Buddhist monk speaks out against Islam. The tides are turning though, because the West has woken up rapidly...

Buddhist monk speaks out against Islam. The tides are turning though, because the West has woken up rapidly. There's lots of hope.

2 minute vid:

youtube.com/watch?v=wBdpuZGiYXA

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/i0djHJBAP3U
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_Buddhism_in_India#Wars_and_persecution
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3872514/Syrian-refugee-s-hand-outs-FOUR-wives-22-children.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

comfy music youtu.be/i0djHJBAP3U

I think one of the big things that will happens is that Islam will become too blatant; their push I mean. So many people are raising eye brows these days. They will be humbled eventually, and their children will turn against them too.

fucking fascist islamophobes. fuck buddhism. Islam is the only religion of peace.

Dude, when did Islam really take over anything for good? Even during the Ottoman empire from 1300 to world war 1, the only reason they were successful pushing into Europe is because they didn't persecute Christians and other faiths. They let them live in peace and to practice their religion in peace.

What are they doing now? Just pissing the world off. It won't even turn into ANYTHING in the end, just embarassement.

this is bretty comfy desu

>didn't persecute Christians and other faiths. They let them live in peace and to practice their religion in peace.
Nigger read a book you dumb piece of shit, Buddhism was almost wiped off the map, almost all of the great libraries destroyed, millions upon millions of Hindu killed and this nigger talking about "didn't persecute"

How does Buddhism get wiped off the map when the Ottoman empire didn't enter Asia? North Africa, middle east, and Europe. I'm talking strictly about the Ottoman empire here.

...

This entire situation is a result of Buddhists in Burma not having enough children. Like 1/4th of young Burmese people are celibate as a result of their anti life Buddhist belief system, so naturally the Muslims are out breeding them causing them to feel threatened.

Not that it really matters but it's funny to me that this entire conflict is basically a result of Buddhists can't into having kids.

Didn't really think about that. Buddhism is supposed to be defended by regultar non-Buddhists, that's the essential thing here. We'll see if the Asians care about their culture...

It says in the Pali Canon that it is a fathers responsibility to find a wife for his son

It also says not to look at women sexually, but that is all about self control, not being a sperg, bible says the same thing

Have you ever tried nofap and got more than a week? It makes you insanely horny, uncontrollably horny, you're trippin

I really love the film Spring, Summer, Autumn and Spring. I've shed so many tears to parts of this film!

I also love the Asian film Samsara.

Yeah man, I've gone more than 7 days, but past that... get real. It's bad for the body at a certain point. You can rub off to a girls pubic hairs at that point. -_-

We've never had a Buddhist shooting 130 people or running down 200 people with a truck.

Fuck Islam and fuck muslims. If they'd all die, the world would be a better place instantly.

>religious text says you should/shouldn't do something but it doesn't mean it literally lol it would be too hard to do/not do that thing

You guys need to knock this shit off. It's not supposed to be easy.

>It's bad for the body at a certain point
Medically wrong opinion

There is more detail I didn't mention
>Not your wife
>certain types of girls
>other people's wife
I'm guessing by these wife mentions you get a pass with looking at your 'woman' sexually

Well i mean it's not like there is a clear good or bad side, basically just two groups of people fighting over land. The demographic dynamic is interesting though, the fact that a Muslim man will take four wives and many Buddhists wont even take one. The rapid demographic growth of the Muslims frightens the Buddhists for a good reason, because the Rohingya Muslims are a poor minority who will be causing trouble increasingly.

Hopefully America and other western nations will not get involved and just see how this plays out. Getting involved will not help the situation at all.

>I'm talking strictly about the Ottoman empire here.
So you're moving goalposts? Other user is right. Buddhism originated in India but today has only a small presence there because Muslims spent centuries killing Buddhists and destroying monasteries. They might not have turned India Muslim but they sure managed to turn it non-Buddhist.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_Buddhism_in_India#Wars_and_persecution

Yeah but certain things are a fucking tortorous joke in Buddhism, like vegetarianism. It says in the mahaparanirvana sutra not to eat meat or wear leather. But can you cut down a tree? If not (because it's alive), why is okay to eat vegetables? Such rubbish, and Buddha placed no such rules onto himself.

>twf her left leg is precisely behind her right relative to the camera
>twf it creates one of the strangest illusions I've ever seen on a photograph

It's interesting to see how distinct cultures have the exact same problems regarding Islam that the West does. Indeed, Islam does not seem to be making itself many friends across the globe. I'd bet that even a spic-majority USA wouldn't hesitate to support Europe in a religious civil war.

sounds more like monk's labor

Okay, but the 4-wife thing is debunked. That means that 3 woman won't be with 3 other men.

Why do you think Muslims are so violent, no porn, can't get laid until they marry, can't find a wife. Spend your entire upbringing reading passages saying you get unlimited wives in heaven, there are even passages in the Qur'an saying you get a 9 year old boy servant, two other lines talk about how pearly white and soft his skin is, Muhammed militarized NEET sperg pedophilies, truly an amazing accomplishment, stellar strategy

What? Muslims have always accepted that a man can marry four wives and they do it all over the world. Also a man can have concubines bought from the slave market or captured from enemy combatants. This is a well documented phenomenon from the time of Muhammad to today.

No, what I'm saying is that during the time of the Ottaman empire, Muslims didn't behave like they do now. After taking over Christian territories, they would respect the culture and religion and architecture, and impose taxes that were significantly smaller.

Respect and preservation of non-Muslim cultures were the reason (the historians argue) that it lasted so long since there wasn't much rebellion from within.

This:

>I'd bet that even a spic-majority USA wouldn't hesitate to support Europe in a religious civil war.

they dindu nuffin

That's not my point. I said 4 wives = more babies for 1 man, but no babies for 3 other men since they don't get those 3 woman since they're married.

Also, if he has 4 wives, will he produce 20 children? Not necessarily. The 4-wife thing doesn't increase procreation.

That is not strictly true. It varied from time to time and the mistreatment of Dhimmi's corresponded to the "ups and downs" of the empire. I mean Muslim men had significant rights over non Muslims, he could demand entrance into a Christian mans house and force him to sleep on the ground while the Muslim slept in his bed, a dhimmi was not permitted to ride a horse, a Muslim could demand a Christian do free labor for him, etc..

Not that we should obsess over the mistreatment of people in the past like a modern black who is obsessed with slavery, but things are not so clear cut as making blanket statements that Muslims always treated Christians good.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3872514/Syrian-refugee-s-hand-outs-FOUR-wives-22-children.html

"Fury in Germany over Syrian Muslim refugee who gets state hand-outs for his FOUR wives and 22 children"

> Four wives
> >20 children

Ah, that gave me a chuckle. However, in your defense, this is only one case.

That seems almost tame compared to the mentality they have now, which is NO respect for anything but Islam. They are on the high horse, and they are MORE religious and LESS spiritual than ever.

I've never met a Muslim who showed any sign that his religious piety bore fruit. Why pray all day and do ramadan if you end up the same as a regular non-religious person?

But the question is... what did the other 3 men produce in terms of Children? Wouldn't there be a shortage in woman with this tactic? But then again... they are overbreading. I get your point.

OK I see what you mean but I'm not sure that is true. First off women naturally outnumber men because of war, famine, and men naturally dying younger than women so that offsets the 3 other men that would go without wives. Secondly divorce is easy in Islam for a man. Osama Bin Ladens dad for instance had 54 children for many different wives. Thirdly historically men taking concubines was common creating even more children.

We know that Muslims have a high birth rate, just look at birth rate by country and Muslims are very high. The mortality rate is also high. It's natural that polygamy produces a lot of children this same principle applies to Mormons that practiced polygamy, they could have as many wives as they wanted resulting in some Mormon men having hundreds of kids.

>mahaparanirvana sutra
Your confusion may be resulting from reading about fanfiction-tier nonsense like Chinese interpretations of Buddhism. Mhayana is a joke.

The prohibition against harming plants is exclusive to monastics and is intended to make them reliant on the goodwill of laypeople (by preventing them from being able to, say, go off into the forest and feed themselves by gardening and never having to interact with the outside world) as much as it is to prevent harm to living things.

It's ok to eat vegetables because it is the least harmful way of sustaining yourself because the alternative is starving to death and if you're a Buddhist, you believe that you will be reborn if you die without reaching the highest stage of enlightenment so you're not preventing harm by killing yourself, you're just being reborn and will continue to be reborn and endlessly cause harm until you reach enlightenment. And as far as that goes, it's ok for monks to eat meat as well as long as the animal it came from wasn't killed specifically for their sake. Monks are supposed to accept whatever is offered to them, not be picky about whether it's vegetarian or gluten free or whatever.

>Buddha placed no such rules onto himself
He lived by every rule he gave to his followers. Why would you think otherwise? He never said, "Hey, I'm not gonna do this but you guys totally should lol".

Most serious religions are difficult to follow. If one were to read the Bible and attempt to completely follow the teachings of Christ, it would be no small undertaking. People like to pretend that they're gaining the benefits of their religion but generally don't have the fortitude to actually follow them, so they try to rationalize and interpret their religious texts in a way that makes them easier to follow. And you're just fucking yourself over when you do this, no matter what religion you follow.

God damn, okay, you know your stuff.

>>Buddha placed no such rules onto himself
>He lived by every rule he gave to his followers.

Yeah but this is highly dubious according to me. If you look at Christ after he died, what resulted were writings about him, some Gnostic.

My point is that religions formed around genuinly Enlightened beings, and what they taught while alive was super simple. For the Buddha it was the 4 noble truths and the 8-fold path, but I don't even trust THAT.

I question all texts. I have gotten purity of mind from just meditation, and the texts had little to do with it.

Probably explains the high rape rates among Muslims if one guy is taking up 4 women

lol

Lots of buddhists eat meat, look at China

...

>All Religions Could Coexist . . . But Muslims Don't Want To

That's the main thing a lot of people in the West refuse to understand. If someone is hellbent on destroying you, you don't have any other option than repaying them in kind. There can be no negotiation with someone who is inherently opposed to your existence. Every compromise you could possibly come to will play into their hands and they will 100% break it if they see the chance to get some advantage from it.

You guys are missing the real evil of polygamy. The guys who get wives are the old bastards who run all the man lets off so they can have mutilple teenaged wives.

>After taking over Christian territories, they would respect the culture and religion and architecture, and impose taxes that were significantly smaller.

They specifically abducted children from Christian families and pressed them into their military. With the goal to wipe out Christianity over the long term by denying them their next generation.

People need to understand, that it's not racism to dislike a religion. Not a race, a religion. One that refuses to live peacefully with anyone one Earth.
It has nothing at all to do with how Muslims view the West. They act out everywhere that they go, because their book tells them to.

Population growth is limited by the amount of women in your population (well, and a couple other things like your advancement in the field of medicine and so on). How you distribute them among the men doesn't really change anything about the potential growth, assuming those men can afford to feed all the children.

Islam is hardly even a religion when compared to the other ones we have in Western societies. It's a totalitarian system that encompasses all aspects of life, it's not like other modernized religions that you can practice in your free time but are more like a hobby rather than anything of real relevance.

Fuck the West

It's all about the Pacific (USA, for one)

Good. Get these shitskins out of leaf land