaning. So the new regime has clean hands.

A noble man compares and estimates himself by an idea which is higher than himself; and a mean man, by one lower than himself. The one produces aspiration; the other ambition, which is the way in which a vulgar man aspires. --Marcus Aurelius

Part of what is wrong with the world today, is that people mistakenly believe that ambition is a good thing. "He lacks ambition" is even used as an insult.

Many derive satisfaction from putting down others, in a vain attempt to make themselves look or feel better.
I compare myself to no man.

>assuming no corruption

For that to be true there would have to be no evil in the world at all for it would find its way to a place with such centralized power.

Assuming that only the government is not corrupt it could only work after something like zero point energy or post scarcity where people would not care how resources are divided.

Question:

Who would run this one world government? We already know everyone else would be slaves to these masters at the top.

The only leader that could be accepted would be a benevolent AI

That's kind of like saying
>assuming no human nature isn't communism the optimal system

No, it would be full of niggers, jews and faggots. Just like what we have now.

Yea, commie bulllshit at it's finest, I get it.

Meanwhile in real world competition (aka evolution) is the driving force behind actual progress and improvement.

Of course a UN flag, fuck off Juncker.

LOL. “Asssuming no corruption”. Hilarious.

the elite have no need of so many slaves
their desire is to enjoy walking in the park, without the filthy beggars. drastic reduction of the population is their goal.

That is why, before the one world begins, we will lose 2/3rds of our population.

No. Read Taleb and Kirkpatrick Sale. Even assuming no corruption (lol) one world government is a fucking stupid idea.

Worker bees are already being made obsolete by automation and once the automation movement has taken hold there will be no use for them anymore.

Yep, just a handful of humans to fix the automation etc

Jesus christ stop watching scifi and basing how you think an AI would act on that you fucking faggot

in the truest sense of "reap what you sow"
the filthy beggars manipulated by media will eliminate themselves
when the food supply is cut off. only those who can literally feed themselves will survive.

I'd estimate that at around 5% of major metropolitan areas surviving.

>Assuming no corruption
hahkeklele

Oh look, another fag who thinks he can survive because he has basic hunting knowledge xD

Assuming no free will yes totalitarian universalism is perfect

What if we had a self-maintaining AI ruler made by non corrupted engineers?

and even that role in society will fall off quickly

Eventually there will be only a handful of elites left living in their robotic society, counting their digital money, farming test tube baby sex slaves and fighting robotic wars for fun.

sorta funny how people who live at mcdonalds assume the rest of the world eats meat.
I'm vegan, bro i grow my own

deny them your essence?

no

It doesn't matter. The answer is always 0. I will die a virgin

yeah, sure you do bud, sure you do

>EVERY HUMAN SOCIETY HAS BEEN CORRUPT IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
>OKAY GUIZE, ASSUME NO CORRUPTION. CAN COMMUNISM WORK?

keep larpin' buddy

>EVERY HUMAN SOCIETY HAS BEEN CORRUPT
+
>ASSUME NO CORRUPTION.
=
ASSUME NO HUMAN SOCIETY

>CAN COMMUNISM WORK?
With no humans to taint it, it sure can!

The only way a world order could succeed is by joining the most clever minds in every aspect of humanity, and make them raise a council of genetically engineered children in a specific manner where the only thing they care about is the benefit of mankind and progress. These kids would grow to become excellent men under the combined guidance of our current generation, and would earn their personal gratification out of watching humanity progress rather than materialistic benefits. Not even the need to breed will be strong enough to break them. These men of infinite wisdom will take care of their next generation of clones, passing down both views and knowledge upon them.
However, how can we be truly free from the constraints that our ancestors have passed down upon us if our leaders weren't really ever free?

No it's not practical or efficient

>The only way a world order could succeed is by joining the most clever minds in every aspect of humanity, and make them raise a council of genetically engineered children in a specific manner where the only thing they care about is the benefit of mankind and progress. These kids would grow to become excellent men under the combined guidance of our current generation, and would earn their personal gratification out of watching humanity progress rather than materialistic benefits. Not even the need to breed will be strong enough to break them. These men of infinite wisdom will take care of their next generation of clones, passing down both views and knowledge upon them.
>stagnation sets in
>a few generation later system rots from inside and is toppled by neighbors who retained healthy competition

Optimal =/= a nice place to live. Western traditional values are neither 100% logical nor 100% optimal. But they are objectively good, and fit well with the natural impulses of intelligent European humans.

Stop the
>hurrrrrr its so logical guise
approach. It is the origin of leftism.

We are not ant people.

...

>humans
>no corruption
pic one you delusional idiot.