Property rights aren't a real thing. Try and convince me otherwise. Protip: you can't.
pic very related
Property rights aren't a real thing. Try and convince me otherwise. Protip: you can't.
pic very related
Civilisation exists because we all agree on certain rules. One of those is property rights. It's a "thing" in the same sense as all laws - without it we're no better than animals.
it's a socially enforced concept of course it's not a """"real thing"""""" wow what a genius you are you've discovered what a social construct is very impressive
>property doesn't exist, because natural disasters can damage it
Does this sum up your opinion?
Absent force, property rights retain their integrity naturally. You have as much property in nature as you can defend. Since property seems to work well, society has amplified and made easier this system.
>as you can defend
I meant as you can make use of (to go with the absent force point), though it almost works the way I said it...
Give me your phone and your car, faggot.
What a tard.
Wolves piss on rocks and trees and shit to mark territory.
They likely did it before humans ever existed.
Property rights not only exist but transcend reason into the realm of biologically rationalized.
Literally molecules being squished through a vice of natural law and made whole out side of thought.
counterpoint: I want no part of what you call civilization. Also, they tend to collapse.
wolves also share necessities on a basis of need and have no currency, employment, hierarchy
>inb4 but alpha males
>no wolves do not have alpha males nor in fact do most species in the wild
as long I can borrow yours ;)
don't actually own a car because they a cash drain
yeah so let's stop reconstructing it
it does not in fact sum up my opinion
un-natural disasters are incidental to the point I'm making
this, also awesome fence pic
then go live in the woods
>Buying shared ownership
>EVER
ISHYGDDT
It is if you can defend it.
>wolves also share necessities on a basis of need
Of course. That's all they can get.
Wolves also live in defacto ethnic tribes
Are you advocating tribalism based on ethnic similarities OP?
Also, aren't we talking about property rights?
Bam! That just happened.
who are you, the topic police?
I am not, but if that were the result of free people making decisons free from coersion, I would be ok with it
...
also what about anarchist environmentalists?
don't forget them
1) It will never be built
2) even if it were it would never last
3) Trump could tell his fans he built it already and they'd believe him