No nukes, no chemical/germ warfare allowed. Everything else is good to go. Who would win? Here are some stats so that you can make informed decisions.
Current state of the military of the USA:
Number of Active Aircraft Carriers : 11 Number of Cruisers : 22 Number of Destroyers : 62 Military Satellites : 123 Battle Tanks : 8,850 Number of Military Aircraft : 3,318 Number of Active Personnel : 1,347,000
Current state of the military of the REST OF THE WORLD:
Number of Active Aircraft Carriers : 8 Number of Cruisers : 7 Number of Destroyers : 153 Military Satellites : 197 Battle Tanks : 90,000 Number of Military Aircraft : 17,000 Number of Active Personnel : 17,000,000
KEEP IN MIND! These numbers include all the shit nations of the world like in Africa, Middle East, Asia, etc... Afghanistan alone has 170,000 soldiers, but they are all useless. Also, USA military has state of the art, deadliest equipment in the world. Well Sup Forums? Does the USA have a chance to win against the WHOLE WORLD?
Carter Martin
This a "war" like Vietnam, or is this a real war WWII?
Austin Carter
Usa we would defend the invasions untill every one is dead.
Austin Wilson
Everything but nukes and chem warfare is fair game. Invasion, etc. all good.
Dominic Miller
Russia and China participating is a bit unfair.
Dominic Murphy
Basically like Rome Extended intense war would spread the forces too thin Plus we let trannies and women in the army I think the US could take some of Mexico and Canada but nothing else. Eventually internal struggles would have contemporary Vandals marching on Washington (ROME)
Gabriel Hughes
You're done for. We would go about it like Russia did in WW2: Throwing expandable lines at the Front line. Of course we would use Arab Muslims and Sub Saharans for that, and send them en mass' towards your Continent. There are only two options: a) you sink they boats and kill them, which will trigger a civil war due to Leftists and Dindus rioting in your streets, or b) you let them on US soil and have them rioting in your streets. Your economy will deteriorate at an alarming rate, until you can't support the war machine any longer.
short version: we got "Refugees" and we ain't afraid to use them!
Brayden Butler
desu Canada should be on our side, they're basically our 51st state
but anyway, nobody would be able to invade the US. especially if Canada was with us. it would end in a stalemate or a US victory
Joshua Jenkins
What a stupid question. North Korea alone would destroy America if it wasn't for nukes. America couldn't even beat the Vietnamese or Taliban. How could they beat millions of Nork soldiers.
Wyatt Williams
expendable krauts
from July 1942 till May 1945 your fucking axis shit forces lost on eastern front more than soviets
Colton Perry
We'd lose because of lack of support back home from anyone left of center.
Nolan Nguyen
>nobody would be able to invade the US >currently being invaded and wiped out by Mexicans
Lol
Wyatt Anderson
By closing all ports so the have to come in with an army. Now they cant fight guerilla warfare.
Hunter Wilson
yea it does seem imbalanced with russia and china as they are both very strong on their own
Caleb Kelly
If the US was on the defensive i doubt anyone would be able to "win". The US would likely judt exhaust everyine elses resources effectively defending the coast lines and winning naval engagements. The US wouldnt lose, but it wouldnt really 'win'. It could be like the war of 1812. The effort would just become not worth it anymore and everyone would fuck off
Jason Gonzalez
Some more info:
Military budget for 2016:
USA - $611 billion Rest of the world - approx $750 billion
Andrew Roberts
>One of the biggest armies in the world >Still loses to Vietnamese farmers with hardly militar formation
Do you think USA could take on the rest of the world, let alone China and Russia?
Christopher Thomas
>politics >natural resources >manufacturing capacity >will to fight all irrelevant in war!
>number of aircraft carriers at the current time now we're talking!
Gavin Powell
We have way more aircraft than that fag lord. We have over 13000 F18s alone
Anthony Foster
Hold on there fella. Vietnam was never a full scale war. Plus, we got technology now that could decimate the entire country with a flick of a button. You can't compare 2017 with the '60s
Brandon Campbell
It could be. I just whipped up the most recent data I could find.
Dominic Johnson
T R I G G E R E D
Christian Cooper
US would quickly destroy Canada, Mexico and South America. The oceans on both sides of us protect us from a land invasion and the Canadian wastes protect us from a Russian invasion from the north. We have bases and a navy stronger than any other all over the world, while no other country has bases or carriers in our territory.
Not a single enemy boot will step foot on our soil.
Alexander Sanders
sauce?
Mason Rodriguez
the only triggering going on here is wehraboos triggering over the failure of theri 'mighty' army kek
Jonathan Foster
Finland alone would beat USA.
Dylan Fisher
Various websites, including, yeah, wikipedia. Sorry about that.
Juan Peterson
>russian invasion Seems you know nothing about the state of the Russian military Literally defunct except for their nuclear stockpile Any war would crumble their economy --> October Revolution II
Ryan Thompson
facts please wehraboo
Isaiah Wilson
>not technically at war with Mexico so we can't legally shoot at each beaner trying to hop the border
there's a big difference, Achmed
Alexander Morris
vietnam beat you on their own and you still expect america to have a chance against the world
Angel Collins
right? americans seem to forget when the vietnamese stormed the beaches of florida
Colton Moore
ikr
Blake Hernandez
US wins as it expands to include the militaries of the other nations as they fall one by one. we create a conscript force of enemy forces and use them as cannon fodder. create mass cal weapons and restart out chemical and biological weapons programs. begin strategic bombing of all enemy nations. create MAD situation with non-nuclear arsenal, have armistice, lie cheat kill. world domination.
