Study shows that women are better surgeons than men

time.com/4975232/women-surgeon-surgery/

Does this BTFO mgtow forever?

Other urls found in this thread:

bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j4366
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It beats up feminism and mgtow

>women take easy surgeries such as foreign object removals
>meanwhile men take on lacerated heart valves as a last hope for life for someone

numbers are inflated

Why would it?

It still doesn't make marriage less of a shitty deal.

Marriage is the glue in a society. The rapid political and social polarisation is partly to be blamed by less marriages

I might believe that (though I don't think I do) as women tend to have good fine motor skills. Men have better gross motor skills since we are the ones who have to literally fight to survive historically. Women care for children which takes a steady gentle hand.

Wrong.

Gender doesn't exist.

You're a gross motor skill

>I can't find a woman that can give a decent hand job.

And you're a gross niggerfaggot

Think of any medical specialty. look for the best practicioners of that specialty in the world. It's never women.

>numbers are more important than social roles
Are you Jewish?

Objective To examine the effect of surgeon sex on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing common surgical procedures.

Design Population based, retrospective, matched cohort study from 2007 to 2015.

Setting Population based cohort of all patients treated in Ontario, Canada.

Participants Patients undergoing one of 25 surgical procedures performed by a female surgeon were matched by patient age, patient sex, comorbidity, surgeon volume, surgeon age, and hospital to patients undergoing the same operation by a male surgeon.

Interventions Sex of treating surgeon.

Main outcome measure The primary outcome was a composite of death, readmission, and complications. We compared outcomes between groups using generalised estimating equations.

Results 104630 patients were treated by 3314 surgeons, 774 female and 2540 male. Before matching, patients treated by female doctors were more likely to be female and younger but had similar comorbidity, income, rurality, and year of surgery. After matching, the groups were comparable. Fewer patients treated by female surgeons died, were readmitted to hospital, or had complications within 30 days (5810 of 52315, 11.1%, 95% confidence interval 10.9% to 11.4%) than those treated by male surgeons (6046 of 52315, 11.6%, 11.3% to 11.8%; adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 0.92 to 0.99, P=0.02). Patients treated by female surgeons were less likely to die within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio 0.88; 0.79 to 0.99, P=0.04), but there was no significant difference in readmissions or complications. Stratified analyses by patient, physician, and hospital characteristics did not significant modify the effect of surgeon sex on outcome. A retrospective analysis showed no difference in outcomes by surgeon sex in patients who had emergency surgery, where patients do not usually choose their surgeon.

I could believe this, and possibly get behind this if there are studies to support it.

However, the methods used were most likely discovered by men. Most of these surgeries are run of the mill.

>Women have more compassion then men
>Smaller hands
>Wider hips

Physical and mental advantages for many reasons.

Conclusions After accounting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, patients treated by female surgeons had a small but statistically significant decrease in 30 day mortality and similar surgical outcomes (length of stay, complications, and readmission), compared with those treated by male surgeons. These findings support the need for further examination of the surgical outcomes and mechanisms related to physicians and the underlying processes and patterns of care to improve mortality, complications, and readmissions for all patients.

this

bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j4366

This is just pseudoscience to fit in with the times, much like phrenology was back in the day

I'm not surprised, it's basically like sewing. Now, pioneering it, inventing it, being in control of an operating theatre logistically and so on, that might be men's work. But stitching my arteries back to my liver and all that shit?

WOMEN'S

WORK

I don't give a shit who the best surgeon is because I'm not a rockerfeller or a Rot-schild; I'm not going to get the best, I'm going to get the median.

>studies show that people who conduct studies can make them show whatever they want

That's it! I'm done being male! Time to give all my shekels to the pharma shills and be a girl. This news article was the final straw.

>Fewer patients treated by female surgeons died, were readmitted to hospital, or had complications within 30 days (5810 of 52315, 11.1%, 95% confidence interval 10.9% to 11.4%) than those treated by male surgeons (6046 of 52315, 11.6%, 11.3% to 11.8%; adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 0.92 to 0.99, P=0.02
>11.1% vs 11.6%

so basically no difference?

>study shows that

if she was such a good surgeon she would know that you arent allowed to raise your hands above your nipple line in the OR because then you are no longer sterile

You misinterpret a crumbling cookie

Sage