Why did important institutions like marriage and family, the education system, and religion break down in our culture?

Why did important institutions like marriage and family, the education system, and religion break down in our culture?

Is there a way to fix these things? Or were they always broken?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sSDClxjcR-4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

|
|>
|
|3
|
|

religion became less necessary as education answered questions

and as for marriage ask your single ass that one

deliberate subversion by tptb/commies/jews/whoever around the 50's/60's
when religion in the U.S. was killed, they had their victory
without christianity, or a religion like it that teaches the same moral and societal values, you will get the shitshow that we have today

Leftist whites and jews of the 60s thought they knew the best way to structure society, turns out they didn't.

Because Jews seek control of the levers of power in any society they enter.
Government, the media, the education system.

Once in place they distort white culture into Jewish culture. Nepotism & degeneracy flourish, merit is discarded.

White boomers dropped the ball too. If you 'have Jews' there is supposed to be a quiet understanding among whites to stop them gaining too much influence.

They could have let the kikes wreck quite a bit without causing irreversible damage but they let them wreck the institution of marriage and lost control of immigration.

Those two things kill societies.

Listen to me and listen good.
The 1965 immigration act under LBJ, the 1960's cultural revolution, degrading our border after Eisenhower, NAFTA and MFN for China were part of a plan that was meant to forever break the back of the white working class in America, both economically and culturally. The white working class was too rooted in the Protestant work ethic and family values to ever be pushed around and kept complacent by the corporate class of old and they never liked it. The seeds of this degradation go back to the industrial revolution. Lord Byron sided with the Luddites for a reason.

The Democratic party of today and RINOs are both gladly participating in this to line their pockets. They worship no God, believe in no philosophy of substance and have become slaves to the passions as did the Romans before their fall. Man is the same animal he always was, Augustine's warning rings as true today as ever. It probably can't be stopped, but you may as well keep fighting rather than die as a spineless coward without courage.

Isn't it about time for your afternoon nap gramps?

MGTOW is what white men are doing now.

remove felame rights and society will make sense and intelligent decisions again.
it's that simple.

Ayyy, matey. Ay.

>Why did important institutions like marriage and family, the education system, and religion break down in our culture?

Because people having values is inherently profit-lowering. It's an inherent issue with Capitalism. Every time a specific tradition and value is destroyed, it opens up a new market for capitalists to exploit.

Despite being anti-marxist myself: just look at Eastern Europe. The communist systems caused stagnant economies, but the family unit and historical traditions were kept intact, despite those countries being "far left progressives".

So it seems that the breakdown of social order (including mass immigration) is inherent to the capitalist system as a means of making more money.

...

what's this

Civilization is hard work.

It's not for the lazy or poor. The motivated make marriage, education and tradition work. Always have, always will.

western philosophy need to replace religion its too easily (((subverted))) the world needs more critical thinkers in general

It's dubbed The Jaffe Memo if I remember right

Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in "ActivitiesRelevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice-president of Planned Parenthood - World Population)

The Marxist ideology has been encroaching on our civilization and enacting a tyrannical post-modern neo-marxist Orwellian dystopia since WW2 ended. It's tyranny one tiny step at a time.

Let Jordan Peterson explain it:
youtube.com/watch?v=sSDClxjcR-4

Well that rules (You) out then.

>The Jaffe Memo

In recent years a 1969 memo written by Frederick S. Jaffe has been a source of controversy. The memo, written to Berelson while he was head of the Population Council, included a table that summarized many proposals from various sources regarding population control. This table contained proposals such as compulsory abortions and sterilizations, encouraging homosexuality, forcing women to work, and other notions that no one would imagine an organization like Planned Parenthood would be associated with. In point of fact, however, Jaffe's table was included in a report by a Planned Parenthood official that worked for Jaffe, that said "The report was prepared in behalf of Planned Parenthood's Population Education Staff Committee as a basis for discussion of and action on the U.S. population problem by the Planned Parenthood national organization."[7]

Furthermore, just two years later, Berelson and Jaffe would work together on the 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report.[8] Many of the ideas discussed in the memorandum were incorporated into the Rockefeller Report. So, while it is true that Jaffe's memorandum was primarily for purposes of laying out options for discussion, it is not true that Jaffe, Berelson, or Planned Parenthood, had no intention of acting on those proposals. Critics contend that the value of the memo is in revealing the lengths that population control advocates, including Berelson and Jaffe, were willing to go.

Definitely no, don't let (((them))) fool you.
Marriage is the institution in which children are raised by two dedicated parents acting as a team. The implication is that you've taken the 'bad deal' for the sake of your children. Were you not aware that parenthood is about sacrifice? The mother sacrifices her body and freedom. The father sacrifices his sexual lust and independence. It's done for the children, not the wife.

Besides, nothing can stop your aging. You may be able to pull some 20-30 year old girls as you approach 50, but it's going to be harder and they're going to drop in quality. And even then, you're just thinking with your dick. There's no comparison to finding a woman who lovingly carries your child, and raises them under your roof. You can wake up with a boner every morning for the latest hot young thing in your bed, or you can develop that long term sense of companionship and teamwork that you get with a wife.

One is the mature man's choice. The other is the choice of a perpetual adolescent who should never reproduce. Which one does the world need right now?

>someone posting inteligent stuff with a nazi flag

Is this bizarro-Sup Forums?

judging by the pic you posted you're probably thinking of the nuclear family as an ideal. it, in itself, is a sign of cultural collapse. women in the nuclear family couldn't form little communities as it would've been the case with the extended family, consequentially, older women lost their stature. the female stepped into the male world (the workforce) . hers was no longer to be found in the household.

in a similar way, kikes became needed as the economy grew.

Religion has been trying to undo itself since the Reformation, flirting with the state and what not in a spiraling immanentism, until the very idea of its existence stopped making sense.
Faith became superstition, superstition made no sense to the next generation, so it became atheistic.

communism showed up once the industrial era rendered the existence of a community impossible. the resulting alienation of the individual has brought epidemic autism (otakus, bronies, a young man's inability to approach women).

similarly, individualism became needed, once authority grew out of its local nature, power became nationally secular, then global.

morals also became ideological, people were obsessed with them, as they realised conscious efforts where needed to uphold such values. you might think it's diametrically opposed to some of the above-mentioned degeneracy, but it's really all symptomatic of dying societies.