Listen Sup Forums, we need to talk about the rampant onslaught of anti-WMAF threads here lately. These people masquerade as trads and act as though WMAF is terrible because "muh Elliot Rodger" and "muh halfbreed without an identity" and "muh purity"
And yet, in the same breath, they say that BMAF is fine, HMAF is fine, and of course AMAF is fine. So everyone on the planet can pursue AF except for WM? Am I understanding this correctly?
(((They))) have used the media as a weapon to push BMWF, (((they))) have used the media to feminize WM and make them look like weak and impotent cowards not worthy of any woman's affection, (((they))) have made it clear that, no matter where WM turns to for love and sex, (((they))) will be there to ensure no woman will want him. But WM found a loophole in AF, and naturally they would want to go for it, but now (((they))) are pushing the narrative that every single race except WM makes for a good pairing with AF
Could it be any more obvious what's being done here? They're giving WM no quarter, taking the very last recourse WM have for progeny, and pushing a narrative in the media that WMAF is toxic and evil and should never come to pass lest they reveal themselves or their future mixed children to be "mentally ill," whatever that means anymore in the year of our lord 2017 (see: highlighting people like Elliot Rodger, Krit McClean, Stephen Paddock being a yellow fever creep, etc.)
Break the conditioning, Sup Forums. See past the bullshit.