Atheists will defend this

>atheists will defend this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rbJaYNIciak
youtube.com/watch?v=ckTEwpctpYQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quetzalcoatlus
youtube.com/watch?v=Go_LIz7kTok
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I don't think anybody could defend a 362x139 JPEG.

shouldn't that be in reverse?

Because they're Chicken?

A fucking atheist could, I bet. I mean, they are able to somehow not see God in themselves, so anything is possible amirite?

if the goal of evolution is to have as many specimens of the same species as possible then it obviously worked

featherless dinosaurs are an outdated depiction of dinosaurs

All dinosaurs were birds. Not reptiles or bird-like
actual birds, just birds, like you see today

trex never existed, it was a giant ostrich

>chickens aren't dinosa-
youtube.com/watch?v=rbJaYNIciak

i'm not an atheist but when you look at the horny legs it seams possible

its literally truth

There was NO SUCH THING as raptors

they were JUST petrels
youtube.com/watch?v=ckTEwpctpYQ

Obviously a big tyrannosaur type isn't the ancestral stock, but a cousin of it. In any case, as one user already implied, these lizard-like reconstructions don't match the fossils very well. Feathers were widespread among even the less birdlike dinosaurs, it now turns out.

I wish some palaeontological artist had produced a more sensible version of galliform evolution so that you retards could better get your head around it. It can be done.

Does that mean Im god?

wow this is comfy

Finally, an opportunity to dump my paleo-art folder.

I don't care what you believe. Believe what makes you happy. If your beliefs impact on my life however, if you begin to insist I must believe as you do, conform to ideals your belief requires you to adhere to, that's when we have a problem.

...

...

...

...

>atheists will defend pic related
Fucking morons

...

This.

...

>religioncucks will defend this as an argument

>christcucks will defend this

...

>Christian "science"
We need to get this in all textbooks right alongside evolution theory

...

I will defend this

t. athiest

The problem is a lot of feathered dinosaurs had something more like downy feathers. Basically functioning like fur.

But all these artists like to draw the more avian interlocking flight feathers on them for some retarded reason.

bump to raise awareness of the dinobirds

This one's pretty good.

>atheists will deny this

woah gee um really really makes me think

Holy shit

Yes, I deny this

Tbh it's big disappointment if true. Of course I would have wanted the creatures that used to rule the planet to be badass lizards but they're just big birds with feathers. Disgusting. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quetzalcoatlus Some of them were alright.

...

>you will never be this much of a brainlet
thank you, Jesus

...

>What is a natural disaster that caused the sun tto block out and the larger dinosaurs to die.
>What is thousands of years of selective breeding to create chickens

Yes.
You are the taco god.
Leaper of walls.

Of course we will. Why do you think all white countries use powerful birds as symbols of their power? It's our inferior complex towards the true master race, the birds. Our feable mammal ancestors adored the bird/dinosaur ubermench and so do we.

Quetzalcoatlus was technically an archosaur reptile, not a dinosaur.

I like how the homologous structures even carry over to whales.

It's pretty much proven that whales were once a land animal that evolved back into an ocean swimmer.
They're mammals, need to surface to breathe, are warm blooded, have teats....etc.

Very different from any fish species, shark species, or what have you
Also, notice how sharks have vertical fins, whales all have horizontal fins. Shape leads to a longitudinal swimming motion.

When you get down into the nitty gritty details (food digestion, cellular respiration strategies, bone composition....etc.) the difference between whales/dolphins/porpoises and other large sea creatures is absolutely immense.

Atheists BTFO

...

...

>uses cartoons to prove reality
>the absolute state of atheists

Now now, let's make it a LITTLE easier on them...

More of a giant land buzzard that ate the giant dinosaurs that already died.

>This is what Christians actually believe

but they are really cool cartoons

that looks like a dinosaur.

Good for specialists and the well-read, but not for the layman, particularly not those most resistant to accepting what might seem obvious to me and thee.

...

>use a 2000 year old book to prove reality
>believes the earth is a flat dome
>the state of religion

>uses fairy tails to prove reality
>the absolute state of theists
ayyy lmao

...

...

>god made this

youtube.com/watch?v=Go_LIz7kTok

Fuck, these are scarey.

When creating new animals why wouldn't God just use the animals already around?

Same way when it's said god created humans from the soil of the earth. That just means an early humanoid looking thing that had no humanity.

>uses straw mans and mockery from the get go to prove creationism
holy shit, you know who else do this? commies. leftists do.
>the absolute state of christcucks

And people say feathers make dinosaurs look stupid

Still has more sense that the idea of God existence.

>t. prefers magic fairytale by illiterate cromagnons
user, please

>tfw dinosaurs were actually just flightless birds straight out of Spore

Hijo, there are better websites out there for you twelve year olds. You should be in bed anyway, it's eleven o'clock.

"creation" implies constraints. ie. I can't build a car with the wheels on the roof, or a wooden combustion engine.

Why does God, and all powerful and all knowing being have constraints?

>tfw no 7 stage life cycle infecting 4 different creatures along the way
Parasites are some of the most fucked up shit you can imagine. Just thinking about it hurts your brain

Truth to power brother

Cos He wanted to make something that worked, requiring minimal supervision? Honestly, it's not that fucking hard to get your head around. Equally, who's to say that He hasn't created over universes without such constraints?

>using a remainers cartoons as "evidence"
I'm disappointed in you pol

i always hated that series when I watched TV as a kid
>unnecessary edits
>shitty music and sound effects
fuck.

>uses a 5 year old painting based off of a theory on bones 66 million years old
The absolute state of science

Yes, most atheists don't give a shit. You're talking about internet atheists.

Are you scared of the proofs that science brings to us? You are the only child here who believes in unproven and stupid fairy tales to escape from reality.

Maybe there won't be such restraints next time the universe collapses in on itself and rebirths anew
Like it's already done countless times

Only the smaller Therapods really looked like birds.

who said evidence, the user just dumped his art folder

There were no doubt big reptiles and big birds - but that's all they were. Nothing magical about that. JEveryone gets a bona over dinos, just 'cause it's big doesn't make it something special.

Tetrapods rule, fish (can't even) drool.

what?

who's to say that there isn't a giant spaghetti monster floating around the Andromeda galaxy? Who's to say there isn't a giant tranny in the core of Jupiter?

I can make up a lot of shit that you can't disprove. Fortunately that's not how logic works, only religion.

This is the truth we've been seeking

...

lol, are you making excuses for God's lack of power?

how's this randomness for you?

How many particles are mixing in the ocean right now?
How many particle collisions are there every second?

lol

You honestly think traditions that have stood the test of ages are "stupid fairy tales"? You think men like Thomas Aquinas, Cardinal Richelieu and Pope Gregory the Great were idiots? You think your high-school level science has any bearing whatsoever on the meaning and nature of existence? Grow up.

>religioncucks will discredit this

Actually, that's what theists believe.

if the paint could replicate itself such as RNA, then yes it could create a painting on its own.

Atheism has nothing to do with evolution, the creation of the universe or anything beyond whether or not you believe in a god or gods.

There's no logic to evolution - it defies the second law of thermodynamics. Things should reduce in complexity.

We see that in the world - the 2nd law holds. Every animal species is reducing in number and general scavengers are succeeding - specialists are dying out.

Why is that happening if evolution is true.

ib4 climate change - it's been happening "since the dinosaurs"...

No - why would you think that?

>meme flag

>a guy does it
>it happens as if by magic
Shouldn't this say "this is what creationists actually believe"?

If you wanted one about atheists, you would need a gif that has a billion canvases and a million colors all randomly being thrown around for about 6 billion years. And at some point during that 6 billion years, at least one of those canvases would have something that kinda looks like a squirrel.